109 results
Search Results
2. Predictive factors for critical care dependency after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
- Author
-
Patel MS, Shah S, Elkazaz MK, Shafafy M, and Grevitt MP
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Retrospective Studies, Female, Male, Child, Adult, Young Adult, Postoperative Care methods, Scoliosis surgery, Spinal Fusion methods, Critical Care
- Abstract
Aims: Historically, patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been nursed postoperatively in a critical care (CC) setting because of the challenges posed by prone positioning, extensive exposures, prolonged operating times, significant blood loss, major intraoperative fluid shifts, cardiopulmonary complications, and difficulty in postoperative pain management. The primary aim of this paper was to determine whether a scoring system, which uses Cobb angle, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and number of levels to be fused, is a valid method of predicting the need for postoperative critical care in AIS patients who are to undergo scoliosis correction with posterior spinal fusion (PSF)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all AIS patients who had undergone PSF between January 2018 and January 2020 in a specialist tertiary spinal referral centre. All patients were assessed preoperatively in an anaesthetic clinic. Postoperative care was defined as ward-based (WB) or critical care (CC) , based on the preoperative FEV1, FVC, major curve Cobb angle, and the planned number of instrumented levels., Results: Overall, 105 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 15.5 years (11 to 25) with a mean weight of 55 kg (35 to 103). The mean Cobb angle was 68° (38° to 122°). Of these, 38 patients were preoperatively scored to receive postoperative CC. However, only 19% of the cohort (20/105) actually needed CC-level support. Based on these figures, and an average paediatric intensive care unit stay of one day before stepdown to ward-based care, the potential cost-saving on the first postoperative night for this cohort was over £20,000. There was no statistically significant difference between the Total Pathway Score (TPS), the numerical representation of the four factors being assessed, and the actual level of care received (p = 0.052) or the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (p = 0.187). Binary logistic regression analysis of the TPS variables showed that the preoperative Cobb angle was the only variable which significantly predicted the need for critical care., Conclusion: Most patients undergoing posterior fusion surgery for AIS do not need critical care. Of the readily available preoperative measures, the Cobb angle is the only predictor of the need for higher levels of care, and has a threshold value of 74.5°., Competing Interests: M. P. Grevitt reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from DePuy Synthes, unrelated to this study., (© 2024 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. 3D CT modeling demonstrates the anatomic feasibility of S1AI screw trajectory for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis.
- Author
-
Bryson XM, Pham NS, Hollyer I, Hu S, Rinsky LA, and Vorhies JS
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Adolescent, Child, Female, Male, Young Adult, Ilium surgery, Ilium diagnostic imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Sacrum surgery, Sacrum diagnostic imaging, Scoliosis surgery, Scoliosis diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods, Feasibility Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods, Bone Screws
- Abstract
Purpose: In patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory is a safe and effective method of lumbopelvic fixation but can lead to implant prominence. Here we use 3D CT modeling to demonstrate the anatomic feasibility of the S1 alar iliac screw (S1AI) compared to the S2AI trajectory in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis., Methods: This retrospective study used CT scans of 14 patients with spinal deformity to create 3D spinal reconstructions and model the insertional anatomy, max length, screw diameter, and potential for implant prominence between 28 S2AI and 28 S1AI screw trajectories., Results: Patients had a mean age of 14.42 (range 8-21), coronal cobb angle of 85° (range 54-141), and pelvic obliquity of 28° (range 4-51). The maximum length and diameter of both screw trajectories were similar. S1AI screws were, on average, 6.3 ± 5 mm less prominent than S2AI screws relative to the iliac crests. S2AI screws were feasible in all patients, while in two patients, posterior elements of the lumbar spine would interfere with S1AI screw insertion., Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, we demonstrate that the S1AI trajectory offers comparable screw length and diameter to an S2AI screw with less implant prominence. An S1AI screw, however, may not be feasible in some patients due to interference from the posterior elements of the lumbar spine., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
- Author
-
Hartman TJ, Nie JW, Anwar FN, Roca AM, Loya AC, Medakkar SS, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Federico VP, Massel DH, Sayari AJ, Lopez GD, and Singh K
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Preoperative Period, Time Factors, Retrospective Studies, Spondylolisthesis surgery, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Spinal Fusion, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
- Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To assess the impact of preoperative symptom duration (PSD) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSpond)., Background: A prolonged duration of preoperative symptoms may implicate inferior long-term outcomes postsurgery. Prior studies of lumbar fusion recipients are limited by the inclusion of heterogeneous populations., Methods: A single-surgeon registry was retrospectively queried for privately insured patients who had undergone primary, elective, single-level MIS-TLIF for DSpond with a recorded symptom start date. Cohorts were formed by PSD: shorter duration (PSD <1 y) or greater duration (GD; PSD ≥1 y). PROMs evaluated included Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale-Back, Visual Analog Scale-Leg, and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The magnitude of PROM (∆PROM) improvement from preoperative baseline to 6 weeks and final follow-up (∆PROM-FF) were compared between cohorts. Intercohort achievement rates of a minimum clinically important difference in each PROM were compared., Results: A total of 133 patients included 85 patients with GD cohort. There were no significant differences in pre hoc demographics and perioperative characteristics between cohorts, as well as preoperative, 6-week, or final follow-up PROMs between cohorts. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up ( P ≤ 0.049, all). There were no significant intercohort differences demonstrated in minimum clinically important difference achievement rates, ∆PROM-6W, or ∆PROM-FF in any PROM., Conclusions: Regardless of the symptom duration before MIS-TLIF for DSpond, patients demonstrate significant improvement in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior scores in any PROM domain. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not suffer inferior rates of clinically meaningful improvement after surgical intervention. These findings should be considered when counseling patients before surgical intervention for DSpond., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A guide to selecting upper thoracic versus lower thoracic uppermost instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity correction.
- Author
-
Kumar RP, Adida S, Lavadi RS, Mitha R, Legarreta AD, Hudson JS, Shah M, Diebo B, Fields DP, Buell TJ, Hamilton DK, Daniels AH, and Agarwal N
- Subjects
- Humans, Kyphosis surgery, Spinal Curvatures surgery, Spinal Curvatures diagnostic imaging, Adult, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery, Thoracic Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation
- Abstract
Purpose: Operative treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been shown to improve patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Selection of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) in either the upper thoracic (UT) or lower thoracic (LT) spine is a pivotal decision with effects on operative and postoperative outcomes. This review overviews the multifaceted decision-making process for UIV selection in ASD correction., Methods: PubMed was queried for articles using the keywords "uppermost instrumented vertebra", "upper thoracic", "lower thoracic", and "adult spinal deformity"., Results: Optimization of UIV selection may lead to superior deformity correction, better patient-reported outcomes, and lower risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Patient alignment characteristics, including preoperative thoracic kyphosis, coronal deformity, and the magnitude of sagittal correction influence surgical decision-making when selecting a UIV, while comorbidities such as poor body mass index, osteoporosis, and neuromuscular pathology should also be taken in to account. Additionally, surgeon experience and resources available to the hospital may also play a role in this decision. Currently, it is incompletely understood whether postoperative HRQOLs, functional and radiographic outcomes, and complications after surgery differ between selection of the UIV in either the UT or LT spine., Conclusion: The correct selection of the UIV in surgical planning is a challenging task, which requires attention to preoperative alignment, patient comorbidities, clinical characteristics, available resources, and surgeon-specific factors such as experience., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Is the Child Opportunity Index a Factor in Surgical Outcomes for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?
- Author
-
Linden GS, Lee S, Cook D, Birch CM, Hedequist DJ, Hresko MT, and Hogue GD
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Child, Treatment Outcome, Prospective Studies, Blood Loss, Surgical, Retrospective Studies, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery, Scoliosis diagnostic imaging, Scoliosis surgery, Scoliosis epidemiology, Spinal Fusion methods, Kyphosis etiology
- Abstract
Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been previously associated with delays in orthopaedic care. However, it is unclear how SES impacts patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly regarding preoperative major coronal curve angle or surgical outcomes. Utilizing the Child Opportunity Index (COI)-an address-driven measure of pediatric education, health/environment, and SES-we investigated whether COI is associated with differences in preoperative scoliosis magnitude, age at surgery, and AIS surgical outcomes., Methods: Consecutive patients with AIS surgically treated at a single center from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed. COI was calculated by inserting a patient's home address into the nationally available COI database to derive a COI value. COI is scored from 0.0 to 100.0 (0.0 is lowest, 100.0 is highest). Specifically, COI is categorized as very low (<20.0), low (20 to 39.9), moderate (40 to 59.9), high (60 to 79.9), and very high (≥80). Those without addresses were excluded. Patients without proper radiographs to assess curve correction were also excluded. A COI threshold of 60.0 was used to separate patients into a low (<60.0) or high COI ( ) group based on published COI guidelines. Outcomes, including preoperative curve magnitude, age at surgery, percentage curve correction, operative time (OT), intraoperative estimated blood loss per level fused, length of stay, and complications, were compared across groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess correlations between COI and preoperative curve magnitude, as well as age., Results: Four hundred four patients were included in the study, and 263 had 2-year follow-up data. Patients were an average age of 14.9 years old (range: 11.2 to 19.8), had a median COI of 76 (range: 4 to 100), and had a mean preoperative major curve angle of 59 degrees (range: 36 to 93). COI was significantly higher for white patients compared with non-white (80.0 vs 40.0, P < 0.001), and higher for non-Hispanic individuals (79.0 vs 15.0, P < 0.001). Patients with Low COI were associated with a lower OT per level fused ( P = 0.003) and decreased postoperative complication risk ( P = 0.02). COI was not associated with preoperative major coronal curve angle, age at surgery, or any other surgical outcomes., Conclusion: COI was significantly lower for non-white patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity. Patients from low COI backgrounds achieved similar surgical results as those from high COI addresses and had a decreased OT per level fused and complication incidence, though the clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether these findings are reproducible across other states and health systems., Level of Evidence: Level III-prognostic study., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The effect of perioperative sequential application of multiple doses of tranexamic acid on postoperative blood loss after PLIF: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Dong W, Tang Y, Lei M, Ma Z, Zhang X, Shen J, Hao J, Jiang W, and Hu Z
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Aged, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Tranexamic Acid administration & dosage, Antifibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage, Postoperative Hemorrhage prevention & control, Spinal Fusion adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been utilized in spinal surgery to effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and allogeneic blood transfusion rates. However, the traditional TXA regimen might last the entire duration of hyperfibrinolysis caused by surgical trauma, resulting in its limited ability to reduce postoperative blood loss (PBL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of perioperative sequential administration of multiple doses of TXA in reducing PBL in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)., Methods: From October 2022 to June 2023, 231 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar degenerative disease and scheduled to undergo PLIF were prospectively enrolled in the present study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Moreover, all patients received an intravenous injection of TXA at a dose of 15 mg/kg 15 min before the surgical skin incision. Patients in Group A received a placebo of normal saline after surgery, while patients in Group B received three additional intravenous injections of TXA at a dose of 15 mg/kg every 24 h. Patients in Group C received three additional intravenous injections of TXA at a dose of 15 mg/kg every 5 h. The primary outcome measure was PBL. In addition, this study assessed total blood loss (TBL), IBL, routine blood parameters, liver and kidney function, coagulation parameters, fibrinolysis indexes, inflammatory indicators, drainage tube removal time (DRT), length of hospital stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate, and incidence of complications for all subjects., Results: The PBL, TBL, DRT, and LOS of Group B and Group C were significantly lower than those of Group A ( P <0.05). The level of D-dimer (D-D) in Group C was significantly lower than that in Group A on the first day after the operation ( P =0.002), and that in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A on the third day after the operation ( P =0.003). The interleukin-6 levels between the three groups from 1 to 5 days after the operation were in the order of Group A > Group B > Group C. No serious complications were observed in any patient. The results of multiple stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that PBL was positively correlated with incision length, IBL, smoking history, history of hypertension, preoperative fibrinogen degradation product level, and blood transfusion. It was negatively correlated with preoperative levels of fibrinogen, red blood cells, blood urea nitrogen, and age. Compared to female patients, male patients had an increased risk of PBL. Finally, the incidence of PBL was predicted., Conclusions: Sequential application of multiple doses of TXA during the perioperative period could safely and effectively reduce PBL and TBL, shorten DRT and LOS, reduce postoperative D-D generation, and reduce the postoperative inflammatory response. In addition, this study provided a novel prediction model for PBL in patients undergoing PLIF., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Biomechanical assessment of lumbar stability: finite element analysis of TLIF with a novel combination of coflex and pedicle screws.
