Search

Background: Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly impacted ophthalmology, especially in glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. In this study, we developed a reliable predictive model for glaucoma detection using deep learning models based on clinical data, social and behavior risk factor, and demographic data from 1652 participants, split evenly between 826 control subjects and 826 glaucoma patients. Methods: We extracted structural data from control and glaucoma patients’ electronic health records (EHR). Three distinct machine learning classifiers, the Random Forest and Gradient Boosting algorithms, as well as the Sequential model from the Keras library of TensorFlow, were employed to conduct predictive analyses across our dataset. Key performance metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were computed to both train and optimize these models. Results: The Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 67.5%, with a ROC AUC of 0.67, outperforming the Gradient Boosting and Sequential models, which registered accuracies of 66.3% and 64.5%, respectively. Our results highlighted key predictive factors such as intraocular pressure, family history, and body mass index, substantiating their roles in glaucoma risk assessment. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of utilizing readily available clinical, lifestyle, and demographic data from EHRs for glaucoma detection through deep learning models. While our model, using EHR data alone, has a lower accuracy compared to those incorporating imaging data, it still offers a promising avenue for early glaucoma risk assessment in primary care settings. The observed disparities in model performance and feature significance show the importance of tailoring detection strategies to individual patient characteristics, potentially leading to more effective and personalized glaucoma screening and intervention.

Objective: To determine the impact of documentation workflow on the accuracy of coded diagnoses in electronic health records (EHRs). Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: All patients who completed visits at the Casey Eye Institute Retina Division faculty clinic between April 7, 2022 and April 13, 2022. Main Outcome Measures: Agreement between coded diagnoses and clinical notes. Methods: We assessed the rate of agreement between the diagnoses in the clinical notes and the coded diagnosis in the EHR using manual review and examined the impact of the documentation workflow on the rate of agreement in an academic retina practice. Results: In 202 visits by 8 physicians, 78% (range, 22%–100%) had an agreement between the coded diagnoses and the clinical notes. When physicians integrated the diagnosis code entry and note composition, the rate of agreement was 87.9% (range, 62%–100%). For those who entered the diagnosis codes separately from writing notes, the agreement was 44.4% (22%–50%, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The visit-specific agreement between the coded diagnosis and the progress note can vary widely by workflow. The workflow and EHR design may be an important part of understanding and improving the quality of EHR data. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.