Search

Since its inception nearly a half century ago, CHARMM has been playing a central role in computational biochemistry and biophysics. Commensurate with the developments in experimental research and advances in computer hardware, the range of methods and applicability of CHARMM have also grown. This review summarizes major developments that occurred after 2009 when the last review of CHARMM was published. They include the following: new faster simulation engines, accessible user interfaces for convenient workflows, and a vast array of simulation and analysis methods that encompass quantum mechanical, atomistic, and coarse-grained levels, as well as extensive coverage of force fields. In addition to providing the current snapshot of the CHARMM development, this review may serve as a starting point for exploring relevant theories and computational methods for tackling contemporary and emerging problems in biomolecular systems. CHARMM is freely available for academic and nonprofit research at https://academiccharmm.org/program.

We present a comprehensive study investigating the potential gain in accuracy for calculating absolute solvation free energies (ASFE) using a neural network potential to describe the intramolecular energy of the solute. We calculated the ASFE for most compounds from the FreeSolv database using the Open Force Field (OpenFF) and compared them to earlier results obtained with the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF). By applying a nonequilibrium (NEQ) switching approach between the molecular mechanics (MM) description (either OpenFF or CGenFF) and the neural net potential (NNP)/MM level of theory (using ANI-2x as the NNP potential), we attempted to improve the accuracy of the calculated ASFEs. The predictive performance of the results did not change when this approach was applied to all 589 small molecules in the FreeSolv database that ANI-2x can describe. When selecting a subset of 156 molecules, focusing on compounds where the force fields performed poorly, we saw a slight improvement in the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The majority of our calculations utilized unidirectional NEQ protocols based on Jarzynski's equation. Additionally, we conducted bidirectional NEQ switching for a subset of 156 solutes. Notably, only a small fraction (10 out of 156) exhibited statistically significant discrepancies between unidirectional and bidirectional NEQ switching free energy estimates.

Double decoupling absolute binding free energy simulations require an intermediate state at which the ligand is held solely by restraints in a position and orientation resembling the bound state. One possible choice consists of one distance, two angle, and three dihedral angle restraints. Here, I demonstrate that in practically all cases the analytical correction derived under the rigid rotator harmonic oscillator approximation is sufficient to account for the free energy of the restraints.

To achieve chemical accuracy in free energy calculations, it is necessary to accurately describe the system's potential energy surface and efficiently sample configurations from its Boltzmann distribution. While neural network potentials (NNPs) have shown significantly higher accuracy than classical molecular mechanics (MM) force fields, they have a limited range of applicability and are considerably slower than MM potentials, often by orders of magnitude. To address this challenge, Rufa et al. [Rufa et al. bioRxiv 2020, 10.1101/2020.07.29.227959.] suggested a two-stage approach that uses a fast and established MM alchemical energy protocol, followed by reweighting the results using NNPs, known as endstate correction or indirect free energy calculation. This study systematically investigates the accuracy and robustness of reweighting from an MM reference to a neural network target potential (ANI-2x) for an established data set in vacuum, using single-step free-energy perturbation (FEP) and nonequilibrium (NEQ) switching simulation. We assess the influence of longer switching lengths and the impact of slow degrees of freedom on outliers in the work distribution and compare the results to those of multistate equilibrium free energy simulations. Our results demonstrate that free energy calculations between NNPs and MM potentials should be preferably performed using NEQ switching simulations to obtain accurate free energy estimates. NEQ switching simulations between the MM potentials and NNPs are efficient, robust, and trivial to implement.