- Author
-
Meganathan S and Alphin MS
- Subjects
- Humans, Biomechanical Phenomena, Range of Motion, Articular, Stress, Mechanical, Models, Biological, Finite Element Analysis, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae physiology, Spinal Fusion methods, Pedicle Screws
- Abstract
Purpose : Finite element analysis is frequently used for lumbar spine biomechanical analysis. The primary scope of this work is to illustrate, using finite element analysis, how the biomechanical behavior of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), along with a novel combination of the interspinous process device (IPD) and pedicle screws, improves lumbar spine stability. Methods : In this study, unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) were used. Four FE models were developed using ANSYS software, as follows: (1) Intact model; (2) TLIF with "U"-shaped Coflex-F IPD (UCF); (3) TLIF with Coflex-F and UPSF (UCF + UPSF); (4) TLIF with Coflex-F and BPSF (UCF + BPSF). The intact model was subjected to four pure moments (10 Nm), and the results were validated with previous literature data. The intact model results correlated well with the literature data, and the model was validated. Three surgical models were subjected to 7.5 Nm four pure moments, flexion (FL), extension (ET), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) and a 280N follower load. Results : The surgical model results were compared with the intact model. The comprehensive analysis results show the UCF + BPSF surgical model gave a good advantage on range of motion, cage stress, Coflex-F stress and endplate stress compared among the two models. Conclusion : This study proposes that the UCF + BPSF system helps to reduce the stress on the implant and adjacent endplates and gives very good stability to the lumbar spine under the various static loading conditions., (© 2023 S. Meganathan et al., published by Sciendo.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Reply to letter to the editor regarding "Exploring the impact of mild-to-moderate foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 on clinical outcomes following L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion".
- Author
-
Lee HR and Cho JH
- Subjects
- Humans, Treatment Outcome, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Stenosis surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. S1 vertebral bone quality score independently predicts pedicle screw loosening following surgery in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.
- Author
-
Li Q, Li J, Yang H, Yang X, Wang L, and Song Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications diagnostic imaging, Sacrum surgery, Sacrum diagnostic imaging, Pedicle Screws, Scoliosis surgery, Scoliosis diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Background Context: MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score is an effective predictor of pedicle screw loosening after lumbar fusion surgery and has been recognized as a valuable tool for assessing preoperative bone quality. Due to the lateral curvature of lumbar spine of degenerative scoliosis, accurate measurement of VBQ score by conventional measurement methods that capture MRI signal intensity at L1-4 may be limited under certain conditions. To this end, a new simplified S1 VBQ score method has been proposed, which is comparable to the previous L1-4 VBQ score or S1 Hounsfield unit (HU) value, and has high accuracy and reliability., Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based S1 VBQ score for pedicle screw loosening following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS)., Study Design/setting: Retrospective single-center cohort., Patient Sample: We reviewed 92 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with pedicle screw fixation for ADS between January 2017 and January 2020., Outcome Measures: Association between S1 VBQ score and pedicle screw loosening following surgery for ADS., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who performed PLIF between January 2017 and January 2020. The clear zone around pedicle screws≥1 mm can be identified as screw loosening. The S1 VBQ score is calculated from the S1 central-based noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The signal intensity (SI) of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was then measured using ROI placed at the L3 level to normalize the results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for screw loosening. Then, constructed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and determined the threshold (cut-off) of VBQ score with high sensitivity and specificity based on Youden Index., Results: A total of 92 patients were included, including 34 males and 58 females. The mean age of the patients was 61.23±1.23 years old. At 1-year follow-up, the screw loosening rate was 56.5% (52/92). The age and levels of fixation were higher in the loosening group than in the nonloosening group (p=.036, p=.025). Patients in the loosening group had a greater VBQ score compared to patients in the nonloosening group (3.31±0.41 vs 3.01±0.28, p=.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age (OR, 1.090; 95% CI 1.005-1.183; p=.039) and higher VBQ score (OR, 5.778; 95% CI 2.889-16.177; p=.001) were independent risk factors for screw loosening. In addition, the ROC curve were created to assess the role of VBQ score as predictors of screw loosening with a diagnostic accuracy of 74.6% (95% CI 64.2%-85.1%).The most suitable threshold for the VBQ score as determined by the Youden Index was 3.175 (sensitivity: 76.0%, specificity: 83.3%)., Conclusions: Higher S1 VBQ score was significantly associated with pedicle screw loosening following surgery for ADS. The S1 VBQ score can be used as an effective preoperative predictor, which has the potential clinical application., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Stand-Alone Devices and Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 1:1 Exact Matched Analysis.
- Author
-
Tao X, Matur AV, Street S, Shukla G, Garcia-Vargas J, Mehta J, Childress K, Duah HO, Gibson J, Cass D, Wu A, Motley B, Cheng J, and Adogwa O
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Adult, Radiculopathy surgery, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Diskectomy methods, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Bone Plates, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology
- Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective cohort., Objective: To compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (ZP; stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with an anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy., Summary of Background Data: Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. Although ACDFs performed with graft and plate have been the gold standard, more recently, ZP implants were developed to decrease implant-related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of ZP (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems., Materials and Methods: Data were extracted from the PearlDiver Mariner Database using Current Procedural Terminology codes to classify patients into 1 level, 2 levels, and a total of 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded., Results: 1:1 exact matching created 2 equal groups of 7284 patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or ZP (stand-alone) implant. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia, or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (risk ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.21, P = 0.95). In addition, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (risk ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.862-1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study., Conclusion: After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that ZP (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared with grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Hip Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Severe Adult Spinal Deformity: Prevalence and Impact on Spine Surgery Outcomes.
- Author
-
Diebo BG, Alsoof D, Balmaceno-Criss M, Daher M, Lafage R, Passias PG, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Deviren V, Line BG, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Mundis GM, Kim HJ, Gum JL, Smith JS, Uribe JS, Kebaish KM, Gupta MC, Nunley PD, Eastlack RK, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Lenke LG, Hart RA, Schwab FJ, Bess S, Lafage V, and Daniels AH
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Spinal Curvatures surgery, Spinal Curvatures epidemiology, Spinal Curvatures diagnostic imaging, Severity of Illness Index, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip statistics & numerical data, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Osteoarthritis, Hip surgery, Osteoarthritis, Hip epidemiology, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Spinal Fusion adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is common in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Limited data exist on the prevalence of hip OA in patients with ASD, or on its impact on baseline and postoperative alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Therefore, this paper will assess the prevalence and impact of hip OA on alignment and PROMs., Methods: Patients with ASD who underwent L1-pelvis or longer fusions were included. Two independent reviewers graded hip OA with the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and stratified it by severity into non-severe (KL grade 1 or 2) and severe (KL grade 3 or 4). Radiographic parameters and PROMs were compared among 3 patient groups: Hip-Spine (hip KL grade 3 or 4 bilaterally), Unilateral (UL)-Hip (hip KL grade 3 or 4 unilaterally), or Spine (hip KL grade 1 or 2 bilaterally)., Results: Of 520 patients with ASD who met inclusion criteria for an OA prevalence analysis, 34% (177 of 520) had severe bilateral hip OA and unilateral or bilateral hip arthroplasty had been performed in 8.7% (45 of 520). A subset of 165 patients had all data components and were examined: 68 Hip-Spine, 32 UL-Hip, and 65 Spine. Hip-Spine patients were older (67.9 ± 9.5 years, versus 59.6 ± 10.1 years for Spine and 65.8 ± 7.5 years for UL-Hip; p < 0.001) and had a higher frailty index (4.3 ± 2.6, versus 2.7 ± 2.0 for UL-Hip and 2.9 ± 2.0 for Spine; p < 0.001). At 1 year, the groups had similar lumbar lordosis, yet the Hip-Spine patients had a worse sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) measurement (45.9 ± 45.5 mm, versus 25.1 ± 37.1 mm for UL-Hip and 19.0 ± 39.3 mm for Spine; p = 0.001). Hip-Spine patients also had worse Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Summary scores at baseline (25.7 ± 9.3, versus 28.7 ± 9.8 for UL-Hip and 31.3 ± 10.5 for Spine; p = 0.005) and 1 year postoperatively (34.5 ± 11.4, versus 40.3 ± 10.4 for UL-Hip and 40.1 ± 10.9 for Spine; p = 0.006)., Conclusions: This study of operatively treated ASD revealed that 1 in 3 patients had severe hip OA bilaterally. Such patients with severe bilateral hip OA had worse baseline SVA and PROMs that persisted 1 year following ASD surgery, despite correction of lordosis., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: Funding for this study was received from DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, and K2/Stryker. In addition, the International Spine Study Group reports grants to the foundation from Medtronic, Globus, Stryker, SI Bone, and Carlsmed. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H962)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Letter to the editor regarding "Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion" by Zhang et al.
