15 results on '"de Boer, Sterre C. M."'
Search Results
2. Letter to the editor on a paper by Kaivola et al. (2020): carriership of two copies of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat intermediate-length alleles is not associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or frontotemporal dementia
- Author
-
de Boer, Sterre C. M., Woolley, Lauren, Mol, Merel O., Serpente, Maria, Reus, Lianne M., van Minkelen, Rick, van Vugt, Joke F. A., Sorrentino, Federica, Veldink, Jan H., Seelaar, Harro, Galimberti, Daniela, van Ruissen, Fred, Mead, Simon, Rogaeva, Ekaterina, Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., and van der Lee, Sven J.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Social cognition differentiates phenocopy syndrome of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.
- Author
-
van Engelen, Marie‐Paule E., Louwers, Paulette, Fieldhouse, Jay L. P., Gossink, Flora T., de Boer, Sterre C. M., Dols, Annemieke, Scheltens, Philip, Schouws, Sigfried N. T. M., Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., Vijverberg, Everard G. B., and Krudop, Welmoed A.
- Subjects
SELF-evaluation ,RECEIVER operating characteristic curves ,FRONTOTEMPORAL dementia ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SOCIAL perception ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,BEHAVIOR ,SOCIAL skills ,NEURORADIOLOGY ,COMPARATIVE studies ,AFFECT (Psychology) ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,ACTIVITIES of daily living ,SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) ,CAREGIVER attitudes - Abstract
Background: Patients displaying clinical features of behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) but lacking both neuroimaging abnormalities and clinical progression are considered to represent the phenocopy syndrome of bvFTD (phFTD). Extensive clinical overlap between early phase bvFTD and phFTD hampers diagnostic distinction. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of clinician‐rated, self‐reported and caregiver‐reported symptoms for clinical distinction between phFTD and bvFTD. Methods: There were 33 phFTD and 95 probable bvFTD patients included in the study (total N = 128). Clinician‐rated, self‐reported tests and caregiver‐reported symptoms were compared between phFTD and bvFTD on social cognition, behaviour, mood and activities of daily living (ADL). Scores were compared between groups, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to assess diagnostic value. Results: Using clinician‐rated and self‐reported tests, phFTD patients performed better on facial emotion recognition and reported more depressive symptoms. Caregiver‐reported behavioural symptoms indicated higher behavioural and ADL impairment in phFTD compared to bvFTD. Facial emotion recognition provided highest diagnostic accuracy for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD (area under the curve (AUC) 0.813 95% CI 0.735–0.892, P < 0.001, sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%) followed by depressive symptoms (AUC 0.769 95% 0.674–0.864, P < 0.001 sensitivity 81%, specificity of 63%). Conclusion: Social cognition tests are most suitable for distinction of phFTD from bvFTD. Caregiver‐reported questionnaires and phFTD diagnosis seemed inversely correlated, showing more symptoms in phFTD. Further research is needed on phFTD aetiology and in caregivers taking into account disease burden to assess what explains this discrepancy between clinician‐rated and caregiver‐based tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Genome-wide association study of frontotemporal dementia identifies a C9ORF72 haplotype with a median of 12-G4C2 repeats that predisposes to pathological repeat expansions
- Author
-
Reus, Lianne M., Jansen, Iris E., Mol, Merel O., van Ruissen, Fred, van Rooij, Jeroen, van Schoor, Natasja M., Tesi, Niccolò, Reinders, Marcel J. T., Huisman, Martijn A., Holstege, Henne, Visser, Pieter Jelle, de Boer, Sterre C. M., Hulsman, Marc, Ahmad, Shahzad, Amin, Najaf, Uitterlinden, Andre G., Ikram, Arfan, van Duijn, Cornelia M., Seelaar, Harro, Ramakers, Inez H. G. B., Verhey, Frans R. J., van der Lugt, Aad, Claassen, Jurgen A. H. R., Jan Biessels, Geert, De Deyn, Peter Paul, Scheltens, Philip, van der Flier, Wiesje M., van Swieten, John C., Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., and van der Lee, Sven J.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Decreased emotion recognition and reduced focus on facial hallmarks in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia compared to primary psychiatric disorders and controls
