Search

Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often performed under general anaesthesia (GA) or deep sedation. Anaesthetic availability is limited in many centers, and deep sedation is prohibited in some countries without anaesthetic support. Very high‐power short duration (vHPSD—90W/4 s) PVI using the Q‐Dot catheter is generally well tolerated under mild conscious sedation (MCS) though an understanding of catheter stability and long‐term effectiveness is lacking. We analyzed lesion metrics and 12‐month freedom from atrial arrythmia with this approach. Methods: Our approach to radiofrequency (RF) PVI under MCS is standardized and includes a single catheter approach with a steerable sheath. We identified patients undergoing Q‐Dot RF PVI between March 2021 and December 2022 in our center, comparing those undergoing vHPSD ablation under MCS (90W/MCS) against those undergoing 50 W ablation under GA (50 W/GA) up to 12 months of follow‐up. Data were extracted from clinical records and the CARTO system. Results: Eighty‐three patients met our inclusion criteria (51 90W/MCS; 32 50 W/GA). Despite shorter ablation times (353 vs. 886 s; p <.001), the 90 W/MCS group received more lesions (median 87 vs. 58, p <.001), resulting in similar procedure times (149.3 vs. 149.1 min; p =.981). PVI was achieved in all cases, and first pass isolation rates were similar (left wide antral circumferential ablation [WACA] 82.4% vs. 87.5%, p =.758; right WACA 74.5% vs. 78.1%, p =.796; 90 W/MCS vs. 50 W/GA respectively). Analysis of 6647 ablation lesions found similar mean impedance drops (10.0 ± 1.9 Ω vs. 10.0 ± 2.2 Ω; p =.989) and mean contact force (14.6 ± 2.0 g vs. 15.1 ± 1.6 g; p =.248). Only median 2.5% of lesions in the 90 W/MCS cohort failed to achieve ≥ 5 Ω drop. In the 90 W/MCS group, there were no procedural related complications, and 12‐month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was observed in 78.4%. Conclusion: vHPSD PVI is feasible under MCS, with encouraging acute and long‐term procedural outcomes. This provides a compelling option for centers with limited anaesthetic support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims Methods Results Conclusion Methods for femoral venous haemostasis following electrophysiology (EP) procedures include manual compression (MC) and suture‐based techniques such as a figure‐of‐eight suture secured with a hand‐tied knot (Fo8HT) or a modified figure‐of‐eight suture secured with a 3‐way stopcock (Fo8MOD). We hypothesised that short‐term bleeding outcomes using the Fo8MOD approach would be superior to MC. We additionally compared outcomes between Fo8MOD and Fo8HT approaches.We studied consecutive patients undergoing EP procedures at our institution between March and December 2023. Patients were categorised into three haemostasis groups: MC, Fo8HT and Fo8MOD. Access site complications were classified as major (requiring intervention or blood transfusion, delaying discharge or resulting in death) or minor (bleeding/haematoma requiring additional compression).1089 patients were included: MC 718 (65.9%); Fo8HT 105 (9.6%); Fo8MOD 266 (24.4%). Procedures were most commonly for atrial fibrillation (52.4%), atrial flutter (10.9%), and atrioventricular nodal re‐entrant tachycardia (10.1%). In patients receiving periprocedural anticoagulation (865, 79.4%), Fo8MOD associated with fewer complications than MC or Fo8HT (major: MC 2.2%, Fo8HT 6.0%, Fo8MOD 0.8%, p = .01; minor: MC 16.5%, Fo8HT 12.0%, Fo8MOD 7.4%, p = .002). In patients not receiving periprocedural anticoagulation, complications did not differ between haemostasis methods (total major and minor complications 5.8%, p = .729 for between groups rates). On multivariable logistic regression, Fo8MOD was associated with a significantly lower risk of access site complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.17–0.48], p < .001), whilst intraprocedural heparinisation (OR 5.25 [2.88–9.69], p < .001) and larger maximal sheath size (OR 1.06 [1.00–1.11], p = .04) were associated with a higher risk of complications.Femoral haemostasis with Fo8MOD associates with fewer access site complications than MC and Fo8HT following EP procedures that need periprocedural anticoagulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]