Search

BackgroundBeta-based adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) is effective in Parkinson's disease (PD), when assessed in the immediate post-implantation phase. However, the potential benefits of aDBS in patients with electrodes chronically implanted, in whom changes due to the microlesion effect have disappeared, are yet to be assessed.MethodsTo determine the acute effectiveness and side-effect profile of aDBS in PD compared to conventional continuous DBS (cDBS) and no stimulation (NoStim), years after DBS implantation, 13 PD patients undergoing battery replacement were pseudo-randomised in a crossover fashion, into three conditions (NoStim, aDBS or cDBS), with a 2-min interval between them. Patient videos were blindly evaluated using a short version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (subUPDRS), and the Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT).ResultsMean disease duration was 16 years, and the mean time since DBS-implantation was 6.9 years. subUPDRS scores (11 patients tested) were significantly lower both in aDBS (p=

Background: Limited treatment options with a rapid onset of action are available to treat off episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the development of rapid onset formulations, for instance with levodopa, is warranted, which was the reason to investigate an inhalable formulation of levodopa. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the duration until maximum effect is reached of inhaled levodopa on the improvement of motor function of PD patients. The secondary objective was to compare the time until maximal effect and the maximal effect of inhaled levodopa versus oral levodopa. Design: Open-label randomized two-way one-period crossover trial. Methods: Nine PD patients in the 'off state' received one dose of inhaled levodopa (90 mg) from Cyclops® and one dose of levodopa orodispersible tablet (100 mg) on two consecutive days in a randomized order. A timed tapping test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score were performed pre-dose and on set time points up to 90 min post-dose as measure for motor function. In addition, blood samples were taken for a pharmacokinetic evaluation (T max, C max and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) 0–3 h). Results: The maximal effect of inhaled levodopa was reached at 30 min (tapping test), at 75 min (TUG test) and at 60 min (UPDRS III). The positive effect on the UPDRS was statistically significant within 20 min after inhalation. After oral administration, C max and AUC 0–3 h were found to be significant higher (p = 0.028 and p = 0.028, respectively) than after pulmonary administration. T max was achieved significantly (p = 0.028) faster after inhalation. The motor function examinations showed a similar maximum clinical improvement after pulmonary and oral administration and although not significant, inhaled levodopa results in a shorter median duration to maximum clinical effect for the TUG and timed finger-tapping test compared with oral administration (TUG: inhalation 55.0 and oral 67.5 min, timed finger-tapping test: inhalation 35.0 and oral 57.5 min). After the levodopa inhalation, there were no adverse events observed and no significant differences found in long-function parameters. Conclusion: Inhaled levodopa from Cyclops® shows promising data as a rescue therapy for PD patients with off episodes, not responsive to the current oral therapies. Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board 'Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek' (RTPO) in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands (approval number RTPO1019). The study was registered in in the Dutch trial register (LTR) with identification number NL6876. From 5 March 2024 on, the research data on onderzoekmetmensen.nl are known as 'Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands' (OMON). This means the use of the name LTR has thus been dropped. Now, it is registered in the OMON with the same identification number (NL6876, Effectiveness of inhaled levodopa in PD | Research with human participants (onderzoekmetmensen.nl)). All patients provided written informed consent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: The Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's disease study showed no effect of earlier versus later levodopa initiation on Parkinson's disease (PD) progression over 80 weeks. We now report the effects over 5 years. Methods: The Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's disease study randomly assigned patients to levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 80 weeks (early start) or to placebo for 40 weeks followed by levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 40 weeks (delayed start). Follow‐up visits were performed 3 and 5 years after baseline. We assessed the between‐group differences in terms of square root transformed total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score at 3 and 5 years with linear regression. We compared the prevalence of dyskinesia, prevalence of wearing off, and the levodopa equivalent daily dose. Results: A total of 321 patients completed the 5‐year visit. The adjusted square root transformed total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale did not differ between treatment groups at 3 (estimated difference, 0.17; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.18) and 5 years (estimated difference, 0.24; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.07). At 5 years, 46 of 160 patients in the early‐start group and 62 of 161 patients in the delayed‐start group experienced dyskinesia (P = 0.06). The prevalence of wearing off and the levodopa equivalent daily dose were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: We did not find a difference in disease progression or in prevalence of motor complications between patients with early PD starting treatment with a low dose of levodopa 40 weeks earlier versus 40 weeks later over the subsequent 5 years. