Search

The article attempts to measure, and indicate the trend of, contemporary expert opinion on the relationship of ethics to economics. It offers the results obtained from a questionnaire study conducted on the subject. Two groups were chosen as being most directly concerned: the economists themselves, and the philosophers, who have special interests in the field of ethics. All the answers from this group were from university teachers. Questionnaires were sent to seventy-five economists and to fifty philosophers. Of these, forty-nine economists responded, giving a 65-percent return, and twenty philosophers, giving a 40-percent return. One question asked whether or not the respondent thought that the subject was so well settled that it renders the making of normative statements an unprofessional act on the part of the economist. It is repetitive, to some extent, of questions already asked on the form, but this was done purposely to be certain that the checked answers would reliably measure the individual's belief. There were some interesting written comments.

Interviews Professor Paul Weiss regarding his career in editing the technical papers of philosopher Charles Peirce. Reason behind his interest in the works of Peirce; Possibility for the papers to be published; Rumors that the portion of the papers were destroyed.

Interviews Professor Charles Hartshorne regarding his career in editing the technical papers of philosopher Charles Peirce. Reason behind his interest in the works of Peirce; Source of the papers he edited; Rumors that the portion of the papers were given away as souvenirs for graduate students at Harvard University.