- Author
-
Taso M and Brox JI
- Subjects
- Humans, Spinal Fusion psychology, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Patient Satisfaction, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Prognostic value in preoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental Component score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
- Author
-
Roca AM, Anwar FN, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, Medakkar SS, Loya AC, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Federico VP, Lopez GD, Sayari AJ, and Singh K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Prognosis, Treatment Outcome, Disability Evaluation, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Fusion methods, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
No study has examined the prognostic value of the Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) Mental Component Score (MCS) on postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) patients. This study examines the effect of preoperative VR-12 MCS on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in MIS-TLIF patients. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: VR-12 MCS < 50 and VR-12 MCS ≥ 50. PROMs of VR-12 MCS/Physical Component Score (PCS), Short Form-12 (SF-12) MCS/PCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back/Leg Pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected.Of 329 patients, 151 were in the VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort. The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort reported significantly inferior scores in all PROMs preoperatively, significantly inferior VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, and ODI scores at 6-weeks postoperatively, and significantly inferior scores in all PROMs, except for VAS-BP at final follow-up. Magnitude of 6-week postoperative improvement was significantly greater in the VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort for VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, and PHQ-9. Magnitude of final postoperative improvement was significantly greater in the VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort for VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS/PCS, and PHQ-9. MCID achievement rates were significantly greater in the VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort for VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, and PHQ-9. MIS-TLIF patients with lesser preoperative VR-12 MCS reported inferior postoperative outcomes in mental health, physical function, pain, and disability. However, patients with inferior preoperative mental health reported greater rates of clinically meaningful improvement in mental health. Inferior preoperative mental health does not limit postoperative improvement in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Prediction of postoperative curve correction based on the supine radiographs for adult idiopathic scoliosis patients.
- Author
-
Chan CYW, Tan YWE, Chandren JR, Chandirasegaran S, Chung WH, Chiu CK, and Kwan MK
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Adult, Supine Position, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Thoracic Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Scoliosis surgery, Scoliosis diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fusion methods, Radiography
- Abstract
Background Context: Preoperative supine radiographs are mandatory in the new adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) classification. Supine radiographs are easily reproducible and highly predictive of side bending radiographs. However, few studies evaluated the use of supine radiographs in predicting postoperative curve correction after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in AdIS., Purpose: To investigate the use of supine and side bending (SB) radiographs in predicting postoperative curve correction in AdIS patients who underwent PSF., Study Design: Retrospective study., Patient Sample: A total of 93 AdIS patients who underwent PSF between 2022 and 2023 were included., Outcome Measures: Demographic data were age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), Risser grade, Lenke curve types and Cobb angles. Main outcome measures were preoperative and immediate postoperative Cobb angle (proximal thoracic [PT], main thoracic [MT] and thoracolumbar/lumbar [TL/L] curves), Supine Cobb angle and Flexibility rate (PT, MT and TL/L), and Correction rate (PT, MT and TL/L)., Methods: Correlation study was performed between Supine Cobb angle vs postoperative Cobb angle for PT, MT and TL/L curves. A predictive formula was derived from the correlation plots., Results: A total of 93 subjects were included in our study with a median age of 24.7 years and comprised of 80 females (86.0%). Preoperative Supine Cobb angle (r=0.835, r=0.881, r=0.767, p<.001) and preoperative SB Cobb angle (r=0.815, r=0.872, r=0.801, p<.001) showed similar strong positive correlation with postoperative PT, MT and TL/L Cobb angle, but preoperative Supine Cobb angle had slightly stronger correlation in PT and MT, whereas preoperative SB Cobb angle had stronger correlation in TL/L curve. Using the derived predictive formulae, there was a significant, strong, positive correlation between the predicted value and actual value of postoperative standing Cobb angle, (r=0.852, p<.001), with 71.0% of the patients had predicted postoperative Cobb angle from the supine radiographs within 5° of the actual value., Conclusion: Both supine radiographs and side bending radiographs had strong predictability of the postoperative Cobb angle for PT, MT and TL/L curves. In 71.0% of patients, the actual postoperative Cobb angle was within 5° of the predicted postoperative Cobb angle using the predictive formulae., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Impact of preoperative mental health diagnosis on postoperative opioid use patterns in spine fusion surgery: A systematic literature review.
- Author
-
El-Abtah ME, Makineni PS, El-Abtah M, Roach MJ, and Kelly ML
- Subjects
- Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Mental Disorders, Preoperative Period, Spinal Fusion, Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use, Pain, Postoperative drug therapy, Pain, Postoperative diagnosis, Pain, Postoperative psychology
- Abstract
Opioids are frequently prescribed for patients undergoing procedures such as spinal fusion surgery for the management of chronic back pain. However, the association between a preoperative mental health illness, such as depression or anxiety, and opioid use patterns after spinal fusion surgery remain unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify articles from the PubMed Database that analyzed the relationship between preoperative mental health illness and postoperative opioid usage after spinal fusion surgery on June 1, 2023. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) was utilized to evaluate the quality of included articles. Seven studies with 139,580 patients and a mean MINORS score of 18 ± 0.5 were included in qualitative synthesis. The most common spine surgery performed was lumbar fusion (59 %) and the mean age across studies ranged from 50 to 62 years. The range of postoperative opioid usage patterns analyzed ranged from 1 to 24 months. The majority of studies (6/7; 86 %) reported that a preoperative diagnosis of mental health illness was associated with increased opioid dependence after spinal fusion surgery. Preoperative use of opioids for protracted periods was shown to be associated with postoperative chronic opioid dependence. Consensus findings suggest that having a preoperative diagnosis of a mental health illness such as depression or anxiety is associated with increased postoperative opioid use after spinal fusion surgery. Patient comorbidities, including diagnoses of mental health illness, must be considered by the spine surgeon in order to reduce rates of postoperative opioid dependence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Preoperative motor weakness and the impact on patient reported outcomes in lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
- Author
-
Kaul A, Roca AM, Anwar FN, Wolf JC, Khosla I, Loya AC, Medakkar SS, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Lopez GD, and Singh K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Disability Evaluation, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Muscle Weakness etiology
- Abstract
This study measures the impact of preoperative motor weakness (MW) on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) patients. Retrospectively-sourced data from a prospectively-maintained, single-surgeon database created two cohorts of LLIF patients: patients with/without documented MW. Demographics/perioperative characteristics/PROMs were collected preoperatively and at six-weeks/final follow-up (FF). Studied outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical/Mental Component Score (PCS/MCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg Pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Multivariable linear/logistic regression calculated/compared intercohort minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Mean postoperative follow-up time was 11.5 ± 7.52 months. In total, 214 LLIF patients from December 2010 to May 2023 were included, with 149 having documented MW. In Table 1, self-reported gender was significant between cohorts (p < 0.025). Other significant demographic characteristics were smoker status (p < 0.002), diabetes (p < 0.016), and CCI score (p < 0.011). Table 2 shows notably significant perioperative characteristics: spinal pathology (degenerative spondylolisthesis/foraminal stenosis/herniated nucleus pulposus) (p < 0.005, all), estimated blood loss/length of stay/postoperative day (POD)-zero narcotic consumption (p < 0.001, all). Table 3 outcomes/MCID achievement percentages demonstrated insignificant intercohort differences besides a weakly significant FF ODI score (p < 0.036). MW, a frequently reported symptom in spine surgery, is poorly studied in LLIF patients. Thus, this study evaluates MW impact on PROMs and notes no significant differences. However, one exception regarding FF disability scores was recorded. MW did not affect MCID achievement for our patient population. Therefore, the preliminary findings suggest preoperative MW imparts minimal influence on PROMs/MCID in LLIF patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. The effect of different fixation systems on oblique lumbar interbody fusion under vibration conditions.
- Author
-
Zhang B, Li TC, Wang X, Du CF, and Zhu R
- Subjects
- Humans, Biomechanical Phenomena, Pedicle Screws, Vibration, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Finite Element Analysis
- Abstract
Despite the fact that lower back pain caused by degenerative lumbar spine pathologies seriously affects the quality of life, however, there is a paucity of research on the biomechanical properties of different auxiliary fixation systems for its primary treatment (oblique lumbar interbody fusion) under vibratory environments. In order to study the effects of different fixation systems of OLIF surgery on the vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine under whole-body vibration (WBV), a finite element (FE) model of OLIF surgery with five different fixation systems was established by modifying a previously established model of the normal lumbar spine (L1-S1). In this study, a compressive follower load of 500 N and a sinusoidal axial vertical load of ±40 N at the frequency of 5 Hz with a duration of 0.6 s was applied. The results showed that the bilateral pedicle screw fixation model had the highest resistance to cage subsidence and maintenance of disc height under WBV. In contrast, the lateral plate fixation model exerted very high stresses on important tissues, which would be detrimental to the patient's late recovery and reduction of complications. Therefore, this study suggests that drivers and related practitioners who are often in vibrating environments should have bilateral pedicle screws for OLIF surgery, and side plates are not recommended to be used as a separate immobilization system. Additionally, the lateral plate is not recommended to be used as a separate fixation system., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Comparison of predictive value for cage subsidence between MRI-based endplate bone quality and vertebral bone quality scores following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched study.
