Search

Limited data exist on the effects of induction treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and renal impairment (RI), who may also be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. This analysis investigated the impact of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) induction on renal function in patients from the Connect® MM Registry based on transplant status. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤2 months before enrollment. Patients in this analysis received front-line RVd for ≥3 cycles and were grouped by transplant status and baseline renal function. As of August 4, 2021, 344 transplanted and 289 non-transplanted patients had received RVd for ≥3 cycles at induction. Improved renal function was observed at 3, 6, and 12 months in patients with all severities of RI at baseline. In patients with >60 and ≤60 creatinine clearance mL/min at baseline, median progression-free survival was 49.4 months and 47.6 months in transplanted patients and 35.7 months and 29.1 months in non-transplanted patients, respectively. These results provide real-world evidence that patients with NDMM and RI who receive front-line RVd for ≥3 cycles may have improved renal function regardless of transplant status, with renal function no longer affecting the long-term outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01081028., Competing Interests: Competing interests Sikander Ailawadhi reports serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectar, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectar, GSK, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, and Sanofi. Hans C. Lee reports serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Allogene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; and grants or contracts from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Regeneron, and Takeda. James Omel, Kathleen Toomey, James W. Hardin, Brian G.M. Durie, Mohit Narang, Howard R. Terebelo, and Rafat Abonour report serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb. Cristina J. Gasparetto reports serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb; support for travel from Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, and Sanofi; advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer; and for Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, and Sanofi. Sundar Jagannath reports serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Regeneron Sanofi, and Takeda; support for travel from American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology (ASH), and International Myeloma Society (IMS); participation on data safety monitoring boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi; and leadership or fiduciary role for ASH, IMS, and Society of Hematologic Oncology. Robert M. Rifkin reports serving on a scientific steering committee for Bristol Myers Squibb; employment, stock, and other ownership interests with McKesson; participation on data safety monitoring board for CARsgen; and advisory role with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences, Genmab, Fresenius Kabi, and Janssen. Ying-Ming Jou reports employment and stock and other ownership interests with Bristol Myers Squibb. Prashant Joshi, Jorge Mouro, and Edward Yu are former employees of Bristol Myers Squibb., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

MEDI2228 is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a fully human B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer. This phase 1 trial evaluated MEDI2228 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM), who received prior treatment with approved agents from 3 classes of antimyeloma drugs (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies). Primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. A total of 107 patients were treated and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 0.14 mg/kg Q3W. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; thrombocytopenia; 0.20 mg/kg Q3W). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were photophobia (43.9%), rash (29.0%), and thrombocytopenia (19.6%). In MTD cohort A ( n  = 41), the objective response rate (ORR) was 56.1%, with 1 stringent complete response, 9 very good partial responses, and 13 partial responses. ORR was 53.3% in triple refractory patients. In cohort B ( n =25), ORR was 32%. Although MEDI2228 demonstrated efficacy in R/R MM, ocular toxicity precluded further development of this drug.

Background: Lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d) is a standard-of-care regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, characteristics and outcomes for nontransplanted patients receiving frontline RVd are not well understood., Patients: The Connect Ⓡ MM Registry is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of NDMM patients., Methods: This analysis investigated characteristics and outcomes of patients who received RVd alone or followed by Rd or R (RVd ± Rd/R) who did not undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation., Results: As of August 2021, 314 of 1979 nontransplanted patients received RVd ± Rd/R as initial therapy. Of these, 135 were aged ≤ 65 years and 179 were > 65 years. 108 patients had time to relapse (TTR) of ≤ 12 months and 182 had TTR > 12 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable regardless of TTR and age group except renal function, which was more commonly impaired in older patients. Among patients aged ≤ 65 and > 65 years, median duration of first-line treatment was 6.3 and 9.0 months, median time to next line for those who received second-line therapy was 15.5 and 15.