Search

Rationale: Despite the importance of trigger perceptions for asthma diagnosis and management, associations among asthma triggers, affective disorders, and asthma outcome have received little attention.Objectives: Because anxiety and depression are known to influence patients' health reports, we measured and controlled for these affective disorders in analyzing associations among patient perceptions of asthma triggers and asthma treatment outcomes.Methods: Patients from a nationally representative sample of respiratory specialist practices (N = 459) were assessed for clinically significant anxiety and depression and completed questionnaires on asthma triggers, quality of life, and asthma control. Physicians recorded exacerbation and emergency treatment frequencies in the prior year, spirometric lung function, and allergy test results. Hierarchical multiple regressions examined associations among reported trigger factors, anxiety, depression, and asthma outcomes, including quality of life, asthma control, exacerbations, emergencies, and spirometry.Measurements and Main Results: Patients across asthma severity levels were well represented. Anxiety and depression were associated with more frequent nonallergic, in particular psychological, triggers. Controlling for demographics, asthma severity, anxiety, and depression, nonallergic asthma triggers (including psychological triggers) explained substantial portions of variance in asthma control (total of 19.5%, odds ratios [ORs] = 2.07-1.37 for individual triggers), asthma-related quality of life (total of 27.5%, ORs = 3.21-1.49), and general quality of life (total of 11.3%, ORs = 1.93-1.55). Psychological triggers were consistently associated with exacerbations and emergency treatments (ORs = 1.96-2.04) over and above other triggers and affective disorders. Spirometric lung function was largely unrelated to perceived asthma triggers.Conclusions: Patients' perceptions of asthma triggers are important determinants of asthma outcomes, which can help identify individuals at risk for suboptimal asthma management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Studies in the last decade showed high rates of poorly treated and poorly controlled asthma in the community. Extending these findings we describe the more recent situation in specialist respiratory care as the most frequent source of treatment provision using comprehensive clinical and patient assessments and exploring predictors for poor control. METHODS: This is a German cross-sectional, clinical epidemiological study in a nationally representative stratified treatment prevalence sample of N = 572 outpatients diagnosed with allergic asthma (AA; females 58.2%, aged 47.5 ± 16.3 (16-81 years). Treating physicians completed standardized clinical assessments (lung function, laboratory, clinical findings, severity, illness and treatment history, asthma control [GINA]), supplemented by patients' self-report measures (EQ5-D, AQLQ, ACT) and mental health module (CIDI-SF). RESULTS: A total of 65.4% of patients were rated (GINA) as controlled, 30.3% partially controlled, and 4.4% uncontrolled; the patient-rated ACT showed lower rates of control (19.9% controlled, 44.2% partial, 35.8% uncontrolled, kappa: 0.2). Consistent with findings of clinical measures, controlled asthma was highest among patients with pre-treatment stage I severity (83.6%) and decreased by pre-treatment severity (stage IV patients: 29.3%). Poorer control was associated with pre-treatment severity, nocturnal attacks, diminished adherence and comorbid anxiety/depression. Patients received complex multiple drug and non-drug interventions, largely consistent with guidelines. Degree of asthma control was associated with improved and even normalized quality of life findings. CONCLUSION: In this representative sample of longterm treated AA patients in specialist respiratory care we find better control rates and better adherence to guidelines as previous studies. Despite remarkable differences in clinician- vs patient-rated control ratings even the initially most severe stage IV patients (12.9% of patients) showed remarkable control rates and close to normal quality of life. Intensified treatment (e.g. omalizumab) was associated with improved control. Poorer control was associated with higher initial severity, diminished adherence, comorbid anxiety/depression and old age. Limitation: Findings apply to AA patients in respiratory specialist care sector which is likely to treat the more severely affected patients. Thus, findings cannot be generalized to the general population, other treatment settings or asthma types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]