Search

Background & Aims: The prevalence and clinical significance of vitamin B12 alterations in patients with cancer are poorly understood. We aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors of vitamin B12 depletion or hypervitaminosis in patients with cancer., Methods: We retrospectively included hospitalised patients with cancer in 2017-2022. Plasma B12 levels were stratified as very low (VL, <200 pg/ml), low (L, 200-299 pg/ml), normal (N, 300-812 pg/ml), or high (H, ≥813 pg/ml). We collected demographic and several clinical data (e.g., comorbidities, nutritional status, ECOG-PS, cancer site and stage). Univariate and multivariate analyses for factors associated to the vitamin B12 status were fitted., Results: 788 patients (F/M ratio 1.05, median age 72 years, [25th, 75th percentiles 62, 78 years]) were included. Vitamin B12 was VL in 14.1%, L in 19.4%, N in 49.4%, and H in 17.1% cases. Vitamin B12 distribution increased significantly as function of ECOG-PS levels. Patients with breast cancer were characterized by the highest median B12 value, while colorectal cancer patients by the lowest. Vitamin B12 was also significantly higher in advanced compared to early-stage patients as well as in those who had liver failure. Multivariate analysis showed that the probability of H vs. VL B12 levels was significantly increased in patients with hypoproteinemia, hypo-prealbuminemia, and ECOG-PS≥2, and decreased in those with colorectal and gastric cancer., Conclusion: Vitamin B12 impairment is common in cancer patients. Increased vitamin B12 is associated with an impaired clinical status, while vitamin B12 depletion is more common in early-stage cancer and in elderly patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: A reliable preclinical model of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) was developed in a case study of a 69-year-old woman diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) to investigate the tumour evolution before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The results were achieved due to the development of PDOs from tissues collected before (O-PRE) and after (O-POST) treatment., Methods: PDO cultures were characterized by histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal microscopy, flow cytometry, real-time PCR, bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and drug screening., Results: Both PDO cultures recapitulated the histological and molecular profiles of the original tissues, and they showed typical mammary gland organization, confirming their reliability as a personalized in vitro model. Compared with O-PRE, O-POST had a greater proliferation rate with a significant increase in the Ki67 proliferation index. Moreover O-POST exhibited a more stem-like and aggressive phenotype, with increases in the CD24 low /CD44 low and EPCAM low /CD49f high cell populations characterized by increased tumour initiation potential and multipotency and metastatic potential in invasive lobular carcinoma. Analysis of ErbB receptor expression indicated a decrease in HER-2 expression coupled with an increase in EGFR expression in O-POST. In this context, deregulation of the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway was assessed by transcriptomic analysis, confirming the altered transcriptional profile. Finally, transcriptomic single-cell analysis identified 11 cell type clusters, highlighting the selection of the luminal component and the decrease in the number of Epithelial-mesenchymal transition cell types in O-POST., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant treatment contributed to the enrichment of cell populations with luminal phenotypes that were more resistant to chemotherapy in O-POST. PDOs represent an excellent 3D cell model for assessing disease evolution., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Despite the advent of numerous targeted therapies in clinical practice, anthracyclines, including doxorubicin (DOX), continue to play a pivotal role in breast cancer (BC) treatment. DOX directly disrupts DNA replication, demonstrating remarkable efficacy against BC cells. However, its non-specificity toward cancer cells leads to significant side effects, limiting its clinical utility. Interestingly, DOX can also enhance the antitumor immune response by promoting immunogenic cell death in BC cells, thereby facilitating the presentation of tumor antigens to the adaptive immune system. However, the generation of an adaptive immune response involves highly proliferative processes, which may be adversely affected by DOX-induced cytotoxicity. Therefore, understanding the impact of DOX on dividing T cells becomes crucial, to deepen our understanding and potentially devise strategies to shield anti-tumor immunity from DOX-induced toxicity. Our investigation focused on studying DOX uptake and its effects on human lymphocytes. We collected lymphocytes from healthy donors and BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Notably, patient-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) promptly internalized DOX when incubated in vitro or isolated immediately after NAC. These DOX-treated PBMCs exhibited significant proliferative impairment compared to untreated cells or those isolated before treatment initiation. Intriguingly, among diverse lymphocyte sub-populations, CD8 + T cells exhibited the highest uptake of DOX. To address this concern, we explored a novel DOX formulation encapsulated in ferritin nanocages (FerOX). FerOX specifically targets tumors and effectively eradicates BC both in vitro and in vivo. Remarkably, only T cells treated with FerOX exhibited reduced DOX internalization, potentially minimizing cytotoxic effects on adaptive immunity.Our findings underscore the importance of optimizing DOX delivery to enhance its antitumor efficacy while minimizing adverse effects, highlighting the pivotal role played by FerOX in mitigating DOX-induced toxicity towards T-cells, thereby positioning it as a promising DOX formulation. This study contributes valuable insights to modern cancer therapy and immunomodulation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent tumour worldwide, and the HR + /HER2 - subtype is the most common. For this tumour type, endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstay of treatment. The association of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represents the gold standard for first-line or second-line therapies. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy after CDK4/6i progression is still a matter of debate, with several randomized clinical trials still ongoing., Patients and Methods: This is an observational, prospective, real-world study including women with HR + /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer progressing to palbociclib plus ET. Patients received either ET or chemotherapy (CT). The primary objective was the evaluation of efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies after palbociclib in terms of median progression-free survival 2. Secondary objectives were the activity of therapeutic strategies measured with the clinical benefit rate, evaluation of the parameters used for the treatment choice, and progression-free survival 1 related to palbociclib plus ET treatment., Results: Overall, 48 patients (median age 53, range 33-78 years) were included. The median progression-free survival 2 was of 5 months in the overall cohort (95% CI 4-48 months) with a statistically significant difference between the two therapeutic strategies adopted (ET versus CT, 10 months versus 5 months, respectively). Regarding secondary objectives, the clinical benefit rate was 55.2% in the CT cohort and 50% in ET. Moreover, women treated with CT had a greater number of visceral metastases and a shorter median progression-free survival 1 than patients who received ET., Conclusions: ET and CT represent two possible therapeutic alternatives for patients progressing on CDK4/6i plus ET. The choice is based on clinical parameters, with a potential preference for ET., Competing Interests: Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/dic.2023-7-5-COI.pdf, (Copyright © 2024 Palumbo R, Quaquarini E, Saltalamacchia G, Malovini A, Lapidari P, Tagliaferri B, Mollica L, Teragni CM, Barletta C, Locati LD, Sottotetti F.)