- Author
-
Fieldhouse, Jay L. P., primary, Singleton, Ellen H., additional, van Engelen, Marie‐Paule E., additional, van ‘t Hooft, Jochum J., additional, de Boer, Sterre C. M., additional, Froeling, Violet E., additional, Braun, Michelle, additional, Oudega, Mardien L., additional, van Grootheest, Daniël, additional, Kerssens, Cora, additional, Duits, Flora H., additional, van Harten, Argonde C., additional, Vijverberg, Everard G. B., additional, and Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Biomarker A plus T-: is this Alzheimer's disease or not? A combined CSF and pathology study
- Author
-
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Vromen, Eleonora M, de Boer, Sterre C M, Teunissen, Charlotte E, Rozemuller, Annemieke, Sieben, Anne, Bjerke, Maria, Visser, Pieter Jelle, Bouwman, Femke H, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Tijms, Betty M, Clinical Biology, Clinical sciences, Neuroprotection & Neuromodulation, and Neurology
- Subjects
autopsy ,Neuroscience(all) ,neurology ,biomarker ,CSF ,Alzheimer’s disease ,AT(N) - Abstract
The biological definition of Alzheimer's disease using CSF biomarkers requires abnormal levels of both amyloid (A) and tau (T). However, biomarkers and corresponding cutoffs may not always reflect the presence or absence of pathology. Previous studies suggest that up to 32% of individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease show normal CSF p-tau levels in vivo, but these studies are sparse and had small sample sizes. Therefore, in three independent autopsy cohorts, we studied whether or not CSF A+T- excluded Alzheimer's disease based on autopsy. We included 215 individuals, for whom ante-mortem CSF collection and autopsy had been performed, from three cohorts: (i) the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC) [n = 80, 37 (46%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time between CSF collection and death 4.5 ± 2.9 years]; (ii) the Antwerp Dementia Cohort (DEM) [n = 92, 84 (91%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 1.7 ± 2.3 years]; and (iii) the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) [n = 43, 31 (72%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 5.1 ± 2.5 years]. Biomarker profiles were based on dichotomized CSF Aβ1-42 and p-tau levels. The accuracy of CSF AT profiles to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease was assessed. Lastly, we investigated whether the concordance of AT profiles with autopsy diagnosis improved when CSF was collected closer to death in 9 (10%) DEM and 30 (70%) ADNI individuals with repeated CSF measurements available. In total, 50-73% of A+T- individuals and 100% of A+T+ individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. Amyloid status showed the highest accuracy to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in the ADC: 88%, 92% and 84%; in the DEM: 87%, 94% and 12%; and in the ADNI cohort: 86%, 90% and 75%, respectively). The addition of CSF p-tau did not further improve these estimates. We observed no differences in demographics or degree of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology between A+T- and A+T+ individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease. All individuals with repeated CSF measurements remained stable in Aβ1-42 status during follow-up. None of the Alzheimer's disease individuals with a normal p-tau status changed to abnormal; however, four (44%) DEM individuals and two (7%) ADNI individuals changed from abnormal to normal p-tau status over time, and all had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. In summary, we found that up to 73% of A+T- individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. This should be taken into account in both research and clinical settings.
- Published
- 2023
7. Trajectories of behavior and social cognition in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric disorders: A call for better operationalization of socioemotional changes.
