Search

The article presents information on the elicitation of information and response biases of repressors, sensitizers and neutrals in behavior prediction. Repressor, sensitizer, and neutral judges predicted the responses of neutral targets on the Adjective Check List. Each judge was paired with a neutral target and interviewed him with the aim of getting to know him as well as possible. Hence, each judge elicited information on which to base his predictions. The groups did not differ with regard to content of information elicited or relevance of the information for criterion responses. Differences in predictions were noted which were consistent with expectations based upon the response biases of the judges. It was concluded that group differences in behavior prediction cannot be accounted for by differential elicitation of information in interpersonal interaction, but instead are determined by response biases. While groups differed in degree of activity in eliciting information from targets, the nature of the information did not differ with regard to interview content measures or judged relevance of the information for the predictive task. Hence, group differences in prediction cannot be accounted for by differential elicitation of information in interpersonal interaction within the limits of this study.