Search

Plusieurs termes existent pour distinguer l’expert du non-expert et le linguiste du non-linguiste. Cette bipartition, à première vue plausible, pose des problèmes quand on l’applique à une situation communicative concrète. S’agit-il d’une dichotomie rigide ? Ou d’une distinction à critères variables, voire d’une construction discursive ? Est-elle valable pour tout genre de métadiscours ? Pour répondre à ces questions, nous discuterons brièvement les désignations coexistantes pour se référer au linguiste et au non-linguiste ainsi que les critères auxquels elles renvoient. L’analyse des métadiscours sur les langues régionales en France nous permettra d’examiner la dépendance de ces critères vis-à-vis du type de métadiscours et de la situation communicative. Several terms serve to distinguish between an expert and a non-expert. This division, though at first sight plausible, causes problems as soon as it is applied to an actual communication situation. Are we dealing with a rigid dichotomy? Or a distinction based on variable criteria ? Or even a discursive construction? Is it valid for all kinds of metadiscourses? To answer these questions, we will briefly discuss the terms that coexist to refer to a linguist and a non-linguist, as well as the criteria according to which the division is made. As an example, we will analyse metadiscourses about regional languages in France. This will allow us to examine to which extent such criteria depend on the kind of metadiscourse or on the communicative situation.

Esta pesquisa tem como principal objetivo problematizar as ideologias de linguagem emergentes em metadiscursos mobilizados por docentes indígenas em formação superior no curso de Licenciatura em Educação Intercultural da Universidade Federal de Goiás, como forma de evidenciar o que esses sujeitos, historicamente marginalizados e subalternizados, pensamsobre língua e de refletir sobre as próprias bases epistemológicas dos estudos linguísticos e do referido curso. Este estudo parte de um direcionamento qualitativo de cunho etnográfico, em um esforço de situar os sujeitos participantes em tempos e espaços específicos para pensar sobre as ideologias de linguagem acionadas e conectá-las a um macrocontexto histórico, político e social mais amplo. Os dados desta pesquisa são compostos de enunciados orais e escritos gerados em contexto de sala de aula, durante etapas que ocorreram na universidade, em temas relativos à formação para o ensino de línguas em contextos interculturais e, consequentemente, à metarreflexão. Partimos de pressupostos teóricos da sociolinguística contemporânea e suas intersecções com a linguística antropológica e áreas afins e enquadramos nosso estudo no paradigma do pensamento decolonial latino-americano, reconhecendo a herança moderna/colonial das concepções hegemônicas de língua e procurando problematizar como essa herança impacta as ideologias de linguagem acionadas pelos docentes indígenas e, ao mesmo tempo, como ela pode ser ressignificada ou desafiada nessas mesmas ideologias e ainda nas práticas de linguajamento observadas. Pretendemos, a partir dos dados gerados, estabelecer um diálogo interepistêmico com esses docentes indígenas em formação, compreendendo-os como sujeitos pensantes, formuladores de teorizações sobre língua, intelectuais que problematizam suas realidades. This research seeks to problematize language ideologies present in metadiscourses mobilized by indigenous teachers in training at University of Goiás Intercultural Education program as a way of: drawing attention to what these historically marginalized subjects think about language; and reflecting upon Linguistic Studies' and the program's own epistemological bases. This study stems from a qualitative ethnographic orientation, in an effort to situate its subjects in specific times and spaces in order to think about language ideologies enacted and to connect them to a broader historical, political and social macrocontext. The data are composed of oral and written statements generated in classroom activities, during stages that took place in the university, related to training for language teaching in intercultural contexts and, consequently, meta-reflection. The analysis was based on theoretical postulates of contemporary sociolinguistics and their intersections with anthropological linguistics and related areas, framed in the paradigm of Latin American decolonial thinking. It aims at recognizing the modern/colonial heritage of hegemonic language conceptions and trying to problematize how this heritage impacts language ideologies enacted by indigenous teachers and, at the same time, how it can be redefined or challenged in these same ideologies and in the language practices observed. The goal is to, from the data generated, establish an inter-epistemic dialog with theses indigenous teachers in training, understanding them as thinking subjects that theorize about language and problematize their realities.

International audience; In the 17th century the different French languages evolved both inside and outside normative systems, through literature, grammars, dictionaries and essays, which emerged in a specific political and military context: the policy of expansion, desire for centralization, the francization of science and jurisdictions, the cultural illustration of national power, economic relations, etc. In tracing the long term history of the discourses on the French language, this period is crucial because of its influence on linguistic practices. In the archaeology of the relationship between oral and written language inside metadiscourses, knowledge of this deep stratum helps us gain to achieve a fuller understanding of contemporary ways of mindsets. This article focuses on the history of metadiscourses: the analysis is based on a corpus featurind grammars and commentary available via the Classiques Garnier database.; Les langues françaises se construisent comme autant de normes et de hors normes au xviie siècle, à travers une littérature et des objets de grammatisation qui ont émergé à la faveur d’une certaine situation politique et militaire – politique d’expansion en même temps que volonté de centralisation, francisation de la science et des juridictions, illustration culturelle de la force du pays, relations économiques… Quand on cherche à faire l’histoire des discours sur la langue, ce moment est déterminant ; quand on cherche à faire l’archéologie de la relation écrit/oral dans les métadiscours, le retour à cette période permet de découvrir une strate aussi profonde que nécessaire dans la compréhension de nos modes d’analyse. Mon propos relève donc de l’histoire des métadiscours et prendra comme corpus de travail les grammaires et les « remarques » disponibles sur la base électronique « Classiques Garnier-numérique ».