Search

Introduction: Cardiac arrest is a public health concern associated with unfavorable disease outcomes. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of optimal quality is widely acknowledged as an indispensable technique in restoring spontaneous circulation. In order to perform advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), chest compression must be paused twice: once to assess the rhythm and again to administer the shock. Australian advanced life support (ALS) recommends that the defibrillator needs to be precharged in order to administer the shock during a solitary interval in chest compressions. While performing chest compressions, precharging defibrillators can decrease hands‐off time without posing a risk of injury. Aim: To compare chest compression fraction (CCF)—which is the cumulative time spent providing chest compressions divided by the total time taken for the entire resuscitation—by calculating the hands‐off time duration in cardiac arrest between the Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC) and American Heart Association (AHA) protocols for CPR. Methods: A simulation‐based pilot study was designed using a Laerdal Resusci Anne mannequin and a LIFEPACK 20 defibrillator. The study included six participants recruited from King Khalid University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where three participants were certified ACLS providers and there were certified ALS providers. Participants were divided into two groups, ALS and ACLS, each following one protocol. For each scenario, a random job was assigned to each participant, regardless of their role as assistant, team leader, or performer of CPR. Each case's shockable and nonshockable rhythms were hidden from the team leader and the chest compressor. Ten trials of CPR were performed, each for four cycles with a total time of 8 min. The simulation was video recorded for hands‐off time counting. Comparison between CCF (seconds) per cycle between the two protocols was performed using an independent sample t‐test. A p value of 0.05 was used to measure statistical significance. Results: Comparing CCF in shockable rhythms between ARC and AHA protocols, it was observed that the CCF of ALS‐ARC was significantly higher than ACLS‐AHA in all cycles; the first cycle: t = 3.782, p = 0.004; the second cycle: t = 3.380, p = 0.007; the third cycle: t = 3.803, p = 0.003; and the fourth cycle: t = 4.341, p = 0.001. Conclusion: Precharging a defibrillator before a rhythm check during chest compression, in anticipation of a potentially shockable rhythm, reduces the time required for defibrillation and limits interruptions in chest compression during CPR. This practice effectively enhances the CCF. Enhancing the continuity of chest compressions can potentially improve survival rates in ARC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vedolizumab is an approved ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. Multiple large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the drug's efficacy and safety. However, real-world data from Middle Eastern countries are spare. The study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy in advanced therapy experienced UC patients., Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review of a cohort study of 153 moderately to severely active UC patients who failed or were intolerant to TNF antagonists and received vedolizumab from two large tertiary care centers was performed. Rates of clinical response and remission were retrospectively evaluated at 3,6, and 12 months post VDZ therapy using Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI); clinical response was defined as a decrease in P-SCCAI ≥3, and clinical remission was defined as a P-SCCAI score of ≤3 points. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response to vedolizumab., Results: A total of 153 UC patients had sufficient data for analysis. Clinical remission rates were 61.9% for patients on vedolizumab every 8 weeks and 89.3% for those receiving every 4 (Q4) weeks dosing. A significant reduction in CRP and improvement of albumin post vedolizumab treatment were observed, and corticosteroids were stopped in most patients. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, several factors were found to influence the clinical effectiveness of VDZ in inducing remission. Female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of remission [OR =3.09, 95% CI = (1.05-9.13), P = 0.04]. Conversely, a greater number of biologics used prior to VDZ treatment was associated with a lower likelihood of remission [OR =0.418, 95% CI = (0.203-0.859), P = 0.017]. Patients with extensive disease (E3) had an increased likelihood of remission [OR =3.81, 95% CI = (1.32-10.97), P = 0.0129]. Additionally, a VDZ dosing frequency of Q4 weeks was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of remission [OR =6.08, 95% CI = (1.73-21.39), P = 0.0049]. No significant safety signals were reported., Conclusions: In this current real-world study, vedolizumab effectively achieved clinical response and remission in most advanced therapy experienced UC patients treated for up to 12 months. Future studies with larger sample sizes and more robust study designs should be conducted to further validate the results of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.)

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory disease that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract and presents with myriad symptoms. Various treatments, including biological treatments, are available. The use of biologics increases the risk of opportunistic infections, with no association with serious infections (1). To the best of our knowledge, there are no established recommendations or case studies for patients with CD infected with Brucella being actively treated with biologics and immunomodulators to date. Herein, we report the first case of brucellosis diagnosed in a patient with CD treated with biologics and immunomodulators. A 40-year-old man had been treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, namely, infliximab and azathioprine, for CD for the past eight years. During a follow-up visit, the patient complained of loss of appetite, fever, weight loss, and joint discomfort. The patient reported a history of raw milk consumption. Blood cultures indicated the growth of Brucella species. Infliximab and azathioprine were held, and brucellosis treatment was initiated, including rifampin 600 mg once daily, doxycycline 100 mg twice daily, and streptomycin 1 g intramuscularly daily. A multidisciplinary team comprising gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists decided to initiate brucellosis treatment and resume biologics and immunomodulators 4 weeks after starting Brucella treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)