- Author
-
Ai Y, Zhu C, Chen Q, Huang Y, Wang J, Ding H, Deng W, Song Y, Feng G, and Liu L
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Bone Density, Case-Control Studies, Propensity Score, Predictive Value of Tests, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Abstract
Background Context: Cage subsidence after lumbar fusion can lead to many adverse outcomes. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a widely recognized risk factor for cage subsidence. Conventional methods can predict and evaluate BMD, but there are many shortcomings. Recently, MRI-based assessment of bone quality in specific parts of the vertebral body has been proposed, including scores for vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and endplate bone quality (EBQ). However, the predictive accuracy of the two scoring systems for cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated MRI-based VBQ and EBQ scores for assessing bone quality and compared their predictive value for cage subsidence after TLIF., Purpose: To compare the predictive value between MRI-based VBQ and EBQ scores for cage subsidence after TLIF., Study Design/setting: A retrospective case-control study., Patients Sample: Patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent single-level TLIF at our medical center between 2014 and 2020, all of whom had preoperative MRIs available., Outcomes Measures: Cage subsidence, disc height, VBQ score, EBQ score, upper and lower vertebral body bone quality (UL-VBQ) score., Methods: Data were retrospectively examined for a consecutive sample of 346 patients who underwent TLIF at our medical center between 2014 and 2020. Patients who subsequently experienced cage subsidence or not were matched to each other based on propensity scoring, and the two matched groups (52 patients each) were compared using conditional logistic regression to investigate the association between the potential radiographic factors and cage subsidence. Scores for VBQ and EBQ were assessed for their ability to predict cage subsidence in the matched patients based on the area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC)., Results: Among matched patients, those who suffered cage subsidence had significantly higher VBQ score (3.7 vs 3.1, p<.001) and EBQ score (5.0 vs 4.3, p<.001), and regression linked greater risk of subsidence to higher VBQ score (OR 4.557, 95% CI 1.076-19.291, p=.039) and higher EBQ score (OR 5.396, 95% CI 1.158-25.146, p=.032). A cut-off VBQ score of 3.4 predicted the cage subsidence among matched patients with an AUC of 0.799, sensitivity of 84.6%, and specificity of 69.2%. A cut-off EBQ score of 4.7 predicted subsidence with an AUC of 0.829, sensitivity of 76.9%, and specificity of 82.7%., Conclusion: Higher VBQ and EBQ scores are associated with a greater risk of cage subsidence following TLIF, and EBQ may perform better because of greater specificity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. A prospective study of lumbar facet arthroplasty in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis: cost-effective assessment from the Total Posterior Spine system (TOPS TM ) IDE Study: 2-year model revision and sensitivity analyses based on 305 subjects.
- Author
-
Ament JD, Petros J, Zabehi T, Yee R, Johnson JP, and Vokshoor A
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Prospective Studies, Arthroplasty economics, Arthroplasty methods, Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Spondylolisthesis surgery, Spondylolisthesis economics, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Spinal Stenosis surgery, Spinal Stenosis economics, Spinal Fusion economics, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Abstract
Background Context: A previous cost-effectiveness analysis published in 2022 found that the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS
TM ) system was dominant over transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This analysis required updating to reflect a more complete dataset and pricing considerations., Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TOPSTM system as compared with TLIF based on an updated and complete FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) data set., Study Design/setting: Cost-utility analysis of the TOPSTM system compared to TLIF., Patient Sample: A multicenter, FDA IDE, randomized control trial (RCT) investigated the efficacy of TOPSTM compared to TLIF with a current population of n=305 enrolled and n=168 with complete 2-year follow-up., Outcome Measures: Cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated to determine our primary outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Secondary outcome measures included: net monetary benefit as well at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds., Methods: The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness is determined by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. A Markov model was used to simulate the health outcomes and costs of patients undergoing TOPSTM or TLIF over a 2-year period. alternative scenario sensitivity analysis, one-way sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results., Results: The updated base case result demonstrated that TOPSTM was immediately and longitudinally dominant compared with the control with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -9,637.37 $/QALY. The net monetary benefit was correspondingly $2,237, both from the health system's perspective and at a WTP threshold of 50,000 $/QALY at the 2-year time point. This remained true in all scenarios tested. The Alternative Scenario Sensitivity Analysis suggested cost-effectiveness irrespective of payer type and surgical setting. To remain cost-effective, the cost difference between TOPSTM and TLIF should be no greater than $1,875 and $3,750 at WTP thresholds of $50,000 and 100,000 $/QALY, respectively., Conclusions: This updated analysis confirms that the TOPSTM device is a cost-effective and economically dominant surgical treatment option for patients with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to TLIF in all scenarios examined., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: a finite element analysis.
- Author
-
Liu C, Zhao M, Zhang W, Wang C, Hu B, Wang K, Xu W, Li L, and Si H
- Subjects
- Humans, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone Density, Adult, Bone Screws, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Finite Element Analysis, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Osteoporosis surgery
- Abstract
Background Context: With the aging population, osteoporosis, which leads to poor fusion, has become a common challenge for lumbar surgery. In addition, most people with osteoporosis are elderly individuals with poor surgical tolerance, and poor bone quality can also weaken the stability of internal fixation., Purpose: This study compared the fixation strength of the bilateral traditional trajectory screw structure (TT-TT), the bilateral cortical bone trajectory screw structure (CBT-CBT), and the hybrid CBT-TT (CBT screws at the cranial level and TT screws at the caudal level) structure under different bone mineral density conditions., Study Design: A finite element (FE) analysis study., Methods: Above all, we established a healthy adult lumbar spine model. Second, under normal and osteoporotic conditions, three transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) models were established: bilateral traditional trajectory (TT-TT) screw fixation, bilateral cortical bone trajectory (CBT-CBT) screw fixation, and hybrid cortical bone trajectory screw and traditional trajectory screw (CBT-TT) fixation. Finally, a 500-N compression load with a torque of 10 N/m was applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. We compared the range of motion (ROM), adjacent disc stress, cage stress, and posterior fixation stress of the different fusion models., Results: Under different bone mineral density conditions, the range of motion of the fusion segment was significantly reduced. Compared to normal bone conditions, the ROM of the L4-L5 segment, the stress of the adjacent intervertebral disc, the surface stress of the cage, and the maximum stress of the posterior fixation system were all increased in osteoporosis. Under most loads, the ROM and surface stress of the cage and the maximum stress of the posterior fixation system of the TT-TT structure are the lowest under normal bone mineral density conditions. However, under osteoporotic conditions, the fixation strength of the CBT-CBT and CBT-TT structures are higher than that of the TT-TT structures under certain load conditions. At the same time, the surface stress of the intervertebral fusion cage and the maximum stress of the posterior fixation system for the two structures are lower than those of the TT-TT structure., Conclusion: Under normal bone mineral density conditions, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with TT-TT fixation provides the best biomechanictability. However, under osteoporotic conditions, CBT-CBT and CBT-TT structures have higher fixed strength compared to TT-TT structures. The hybrid CBT-TT structure exhibits advantages in minimal trauma and fixation strength. Therefore, this seems to be an alternative fixation method for patients with osteoporosis and degenerative spinal diseases., Clinical Significance: This study provides biomechanical support for the clinical application of hybrid CBT-TT structure for osteoporotic patients undergoing TLIF surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Intraoperative navigation increases the projected lifetime cancer risk in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
- Author
-
Striano BM, Crawford AM, Verhofste BP, Hresko AM, Hedequist DJ, Schoenfeld AJ, and Simpson AK
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Female, Male, Child, Retrospective Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surgery, Computer-Assisted adverse effects, Surgery, Computer-Assisted methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Exposure adverse effects, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced epidemiology, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced etiology, Scoliosis surgery, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
Background Context: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common condition, often requiring surgical correction. Computed tomography (CT) based navigation technologies, which rely on ionizing radiation, are increasingly being utilized for surgical treatment. Although this population is highly vulnerable to radiation, given their age and female predominance, there is little available information elucidating modeled iatrogenic cancer risk., Purpose: To model lifetime cancer risk associated with the use of intraoperative CT-based navigation for surgical treatment of AIS., Study Design/setting: This retrospective cross-sectional study took place in a quaternary care academic pediatric hospital in the United States., Patient Sample: Adolescents aged 10-18 who underwent posterior spinal fusion for a diagnosis of AIS between July 2014 and December 2019., Outcomes Measures: Effective radiation dose and projected lifetime cancer risk associated with intraoperative doses of ionizing radiation., Methods: Clinical and radiographic parameters were abstracted, including total radiation dose during surgery from flat plate radiographs, fluoroscopy, and intraoperative CT scans. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess differences in radiation exposure between patients treated with conventional radiography versus intraoperative navigation. Radiation exposure was translated into lifetime cancer risk using well-established algorithms., Results: In total, 245 patients were included, 119 of whom were treated with navigation. The cohort was 82.9% female and 14.4 years of age. The median radiation exposure (in millisieverts, mSv) for fluoroscopy, radiography, and navigation was 0.05, 4.14, and 8.19 mSv, respectively. When accounting for clinical and radiographic differences, patients treated with intraoperative navigation received 8.18 mSv more radiation (95%CI: 7.22-9.15, p<.001). This increase in radiation projects to 0.90 iatrogenic malignancies per 1,000 patients (95%CI 0.79-1.01)., Conclusions: Ours is the first work to define cancer risk in the setting of radiation exposure for navigated AIS surgery. We project that intraoperative navigation will generate approximately one iatrogenic malignancy for every 1,000 patients treated. Given that spine surgery for AIS is common and occurs in the context of a multitude of other radiation sources, these data highlight the need for radiation budgeting protocols and continued development of lower radiation dose technologies., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Improved intervertebral fusion in LLIF rabbit model with a novel titanium cage.
