Search

Bladder cancer aggressiveness is correlated with abnormal N-cadherin transmembrane glycoprotein expression. This protein is cleaved by the metalloprotease ADAM10 and the γ-secretase complex releasing a pro-angiogenic N-terminal fragment (NTF) and a proliferation-activating soluble C-terminal fragment (CTF2). Tetraspanin 15 (Tspan15) is identified as an ADAM10-interacting protein to induce selective N-cadherin cleavage. We first demonstrated, in invasive T24 bladder cancer cells, that N-cadherin was cleaved by ADAM10 generating NTF in the extracellular environment and leaving a membrane-anchored CTF1 fragment and that Tspan15 is required for ADAM10 to induce the selective N-cadherin cleavage. Targeting N-cadherin function in cancer is relevant to preventing tumor progression and metastases. For antitumor molecules to inhibit N-cadherin function, they should be complete and not cleaved. We first showed that the GW501516, an agonist of the nuclear receptor PPARβ/δ, decreased Tspan15 and prevented N-cadherin cleavage thus decreasing NTF. Interestingly, the drug did not modify ADAM10 expression, which was important because it could limit side effects since ADAM10 cleaves numerous substrates. By targeting Tspan15 to block ADAM10 activity on N-cadherin, GW501516 could prevent NTF pro-tumoral effects and be a promising molecule to treat bladder cancer. More interestingly, it could optimize the effects of the N-cadherin antagonists those such as ADH-1 that target the N-cadherin ectodomain.

Bladder cancer aggressiveness is correlated with abnormal N-cadherin transmembrane glycoprotein expression. This protein is cleaved by the metalloprotease ADAM10 and the γ-secretase complex releasing a pro-angiogenic N-terminal fragment (NTF) and a proliferation-activating soluble C-terminal fragment (CTF2). Tetraspanin 15 (Tspan15) is identified as an ADAM10-interacting protein to induce selective N-cadherin cleavage. We first demonstrated, in invasive T24 bladder cancer cells, that N-cadherin was cleaved by ADAM10 generating NTF in the extracellular environment and leaving a membrane-anchored CTF1 fragment and that Tspan15 is required for ADAM10 to induce the selective N-cadherin cleavage. Targeting N-cadherin function in cancer is relevant to preventing tumor progression and metastases. For antitumor molecules to inhibit N-cadherin function, they should be complete and not cleaved. We first showed that the GW501516, an agonist of the nuclear receptor PPARβ/δ, decreased Tspan15 and prevented N-cadherin cleavage thus decreasing NTF. Interestingly, the drug did not modify ADAM10 expression, which was important because it could limit side effects since ADAM10 cleaves numerous substrates. By targeting Tspan15 to block ADAM10 activity on N-cadherin, GW501516 could prevent NTF pro-tumoral effects and be a promising molecule to treat bladder cancer. More interestingly, it could optimize the effects of the N-cadherin antagonists those such as ADH-1 that target the N-cadherin ectodomain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In drug hypersensitivity, drug provocation testing (DPT), also called drug challenge, is the gold standard for investigation. In recent years, risk stratification has become an important tool for adjusting the diagnostic strategy to the perceived risk, whilst still maintaining a high level of safety for the patient. Skin tests are recommended before DPT but may be omitted in low‐risk patients. The task force suggests a strict definition of such low‐risk patients in children and adults. Based on experience and evidence from studies of allergy to beta‐lactam antibiotics, an algorithm on how to adjust DPT to the risk, and when to omit skin tests before DPT, is presented. For other antibiotics, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and other drugs, skin tests are poorly validated and DPT is frequently necessary. We recommend performing DPT with chemotherapeutics and biologicals to avoid unnecessary desensitization procedures and DPT with skin tests negative contrast media. We suggest DPT with anesthetics only in highly specialized centers. Specifics of DPT to proton pump inhibitors, anticonvulsants and corticosteroids are discussed. This position paper provides general recommendations and guidance on optimizing use of DPT, whilst balancing benefits with patient safety and optimizing the use of the limited available resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are invaluable therapeutic options in a variety of dyspeptic diseases. In addition to their well‐known risk profile, PPI consumption is related to food and environmental allergies, dysbiosis, osteoporosis, as well as immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The latter, although a rare event, around 1%–3%, due to the extraordinarily high rate of prescription and consumption of PPIs are related to a substantial risk. In this Position Paper, we provide clinicians with practical evidence‐based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of HSRs to PPIs. Furthermore, the unmet needs proposed in the document aim to stimulate more in‐depth investigations in the topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosing immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) can pose a significant challenge and there is an urgent need for safe and reliable tests. Evidence has emerged that the basophil activation test (BAT), an in vitro assay that mirrors the in vivo response, can be a complementary test for many drugs. In this position paper, members of Task Force (TF) "Basophil activation test in the evaluation of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions" from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) present the data from a survey about the use and utility of BAT in IDHRs in Europe. The survey results indicate that there is a great interest for using BAT especially for diagnosing IDHRs. However, there are still main needs, mainly in the standardization of the protocols. Subsequently consensus‐based recommendations were formulated for: (i) Technical aspects of BAT in IDHRs including type of sample, management of drugs, flow cytometry protocols, interpretation of the results; and (ii) Drug‐specific aspects that should be taken into account when performing BAT in relation to betalactams, neuromuscular blocking agents, fluoroquinolones, chlorhexidine, opioids, radio contrast media, chemotherapeutics, biological agents, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, COVID vaccine, and excipients. Moreover, aspects in the evaluation of pediatric population have also been considered. All this indicates that BAT offers the clinician and laboratory a complementary tool for a safe diagnostic for IDHRs, although its place in the diagnostic algorithm depends on the drug class and patient population (phenotype, geography, and age). The standardization of BAT is important for generalizing this method beyond the individual laboratory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies have evaluated allergy workup in fixed drug eruption (FDE) in a large population., Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity of a standardized allergy workup for diagnosing the cause of FDE, with a focus on in situ repeated open application tests (ROATs)., Methods: In a retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the practice of conducting a complete allergy workup for the etiological diagnosis of FDE. It consisted of 3 steps: in situ patch tests (PTs) for all cases except pure mucosal involvement, followed by in situ ROAT if in situ PT results were negative, and finally a drug challenge (DC). The in situ ROAT involved daily application of the suspected drug on a previously affected FDE site for 7 days., Results: Of 98 suspected FDE cases, 61 patients (median age 61 y; male-to-female ratio 1.8) with a complete allergy workup were included. In 4 cases, even the DC yielded negative results. Among the remaining 57 patients with a positive workup, implicated drugs included paracetamol (12 cases), β-lactams (11 cases), imidazoles (9 cases, including 5 with metronidazole), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8 cases), iodinated contrast media (4 cases), cotrimoxazole (3 cases), and various other drugs in 10 patients. The diagnosis was confirmed by in situ PT in 17 of 54 cases (31.5%), in situ ROAT in 14 of 40 cases (35%) (with 4 cases showing remote reactivation of FDE sites), and DC in 26 cases., Conclusions: The sequential allergy workup involving successively in situ PT, in situ ROAT, and DC is a reliable and safe method for diagnosing the cause of FDE. In situ tests exhibited a sensitivity of over 50%., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)