- Author
-
Fieldhouse JLP, van Engelen ME, Handgraaf D, de Boer SCM, van 't Hooft JJ, Schouws SNTM, van Grootheest D, Kerssens C, Duits FH, van Harten AC, Oudega ML, Vijverberg EGB, and Pijnenburg YAL
- Abstract
Background and Purpose: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary psychiatric disorders (PPD), such as mood, psychotic, and autism spectrum disorders, share similar clinical characteristics of behavior and social cognition. Better understanding of clinical progression in bvFTD and PPD is essential for adequate disease monitoring and trial design., Methods: In this longitudinal study (N = 89), patients with bvFTD and PPD with at least one follow-up assessment were included from the Social Brain Project of the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam. Behavioral change and social cognitive decline were assessed via informant-rated questionnaires (Cambridge Behavioral Inventory-Revised, Frontal Behavioral Inventory [FBI], Stereotypy Rating Inventory, Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale, Revised Self-Monitoring Scale [RSMS]-caregiver) and patient assessment (Ekman 60-Faces Test, RSMS-patient, Emotional Contagion Scale). Clinical trajectories (median = 1.4 years, interquartile range = 1.0-2.2) were examined using linear mixed models. In a subsample, associations with baseline serum neurofilament light (sNfL) were examined., Results: At baseline, behavioral and social cognitive symptoms were similar between diagnosis groups, except for poorer emotion recognition in bvFTD. Over time, behavioral symptoms worsened in bvFTD, whereas most measures remained stable and the FBI improved in PPD. Regarding social cognition, emotion recognition and caregiver-reported socioemotional sensitivity worsened in bvFTD and remained stable in PPD. Patient-reported social cognitive measures did not change over time. Higher sNfL was associated with faster behavioral change., Conclusions: Trajectories of behavior and social cognition differentiate bvFTD from PPD, provided that social cognition is not patient-reported. Therefore, we stress the need to optimize longitudinal social cognitive assessment in bvFTD. sNfL may be a useful prognostic marker of behavioral progression in neuropsychiatric populations., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Large-scale CSF proteome profiling identifies biomarkers for accurate diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia.
- Author
-
Hok-A-Hin YS, Vermunt L, Peeters CFW, van der Ende EL, de Boer SCM, Meeter LH, van Swieten JC, Hu WT, Lleó A, Alcolea D, Engelborghs S, Sieben A, Chen-Plotkin A, Irwin DJ, van der Flier WM, Pijnenburg YAL, Teunissen CE, and Del Campo M
- Abstract
Diagnosis of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and the specific underlying neuropathologies (frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP) is challenging, and thus fluid biomarkers are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy. We used proximity extension assays to analyze 665 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a multicenter cohort including patients with FTD (n = 189), Alzheimer's Disease dementia (AD; n = 232), and cognitively unimpaired individuals (n = 196). In a subset, FTLD neuropathology was determined based on phenotype or genotype (FTLD-Tau = 87 and FTLD-TDP = 68). Forty three proteins were differentially regulated in FTD compared to controls and AD, reflecting axon development, regulation of synapse assembly, and cell-cell adhesion mediator activity pathways. Classification analysis identified a 14- and 13-CSF protein panel that discriminated FTD from controls (AUC: 0.96) or AD (AUC: 0.91). Custom multiplex panels confirmed the highly accurate discrimination between FTD and controls (AUCs > 0.96) or AD (AUCs > 0.88) in three validation cohorts, including one with autopsy confirmation (AUCs > 0.90). Six proteins were differentially regulated between FTLD-TDP and FTLD-Tau, but no reproducible classification model could be generated (AUC: 0.80). Overall, this study introduces novel FTD-specific biomarker panels with potential use in diagnostic setting.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Rationale and Design of the "DIagnostic and Prognostic Precision Algorithm for behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia" (DIPPA-FTD) Study: A Study Aiming to Distinguish Early Stage Sporadic FTD from Late-Onset Primary Psychiatric Disorders.