- Author
-
Li J, Zhao B, Wang W, Xu Y, Wu H, and Zhang W
- Subjects
- Animals, Rabbits, Female, Male, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2, Models, Animal, X-Ray Microtomography, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Titanium, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Bone Transplantation methods
- Abstract
Background Context: There is no established small animal approach model for the strict simulation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery., Purpose: This study aims to establish a reliable LLIF rabbit model that strictly simulates the procedure and to preliminarily evaluate the differences in fusion outcomes with different graft materials., Study Design: A controlled laboratory., Methods: Fifty-four 4-month-old white New Zealand female and male rabbits were selected and divided into five groups: Group A (dissection group) consisted of 9 rabbits, Group B (normal approach group) consisted of 9 rabbits, Group C (autogenous iliac bone group) consisted of 12 rabbits, Group D (BMP-2 carrier material group) consisted of 12 rabbits, and Group E (allograft bone group) consisted of 12 rabbits. Based on data from Group A, a novel titanium metal fusion device was designed. Postoperatively, at the 12-week mark, manual palpation was employed to compare the interbody fusion status among Groups B, C, D, and E. Specimens from Groups C, D, and E were subjected to Micro-CT scanning to compare various parameters such as trabecular bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV, BVF), and bone surface area (BS). Furthermore, a tissue histopathological examination was performed to observe the structure and morphology of newly formed bone within the fusion mass as well as the remodeling of the graft in each group., Results: Based on the measurements obtained from the dissection group, we designed a U-shaped interbody fusion device with dimensions of 10 mm in length, 2.5 mm in width, and 1.3 mm in height. In Group B, 9 cases exhibited intervertebral mobility. In Group C, 1 case showed nonfusion. In Group D, all cases achieved fusion. In Group E, 4 cases did not achieve fusion. Additionally, the Micro-CT results showed that the interbody fusion index scores were 4.64±0.50 in Group C, 4.33±0.65 in Group D, and 3.36±0.81 in Group E. There was no statistically significant difference in fusion index scores between Groups C and D (p=.853). Notably, Groups C and D had higher scores than Group E (p<.001). The trabecular bone volume (BV) in Groups C and D also showed no significant difference but was significantly higher than in Group E (p<.001). Furthermore, the histopathological results revealed that the specimens from Group E had less newly formed cartilage and bone compared to Groups C and D., Conclusions: This study successfully established a strict simulation of the clinical LLIF procedure in a rabbit model. Moreso, we conducted a preliminary validation indicating that the BMP-2 carrier material achieved interbody fusion outcomes similar to autogenous iliac bone., Clinical Significance: The findings of this investigation from animal models provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of BMP-2 to promote early spinal fusion in LLIF procedures. Importantly, the study provides a small animal model foundation for research related to LLIF surgery., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Optimal time window for initiating cefuroxime surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in spinal fusion surgery: a nested case-control study.
- Author
-
Zhang H, Zhao Y, Du Y, Yang Y, Zhang J, and Wang S
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage, Adult, Time Factors, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods, Surgical Wound Infection prevention & control, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Antibiotic Prophylaxis methods, Cefuroxime administration & dosage, Cefuroxime therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background Context: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the common complications following spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, several studies had shown conflicting results regarding optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Due to limitations in population homogeneity and sample size, these studies have not provided significant statistical correlations or clear practical recommendations., Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of timing of cefuroxime SAP on the risk of SSI in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, and to determine the optimal timing of administration., Design: Retrospective nested case-control study., Patient Sample: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021., Outcome Measure: In the current study, the primary outcome measure was SSI., Methods: This was a retrospective nested case-control study. All consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021 formed a retrospective cohort. For each SSI case, 2 controls free of SSI at the time of the index date of their corresponding case were selected, matched by age, sex, and calendar year. Electronic record and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively in electronic database. SAP related data included timing of administration, preoperative dose, intraoperative second dose, and postoperative use. To examine the effects of mismatched variables, we further adjusted for possible confounding factors using conditional logistic regression models. Subsequently, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the statistical associations., Results: According to the preplanned statistical scheme and matching factors, we matched 236 controls for these SSI cases, and the subsequent statistical analysis was performed on these 354 patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, the results indicated that the risk of SSI was 70% higher in the group receiving SAP 31 to 60 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=1.732, 95%CI 1.031-2.910, p=.038). Additionally, the risk of SSI was 150% higher in the group receiving SAP 61 to 120 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=2.532, 95%CI 1.250-5.128, p=.010). In subgroup analysis, this statistical trend persisted for both deformity surgeries and different SSI classifications., Conclusion: Administering cefuroxime SAP within 30 minutes before skin incision significantly reduces the risk of SSI, whether they are deep or superficial, in spinal fusion surgery. This pattern remains consistent among spinal deformity patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Letter to the editor regarding "MRI-based endplate bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" by Chen et al.
- Author
-
Mochizuki H, Tsukamoto M, Morimoto T, Hirata H, Yoshihara T, and Mawatari M
- Subjects
- Humans, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that may have influenced the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Letter to the editor regarding "Does the interfacing angle between pedicle screws and support rods affect clinical outcomes after posterior thoracolumbar fusion? A retrospective clinical study" by Noriega et al.
- Author
-
Yüzügüldü U and Erşen Ö
- Subjects
- Humans, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery, Pedicle Screws
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Exploring the impact of mild-to-moderate foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 on clinical outcomes following L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
- Author
-
Lee HR, Cho JH, Lee DH, Seok SY, Hwang CJ, and Lee CS
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Sacrum surgery, Sacrum diagnostic imaging, Pain Measurement, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Spinal Stenosis surgery
- Abstract
Background Context: Patients scheduled for L4-5 PLIF often have FS at L5-S1. However, data on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cases with mild-to-moderate L5-S1 FS are lacking, which may affect clinical outcomes or require additional surgery after L4-5 fusion., Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of L4-5 PLIF in patients with and without mild-to-moderate L5-S1 FS, with a primary focus on the association between L5-S1 FS and postoperative clinical outcomes including back pain, leg pain, and scores on the oswestry disability index (ODI) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D)., Study Design: Retrospective comparative study., Patient Sample: A retrospective review of patients who underwent L4-5 PLIF from 2014 to 2018. The patients were divided according to the presence of mild-to-moderate FS at L5-S1., Outcome Measures: Clinical assessment included the pain visual analog scale (VAS), ODI, and EQ-5D score. Radiographic assessments included spinopelvic parameters and grades for central and foraminal stenosis., Methods: Clinical outcomes were assessed using validated outcome measures at preoperative, 6-month, 12-month, and 36-month follow-up visits. Radiographic evaluations were performed using preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Foraminal stenosis was assessed qualitatively using MRI with a grading system from none to severe and quantitatively by measuring changes in the foraminal area on CT., Results: Among 186 patients, 55 were categorized as the FS group and 131 as the non-FS group. The FS group was older (p=0.039) and had more severe central stenosis at L5-S1 (p=0.007) as well as more severe FS at both L4-5 and L5-S1 (both p<0.001). Preoperative disc height (p<0.001), C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (p=0.003), lumbar lordosis (p=0.005), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (p=0.026) were more aggravated in the FS group. The FS group showed inferior clinical outcomes at the final follow-up in terms of back pain (p=.010) and ODI score (p=.003)., Conclusion: The presence of mild-to-moderate FS at L5-S1 was associated with more aggravated sagittal balance in terms of smaller preoperative disc height, larger sagittal vertical axis, smaller lumbar lordosis, and larger pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. Patients with L5-S1 FS also had poorer clinical outcomes including back pain and ODI score after L4-5 PLIF. Patients with L5-S1 FS need to be carefully examined before L4-5 fusion considering their adverse outcomes due to underlying degenerative changes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Reply to letter to the Editor regarding "Does the interfacing angle between pedicle screws and support rods affect clinical outcomes after posterior thoracolumbar fusion? A retrospective clinical study".
- Author
-
Noriega DC
- Subjects
- Humans, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Pedicle Screws adverse effects, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
- Author
-
Dat KO, Cher D, and Polly DW
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Male, Female, Adult, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Titanium, Pain Measurement, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods, Sacroiliac Joint surgery, Body Mass Index, Obesity surgery, Obesity complications
- Abstract
Background Context: Obesity is increasing. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between obesity and adverse events after lumbar fusion. There is limited evidence on the effect of obesity on minimally invasive SI joint fusion (SIJF) outcomes., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing SIJF surgery using triangular titanium implants (TTI)., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study based on four prospective clinical trials (INSITE [NCT01681004], SIFI [NCT01640353], iMIA [NCT01741025], and SALLY [NCT03122899])., Patient Sample: Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion between 2012 and 2021., Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS Pain), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)., Methods: Participants were classified using the National Institutes of Health body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI of 30 to 39 with no significant comorbidity are considered obese, patients with a BMI of 35 to 39 with a significant comorbidity or a BMI of 40 or greater are considered morbidly obese. All subjects underwent either minimally invasive SIJ fusion with TTI or nonsurgical management (INSITE and iMIA studies only). All subjects completed SIJ pain scale scores (measured with a 100-point VAS) and disability scores (measured with ODI) at baseline and at scheduled visits to 24 months. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the impact of BMI category on score changes., Results: In the SIJF group, mean SIJ pain improved at 24 months by 53.3 points (p<.0001). Over the 24-month follow-up period, BMI category did not impact mean improvement in SIJ pain scale score (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) p=.44). In the SIJF group, mean ODI at 24 months improved by 25.8 points (p<.0001). BMI category did not impact mean improvement in ODI (ANOVA p=.60). In the nonsurgical management (NSM) group, mean improvements in SIJ pain scale and ODI were clinically small (8.7 and 5.2 points, respectively) and not affected by BMI category (ANOVA p=.49 and .40)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates similar benefits and risks of minimally invasive SIJ fusion with TTI across all BMI categories. This analysis suggests that obese patients benefit from minimally invasive SIJ fusion and should not be denied this procedure based solely on elevated BMI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review].
- Author
-
Anwar FN, Roca AM, Loya AC, Medakkar SS, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Lopez GD, and Singh K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Mental Health, Spinal Fusion methods, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
No study has evaluated the preoperative impact of Veterans RAND-12 Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) on anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) patients. This study examines its influence on physical function, mental health, pain, and disability outcomes. Two cohorts of ALIF patients with preoperative VR-12 PCS scores were formed using a single-surgeon registry: VR-12 PCS < 30 and VR-12 PCS ≥ 30. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. PROMs of VR-12 PCS/Mental Composite Score (MCS), Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS/MCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale-Back/Leg Pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected pre/postoperatively up to 2-years. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and preoperative PROMs were compared. Intercohort postoperative 6-week/final PROMs and improvements were compared. Of 80 patients, there were 41 in the VR-12 PCS < 30 cohort. Besides VR-12 PCS, VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior preoperative VR-12 MCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9/ODI scores (p ≤ 0.003, all). At 6-weeks postoperatively, VR-12 PCS < 30 reported inferior VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.030, all). There was greater improvement up to 6-weeks postoperatively in VR-12 PCS < 30 for VR-12 PCS/MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.020, all). VR-12 PCS < 30 reported superior improvement by final follow-up in VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.006, all). MCID achievement rates were higher in VR-12 PCS < 30 for PHQ-9 and ODI (p ≤ 0.013, both). VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior postoperative physical function, mental health, and disability, yet superior magnitude of improvement in physical function and mental health. Rates of clinically meaningful improvement for VR-12 PCS < 30 were greater in mental health and disability., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Response to letter to the editor regarding, "MRI-based endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion".
