1. Experiences of patients with advanced chronic diseases and their associates with a structured palliative care nurse visit followed by an interprofessional case conference in primary care – a deductive-inductive content analysis based on qualitative interviews (KOPAL-Study)
- Author
-
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis, Weber, Jan, Stiel, Stephanie, Schade, Franziska, Nauck, Friedemann, Timm, Janina, Scherer, Martin, and Marx, Gabriella
- Subjects
- *
TREATMENT of dementia , *HEART failure treatment , *CHRONIC disease treatment , *OBSTRUCTIVE lung disease treatment , *HOME care services , *PROXY , *QUALITATIVE research , *RESEARCH funding , *INTERPROFESSIONAL relations , *HUMAN research subjects , *PRIMARY health care , *CONTENT analysis , *INTERVIEWING , *NURSING assessment , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *JUDGMENT sampling , *CONFERENCES & conventions , *MOTIVATION (Psychology) , *RESEARCH methodology , *ATTITUDES of medical personnel , *QUALITY of life , *PHYSICIAN-patient relations , *COMMUNICATION , *PALLIATIVE care nurses , *EXTENDED families , *DATA analysis software , *PATIENTS' attitudes , *DEMENTIA patients , *INTEGRATED health care delivery , *PSYCHOSOCIAL factors , *HEALTH care teams - Abstract
Background: Chronic, non-malignant diseases (CNMD) like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and dementia in advanced stages are very burdensome for patients. Timely palliative care with strong collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams can reduce symptom burden, hospitalization rates, hospitalization costs and overall healthcare costs. The KOPAL-study on strengthening interprofessional collaboration for patients with palliative care needs tested the effect of an intervention comprising of a SPHC nurse assessment and an interprofessional case conference. This qualitative evaluative study explores patients', proxies' and their associates' motivation to participate in the KOPAL-study and views on the (benefits of the) intervention. Methods: We interviewed 13 male and 10 female patients as well as 14 proxies of patients with dementia and six associates of study participants using a semi-structured interview guide. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis. Results: Motivation for participation was driven by curiosity, the aim to please the GP or to support research, respectively to help other patients. Few interviewees pointed out to have expected positive effects for themselves. The nurse visit was evaluated very positively. Positive changes concerning health care or quality of life were reported sparsely. Most study participants did not prepare for the SPHC nurse assessment. They had no expectations concerning potential benefits of such an assessment, the interdisciplinary case conference and an early integration of palliative care. The majority of interviewees reported that they did not talk about the nurse visit and the interprofessional case conference with their GPs. Conclusion: Our results lead to the conclusion that SPHC nurses can serve as an advocate for the patient and thereby support the patients' autonomy. GPs should actively discuss the results of the interdisciplinary case conference with patients and collaboratively decide on further actions. Patient participation in the interdisciplinary case conference could be another way to increase the effects of the intervention by empowering patients to not just passively receive the intervention. Trial registration: DRKS00017795 German Clinical Trials Register, 17Nov2021, version 05. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF