1. Far Field Electrocochleography. Frequency Specificity of the Response
- Author
-
K. Terkildsen, F. Huis in't Veld, and P. Osterhammel
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Linguistics and Language ,Frequency selectivity ,Near and far field ,Audiology ,Stimulus (physiology) ,Electrocochleography ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Frequency specificity ,Language and Linguistics ,Speech and Hearing ,Otorhinolaryngology ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Stimulus frequency ,sense organs ,Brainstem ,Cochlea ,Mathematics - Abstract
It is commonly thought that the AP is determined by high frequency units in the most basal part of the cochlea, and that the frequency specificity of this response is rather poor. We have evaluated these relations for the 7 msec far field activity by means of masking experiments and recordings from the Vertex. Stimuli were tone bursts at 1, 2 and 4 kHz with rise-fall times from 1 to 3 msec. Peak duration 0.5 msec. Maskers were noisebands with center frequencies spaced at narrow intervals from 0.5 to 6 kHz. In all situations where the frequency for the masker and the stimulus were close to each other there were pronounced and characteristic changes in the response. The results clearly demonstrate that the 7 msec response reflects activity in the cochlea that is characteristic for each stimulus frequency. We were unable to detect any particular influence from the most basal part of the cochlea. There is thus a distinct discrepancy between the frequency selectivity for the AP and for the brainstem responses....
- Published
- 1975
- Full Text
- View/download PDF