- Author
-
Ai Y, Chen Q, Zhu C, and Liu L
- Subjects
- Humans, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Spinal Fusion methods, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Safety and benefit of ambulation within 24 hours in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion: propensity score matching study of 882 patients.
- Author
-
Wang SK, Li YJ, Wang P, Li XY, Kong C, Ma J, and Lu SB
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Female, Male, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Patient Readmission statistics & numerical data, Spinal Fusion methods, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Early Ambulation statistics & numerical data, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Propensity Score, Length of Stay statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background Context: Elderly patients are less likely to recover from lumbar spine fusion (LSF) as rapidly compared with younger patients. However, there is still a lack of research on the effect of early ambulation on elderly patients undergoing LSF surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders., Purpose: To evaluate the safety and benefit of ambulation within 24 hours in elderly patients who underwent LSF., Study Design: A retrospective study., Patient Sample: Consecutive patients (aged 65 and older) who underwent elective transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for degenerative disorders from January 2019 to October 2022., Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included postoperative complications, postoperative drainage (mL), laboratory test data, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission and reoperation within 3 months., Methods: Early ambulation patients (ambulation within 24 hours after surgery) were propensity-score matched 1:1 to a delayed ambulation patients (ambulation at a minimum of 48 hours postoperatively) based on age, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fused segments. The incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs, including rates of complications, readmission, and prolonged LOS) and the average LOS were used to assess the safety and benefit of early ambulation, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the association between early ambulation and postoperative AEs. The risk factors for delayed ambulation were also determined using multivariable logistic analyses., Results: A total of 998 patients with LSF surgery were reviewed in this study. After excluding 116 patients for various reasons, 882 patients (<24 hours: N=350, 24-48 hours: N=230, and >48 hours: N= 302) were included in the final analysis. After matching, sex, BMI, preoperative comorbidities, laboratory test data and surgery-related variables were comparable between the groups. The incidence of postoperative AEs was significantly lower in the EA group (44.3% vs 64.0%, p<.001). The average postoperative LOS of the EA group was 2 days shorter than the DA group (6.5 days vs 8.5 days, p<.001). Patients in the EA group had a significantly lower rate of prolonged LOS compared with the DA group (35.1% vs 55.3%, p<.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volumes between the two groups. Multivariable analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, p<.001), increased intraoperative EBL (OR 1.002, p=.001), and higher international normalization ratio (OR 10.57, p=.032) as significant independent risk factors for delayed ambulation., Conclusions: Ambulation within 24 hours after LSF surgery is independently associated fewer AEs and shorter hospital stays in elderly patients. Implementing the goal of ambulation within 24 hours after LSF surgery into enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for elderly patients seems appropriate. Older age, increased intraoperative blood loss and worse coagulation function are associated with delayed ambulation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Torque forces of expandable titanium vertebral body replacement cages during expansion and subsidence in the osteoporotic lumbar spine.
- Author
-
Sircar K, Weber M, Walter SG, Ott N, Prescher A, Eysel P, and Kernich N
- Subjects
- Humans, Vertebral Body, Torque, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Prostheses and Implants, Titanium, Spinal Fusion
- Abstract
Background: The application of expandable titanium-cages has gained widespread use in vertebral body replacement for indications such as burst fractures, tumors and infectious destruction. However, torque forces necessary for a satisfactory expansion of these implants and for subsidence of them into the adjacent vertebrae are unknown within the osteoporotic spine., Methods: Six fresh-frozen human, osteoporotic, lumbar spines were dorsally instrumented with titanium implants (L2-L4) and a partial corpectomy of L3 was performed. An expandable titanium-cage was inserted ventrally and expanded by both residents and senior surgeons until fixation was deemed sufficient, based on haptic feedback. Torque forces for expansion were measured in Nm. Expansion was then continued until cage subsidence occurred. Torque forces necessary for subsidence were recorded. Strain of the dorsal rods during expansion was measured with strain gauges., Findings: The mean torque force for fixation of cages was 1.17 Nm (0.9 Nm for residents, 1.4 Nm for senior surgeons, p = .06). The mean torque force for subsidence of cages was 3.1 Nm (p = .005). Mean peak strain of the dorsal rods was 970 μm/m during expansion and 1792 μm/m at subsidence of cages (p = .004)., Interpretation: The use of expandable titanium-cages for vertebral body replacement seems to be a primarily safe procedure even within the osteoporotic spine as torque forces required for subsidence of cages are nearly three times higher than those needed for fixation. Most of the expansion load is absorbed by straining of the dorsal instrumentation. Rod materials other than titanium may alter the torque forces found in this study., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Wang X, Li HX, Zhu QS, and Zhu YH
- Subjects
- Humans, Fluoroscopy methods, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Retrospective Studies, Pedicle Screws, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Robotics, Scoliosis surgery, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023471837). Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The outcomes included operation time, pedicle screw implantation time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopic, accuracy of pedicle screw position, hospital stays, postoperative hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Scoliosis Research Society-22(SRS-22), cobb angle, cobb angle correction rate, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and complications. Eight papers involving 473 patients met all the criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the reduction in operation time. The effect of reducing the pedicle screw implantation time in the RA group was significant (WMD = -1.28; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.80; P < 0.00001). The effect of reducing the blood loss in the RA group was significant (WMD=-105.57; 95% CI: -206.84 to -4.31; P = 0.04). The effect of reducing the number of fluoroscopic in the RA group was significant (WMD=-5.93; 95% CI: -8.24 to -3.62; P < ). The pedicle screw position of Grade A was significantly more in the RA group according to both the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and the Rampersaud scale. Compared with the FA group, the difference in the hospital stays in the RA group was not statistically significant, but the effect of reducing the postoperative hospital stays in the RA group was significant (WMD = -2.88; 95% CI: -4.13 to -1.63; P < 0.00001). The difference in the VAS, JOA, SRS-22, Cobb angle and Cobb angle correction rate, SVA, and complications between the two groups was not statistically significant. The robot-assisted technique achieved statistically significant results in terms of pedicle screw placement time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, accuracy of pedicle screw position, and postoperative hospital stay., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Mechano-driven intervertebral bone bridging via oriented mechanical stimulus in a twist metamaterial cage: An in silico study.
- Author
-
Huo M, He S, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Liu M, Zhou G, Zhou P, and Lu J
- Subjects
- Osteogenesis, Lumbar Vertebrae, Biomechanical Phenomena, Prostheses and Implants, Spinal Fusion
- Abstract
Stiffer cages provide sufficient mechanical support but fail to promote bone ingrowth due to stress shielding. It remains challenging for fusion cage to satisfy both bone bridging and mechanical stability. Here we designed a fusion cage based on twist metamaterial for improved bone ingrowth, and proved its superiority to the conventional diagonal-based cage in silico. The fusion process was numerically reproduced via an injury-induced osteogenesis model and the mechano-driven bone remodeling algorithm, and the outcomes fusion effects were evaluated by the morphological features of the newly-formed bone and the biomechanical behaviors of the bone-cage composite. The twist-based cages exhibited oriented bone formation in the depth direction, in comparison to the diagonal-based cages. The axial stiffness of the bone-cage composites with twist-based cages was notably higher than that with diagonal-based cages; meanwhile, the ranges of motion of the twist-based fusion segment were lower. It was concluded that the twist metamaterial cages led to oriented bone ingrowth, superior mechanical stability of the bone-cage composite, and less detrimental impacts on the adjacent bones. More generally, metamaterials with a tunable displacement mode of struts might provide more design freedom in implant designs to offer customized mechanical stimulus for osseointegration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Biomechanical analysis of complications following T10-Pelvis spinal fusion: A population based computational study.
- Author
-
Nguyen AQ, Rodriguez C, Kumar R, Gupta S, Anderson DE, and Saifi C
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Thoracic Vertebrae, Pelvis, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Kyphosis, Spinal Curvatures
- Abstract
Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are challenging complications of long fusion constructs for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. The objective of this study is to understand the biomechanical stresses proximal to the upper instrumentation of a T10-pelvis fusion in a large patient cohort. The pre-fusion models were subject-specific thoracolumbar spine models that incorporate the height, weight, spine curvature, and muscle morphology of 250 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study Multidetector CT Study. To create post-fusion models, the subject-specific models were further modified to eliminate motion between the intervertebral joints from T10 to the pelvis. OpenSim analysis tools were used to calculate the medial lateral shear force, anterior posterior shear force, and compressive force on the T9 vertebra during the static postures. Differences between pre-fusion and post-fusion T9 biomechanics were consistent between increased segmental mobility and unchanged segmental mobility conditions. For all static postures, compression decreased (p < 0. 0005). Anterior-posterior shear force significantly increased (p < 0. 0005) during axial twist and significantly increased (p < 0. 0005) during trunk flexion. Medial lateral shear force significantly increased (p < 0. 0005) during axial twist. This computational study provided the first use of subject-specific models to investigate the biomechanics of long spinal fusions. Patients undergoing T10-Pelvis fusion were predicted to have increased shear forces and decreased compressive force at the T9 vertebra, independent of change in segmental mobility. The computational model shows potential for the investigation of spinal fusion biomechanics to reduce the risk of PJK or PJF., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Impact of osteoporosis and Cement-Augmented fusion on adjacent spinal levels Post-Fusion Surgery: Patient-Specific finite element analysis.
- Author
-
Khalaf K, Nikkhoo M, Shams S, Niu CC, and Cheng CH
- Subjects
- Humans, Finite Element Analysis, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Bone Cements, Biomechanical Phenomena, Osteoporosis surgery, Spinal Fusion adverse effects
- Abstract
Cement-augmentation is a technique commonly used during posterior lumbar instrumented fusion (PLIF) to reinforce compromised osteoporotic vertebral bone, minimize the risk of loosening screws, enhance stability, and improve overall surgical outcomes. In this study, we introduce a novel segmented vertebral body regional modeling approach to investigate the effects of osteoporosis and cement-augmented lumbar fusion on disc biomechanics at spinal levels adjacent to the fused vertebrae. Using our previously validated personalized-poroelastic-osteoligamentous FE model of the spine, fusion was simulated at L4-L5, and the biomechanics of adjacent levels were studied for 30 patients (non-osteoporotic patients (N = 15), osteoporotic patients (N = 15)). PLIF models, with and without cement-augmentation, were developed and compared after an 8 h-rest period (200 N), following a 16 h-cyclic compressive loading of 500-1000 N (40 and 20 min, respectively). Movement in different directions (flexion/ extension/ lateral bending/ axial rotation) was simulated using 10Nm moment before and after cyclic loading. The material mapping algorithm was validated by comparing the results of voxel-based and parametric models. The FE cement-augmented models, subject to daily activity loading, demonstrated significant differences in disc height loss and fluid loss as compared to non-cemented models. The calculated axial stress and fiber strain values were also significantly higher for these models. This work demonstrates that although osteoporosis does not significantly alter the time-dependent characteristics of adjacent IVDs post-surgery, cement-augmentation increases the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD) incidence. A holistic understanding of the trade-offs and long-term complex interplay between structural reinforcement modalities, including cement augmentation, and altered biomechanics warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Plastic surgeon closure is comparable to orthopedic closure when a perioperative optimization protocol is instituted for pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.
