Search

Objective To compare and analyze the knee function and clinical prognosis of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and non-DLM treated with arthroscopically in adolescent patients. Methods A total of 47 adolescent patients treated with arthroscopy in our hospital from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the DLM group (20 cases) and the non-DLM group (27 cases) according to whether they had DLM.The clinical features, type of surgery, and scores of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ) at six months, one year, and two years after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results The age and body mass index of the DLM group were lower than those of the non-DML group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). IKDC and PAQ scores of patients in two groups were significantly improved six months after surgery, one year and two years after surgery, with statistical significance (P＜0.05), but there was no statistical significance in IKDC and PAQ scores between two groups at each time point (P＞0.05). There were no significant differences in IKDC and PAQ scores among patients with different gender, age and type of surgery (P＞0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic surgery can effectively improve the knee function of DLM and non-DLM patients, but gender, type of surgery, age do not affect the knee function and physical recovery [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and clinical effect of the treatment of NeerⅡb distal clavicular fracture with locking plate under arthroscopy., Methods: Between June 2018 and September 2022, the medical records of 15 patients with NeerⅡb distal clavicular fracture treated with locking plate under arthroscope were retrospectively analyzed, including 9 males and 6 females, aged from 25 to 57 years old with an average of (42.50±7.75) years old, 5 left shoulder, 10 right shoulder, and duration of the disease ranged from 4 to 7 days with an average of (5.16±0.98) d. Visual analog score (VAS), Constant-Murley shoulder joint score scale and Neer standard score were used before operation, 1 month after operation and the last follow-up., Results: All patients successfully completed the treatment of NeerⅡb distal clavicular fracture with locking plate under arthroscopy, with the operation time ranging from 0.3 to1.0 h with an average of (0.55±0.24) h. All patients were healed at stageⅠ. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 15 months with an average of (9.2±2.8) months. The preoperative VAS score was 7.23±0.67, the Constant-Murley shoulder joint score was (19.57±0.91), and the Neer standard score was (11.27±1.12);The VAS score was (1.56±0.81), the Constant-Murley shoulder joint score was (52.62±1.54), and the Neer standard score was (61.98±2.99) in the first month after operation;At the last follow-up, the VAS was (0.42±0.54), the Constant-Murley shoulder joint score was (91.24±1.97), and the Neer standard score was (93.24±3.38). The difference between VAS, Constant-Murley shoulder joint score and Neer standard score was statistically significant at one month postoperative and preoperative ( P <0.05), and the difference between the last follow-up visit and one month postoperative was statistically significant ( P <0.05)., Conclusion: The treatment of NeerⅡb distal clavicular fracture with locking plate under arthroscope can restore the function of shoulder joint, with definite curative effect and feasibility.

Objective: To compare the clinical effect of modified anterolateral and traditional acromioplasty in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: The clinical data of 92 patients with total rotator cuff tears admitted to the Department of Joint Surgery of Jinhua Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 42 were male, 50 were female, with a mean age of (57.1±13.2) years. Among them, 42 patients underwent traditional acromioplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (traditional group), and 50 underwent modified anterolateral acromioplasty (modified group). The preoperative and postoperative shoulder function of the patients in the two groups were evaluated and compared by using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the rating scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the constant Murley shoulder score scale. And the preoperative and postoperative pain of patients was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS). The incidence of rotator cuff retears 12 months after operation was counted. Results: There was no statistically significant differences in general information such as gender, age, affected side and course of disease between the two groups before the surgery (all P <0.05). All patients were followed up for (12.9±1.1) months. There was no significant differences in the UCLA score (31.4±3.0 vs 32.0±2.5), ASES score (13.1±0.7 vs 13.3±0.6), Constant Murley shoulder score (92.1±6.6 vs 94.3±4.6) and VAS score (1.5±0.8 vs 1.2±1.1) between the traditional group and the modified group 12 months after the operation (all P >0.05). The preoperative CSA (36.0°±1.7°) in the traditional group did not differ significantly from that at 12 months postoperatively (35.5°±1.2°) ( P =0.270); the postoperative CSA at 12 months (30.8°±2.5°) in the modified group was significantly smaller than that before the operation (36.5°±1.9°), and also was smaller than that in the traditional group 12 months after the operation (35.5°±1.2°) (both P <0.05). At 12 months after operation, the rate of rotator cuff tears in the traditional group and modified group was 16.7% (7/42) and 4.0% (2/50), respectively ( P =0.045). Conclusions: Traditional and modified anterolateral acromioplasty in treating total rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can significantly improve shoulder joint function. However, modified anterolateral acromioplasty significantly reduces the CSA value and decreases the incidence of rotator cuff re-tears.

Background: In terms of the optics used for Knee arthroscopy, a large number of different endoscopes are currently available. However, the use of the 30° optics in knee arthroscopy has been established as the standard procedure for many years. As early as the 1990s, needle arthroscopy was occasionally used as a diagnostic tool. In addition to the development of conventional optics technology in terms of camera and resolution, needle arthroscopes are now available with chip-on-tip image sensor technology. To date, no study has compared the performance of this kind of needle arthroscopy versus standard arthroscopy in the clinical setting in terms of the visibility of anatomical landmarks. In this monocentric prospective feasibility study, our aim was to evaluate predefined anatomical landmarks of the knee joint using needle arthroscopy (0° optics) and conventional knee arthroscopy (30° optics) and compare their performance during knee surgery., Methods: Examinations were performed on eight cadavers and seven patients who required elective knee arthroscopy. Two surgeons independently performed the examinations on these 15 knee joints, so that we were able to compare a total of 30 examinations. The focus was on the anatomical landmarks that could be visualized during a conventional diagnostic knee arthroscopy procedure. The quality of visibility was evaluated using a questionnaire., Results: In summary, the average visibility for all the anatomic landmarks was rated 4.98/ 5 for the arthroscopy using 30° optics. For needle arthroscopy, an average score of 4.89/ 5 was obtained. Comparatively, the needle arthroscope showed slightly limited visibility of the retropatellar gliding surface in eight (4.5/ 5 vs. 5/ 5), medial rim of the patella in four (4.85/ 5 vs. 5/ 5), and suprapatellar recess in four (4.83/ 5 vs. 5/ 5) cases. Needle arthroscopy was slightly better at visualizing the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in four knee joints (4.9/ 5 vs. 4.85/ 5)., Conclusion: Needle arthroscopy is a promising technology with advantages in terms of minimally invasive access and good visibility of anatomical landmarks. However, it also highlights some limitations, particularly in cases with challenging anatomy or the need for a wide field of view., (© 2024. The Author(s).)