Search

Globally, individuals with Down syndrome (DS) face profound inequities in social and health care access. These challenges are further compounded by racial disparities as well as a lack of awareness, research, and support, particularly in the Global South. This commentary discusses the multifaceted challenges and disparities encountered by people with DS in South Africa, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. The paper will summarise the proceedings and outcomes of an imbizo—a strategic gathering of stakeholders in South Africa. This event brought together a diverse group from the DS community, including individuals with DS, their families, healthcare providers, non-profit organizations, and representatives from the Gauteng Department of Health. The discussions at the imbizo were organized into five key thematic areas: Advocacy and Awareness, Inclusion and Engagement, Education, Data and Research, and Networking and Collaboration. Additionally, the paper will underscore the critical need for the establishment of a dedicated DS research network in South Africa. Such a network is envisioned to foster collaboration, facilitate knowledge sharing, and ensure that research initiatives are closely aligned with the needs of the DS community. Overcoming these inequities requires a holistic approach that encompasses policy reforms and the crafting of inclusive services. In its concluding sections, the paper will explore future avenues for creating a sustainable framework aimed at addressing the multifaceted needs of the DS community in South Africa. This initiative represents an effort towards amplifying the well-being, rights, and inclusion of people with DS. Highlighting the necessity of a collaborative and multifaceted approach, this paper proposes a path towards a more inclusive society, advocating for the mitigation of challenges faced by this marginalized community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) often exhibit lower levels of physical fitness compared to the general population, including reduced strength, endurance, flexibility, and coordination. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training can potentially improve the performance of adults with ID caused by weak motor skills due to a lack of desirable nerve growth during childhood and before puberty. Also, DNS training proposed to improve physical fitness in this population, but the effectiveness and durability of DNS training on specific fitness components have not been well-established. This study employed a randomized controlled trial design to investigate the effects of an 8-week DNS training program on the strength, endurance, and flexibility of adults with ID. A total of 31 participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n = 16) or a control group (n = 15). Muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility were assessed at baseline (pre-test), immediately after the intervention (post-test), and 2 months following the intervention (follow-up) using the 30-second chair stand (30sCS) test, sit-ups test, trunk lift test, and chair sit-and-reach test. Participants in the intervention group engaged in the DNS training program for 8 weeks, with 3 sessions per week, while the control group maintained their usual activities. The analysis of the outcome measures revealed significant time, group, and time-group interaction effects. Post-hoc analyses indicated that the DNS group exhibited significantly greater improvements in 30sCS, sit-ups, trunk lift, and chair sit-and-reach compared to the control group (p < 0.01). These improvements were maintained at the 2-month follow-up assessment in the DNS group. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that an 8-week DNS training program significantly improves muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility in adults with ID, with benefits maintained at a 2 month follow-up. Further research is needed to replicate these findings and investigate underlying mechanisms, but the study highlights the potential of DNS training to promote physical fitness and well-being in individuals with ID. Trial registration RTC, prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000053560) on 24/03/2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Working in inpatient mental health settings is often characterised by highly emotive work and staff shortages. Despite the suggested benefits of reflective practice groups on staff well-being and clinical practice across healthcare settings, to date, there have been limited empirical studies on reflective practice groups in inpatient mental health settings, especially on group engagement and improvement. Methods: We interviewed fifteen participants, including both facilitators and attendees of reflective practice groups. Participants were from eight inpatient mental health wards across two National Health Service settings in the UK. We analysed interview transcripts using thematic analysis. Result: We deductively organised the data into themes and subthemes under three overarching domains–"Impact", "Factors on Engagement", and "Improvement". Theme development was generated inductively from the data. For impacts, we found reflective practice groups may bolster staff reflective capacity and team cohesion. The groups may help attendees create appropriate distance from their emotions and overcome power hierarchies. We discovered that the availability of reflective practice, sense of containment in groups, and team composition may influence group facilitation and engagement. For improvements, different measures could be adopted to improve access and engagement of staff with difficulties attending. Facilitators may benefit from more support to establish a reflective culture and experiment with new ways of facilitating. Discussion: Our findings add to the growing evidence base of the potential value of reflective practice groups in inpatient settings and elaborate on novel mechanisms of their potential impact. This study highlights changeable factors for engagement, concrete recommendations for improvements, and opportunities for further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Commission's Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030 aims to ensure equal opportunities and rights for all individuals, including those with intellectual disabilities. People with intellectual disabilities are often underrepresented in cancer prevention and screening policies, leading to disparities in health outcomes and early mortality. The intersection of intellectual disability, cancer, and depression represents an underexplored area in healthcare research. Individuals with intellectual disability diagnosed with both cancer and depression face compounded challenges impacting their quality of life, proper access to medical care, and treatment outcomes. To address these gaps in the systems globally, a focused effort is indispensable to understand their unique needs and better tailor care strategies for this target group. Therefore, this commentary outlines the challenges in researching individuals with intellectual disabilities who have a dual diagnosis of cancer and depression. Challenges include providing informed consent, ethical researcher-participant relationships, and maintaining confidentiality and autonomy. Strategies for improvement include creating accessible procedures, raising awareness, and involving individuals with intellectual disabilities in research ethics committees., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: None. Consent for publication: None. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)