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 and 23.0 months, and median overall survival was 60.0 and 59.1 months, respectively. High-risk disease (per IMWG criteria) and high serum calcium were associated with higher hazard of progression or death; the adjusted PFS hazard ratio with respect to age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years) based on multivariable analysis was 1.18 (0.89-1.57; P = .25)., Conclusion: These results indicate RVd is active across age groups and provide a better understanding of outcomes with RVd in NDMM., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Dexamethasone is a key component of induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) despite common toxicities including hyperglycemia and insomnia. In the randomized ECOG E4A03 trial, dexamethasone 40 milligrams (mg) once weekly was associated with lower mortality than higher doses of dexamethasone. However, the performance of dexamethasone dose reductions below this threshold with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NDMM have not been fully characterized. We conducted a secondary pooled analysis of the S0777 and S1211 SWOG studies of NDMM, which employed lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) alone with or without bortezomib (VRd) and with or without elotuzumab (Elo-VRd). Planned dexamethasone intensity was 40-60 mg weekly in all arms. Patients were categorized into FD-DEX (full-dose dexamethasone maintained throughout induction) or LD-DEX (lowered-dose dexamethasone or discontinuation; only permitted for Grade 3+ toxicities per both study protocols). Of 541 evaluated patients, the LD-DEX group comprised 373 patients (69%). There was no difference in PFS or OS between the FD-DEX or LD-DEX groups, which were balanced in terms of age, stage, and performance status. Predictors of PFS and OS in multivariate models were treatment arm, age ≥70, and thrombocytopenia; FD-DEX did not significantly improve either outcome. Our study suggests that dexamethasone dose reductions are common in multiple myeloma, even within clinical trials. Given dexamethasone's many toxicities and unclear benefit in the era of modern treatment regimens, dexamethasone dose reduction during NDMM induction warrants further prospective study. NCT00644228, NCT01668719., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Abstract: Currently, the role of DNA methylation in the immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy disease spectrum remains poorly understood. In the present study, a multiomics prospective analysis was conducted integrating DNA methylation, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and whole-exome sequencing data in 34 subjects (23 with Waldenström macroglobulinemia [WM], 6 with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [MGUS], and 5 normal controls). Analysis was focused on defining differences between IgM gammopathies (WM/IgM-MGUS) compared with controls, and specifically between WM and IgM-MGUS. Between groups, genome-wide DNA methylation analysis demonstrated a significant number of differentially methylated regions that were annotated according to genomic region. Next, integration of RNA-seq data was performed to identify potentially epigenetically deregulated pathways. We found that pathways involved in cell cycle, metabolism, cytokine/immune signaling, cytoskeleton, tumor microenvironment, and intracellular signaling were differentially activated and potentially epigenetically regulated. Importantly, there was a positive enrichment of the CXCR4 signaling pathway along with several interleukin (interleukin 6 [IL-6], IL-8, and IL-15) signaling pathways in WM compared with IgM-MGUS. Further assessment of known tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes uncovered differential promoter methylation of several targets with concordant change in gene expression, including CCND1 and CD79B. Overall, this report defines how aberrant DNA methylation in IgM gammopathies may play a critical role in the epigenetic control of oncogenesis and key cellular functions., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Importance: Utilization of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic cancers previously demonstrated race, ethnicity, and age-based disparities., Objective: To evaluate utilization over time by race, ethnicity, and age to determine if disparities persist in light of recent significant increases in HCT volume., Design, Setting, and Participants: This US population-based retrospective cohort study includes patients who received transplants from January 2009 to December 2018. Data collection and cleaning occurred from February 2019 to November 2021, and data analysis occurred from January 2022 to October 2023. Method 1 restricted the analysis to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reporting areas for cases and transplants. Method 2 applied SEER age-, race-, and ethnicity-specific incidence rates to corresponding US census population and included all transplants reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Race and ethnicity groups were hierarchically defined as Hispanic (any race), non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic Other (Asian and American Indian)., Exposure: Receipt of HCT., Main Outcomes and Measures: Utilization rate of autologous or allogeneic HCT for patients with hematologic cancers by age, race, and ethnicity., Results: From 2009 to 2018, 136 280 HCTs were analyzed for 6 hematologic cancers comprising 16.7% pediatric/adolescent/young adults (0-39 years), 83.3% adults (40-84 years), 58% male, 10.3% Hispanic, 11.4% non-Hispanic Black, 3.8% non-Hispanic Other, and 74.5% non-Hispanic White patients, with 49 385 allogeneic and 86 895 autologous HCTs performed. HCT utilization increased over time for all disease, age, race, and ethnic groups. From 2017 to 2018, adult (40-84 years) allogeneic transplant utilization for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was similar for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White or Other patients but was lower for non-Hispanic Black patients (acute myeloid leukemia: 19% vs 13%; MDS: 9%-10% vs 5%). Similarly, autologous transplant utilization for lymphoma was similar for all race and ethnicity groups; however, autologous transplant for multiple myeloma was highest for non-Hispanic White patients and lower for all other groups (31% vs 26%-27%). In patients aged 0 to 39 years, utilization of allogeneic transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia was highest in Hispanic patients, followed by non-Hispanic White, Black, and Other races (acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 19%, 18%, 17%, and 16%, respectively)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of autologous and allogeneic transplant utilization for hematologic cancers, disparities persisted for non-Hispanic Black patients. Hispanic, non-Hispanic Other, and younger age groups had increased utilization over time that was on par with non-Hispanic White patients in the most recent cohort.

Outcomes are poor in triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03651128) trial, patients with TCE RRMM and 2-4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P<.0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median (95% CI) was 41.4 (30.9-not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (23.4-NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE RRMM. NCT03651128., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Many studies have documented racial, socioeconomic, geographic, and other disparities for United States (US) patients with multiple myeloma pertaining to diagnosis and frontline management. In contrast, very little is known about disparities in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) despite a plethora of novel treatment options. In this review, we discuss the manifestations of disparities in RRMM and strategies to mitigate their impact. Immunomodulatory drugs can create disparities on many axes, for example inappropriately low dosing due to Duffy-null status as well as time toxicity and financial toxicity from logistical hurdles for socioeconomically vulnerable patients. Access to myeloma expertise at high-volume centers is a critical consideration given the disconnect between how drugs like carfilzomib and dexamethasone are prescribed in trials versus optimized in real-world practice to lower toxicities. Disparities in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody therapy span across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines in large part due to their limited availability outside of high-volume centers. Another insidious source of disparities is supportive care in RRMM, ranging from inadequate pain control in Black patients to limited primary care provider access in rural settings. We discuss the rationales and evidence base for several solutions aimed at mitigating these disparities: for example, (1) bidirectional co-management with community-based oncologists, (2) screening for risk factors based on social determinants of health, (3) strategies to build patient trust with regard to clinical trials, and (4) longitudinal access to a primary care provider. As the treatment landscape for RRMM continues to expand, these types of efforts by the field will help ensure that this landscape is equally accessible and traversable for all US patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Three classes of BCMA-directed therapy (BDT) exist: antibody drug-conjugates (ADCs), CAR-T, and T-cell engagers (TCEs), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. To aid clinicians in selecting between BDTs, we reviewed myeloma patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BDT between 2018-2023. We identified 339 individuals (1-exposure = 297, 2-exposures = 38, 3-exposures = 4) who received 385 BDTs (ADC = 59, TCE = 134, CAR-T = 192), with median follow-up of 21-months. ADC recipients were older, with more lines of therapy (LOT), and penta-refractory disease. Compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.20-0.43) and TCEs (aHR = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.43-0.91) had better progression-free survival (PFS) on analysis adjusted for age, the presence of extramedullary (EMD), penta-refractory disease, multi-hit high-risk cytogenetics, prior BDT, and the number of LOT in the preceding 1-year. Likewise, compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.18-0.44) and TCEs (aHR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.93) had superior overall survival. Prior BDT exposure negatively impacted all classes but was most striking in CAR-T, ORR 86% vs. 50% and median PFS 13-months vs. 3-months. Of relapses, 54% were extramedullary in nature, and a quarter of these cases had no history of EMD. CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy and where feasible, should be the initial BDT. However, for patients with prior BDT or rapidly progressive disease, an alternative approach may be preferable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) have disparate outcomes. Newer therapies have emerged since the development of International Prognostic Scoring System, and MYD88 L265P mutation is now frequently assessed at diagnosis, warranting reexamination of the prognostic parameters., Patients and Methods: We reviewed records of 889 treatment-naïve patients with active WM, consecutively seen between January 01, 1996, and December 31, 2017, to identify clinical predictors of overall survival (OS) in univariate analyses. Patients with complete data for the parameters significant on the univariate analyses (n = 341) were included in a multivariable analysis to derive a prognostic model, subsequently validated in a multi-institutional cohort., Results: In the derivation cohort (n = 341), age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.1]; P = .0009), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper limit of normal (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3 to 4.5]; P = .007), and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.99 to 2.3]; P = .056) were independently prognostic. By assigning a score of 1 point each to albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR, 1.5) and age 66-75 years (HR 1.4) and 2 points for age >75 years (HR, 2.6) or elevated LDH (HR, 2.3), four groups with distinct outcomes were observed on the basis of the composite scores. Five-year OS was 93% for the low-risk (score 0), 82% for low-intermediate risk (score 1), 69% for intermediate-risk (score 2), and 55% for the high-risk (score ≥3; P < .0001) groups. In the validation cohort (N = 335), the model maintained its prognostic value, with a 5-year OS of 93%, 90%, 75%, and 57% for the four groups, respectively ( P < .0001)., Conclusion: Modified Staging System for WM (MSS-WM), utilizing age, albumin, and LDH is a simple, clinically useful, and externally validated prognostic model that reliably risk-stratifies patients with symptomatic WM into four groups with distinct prognosis.

