Search

Various methods based on Student t variates have been suggested and used for obtaining simultaneous confidence intervals for several means, or for several contrasts among means. Determination of an overall confidence level for such intervals involves evaluating the probability mass of a multivariate t distribution over a hypercube centered at the origin, with sides paralleling the coordinate planes, or obtaining bounds for this probability mass. Since such distributions involve many nuisance parameters, an impossible number of tables would be necessary in order to make exact confidence intervals. In the virtual absence of tables, approximations and bounds become important. In this paper, an attempt has been made to investigate the adequacy of certain suggested approximations [2], [5], [8] by computing the exact distributions for some particular cases. These exact distributions have been compared with approximations. This paper is concerned with two-sided confidence intervals, rather than one-sided intervals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A method is described for assigning an observation to one of two normal populations with differing, unknown means and differing, unknown variances. The classification procedure rests on the likelihood ratio, which, for a given observation, is a function of four unknown parameters. Sample information is used to obtain a confidence region for these parameters. From this confidence region, a conservative confidence interval for the likelihood ratio is derived. Interpreting the likelihood ratio as a measure of the odds in favor of each population as the source of the observation, the interval can be used, in an obvious manner, for classification purposes. Simulation techniques are employed to examine the conservative nature of the interval Finally, as an illustration of the method, the results are applied to the determination of authorship of the disputed Federalist papers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware of the applicability and advantage of a particular mathematical model. The application is typified by an example and the advantage is via confidence intervals; that is, shorter confidence intervals are possible using the model than if one ignores it, providing the applicability is valid. It is also shown that an improved estimate can be obtained through use of the model. Let f(y|mu, sigma) be a normal density with mean mu and variance sigma[sup 2] and let g(mu|lambda, beta) be a normal density with mean lambda and variance beta[sup 2]. A sequence y[sub 1], y[sub 2],..., y[sub n+1] of independent observations from the mixture off and g can be considered as follows: An unobservable mu [sub i] is first drawn from g(mu|lambda, beta) and then y[sub i] which can be observed is drawn from f(y|mu[sub i], sigma). Confidence intervals on mu[sub n+1] are obtained which are based on the observations y[sub 1],..., y[sub n+1] and which are shorter than the standard interval based on y[sub n+1] only for any n. Shorter intervals are obtained for two cases: (i) lambda unknown, sigma, beta known; (ii) only sigma/beta = c known. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A progressive-censoring model arises from a life test of a sample of items in which one or more of the survivors may be removed from the test at the time of any failure. Such a model is often more realistic for actual failure data which must be analyzed by a statistician than one in which all survivors are assumed to be removed from test simultaneously. This paper deals with the situation in which the underlying failure-time distribution for the population sampled is the two-parameter Weibull distribution. The reliable life for the population is defined to be the 100(1-R) percent point of the failure-time distribution, where R is a specified population survival proportion, or reliability. An exact confidence bound on reliable life based on three observed ordered failure times is derived for this progressive-censoring model. The criterion used for selecting the order numbers of the three failure times upon which the bound is based depends upon computed values of the power function of the test associated with the bound. A table from which lower bounds can be obtained is given for R equal to .95, confidence level .90, sample size equal to 2, 3, . . . , 6, and all possible censorings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The least squares estimator of a regression coefficient beta is vulnerable to gross errors and the associated confidence interval is, in addition, sensitive to non-normality of the parent distribution. In this paper, a simple and robust (point as well as interval) estimator of beta based on Kendall's [6] rank correlation tau is studied. The point estimator is the median of the set of slopes (Y[sub I]--Y[sub I])/(t[sub I]--t[sub I]) joining pairs of points with t[sub 1] is not equal to t[sub 1], and is unbiased. The confidence interval is also determined by two order statistics of this set of slopes. Various properties of these estimators are studied and compared with those of the least squares and some other nonparametric estimators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is desired to set confidence limits for the probability of successful operation at least until time x[sub 0] of a series system of k dissimilar components. The components follow exponential failure laws, and data are available on failure times of components of each type. Exact confidence limits for k=2 have previously been given by Lentner and Buehler. The present paper deals with a large-sample approximation to the exact solution for arbitrary k. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a method of constructing conservative joint confidence regions for the parameters of a linear model and the volumes of these regions are compared with the volume of an exact confidence region. Confidence regions on the entire surface are obtained from the confidence region on the parameters. The procedures are illustrated for the case of a simple linear model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper surveys results about the behavior of nonparametric methods in cases where the customary continuity assumptions are not satisfied. A projection approach is used to show that true confidence coefficients associated with confidence intervals for appropriate location parameters derived from Wilcoxon one- and two-sample tests are at least equal to the nominal level for the continuous case, if the confidence intervals are considered closed, at most equal to the nominal level, if they are considered open. The results are interpreted in terms of tests of hypotheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Formulas for confidence, prediction, and tolerance regions for the multivariate normal distribution for the various cases of known and unknown mean vector and covariance matrix are assembled for easy reference in this expository paper. Tables are provided for the bivariate case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The determination of sample size to meet certain probability requirements is a problem which often faces an experimenter when obtaining a confidence interval or testing a hypothesis. This paper includes some new graphs useful in selecting sample size and gives a reference to a new textbook which includes a number of other similar type graphs. The method of construction is explained in detail and examples are included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]