Search

Background: Calcific tendonitis is a painful shoulder disorder characterized by calcium deposits (CDs) in the rotator cuff tendon. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the most efficient surgical procedure for calcific tendonitis. This includes the comparison between the three main surgical techniques: CD removal, CD removal with subacromial decompression (SAD) and CD removal with tendon repair with respect to functional outcomes and pain control scores., Methods: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched in February 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, and participants were patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis of one or more rotator cuff tendon based on diagnostic imaging who underwent shoulder calcific tendonitis surgery. Other shoulder pathology diagnoses were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted for results that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if effect sizes differed based on the patient's position during the surgery, physiotherapy, and follow-up time., Results: All surgical interventions resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain control. There were no significant differences between CD removal vs. CD removal with SAD or CD removal vs. CD removal with tendon repair. However, there was a trend in favor of CD removal alone or CD removal with SAD approaches, as they provided better outcome scores than CD removal with tendon repair in terms of shoulder function and pain control., Conclusions: All surgical interventions provide substantial improvement in shoulder functions and pain control scores with no significant difference between these surgical techniques., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Purpose: The risk of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury during surgical approaches to the lateral elbow varies depending on the chosen approach, level of dissection, and rotational position of the forearm. Previous studies evaluated the trajectory of the PIN in specific surgical applications to reduce iatrogenic nerve injuries. The goal of this study is to examine the location of the PIN using common lateral approaches with varying forearm rotation., Methods: The Kaplan, extensor digitorum communis (EDC) split, and Kocher approaches were performed on 18 cadaveric upper extremity specimens. Measurements were recorded with a digital caliper from the radiocapitellar (RC) joint and the lateral epicondyle to the point where the PIN crosses the approach in full supination, neutral, and full pronation with the elbow at 90°. The ratio of the nerve's location in relation to the entire length of the radius was also evaluated to account for different-sized specimens., Results: The PIN was not encountered in the Kocher interval. For Kaplan and EDC split, with the forearm in full supination, the mean distance from the lateral epicondyle to the PIN was 52.0 ± 6.1 mm and 59.1 ± 5.5 mm, respectively, and the mean distance from the RC joint to the PIN was 34.7 ± 5.5 mm and 39.3 ± 4.7 mm, respectively; with the forearm in full pronation, the mean distance from the lateral epicondyle to the PIN was 63.3 ± 9.7 mm and 71.4 ± 8.3 mm, respectively, and the mean distance from the RC joint to the PIN was 44.2 ± 7.7 mm and 51.1 ± 8.7 mm, respectively., Conclusions: The PIN is closer to the lateral epicondyle and RC joint in the Kaplan than EDC split approach and is not encountered during the Kocher approach. The PIN was not encountered within 26 mm from the RC joint and 39 mm from the lateral epicondyle in any approach and forearm position and is generally safe from iatrogenic injury within these distances., (Copyright © 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)