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Facial emotion recognition (FER) is a crucial component of social cognition and is essential in social‐interpersonal behaviour regulation. Although FER impairment is well‐established in advanced PD, data about FER at the time of diagnosis and its relationship with social behavioural problems in daily life are lacking. The aim was to examine FER at the time of PD diagnosis compared to a matched healthy control (HC) group and to associate FER with indices of social behavioural problems. In total, 142 de novo, treatment‐naïve PD patients and 142 HC were included. FER was assessed by the Ekman 60 faces test (EFT). Behavioural problems in PD patients were assessed using the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX‐self and DEX‐proxy) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES‐self). PD patients had significantly lower EFT‐total scores (p =.001) compared to HC, with worse recognition of Disgust (p =.001) and Sadness (p =.016). Correlational analyses yielded significant correlations between AES‐self and both EFT‐total (rs =.28) and Fear (rs =.22). Significant negative correlations were found between DEX‐proxy and both EFT‐total (rs = −.28) and Anger (rs = −.26). Analyses of DEX‐subscales showed that proxy ratings were significantly higher than patient‐ratings for the Social Conventions subscale (p =.047). This DEX‐proxy subscale had the strongest correlation with EFT‐total (rs = −.29). Results show that de novo PD patients already show impaired FER compared to HC. In addition, lower FER is linked to self‐reported apathy and proxy‐reported social‐behavioural problems, especially concerning social conventions. These findings validate the importance of the inclusion of social cognition measures in the neuropsychological assessment even in early PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients experience visual symptoms and retinal degeneration. Studies using optical coherence tomography (OCT) have shown reduced thickness of the retina in PD, also a key characteristic of glaucoma. Objective: To identify the presence and pattern of retinal changes in de novo, treatment-naive PD patients compared to healthy controls (HC) and early primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Methods: Macular OCT data (10×10 mm) were collected from HC, PD, and early POAG patients, at the University Medical Center Groningen. Bayesian informative hypotheses statistical analyses were carried out comparing HC, PD-, and POAG patients, within each retinal cell layer. Results: In total 100 HC, 121 PD, and 78 POAG patients were included. We showed significant reduced thickness of the inner plexiform layer and retinal pigment epithelium in PD compared to HC. POAG patients presented with a significantly thinner retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, inner plexiform layer, outer plexiform layer, and outer photoreceptor and subretinal virtual space compared to PD. Only the outer segment layer and retinal pigment epithelium were significantly thinner in PD compared to POAG. Conclusions: De novo PD patients show reduced thickness of the retina compared to HC, especially of the inner plexiform layer, which differs significantly from POAG, showing a more extensive and widespread pattern of reduced thickness across layers. OCT is a useful tool to detect retinal changes in de novo PD, but its specificity versus other neurodegenerative disorders has to be established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) is a recognized treatment for medication‐refractory dystonia. Problems in executive functions and social cognition can be part of dystonia phenotypes. The impact of pallidal DBS on cognition appears limited, but not all cognitive domains have been investigated yet. In the present study, we compare cognition before and after GPi DBS. Seventeen patients with dystonia of various aetiology completed pre‐ and post‐DBS assessment (mean age 51 years; range 20–70 years). Neuropsychological assessment covered intelligence, verbal memory, attention and processing speed, executive functioning, social cognition, language and a depression questionnaire. Pre‐DBS scores were compared with a healthy control group matched for age, gender and education, or with normative data. Patients were of average intelligence but performed significantly poorer than healthy peers on tests for planning and for information processing speed. Otherwise, they were cognitively unimpaired, including social cognition. DBS did not change the baseline neuropsychological scores. We confirmed previous reports of executive dysfunctions in adult dystonia patients with no significant influence of DBS on cognitive functioning in these patients. Pre‐DBS neuropsychological assessments appear useful as they support clinicians in counselling their patients. Decisions about post‐DBS neuropsychological evaluations should be made on a case‐by‐case basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]