Abstract: There has been an increase in volume as well as an improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic disorders. It is unknown if these changes have affected racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this observational study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research of 79 904 autologous (auto) and 65 662 allogeneic (allo) HCTs, we examined the volume and rates of change of autoHCT and alloHCT over time and trends in OS in 4 racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic African Americans (NHAAs), and Hispanics across 5 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. Rates of change were compared using Poisson model. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined trends in mortality in the 4 racial/ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. The rates of increase in volume were significantly higher for Hispanics and NHAAs vs NHW for both autoHCT and alloHCT. Adjusted overall mortality after autoHCT was comparable across all racial/ethnic groups. NHAA adults (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22; P = .004) and pediatric patients (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.3-2.03; P < .001) had a higher risk of mortality after alloHCT than NHWs. Improvement in OS over time was seen in all 4 groups after both autoHCT and alloHCT. Our study shows the rate of change for the use of autoHCT and alloHCT is higher in NHAAs and Hispanics than in NHWs. Survival after autoHCT and alloHCT improved over time; however, NHAAs have worse OS after alloHCT, which has persisted. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate disparities for patients requiring alloHCT., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: This retrospective longitudinal study compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone+lenalidomide (Rd)-based triplet regimens containing proteasome inhibitors (PIs) ixazomib (IRd), carfilzomib (KRd), and bortezomib (VRd) or monoclonal antibodies (MABs) elotuzumab (ERd) and daratumumab (DRd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)-including those with high cytogenetic risk-primarily treated at community oncology clinics in the United States., Methods: Electronic health records of adult RRMM patients in a deidentified real-world database (01/01/2014-09/30/2020) who initiated IRd, KRd, VRd, ERd, or DRd in the second or later line of therapy (LOT) were analyzed. The index date was the date of initiation of each LOT and baseline was the 6-month pre-index period. Duration of therapy (DOT), time to next therapy (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared across regimens with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Of the 1,185 patients contributing 1,332 LOTs, 985 had standard cytogenetic risk (median age, 71 years) and 180 had high risk (median age, 69 years). Compared with other regimens, DRd was associated with longer DOT overall (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval]: 1.84 [1.42, 2.38] vs. KRd, 1.65 [1.20, 2.28] vs. ERd, 1.58 [1.23, 2.04] vs. IRd, and 1.54 [1.18, 2.00] vs. VRd), and longer TTNT and PFS. KRd was associated with shorter OS compared with DRd (1.45 [1.01, 2.08]) and VRd (1.32 [1.01, 1.73]). High-risk patients had similar outcomes with all triplet regimens., Conclusion: Although DRd improved clinical outcomes overall, Rd-based triplet regimens containing a PI or MAB are similarly effective in high-risk RRMM., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MC, MD, AH, JC, and MSD are employees of Analysis Group, a consulting firm that received research funding from Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., to conduct this study. DC and DMS are employees of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. LS and SA have received consulting funds from Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Isatuximab-based combinations are among the accepted standard-of-care regimens for early-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM and IKEMA trials. Further study findings have shown benefit with Isa-based combinations in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as reported from the randomized GMMG-HD7 and CONCEPT trials. Isa is currently approved in various countries for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with RRMM. A more convenient route of administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) injection, and faster IV infusion may substantially increase convenience of treatment. In this review, we outline evidence emerging from clinical trials that shows increasing clinical applicability of Isa across the MM therapeutic spectrum. We then review recent study results demonstrating that new treatment modalities, either SC Isa administration via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) or fast, 30-minute, fixed-volume IV infusion, are safe and effective, and enhance convenience of treatment with Isa for MM patients and healthcare providers. In the recently reported Phase 1b study, the safety profile and efficacy of Isa administered SC plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone were comparable to those observed with Isa administered IV plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in the control arm and in the ICARIA-MM trial. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes indicated patient confidence in SC Isa administration and satisfaction with treatment delivery by OBDS. These findings point to SC administration as the preferred route for future treatment with Isa-based combinations, as well as to the use of fast, 30-minute IV infusions in settings where SC administration of Isa might not be available., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) therapeutics have evolved tremendously in recent years, with significant improvement in patient outcomes. As newer treatment options are developed, stem cell transplant (SCT) remains an important modality that provides excellent disease control and delays the progression of disease. Over the years, SCT use has increased overall in the U.S., but two distinct gaps remain, including suboptimal use overall and racial-ethnic disparities. We evaluated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to study what sociodemographic factors might play a role within a given racial-ethnic group leading to disparate SCT utilization, such that targeted approaches can be developed to optimize SCT use for all. In nearly 112,000 cases belonging to mutually exclusive categories of non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians (NHA), and others, we found certain factors including age, comorbidity index, payor type, facility type (academic vs. community) and facility volume to be uniformly associated with SCT use for all the racial-ethnic groups, while gender was not significant for any of the groups. There were several other factors that had a differential impact on SCT utilization among the various race-ethnicity groups studied, including year of diagnosis (significant for NHW, NHB, and Hispanics), income level (significant for NHW and Hispanics), literacy level (significant for NHW and NHB), and geographic location of the treatment facility (significant for NHW and NHA). The suboptimal SCT utilization overall in the U.S. suggests that there may be room for improvement for all, even including the majority NHW, while we continue to work on factors that lead to disparities for the traditionally underserved populations. This study helps identify sociodemographic factors that may play a role specifically in each group and paves the way to devise targeted solutions such that resource utilization and impact can be maximized., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies offer substantial advancement in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the CAR-T therapy process involves complex decision-making that is