Search

Against the backdrop of a fragmented and evolving governance landscape, this paper examines how effective climate commissions are in engaging the public to co-produce local climate action in the UK. Climate commissions are emerging amid heightened concerns regarding the top-down style of policymaking on climate change and resource-constrained local authorities. However, less is known about how they engage the public who are pivotal for climate action, both in signalling greater ambition from governments and through their own mitigation and adaptation efforts. This paper draws on qualitative interviews with an array of individuals both inside and outside climate commissions in the UK, and utilises Cash's theoretical framework of 'salience, legitimacy and credibility' to assess how effective climate commissions are in engaging the public to co-produce local climate action. The findings indicate a discernible chasm between commissions and the broader public. Equally however, they provide hopeful perspectives into the effect that more collaborative engagement, that speaks to local concerns and leverages local knowledge, would have on commissions' 'salience, legitimacy and credibility' and, additionally, the legitimacy of local authorities. Moreover, they suggest that deeper collaboration with local networks of community groups, who are not yet represented on commissions, could foster more sustained climate action. It concludes by considering the novel implications of these emergent insights for the Cash framework and what this means for commissions in their future engagement with the public. • Knowledge co-production resonates in both theory and practice. • Local and grassroot action is critical to meet climate mitigation and adaptation goals. • Ensuring 'salience, legitimacy and credibility' can lead to more effective climate policy. • Climate commissions need to better leverage local knowledge to drive climate action. • Community groups are under-utilised in climate conversations and decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A review of the spectrum of emerging Direct Air Capture, DAC technologies. • Several categories are under different levels of development with different working principles. • A widespread data on DAC technical, economic, and environmental performance. • Lack of standardized frameworks for DAC assessment. • Multicriterial assessment frameworks can provide comprehensive guidance for rapid deployment. Direct air capture (DAC) is set to play a crucial role in meeting climate change targets as most recent climate scenarios rely on its large-scale implementation. Nevertheless, despite this widespread consensus, DAC performance and impact have not been sufficiently investigated, which has resulted in hindering its wide-scale deployment for climate change mitigation initiatives. Here, we present a comparative review of different DAC technologies and examine their performance from a holistic perspective by considering different aspects, from technical, commercial, and economic to environmental. We classify DAC technologies into five main categories, namely (i) liquid scrubbing, (ii) solid sorbent, (iii) electrochemical, (iv) cryogenic, and (v) membrane, and within each category, various approaches can be employed. We explore key challenges involved in developing each DAC technology and compare their performance using up-to-date data. We then critically analyze the primary factors contributing to the inconsistencies arising from the economic assessment results and provide valuable guidelines for future studies. Overall, the present review can benefit researchers, engineers, and policymakers in obtaining a holistic understanding of these state-of-the-art technologies in addition to filling key gaps in the DAC field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]