- Author
-
Grush AE, Mohan VE, Roy MG, Burns HR, and Monson LA
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Surgical Wound Infection etiology, Surgical Wound Infection prevention & control, Retrospective Studies, Scoliosis etiology, Orthopedics, Surgeons, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
Background Context: Since 2015, plastic multilayer closure (PMC) has been gaining attraction due to improved wound healing outcomes for medically complex patients. Plastic multilayer closure has been readily used for complex spine surgery closures in patients susceptible to wound healing issues (ie, dehiscence, surgical site infection [SSI]). However, PMC requires extensive soft tissue manipulation compared with standard orthopedic spine surgeon closure (SOC) and can result in extended operative times, increased transfusion rates, and more frequent returns to the operating room., Purpose: From 2016 to 2019, our institution implemented a perioperative protocol designed to decrease postoperative complication rates in NMS patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed to determine if PMC imparted advantages over SOC above and beyond that from the perioperative protocol., Study Design/setting: Retrospective study at a single academic institution., Patient Sample: Eighty-one pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing spinal fixation surgery., Outcome Measures: Postoperative wound complications such as surgical site infection, hematoma, and superficial/deep dehiscence were the main outcome measures. Respiratory and neuromuscular complications along with duration of surgery were also recorded., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of NMS patients undergoing spinal fixation at a single academic pediatric hospital over 4 years. Cases were labeled as SOC (n=41) or PMC (n=40) based on the closure technique applied. Reported 90-day complications were evaluated as the primary outcome., Results: Of the 81 reviewed patients, 45 reported complications, roughly equal between the study groups. While we found no statistically significant differences in rates of postoperative complications or SSIs, SOC cases were 30 minutes shorter on average with fewer returns to the operating room for additional surgery., Conclusions: With the implementation of our perioperative protocol for NMS patients, PMC did not result in fewer complications than SOC but the surgeries did take longer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Comparing the osteogenesis outcomes of different lumbar interbody fusions (A/O/X/T/PLIF) by evaluating their mechano-driven fusion processes.
- Author
-
Lu T, Sun Z, Xia H, Qing J, Rashad A, Lu Y, and He X
- Subjects
- Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbosacral Region, Osteogenesis, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
Background: In lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), achieving proper fusion status requires osteogenesis to occur in the disc space. Current LIF techniques, including anterior, oblique, lateral, transforaminal, and posterior LIF (A/O/X/T/PLIF), may result in varying osteogenesis outcomes due to differences in biomechanical characteristics., Methods: A mechano-regulation algorithm was developed to predict the fusion processes of A/O/X/T/PLIF based on finite element modeling and iterative evaluations of the mechanobiological activities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their differentiated cells (osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts). Fusion occurred in the grafting region, and each differentiated cell type generated the corresponding tissue proportional to its concentration. The corresponding osteogenesis volume was calculated by multiplying the osteoblast concentration by the grafting volume., Results: TLIF and ALIF achieved markedly greater osteogenesis volumes than did PLIF and O/XLIF (5.46, 5.12, 4.26, and 3.15 cm
3 , respectively). Grafting volume and cage size were the main factors influencing the osteogenesis outcome in patients treated with LIF. A large grafting volume allowed more osteoblasts (bone tissues) to be accommodated in the disc space. A small cage size reduced the cage/endplate ratio and therefore decreased the stiffness of the LIF. This led to a larger osteogenesis region to promote osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs and osteoblast proliferation (bone regeneration), which subsequently increased the bone fraction in the grafting space., Conclusion: TLIF and ALIF produced more favorable biomechanical environments for osteogenesis than did PLIF and O/XLIF. A small cage and a large grafting volume improve osteogenesis by facilitating osteogenesis-related cell activities driven by mechanical forces., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Primary anterior lumbar interbody fusion, with and without posterior instrumentation: a 1,377-patient cohort from a multicenter spine registry.
- Author
-
Laiwalla AN, Chang RN, Harary M, Salek SA, Richards HG, Brara HS, Hirt D, Harris JE, Terterov S, Tabaraee E, and Rahman SU
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Adolescent, Retrospective Studies, Reoperation, Lumbosacral Region surgery, Treatment Outcome, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
Background Context: Lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques are common and effective surgical options for a variety of lumbar degenerative pathologies. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become a versatile and powerful means of decompression, stabilization, and reconstruction. As an anterior only technique, the integrity of the posterior muscle and ligaments remain intact. Adding posterior instrumentation to ALIF is common and may confer benefits in terms of higher fusion rate but could contribute to adjacent segment degeneration due to additional rigidity. Large clinical studies comparing stand-alone ALIF with and without posterior supplementary fixation (ALIF+PSF) are lacking., Purpose: To compare rates of operative nonunion and adjacent segment disease (ASD) in ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Patient Sample: Adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent primary ALIF for lumbar degenerative pathology between levels L4 to S1 over a 12-year period. Exclusion criteria included trauma, cancer, infection, supplemental decompression, noncontiguous fusions, prior lumbar fusions, and other interbody devices., Outcome Measures: Reoperation for nonunion and ASD compared between ALIF only and ALIF+PSF., Methods: Reoperations were modeled as time-to-events where the follow-up time was defined as the difference between the primary ALIF procedure and the date of the outcome of interest. Crude cumulative reoperation probabilities were reported at 5-years follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate risk of operative nonunion and for ASD adjusting for patient characteristics., Results: The study consisted of 1,377 cases; 307 ALIF only and 1070 ALIF+PSF. Mean follow-up time was 5.6 years. The 5-year crude nonunion incidence was 2.4% for ALIF only and 0.5% for ALIF+PSF; after adjustment for covariates, a lower operative nonunion risk was observed for ALIF+PSF (HR=0.22, 95% CI=0.06-0.76). Of the patients who are deemed potentially suitable for ALIF alone, one would need to add posterior instrumentation in 53 patients to prevent one case of operative nonunion at a 5-year follow-up (number needed to treat). Five-year operative ASD incidence was 4.3% for ALIF only and 6.2% for ALIF+PSF; with adjustments, no difference was observed between the cohorts (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.71)., Conclusions: While the addition of posterior instrumentation in ALIFs is associated with lower risk of operative nonunion compared with ALIF alone, operative nonunion is rare in both techniques (<5%). Accordingly, surgeons should evaluate the added risks associated with the addition of posterior instrumentation and reserve the supplemental posterior fixation for patients that might be at higher risk for operative nonunion. Rates of operative ASD were not statistically higher with the addition of posterior instrumentation suggesting concern regarding future risk of ASD perhaps should not play a role in considering supplemental posterior instrumentation in ALIF., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Reply to letter to the editor regarding "Wound drain in lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative disease: an experimental, multicenter, randomized controlled trial".
- Author
-
Molina M
- Subjects
- Humans, Drainage, Spinal Fusion
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery.
- Author
-
Hu YX, Yang R, Liu SM, and Wang H
- Subjects
- Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Treatment Outcome, Bibliometrics, Spinal Fusion, Spondylolisthesis surgery
- Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis to examine the current condition, areas of interest, and rising trends of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery (TLIF), as well as its importance in associated research domains., Materials and Methods: An extensive collection of academic papers on the use of TLIF was obtained from the Web of Science between January 1, 2000, and November 5, 2023. Then, using a variety of tools like HisCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix package, a bibliometric study was carried out. This study included the collection of information on country, institution, author, journal, and keywords., Results: A comprehensive analysis was undertaken on a total of 1,907 publications obtained from 181 journals, encompassing the contributions of 7,232 authors affiliated with 1,775 institutes spanning 57 countries/regions. Notably, the USA exhibited the highest number of publications, with 763 (40.03%) articles on TLIF. The most productive institution was Rush University, with 96 (5.03%) publications. The author with the highest publication output was Singh, Kern with 75 (3.93%) publications. World Neurosurgery demonstrated the highest level of productivity, having published a total of 211 (11.06%) articles. The most frequently used keywords were "TLIF", "spondylolisthesis" and "complication". Meanwhile, "workflow", "technical note" and "hidden blood loss" have been identified as the research frontiers for the forthcoming years., Conclusions: This paper provides a thorough evaluation of current research trends and advancements in TLIF. It includes relevant research findings and emphasizes collaborative efforts among authors, institutions, and countries.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Defining the Post-Operative Progression of Degenerative Scoliosis: An Analysis of Cases without Instrument Failure.
- Author
-
Jha R, Chalif JI, Yearley AG, Chalif E, and Zaidi HA
- Subjects
- Animals, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Scoliosis diagnostic imaging, Scoliosis surgery, Scoliosis etiology, Spinal Fusion methods, Lordosis diagnostic imaging, Lordosis surgery, Lordosis etiology, Kyphosis surgery
- Abstract
Objective: The expected post-operative changes in radiographic alignment over time remain poorly defined in patients surgically treated for degenerative scoliosis without instrument failure. Here we aim to describe the optimal natural progression of radiographic degenerative scoliosis at multiple timepoints in patients treated with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)., Methods: We identified an initial retrospective cohort of 114 patients treated with a TLIF for degenerative scoliosis between 2018 and 2022, with 39 patients ultimately meeting the imaging inclusion criteria. Patients who completed a primary or revision procedure with no evidence of instrument failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, or proximal junctional failure at last follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements of spinopelvic alignment were manually extracted from X-Ray scoliosis films., Results: Thirty-nine patients (mean age 62.6 ± 8.7, mean follow-up 2.9 years), of which 23 underwent a primary TLIF (Primary) and 16 a revision procedure (Revision), were analyzed. Patients in the Primary group experienced a durable improvement in Thoracolumbar Cobb angle (-25° ± 15°), Thoracic Kyphosis (10° ± 13°), and Pelvic Incidence/lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL) (-19° ± 19°) through the first year of follow-up. In the Revision group, at one year follow-up, all measures of spinopelvic alignment except PI/LL mismatch had reverted to pre-operative levels. Thoracolumbar Cobb angle decreased to a significantly greater degree in the Primary group compared to the Revision group., Conclusion: Primary TLIF operations without instrument failure consistently improve radiographic outcomes in three key measures through the first year. For revision procedures, there appears to be modest radiographic benefit at follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. There were no funders for this project., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Clinical role of crosslink augmentation during short-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.