informed by many variables. This review aims to provide an overview of the patient selection and administration process for CAR-T therapy for MM from the perspective of experienced healthcare providers (HCPs), including considerations for each step in the CAR-T therapy process. Referring HCPs should initiate conversations with HCPs at CAR-T capable centers earlier in the treatment journey, even before patients are eligible for CAR-T therapy, particularly for patients from underserved populations and patients with high-risk disease, to ensure adequate time for logistical planning and patient education. Patient selection for CAR-T therapy may be guided by factors such as performance status, rate of disease progression, and logistical considerations. Some anticancer therapies may affect T-cell fitness and therefore impact CAR-T manufacturing and patient outcomes; however, additional research is needed to confirm this in MM. Bridging therapies should be tailored to the needs of the patient and ideally halted 1 week or longer before CAR-T infusion, contingent upon the agent(s) used. Lymphodepletion regimens may need to be modified for patients with renal insufficiency. Collaboration with HCPs at both the treating and referring centers is important to optimize coordinated care of patients. Collaboration with and guidance from experienced HCPs throughout patient selection, referral, and CAR-T administration is instrumental in optimizing patient outcomes as access to CAR-T therapies expands., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors received compensation from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Legend Biotech USA, Inc, for participation in an advisory board to discuss the topics described in this review article prior to initiation of manuscript development; however, authors received no compensation for their involvement as authors of this article. Additional disclosures include the following: SA reports consulting for Amgen, Beigene, BMS, GSK, Janssen Astra Zeneca, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda and receiving research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Cellectar, GSK, Janssen, Medimmune, Pharmacyclics, and Xencor. SJ reports consulting for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Merck, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and is the Senior Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia. YL reports consulting for bluebird bio, Celgene/BMS, Fosun Kite, Gamida Cell, Iovance, Janssen, Juno/BMS, Kite/Gilead, Legend BioTech, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; receiving grant/research support from bluebird bio, Boston Scientific, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Legend Biotech, Merck, and Takeda; and serving on a data safety and monitoring board for Sorrento, a data review committee for Pfizer, and a scientific advisory committee for NexImmune. KP reports consulting for Arcellx, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Pfizer; research funding from AbbVie/Genentech, Allogene Therapeutics, Celgene/GMS, Cellectis, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision Biosciences, and Takeda; and travel funds from BMS. LS reports consulting for Janssen. SWW reports consulting for Amgen and Sanofi and research funding from BMS, Caelum, Fortis, Genentech, GSK, and Janssen., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This phase II study evaluated time-limited (24 cycles) treatment with ibrutinib and ixazomib in newly diagnosed (NDWM; n = 9) and relapsed/refractory (RRWM; n = 12) Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). The overall response rate (ORR) was 76.2% (n = 16) in 21 evaluable patients with no patient achieving a complete response (CR). The median duration of treatment was 15.6 months, and after a median follow-up time of 25.7 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.9 months. While the primary end-point was not met (CR rate at any time) and 28.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, ibrutinib plus ixazomib led to a clinically meaningful ORR and PFS. Combined Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and proteasome inhibition merits further evaluation in WM., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: In preclinical models, combining a GLUT4 inhibitor with an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor shows synergistic therapeutic potential against multiple myeloma (MM). Thus, this study evaluated the safety and tolerability of repurposing metformin, a complex I inhibitor, and nelfinavir, a GLUT4 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM that had progressed on all standard of care therapies., Materials and Methods: This trial utilized a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with 3 dose levels planned for up to a maximum of 6 (21-day) cycles. Metformin and nelfinavir were administered for 14 of 21 days, and subQ bortezomib was administered to a portion of patients on days 1, 8, and 15. The primary objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose, and the secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and overall response rate (ORR) of this combination., Results: Nine patients were accrued with a median age of 65 (range: 42-81) and received a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (Range: 5-12). The first 3 patients received only metformin (500 mg BID) and nelfinavir (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level, with 1 patient experiencing an unconfirmed minimal response (MR) in the first cycle, 1 experiencing progressive disease after 1 cycle of treatment and 1 patient going off treatment prior to assessing response but with signs of progressive disease. Given the limited therapeutic activity, the upfront addition of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2 ) was utilized for the subsequent 6 patients accrued. Three of these 6 patients went off study due to progressive disease, 1 patient achieved an unconfirmed partial response after 1 cycle of treatment but reported progressive disease in the subsequent cycle, 1 patient went off study to enter hospice, and the remaining patient experienced stable disease (SD) after receiving 6 cycles of clinical trial treatment. The study was closed before accrual to the next dose level was started., Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this repurposed drug combination in this very difficult-to-treat population of relapsed and refractory MM. This was an overall negative study with no ORR observed. Fortunately, 1 patient experienced an SD response, allowing this combination to stabilize their disease until another novel therapy on a clinical trial was available., Competing Interests: Disclosure These authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To validate algorithms based on electronic health data to identify composition of lines of therapy (LOT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Materials & methods: This study used available electronic health data for selected adults within Henry Ford Health (Michigan, USA) newly diagnosed with MM in 2006-2017. Algorithm performance in this population was verified via chart review. As with prior oncology studies, good performance was defined as positive predictive value (PPV) ≥75%. Results: Accuracy for identifying LOT1 (N = 133) was 85.0%. For the most frequent regimens, accuracy was 92.5-97.7%, PPV 80.6-93.8%, sensitivity 88.2-89.3% and specificity 94.3-99.1%. Algorithm performance decreased in subsequent LOTs, with decreasing sample sizes. Only 19.5% of patients received maintenance therapy during LOT1. Accuracy for identifying maintenance therapy was 85.7%; PPV for the most common maintenance therapy was 73.3%. Conclusion: Algorithms performed well in identifying LOT1 - especially more commonly used regimens - and slightly less well in identifying maintenance therapy therein.

