Search

Background: The tumoricidal complex alpha1‐oleate targets bladder cancer cells, triggering rapid, apoptosis‐like tumor cell death. Clinical effects of alpha1‐oleate were recently observed in patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), using a randomized, placebo‐controlled study protocol. Aims: To investigate if there are dose‐dependent effects of alpha1‐oleate. Materials and Methods: Here, patients with NMIBC were treated by intravesical instillation of increasing concentrations of alpha1‐oleate (1.7, 8.5, or 17 mM) and the treatment response was defined relative to a placebo group. Results: Strong, dose‐dependent anti‐tumor effects were detected in alpha1‐oleate treated patients for a combination of molecular and clinical indicators; a complete or partial response was detected in 88% of tumors treated with 8.5 mM compared to 47% of tumors treated with 1.7 mM of alpha1‐oleate. Uptake of alpha1‐oleate by the tumor triggered rapid shedding of tumor cells into the urine and cell death by an apoptosis‐like mechanism. RNA sequencing of tissue biopsies confirmed the activation of apoptotic cell death and strong inhibition of cancer gene networks, including bladder cancer related genes. Drug‐related side effects were not recorded, except for local irritation at the site of instillation. Discussion and Conclusions: These dose‐dependent anti‐tumor effects of alpha1‐oleate are promising and support the potential of alpha1‐oleate treatment in patients with NMIBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Patients and Methods Results Conclusion To determine the safety and oncological advantages of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) vs conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour (cTURBT) in terms of resection quality, staging quality, and safety.We conducted a single‐blinded randomised controlled trial at seven European hospitals with the following inclusion criteria: first diagnosis of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer, no singular carcinoma in situ, and tumour size >4.3 mm. Patients were randomised intraoperatively in a 1:1 ratio to either the ERBT or cTURBT group. Outcome analysis was performed using the chi‐square test, t‐test, and multivariate regression analysis.A total of 97 patients were randomised into the study (cTURBT = 40, ERBT = 57). A switch to cTURBT was necessary in two patients (3.5%) and 11.5% of the screened patients were preoperatively excluded for ERBT. There was no difference in the specimen presence of detrusor muscle with 73.7% in cTURBT and 67.3% in ERBT specimens (P = 0.69). There were no significant differences in mean operative time (ERBT 27.6 vs cTURBT 25.4 min, P = 0.450) or mean resection time (ERBT 16.3 vs cTURBT 15.5 min, P = 0.732). Overall the complication rate did not differ significantly (ERBT 18.2% vs cTURBT 7.5%, P = 0.142). Bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group (ERBT seven vs cTURBT none, P = 0.020). R0 status was reported more often after ERBT, whilst a second resection was significantly less frequent after ERBT (P = 0.018). Recurrence rates were comparable for both techniques after 6 months of follow‐up.The feasibility of ERBT is higher than previously reported. Whereas other perioperative and safety parameters are comparable to cTURBT, bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group and raised safety concerns. This is why this trial was terminated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]