Search

This theory is based on the idea that both bureaucratic and community primary groups are essential for achieving most tasks in our society. At the same time they have antithetical atmospheres. Therefore, they are best linked when they are at some midpoint of social distance. If they are too close, there will be conflicts because of their atmospheres. If they are too far, they will not be able to coordinate to solve their mutual problems. The paper suggests eight possible mechanisms of coordination which can link bureaucratic organizations with primary groups. It suggests the theoretical bases for determining which of these mechanisms tends to close social distance and which tends to open distance. It further suggests what kinds of bureaucratic structures can tolerate each type of coordinating mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article announces the second series of the guidance workshops operating under a grant from the Rosenberg Foundation initiated by the San Diego State College in California. The workshop has a 6 week session from June 18-July 27, 1951 and has been scheduled for two class periods each day. The workshop is under the leadership of C. Gilbert Wrenn, president of the Division of Counseling and Guidance of the American Psychological Association. The 1951 workshop will provide opportunities for both group and individual study.