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) that are refractory to the five most active anti-MM drugs, so-called penta-refractory MM, have historically had dismal outcomes with subsequent therapies. Progressive immune dysfunction, particularly of the T-cell repertoire, is implicated in the development of disease progression and refractory disease. However, the advent of novel immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies are rapidly changing the treatment landscape and improving the survival outcomes of patients with RRMM. Bispecific antibodies are antibodies that are engineered to simultaneously engage cytotoxic immune effector cells (T cells or NK cells) and malignant plasma cells via binding to immune effector cell antigens and extracellular plasma cell antigens leading to immune effector cell activation and malignant plasma cell destruction. Currently, bispecific antibodies that bind CD3 on T cells and plasma cell epitopes such as B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), G-protein coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5d), and Fc receptor homologue 5 (FcRH5) are the most advanced in clinical development and are showing unprecedented response rates in patients with RRMM, including patients with penta-refractory disease. In this review article, we explore the available clinical data of bispecific antibodies in RRMM and summarize the efficacy, safety, toxicity, clinical outcomes, mechanisms of resistance, and future directions of these therapies in patients with RRMM., Competing Interests: RP serves on the advisory board for Sanofi Aventis and AstraZeneca and has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline and the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation. SA has provided consultancy for Celgene, Amgen, Janssen and Takeda, and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics, Cellectar and Janssen. The remaining author declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Parrondo, Ailawadhi and Cerchione.)

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) is an important treatment modality for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although patients are living longer with MM, they are more likely to have comorbidities related to treatment, such as bone pain; however, RT can provide symptom relief. To date, the characterization of patients who have received RT in the real-world setting has been limited., Methods and Materials: The Connect® MM Registry is a large, US multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with newly diagnosed MM from mostly community sites. RT utilization and outcomes were analyzed quarterly throughout treatment. Factors associated with RT use were identified via multivariable analysis., Results: A total of 3011 patients were enrolled in the Connect MM Registry with 903 patients (30%) having received RT at any time. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in overall RT use among patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 versus ≥2, International Staging System disease stage I/II versus III, a history of plasmacytoma or a novel agent in their first regimen, and any number of bone lesions or severe osteoporosis/fracture. RT use was associated with having bone lesions or severe osteoporosis (vs not having bone lesions). Additionally, RT use was associated with ethnicity (Hispanic vs not) and Connect MM Registry cohort (cohort 1 [enrolled 2009-2011] vs 2 [enrolled 2012-2016]). In the 6 months before death, increased RT use was associated with increasing number of treatment lines (P < .0001) and high- versus standard-risk disease (per International Myeloma Working Group criteria; P = .0028)., Conclusions: Real-world results from the Connect MM Registry show RT is frequently used and is associated with clinical factors, including performance status and disease stage. Earlier in MM diagnosis, RT may be used as an adjunct to palliate symptoms or delay systemic therapy. Toward the end of life, RT is more frequently used for palliation when treatment options are often limited., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Ballas reports travel fees associated with a leadership role with the American Board of Radiology and fees for providing expert legal testimony. Dr Ailawadhi reports consulting fees from GSK, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Takeda, BeiGene, Janssen, Regeneron, Cellectar, and Pfizer; serving on a scientific steering committee for BMS; and research funding for his institution from GSK, BMS, Pharmacyclics, Amgen, Janssen, Cellectar, AbbVie, Ascentage, and Sanofi. Dr Gasparetto reports payments or honoraria, and travel fees from Sanofi, Karyopharm, and BMS; serving on a scientific steering committee for BMS; and serving on advisory boards for Pfizer, Janssen, and BMS. Dr Lee reports grants or contracts from Amgen, BMS, Janssen, GSK, Regeneron, and Takeda; consulting fees from BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Regeneron, GSK, Sanofi, Pfizer, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Takeda, and Allogene Therapeutics; and serving on a scientific steering committee for BMS. Dr Rifkin is a current employee of McKesson and reports serving on data safety monitoring boards for CARsgen; advisory boards for Amgen, BMS, Coherus, Fresenius Kabi, Genmab, and Janssen; and a scientific steering committee for BMS. Dr Jagannath reports consultancy fees from BMS, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Regeneron, Takeda, Sanofi, and Karyopharm; serving on steering committees and data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Janssen, BMS, and Sanofi; support for attending IMS, ASH, and ASCO; and leadership or fiduciary roles with IMS, SOHO, and ASH. Dr Narang, James W. Hardin, Brian G. M. Durie, Kathleen Toomey, James Omel, Lynne Wagner, Rafat Abonour, Howard R. Terebelo report serving on a scientific steering committee for BMS. Dr Joshi, Edward Yu, and Liang Liu are employees of BMS., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) showed significantly improved progression-free survival compared with standard regimens in adults with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received two to four previous regimens in the ongoing phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial (NCT03651128). This study analysed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), a KarMMa-3 secondary endpoint., Methods: In the randomised, open-label, phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, 386 patients in hospitals (≥18 years of age, with measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, who had received two to four previous regimens-including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and daratumumab-and had documented disease progression after receiving their last dose of the last therapy) were randomly assigned to ide-cel (n=254) or