- Author
-
Okamoto N, Okazaki R, Azuma S, and Oshima Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Propensity Score, Treatment Outcome, Bone Screws, Lumbar Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Lumbosacral Region surgery, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
We investigated the clinical role of crosslink augmentation during PLIF with total facetectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 376 patients who underwent one- or two-segment PLIF with unilateral or bilateral total facetectomy between January 2017 and March 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on whether a crosslink was instrumented or not. Radiological outcome measurements included fusion status and implant failure rates on 12-month postoperative computed tomography. Patient-reported outcome measures included the Numerical Rating Scale for lower back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary scores, which were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Surgery-related complications included surgical site infection, symptomatic implant failure, and epidural hematoma. Propensity score matching was performed to compare both groups after adjusting for confounding factors, including baseline and surgical procedural characteristics. A total of 200 cases were included in the propensity score calculation, and one-to-one matching was performed, resulting in 56 pairs with and without a crosslink. The fusion status (88.7 % vs. 85.5 %), screw loosening (14.3 % vs. 14.3 %), cage subsidence (17.9 % vs. 16.1 %), and cage dislodgement (5.4 % vs. 0 %) showed no significant difference between those with and without a crosslink, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the patient-reported outcomes or surgery-related complication rates between the groups. Crosslink augmentation during PLIF with total facetectomy is not recommended because it does not provide any radiological or clinical benefit and is associated with avoidable expenses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. [Selection of posterior fixation segments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
- Author
-
Du JP and He BR
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Quality of Life, Thoracic Vertebrae surgery, Retrospective Studies, Radiography, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies, Scoliosis surgery, Spinal Fusion methods, Kyphosis surgery
- Abstract
With the further understanding of the concept of three-dimensional correction by spinal surgeons, the progress of internal fixation instruments, de-rotation tools and the improvement of surgical techniques, the scientific formulation of surgical strategies for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has gradually become the focus of controversy. The formulation of preoperative surgical strategy not only directly affects the correction of deformity and balance reconstruction, but also is directly related to the activity function of spine and the quality of life of patients after operation. Therefore, this paper will discuss from three aspects: the method of surgical fixation, the surgical approach and the selection of fixed vertebrae. The author believes that Risser sign should be taken as an important consideration to judge the method of surgical fixation. The choice of surgical approach must refer to the operator's familiarity and experience with the approach, grasp the adaptive signs and consider the risks and benefits of the operation, and choose the appropriate surgical approach according to the needs of different patients. The choice of fixed vertebrae, choosing upper end vertebra (UEV) as upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), is safer than the more radical upper end vertebra-1 (UEV-1), and five factors need to be combined in the specific selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV).
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Letter to the editor regarding "Lateral decubitus single position anterior posterior surgery improves operative efficiency, improves perioperative outcomes, and maintains radiological outcomes comparable with traditional anterior posterior fusion at minimum 2-year follow-up" by Buckland et al.
- Author
-
Pan SH, Wu YC, and Pan CC
- Subjects
- Humans, Follow-Up Studies, Treatment Outcome, Radiography, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Retrospective Studies, Radiology, Spinal Fusion
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Decreasing implant load indicates spinal fusion when measured continuously.
- Author
-
Heumann M, Benneker LM, Constant C, Ernst M, Richards RG, Wilke HJ, Gueorguiev B, and Windolf M
- Subjects
- Humans, Animals, Sheep, Lumbar Vertebrae surgery, Biomechanical Phenomena, Range of Motion, Articular, Spinal Fusion, Pedicle Screws
- Abstract
Reliable and timely assessment of bone union between vertebrae is considered a key challenge after spinal fusion surgery. Recently, a novel sensor concept demonstrated the ability to objectively assess posterolateral fusion based on continuous implant load monitoring. The aim of this study was to investigate systematically the concept in a mono-segmental fusion model using an updated sensor setup. Three sheep underwent bilateral facetectomy at level L2-L3 and L4-L5. The segments were stabilized using two unconnected pedicle-screw-rod constructs per level. Sensing devices were attached to the rods between each pedicle screw pair and the loads were continuously monitored over 16 weeks. After euthanasia, the spines were biomechanically tested for their range of motion and high-resolution CT scans were performed to confirm the fusion success. After an initial increase in implant load until reaching a maximum (100 %) at approximately week 4, eleven out of twelve sensors measured a constant decrease in implant load to 52 ± 9 % at euthanasia. One sensor measurement was compromised by newly forming bone growing against the sensor clamp. Bridging bone at each facet and minor remnant segmental motion (<0.7°) confirmed the fusion of all motion segments. Data obtained by continuous measurement of implant loading of spinal screw-rod constructs enables objective monitoring of spinal fusion progression. The sensor concept provides valuable real-time information, offering quantifiable data as an alternative to traditional imaging techniques. However, the design of the current sensor concept needs to be matured, tailored to, and validated for the human spine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis.
- Author
-
Jiang W, Zhao F, Rahman WU, Dong T, and Yang G
- Subjects
- Humans, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Diskectomy methods, Finite Element Analysis, Range of Motion, Articular, Artificial Limbs, Intervertebral Disc surgery, Spinal Fusion methods, Total Disc Replacement
- Abstract
In recent years, artificial cervical discs have been used in intervertebral disc replacement surgery and hybrid surgery (HS). The advantages and disadvantages of different artificial cervical discs in artificial cervical disc replacement surgery have been compared. However, few scholars have studied the biomechanical effects of various artificial disc prostheses on the human cervical spine in HS which include the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA). This study compared the biomechanical behavior of Mobi-C and Prestige LP in the operative and adjacent segments during two-level hybrid surgery. A three-dimensional finite element model of C2-C7 was first established and validated. Subsequently, clinical surgery was then simulated to establish a surgical model of anterior cervical fusion at the C4-C5 level. Mobi-C and Prestige-LP artificial disc prostheses were implanted at the C5-C6 level to create two hybrid models. All finite element models were fixed on the lower endplate of the C7 vertebra and subjected to a load of 73.6 N and different directions of 1 Nm torque on the odontoid process of the C2 vertebra to simulate human flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. This paper compares the ROM, intervertebral pressure, and facet joint force after hybrid surgery with the intact model. The results show that compared with Prestige LP, Mobi-C can improve ROM of the replacement segment and compensate for the intervertebral pressure of the adjacent segment more effectively, but the facet joint pressure of the replacement segment may be higher., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Comparative effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Shang, Qisong, Luan, Haopeng, Peng, Cong, and Song, Xinghua
- Subjects
LUMBAR vertebrae surgery ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,STATISTICAL models ,PAIN measurement ,RESEARCH funding ,COMPACT bone ,BONE screws ,POSTOPERATIVE pain ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,META-analysis ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,SURGICAL blood loss ,FUNCTIONAL status ,CHI-squared test ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,MEDLINE ,SURGICAL complications ,ODDS ratio ,SPINAL fusion ,MEDICAL databases ,ONLINE information services ,DATA analysis software ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,LENGTH of stay in hospitals ,BACKACHE - Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion. Methods: This study was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42023484937). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database by computer to collect controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion from database establishment to November 2023. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, recorded the authors, and sample size, and extracted the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Visual analogue scale (VAS), disc height (DH), hospital length stay and complications in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library. Results: A total of 6 cohort studies (CS) and 1 randomized controlled study with a total of 420 patients were included in this study, including 188 patients in the CBT group and 232 patients in the PS group. The CBT group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the PS group [mean difference (MD) = -129.38, 95% CI (-177.22, -81.55), P < 0.00001] and operation time was shorter than that of the PS group [MD = -1.42, 95% CI (-2.63, -0.20), P = 0.02]. Early postoperative back and leg pain improved more significantly in the CBT group [MD = -0.77, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.19), P = 0.01; MD = -0.24, 95% CI (-0.37, -0.10), P = 0.0005]. Conclusion: Compared with PS, CBT for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and less back and leg pain in the early postoperative period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Chest tube management following two row vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
- Author
-
James, Leslie, O'Connell, Brooke, De Varona-Cocero, Abel, Robertson, Djani, Zervos, Michael, Cerfolio, Robert J., Chang, Stephanie, Bizekis, Costas, and Rodriguez-Olaverri, Juan Carlos
- Subjects
EMERGENCY room visits ,ADOLESCENT idiopathic scoliosis ,LENGTH of stay in hospitals ,BODY mass index ,SPINAL fusion ,CHEST tubes - Abstract
The current gold standard of scoliosis correction procedures is still posterior spinal fusion, an extensively studied procedure. anterior vertebral body tethering is a newer surgical technique for the correction of scoliotic curves. Consequently, best practices have yet to be determined. A single-institution, retrospective, review of all patients diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent two row anterior vertebral body tethering between June 2020 and April 2022 was performed. Over the study period, 95 patients met inclusion: 79 females (83.2%) and 16 males (16.8%), age 14.4 ± 2.5 years, with a body mass index of 20.0 ± 2.9, and an average of 8.4 ± 2.1 levels treated. 28 (29.5%) procedures were for double curves and 67 (70.5%) for single curves. After tethering, a chest tube was positioned in each corrected side. A total of 123 chest tubes were analyzed, including 67 single curves and 28 double curves. The average chest tube duration was 2.5 ± 1.1 days and the average length of stay was 5.0 ± 2.0 days. The average chest tube output eight hours prior to removal was 61.1 ± 45.6 mL. There was no significant difference in average length of stay for patients who underwent correction of a single curve versus a double curve nor was there a difference in average length of stay or chest tube duration for revisions compared to primary procedures. For the entire cohort, the 30-day emergency department visit rate was 7.4% (n = 7) and the readmission rate was 4.2% (n = 4). This early review of a 2-year two row vertebral body tethering postoperative experience provides a report of a safe and effective approach to chest tube management at a single academic center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.