Since the restoration of political stability in the early 1930's, Mexico has enjoyed almost continuous prosperity and has been able to achieve large increases in both her total and per capita outputs of goods and services. Between 1939, the earliest year for which firm data are available, and 1957, the latest year obtainable at the time of writing, the Mexican gross national product expanded by about 183 per cent and national income grew by some 192 per cent, both magnitudes being measured in terms of "constant" pesos. Despite a staggering rise of 62 per cent in population, this represented a rise of 75 per cent in product per capita and of 81 per cent in income per capita. Growth appears to have been most rapid in the earlier years of the period, but very respectable gains have been registered more recently as well. Manufacturing industry led the other major sectors of the economy in rate of growth, but increases in agriculture, transportation and communication, and other sectors were also large. In fact, the broad sectoral distribution of increases in output is one of the most interesting and encouraging characteristics of Mexican growth. Though it did not grow as fast as manufacturing, the rise in agricultural output was particularly vital to the general development of the Mexican economy, since this sector employs a large share of the total labor force and also because its gains allowed the use of foreign exchange earnings for purposes other than the purchase of food and basic fibers. The share of savings and investment in Mexico's gross product during these years has been substantial though not spectacular. In view of the results obtained, however, it seems to have been well directed. Public investment has bulked large in the total with most of it going into such fields as transportation and communication, public utilities, agriculture, and petroleum. Mexico's economic growth seems to have been generated mainly from domestic sources. While both exports and capital imports have grown, they have expanded at a less rapid pace than the nation's output as a whole, and they do not seem to have been the prime movers of the Mexican development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]