standard regimens (daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib and dexamethasone; or elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; n=132). Patients were expected to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20), EQ 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and follow-up timepoints (data cutoff April 18, 2022). PROs included nine prespecified primary domains: EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS-quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, and pain; QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms and side effects of treatment; and five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) index score and EQ-5D visual VAS. Differences in overall least-squares mean changes from baseline to month 20 were analysed using post-hoc constrained longitudinal data analysis. Time to confirmed improvement or deterioration from baseline was analysed using Cox proportional hazard models., Findings: Patients were randomly assigned between May 6, 2019, and April 8, 2022. Overall, the median age was 63 years (IQR 55-68); 151 (39%) patients were female; and 250 (65%) patients were White, 36 (9%) Black or African American, 19 (5%) Hispanic or Latino, 12 (3%) Asian, and seven (2%) of other race. The median follow-up was 18·6 months (IQR 14·0-26·4). PRO compliance was higher than 75% throughout. Overall least-squares mean changes from baseline favoured ide-cel with Hedges' g effect sizes from 0·3 to 0·7 for most domains. Patients in the ide-cel group showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across the primary PRO domains of interest, with the exception of QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms, side effects of treatment, and EQ-5D-5L index score, which showed improvement across assessment visits but did not exceed the within-group minimally important difference thresholds. The ide-cel group had shorter times to clinically meaningful improvement than the standard regimens group in QLQ-C30 domains except in role functioning, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties; in QLQ-MY20 domains except body image; and in EQ-5D-VAS., Interpretation: Ide-cel offers improved health-related quality of life compared with standard regimens for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after previous lines of therapy. The PRO data highlight the extended QoL benefits of a one-time infusion with ide-cel compared with continuous treatment with standard regimens in the treatment of triple-class exposed patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma., Funding: 2seventy bio and Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MD reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda. KP reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Arcellx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caribou Science, Cellectis, Genentech, Janssen, Karvopharm, Legend Biotech, Merck, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, and Precision Biosciences. BA reports consulting fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; and honoraria for presentations, support for attending meetings or travel, and participation on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi. MC reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda. AN reports honoraria and participation on advisory boards for Adaptative Biotechnologies, Amgen, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectar Biosciences, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, ONK Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Secura Bio, and Takeda; research funding to the institution from Aduro Biotech, Amgen, Arch Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda; and grants and research support for investigator-initiated studies from Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Merck, and Takeda. SM reports participation on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. SG reports grants or contracts from Amgen, Actinuum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Miltenyi, Omeros, and Takeda; leadership or fiduciary role on other board, society committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for Amgen, Actinuum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Jazz Phamaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda; and ownership of stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. HE reports consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, support for attending meetings or travel, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda; research funding to the institution from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, and Sanofi; and ownership of stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. SA reports consulting fees from BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectar Biosciences, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding to the institution from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectar Biosciences, GSK, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, and Sanofi. PR-O reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, H3 Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, and Sanofi; support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen. LE, DD, TSM, and MPM are employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. LS and SG are employees of Evidera. NC declares no competing interests. MC is an employee of Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Multi-agent regimens incorporating immunomodulatory (IMiD ® ) agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have become the preferred standard of care for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in improved survival outcomes. Currently, there are three IMiD agents approved for the treatment of MM: thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. Lenalidomide is commonly used to treat patients with newly diagnosed MM and as maintenance therapy following stem cell transplant or after disease relapse. Pomalidomide, the focus of this review, is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Despite survival benefits, IMiD agents each have different safety profiles requiring consideration both prior to starting therapy and during treatment. Adverse event (AE) management is essential, not only to ensure treatment adherence and thus ensure optimal efficacy but also to maintain patient quality of life. Here, we discuss AEs associated with pomalidomide and present five clinically relevant hypothetical case studies in patients with RRMM to provide scenario-driven guidance regarding treatment selection and AE prevention and management in the clinical setting. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in MM, we also discuss novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agents including iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480).

