Search

Background: Research publication is an important aspect of academic life as it aids in career progression. A high volume of publications by Indian authors is found in questionable journals. In 2020, the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India modified the list of accepted bibliographic databases, with one significant change being the exclusion of Index Copernicus. Our research question focused on whether this change had any impact on the publication patterns in questionable journals. Aim: This study aimed to observe the number of publications in the questionable journal before and after the change in the accepted database by the NMC. Methods: We prepared a final list of 12 questionable journals using extensive criteria to classify a journal as questionable. The journal issues from 2015 to 2022 were scrutinized to determine the number of original research articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, editorials, and letters to the editor. Results: There was a gradual increase in the percentage of publications from 2015 to 2018, followed by a plateau that lasted for three years (2018–2020). However, there was a sudden decrease in publication numbers in 2021, reaching its lowest point in 2022 (χ2 [7] = 658.2, P < 0.0001). The majority of the articles were original research articles (94.54%), while only 3.27% of publications consisted of case reports and 1.45% were review articles. It is noteworthy that none of the journals published any editorials or letters to the editor. Conclusion: A change in the accepted bibliographical database by the NMC may be one of the reasons for the decline in publications in questionable journals. It is important for stakeholders to prioritize the promotion of sound research output from medical institutions rather than solely focusing on the number of publications. In this article, we have presented a holistic approach to address this issue.

This article offers an overview of the history and current status of the journal Religion (Routledge). Its authors have co-edited the journal since 2008. It reviews aspects of the journal's history and its profile as a generalist, international disciplinary journal in the study of religion/s. It offers bibliometric overview of the journal, in comparison with 49 other SoR journals, followed by a discussion of journals as business venues and of changes brought about by Open Access, including challenges posed by new publishers and new types of (mega)journals. The article concludes with reflection on the peer review process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Research publication is an important aspect of academic life as it aids in career progression. A high volume of publications by Indian authors is found in questionable journals. In 2020, the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India modified the list of accepted bibliographic databases, with one significant change being the exclusion of Index Copernicus. Our research question focused on whether this change had any impact on the publication patterns in questionable journals. Aim: This study aimed to observe the number of publications in the questionable journal before and after the change in the accepted database by the NMC. Methods: We prepared a final list of 12 questionable journals using extensive criteria to classify a journal as questionable. The journal issues from 2015 to 2022 were scrutinized to determine the number of original research articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, editorials, and letters to the editor. Results: There was a gradual increase in the percentage of publications from 2015 to 2018, followed by a plateau that lasted for three years (2018-2020). However, there was a sudden decrease in publication numbers in 2021, reaching its lowest point in 2022 (χ2 [7] = 658.2, P < 0.0001). The majority of the articles were original research articles (94.54%), while only 3.27% of publications consisted of case reports and 1.45% were review articles. It is noteworthy that none of the journals published any editorials or letters to the editor. Conclusion: A change in the accepted bibliographical database by the NMC may be one of the reasons for the decline in publications in questionable journals. It is important for stakeholders to prioritize the promotion of sound research output from medical institutions rather than solely focusing on the number of publications. In this article, we have presented a holistic approach to address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How do we engage creatively with archives, in addition to or alongside reading for 'historical evidence' or beyond the usual discovery-recovery paradigm, giving ourselves fictional or speculative permissions? This coda thinks about embodied research, performance as publishing, feminist and queer avant-garde legacies, taking up the work of small-press editors and contributors, and bringing that work into mediated circulation again, in a form of homage and even performative séance. How can artworks archive intimacy and desire? Para-fictional, para-academic, and speculative forms of research and creative practice can act as playful and rigorous enquiries into how we read or 'use' the past. Reading becomes a form of listening and engaging with other voices on the page. It is about making (new) work happen rather than historicise it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From 1975 through 1978, Michael Sappol's little magazine Personal Injury proposed a remarkable moment of possibility in which writing by Bruce Andrews, Susan Howe, Lynne Dreyer, P. Inman and Tina Darragh (all of whom would be included in Language poetry publications including Ron Silliman's breakthrough anthology In the American Tree (1986)) jostled amiably alongside writing by New York School-affiliated poets including Ted Berrigan, Alice Notley, Harris Schiff, and Eileen Myles. Personal Injury showed a little magazine's ability to productively trouble and push back against critics' efforts to neatly organise poets into 'generations' and/or 'schools.' As I will show, Personal Injury predicted a literary-historical future that drew dividing lines between the quotidian affect of poets such as Berrigan and Schiff and the theoretically informed texts of writers including Inman and Darragh and messed that future up before it happened. Personal Injury, I argue, stands as a preemptive and fun refusal of literary classifications, revealing networks of influence and congruence among writers who are now defined distinctly as Language or New York School poets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the challenges and rewards of writing for children's markets, highlighting the complexity of crafting engaging content and navigating the publishing process. Topics include the author's journey into children's writing, strategies for success in both magazine and book markets, and the importance of perseverance and adaptation in achieving publication.

Copyright of Sociohistórica: Cuadernos del CISH is the property of Universidad Nacional de La Plata and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

"On Collaboration" attempts to situate the withdrawal of support from the magazine Artforum (precipitated by the firing of its editor-in-chief David Velasco in October 2023) within a longer history of institutional antagonism. It compares strategies of opposition available to the avant-garde and counterculture in the 1960s (as exemplified by Fluxus's George Maciunas and the novelist Thomas Pynchon) with those that emerged in the 1970s, with particular attention paid to the machinery that sustained the appearance of the art world and, more broadly, the public sphere. Citing Vito Acconci's contributions to the exhibition ROOMS P.S. 1 (1976), it argues that much of what has been historically recognized as strategies of institutional opposition from the 1970s onward, including institutional critique and the alternative space movement, might be better understood within a framework of "institutional collaboration." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]