Search

Heart transplantation is the gold standard for treating patients with advanced heart failure. Although improvements in immunosuppressive therapies have significantly reduced the frequency of cardiac graft rejection, the incidences of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection remain almost unchanged. A four-archetype analysis (4AA) model, developed by Philip F. Halloran, illustrated this problem well. It provided a new dimension to improve the accuracy of diagnoses and an independent system for recalibrating the histology guidelines. However, this model was based on the invasive method of endocardial biopsy, which undoubtedly increased the postoperative risk of heart transplant patients. Currently, little is known regarding the associated genes and specific functions of the different phenotypes. We performed bioinformatics analysis (using machine-learning methods and the WGCNA algorithm) to screen for hub-specific genes related to different phenotypes, based Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE124897. More immune cell infiltration was observed with the ABMR, TCMR, and injury phenotypes than with the stable phenotype. Hub-specific genes for each of the four archetypes were verified successfully using an external test set (accession number GSE2596). Logistic-regression models based on TCMR-specific hub genes and common hub genes were constructed with accurate diagnostic utility (area under the curve > 0.95). RELA, NFKB1, and SOX14 were identified as transcription factors important for TCMR/injury phenotypes and common genes, respectively. Additionally, 11 Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs were chosen from the DrugBank Database for each four-archetype model. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be a promising new option for transplant rejection treatment. KRAS signaling in cardiac transplant rejection is worth further investigation. Our results showed that heart transplant rejection subtypes can be accurately diagnosed by detecting expression of the corresponding specific genes, thereby enabling precise treatment or medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxidative phosphorylation is becoming increasingly important in the induction and development of endometriosis. Recently, it has been reported that ring finger protein 43 (RNF43) is involved in the process of oxidative phosphorylation, but the mechanism remains unclear. Our investigation is to delve into the roles of RNF43 in endometriosis and elucidate the related mechanisms. We found RNF43 was downregulated in ectopic endometrial tissue and primary ectopic endometrial stromal cells (ECESCs). Knockdown of RNF43 enhanced cell viability and migration by activating oxidative phosphorylation in eutopic endometrial stromal cells (EUESCs), while overexpression of RNF43 led to the opposite results. Moreover, RNF43 reinforced the ubiquitination and degradation of NADH dehydrogenase Fe‐S protein 1 (NDUFS1) by interacting with it. Likewise to RNF43 overexpression, NDUFS1 silencing inhibited cell viability, migration, and oxidative phosphorylation in ECESCs. NDUFS1 was a downstream target of RNF43, mediating its biological role in endometriosis. Interestingly, the expression and stability of RNF43 mRNA were regulated by the Methyltransferase‐like 3 (METTL3)/IGF2BP2 m6A modification axis. The results of rat experiments showed decreased RNF43 expression and increased NDUFS1 expression in endometriosis rats, which was enhanced by METTL3 inhibition. Those observations indicated that m6A methylation‐mediated RNF43 negatively affects viability and migration of endometrial stromal cells through regulating oxidative phosphorylation via NDUFS1. The discovery of METTL3/RNF43/NDUFS1 axis suggested promising therapeutic targets for endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]