Esophageal stricture after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is exceptionally rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature. We present an interesting case of a 58-year-old male with refractory multiple myeloma who developed dysphagia five days following his second bone marrow transplantation. He was found to have a severe esophageal stricture. The patient was treated with multiple esophageal dilations and triamcinolone injections in the following weeks to months, resulting in an improvement in symptoms. Although the exact underlying mechanism remains unknown, high-dose chemotherapy conditioning with melphalan prior to BMT likely contributed to the stricture. Our case highlights the importance of heightened post-bone marrow transplantation management for rare complications, such as an esophageal stricture., (© 2023. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

Aim: Improved management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has resulted in a growing population of CLL survivors; these patients have a higher risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs) versus the general population. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the timing, frequency, incidence and types of SPMs in treated and untreated patients with CLL in the USA, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database, which links a nationally representative cancer registry with Medicare claims data. Patients & methods: Patients aged ≥66 years with newly diagnosed CLL between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, who were enrolled in Parts A and B of Medicare for ≥12 months pre-diagnosis of CLL were selected from the database. Patients were assessed for ≥36 months until the end of continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B and D, a switch to a health maintenance organization, death, or end of the study period (December 2019). Results: Of 3053 patients included in the analyses, 620 (20.3%) were treated and 2433 (79.7%) were untreated within 36 months of diagnosis. Overall, 638 (20.9%) patients developed a SPM, 26.8% of patients in the treated cohort and 19.4% of patients in the untreated cohort. The most common SPMs for both cohorts were squamous cell carcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Among the 166 treated patients who developed a SPM, a greater proportion developed their first SPM after treatment initiation versus those who developed their first SPM prior to treatment initiation (p < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients who received targeted therapy developed a SPM (p < 0.05) versus patients treated with anti-CD20 + chemotherapy. Conclusion: Findings indicate that treatment type and timing can affect SPM development in patients with CLL. Combined with previous findings, this can help inform best practices in monitoring for SPM in patients with CLL.

Objectives: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs) requires plasma cell (PC) identification or purification strategies to optimize results. We compared the efficacy of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin FISH (cIg-FISH) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting FISH (FACS-FISH) in a clinical laboratory setting., Methods: The FISH analysis results of 14,855 samples from individuals with a suspected PCN subjected to cytogenetic evaluation between 2019 and 2022 with cIg-FISH (n = 6917) or FACS-FISH (n = 7938) testing were analyzed., Results: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH increased the detection rate of abnormalities in comparison with cIg-FISH, with abnormal results documented in 54% vs 50% of cases, respectively (P < .001). It improved the detection of IGH::CCND1 (P < .001), IGH::MAF (P < .001), IGH::MAFB (P < .001), other IGH rearrangements (P < .001), and gains/amplifications of 1q (P < .001), whereas the detection rates of IGH::FGFR3 fusions (P = .3), loss of 17p (P = .3), and other abnormalities, including hyperdiploidy (P = .5), were similar. Insufficient PC yield for FISH analysis was decreased between cIg-FISH and FACS-FISH (22% and 3% respectively, P < .001). Flow cytometry allowed establishment of ploidy status in 91% of cases. In addition, FACS-FISH decreased analysis times, workload efforts, and operating costs., Conclusions: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH is an efficient PC purification strategy that affords significant improvement in diagnostic yield and decreases workflow requirements in comparison with cIg-FISH., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 mAb, used frequently in combination with lenalidomide and pomalidomide. No studies compared daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) to daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) in lenalidomide-exposed multiple myeloma. We identified 504 consecutive multiple myeloma patients who received daratumumab at Mayo Clinic between January 2015 and April 2019. We excluded patients who received daratumumab in the first line, received more than four lines of therapy prior to daratumumab use, did not receive lenalidomide prior to daratumumab, or had an unknown status of lenalidomide exposure, and patients who received daratumumab combinations other than DRd or DPd. We examined the impact of using DRd compared to DPd on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Out of 504 patients, 162 received DRd or DPd and were included; 67 were lenalidomide-exposed and 95 were lenalidomide-refractory. DRd was used in 76 (47%) and DPd in 86 (53%) patients. In lenalidomide-exposed multiple myeloma, there was no difference in median PFS; 34.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.8-44.6] for DRd compared to 25.2 months (95% CI, 4.9-35.3) for DPd, P  = 0.2. In lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma, there was no difference in median PFS; 18.6 months (95% CI, 13-32) for DRd compared to 9 months (95% CI, 5.2-14.6) for DPd, P  = 0.09. No difference in median OS was observed in DRd compared to DPd. Our study shows combining daratumumab with lenalidomide in patients with prior lenalidomide use is a viable and effective treatment option., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)