- Author
-
de Boer SCM, Riedl L, Fenoglio C, Rue I, Landin-Romero R, Matis S, Chatterton Z, Galimberti D, Halliday G, Diehl-Schmid J, Piguet O, Pijnenburg YAL, and Ducharme S
- Subjects
- Humans, Prospective Studies, Prognosis, Neuropsychological Tests, Biomarkers, Frontotemporal Dementia genetics, Acetamides, Isothiocyanates
- Abstract
Background: The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is very heterogeneous in pathology, genetics, and disease course. Unlike Alzheimer's disease, reliable biomarkers are lacking and sporadic bvFTD is often misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) due to overlapping clinical features. Current efforts to characterize and improve diagnostics are centered on the minority of genetic cases., Objective: The multi-center study DIPPA-FTD aims to develop diagnostic and prognostic algorithms to help distinguish sporadic bvFTD from late-onset PPD in its earliest stages., Methods: The prospective DIPPA-FTD study recruits participants with late-life behavioral changes, suspect for bvFTD or late-onset PPD diagnosis with a negative family history for FTD and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subjects are invited to participate after diagnostic screening at participating memory clinics or recruited by referrals from psychiatric departments. At baseline visit, participants undergo neurological and psychiatric examination, questionnaires, neuropsychological tests, and brain imaging. Blood is obtained to investigate biomarkers. Patients are informed about brain donation programs. Follow-up takes place 10-14 months after baseline visit where all examinations are repeated. Results from the DIPPA-FTD study will be integrated in a data-driven approach to develop diagnostic and prognostic models., Conclusions: DIPPA-FTD will make an important contribution to early sporadic bvFTD identification. By recruiting subjects with ambiguous or prodromal diagnoses, our research strategy will allow the characterization of early disease stages that are not covered in current sporadic FTD research. Results will hopefully increase the ability to diagnose sporadic bvFTD in the early stage and predict progression rate, which is pivotal for patient stratification and trial design.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Gaps in clinical research in frontotemporal dementia: A call for diversity and disparities-focused research.
- Author
-
Franzen S, Nuytemans K, Bourdage R, Caramelli P, Ellajosyula R, Finger E, Illán-Gala I, Loi SM, Morhardt D, Pijnenburg Y, Rascovsky K, Williams MM, Yokoyama JS, Alladi S, Ayhan Y, Broce I, Castro-Suarez S, Coleman K, de Souza LC, Dacks PA, de Boer SCM, de Leon J, Dodge S, Grasso S, Gupta V, Gupta V, Ghoshal N, Kamath V, Kumfor F, Matias-Guiu JA, Narme P, Nielsen TR, Okhuevbie D, Piña-Escudero SD, Garcia RR, Scarioni M, Slachevsky A, Suarez-Gonzalez A, Tee BL, Tsoy E, Ulugut H, Babulal GM, and Onyike CU
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Language, Europe, Frontotemporal Dementia diagnosis, Frontotemporal Dementia therapy, Frontotemporal Dementia psychology, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Alzheimer Disease therapy
- Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is one of the leading causes of dementia before age 65 and often manifests as abnormal behavior (in behavioral variant FTD) or language impairment (in primary progressive aphasia). FTD's exact clinical presentation varies by culture, language, education, social norms, and other socioeconomic factors; current research and clinical practice, however, is mainly based on studies conducted in North America and Western Europe. Changes in diagnostic criteria and procedures as well as new or adapted cognitive tests are likely needed to take into consideration global diversity. This perspective paper by two professional interest areas of the Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment examines how increasing global diversity impacts the clinical presentation, screening, assessment, and diagnosis of FTD and its treatment and care. It subsequently provides recommendations to address immediate needs to advance global FTD research and clinical practice., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Diagnostic Instability Over Time in the Late-Onset Frontal Lobe Syndrome: When Can We Say it's FTD?
- Author
-
de Boer SCM, Gossink F, Krudop W, Vijverberg E, Schouws S, Reus LM, Pijnenburg YAL, and Dols A
- Subjects
- Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Frontal Lobe diagnostic imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, Frontotemporal Dementia diagnosis, Frontotemporal Dementia psychology
- Abstract
Objectives: Distinguishing sporadic behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from late-onset primary psychiatric disorders (PPD) remains challenging with the lack of robust biomarkers. An early bvFTD misdiagnosis in PPD cases and vice-versa is common. Little is known about diagnostic (in)stability over longer period of time. We investigated diagnostic instability in a neuropsychiatric cohort up to 8 years after baseline visit and identified which clinical hallmarks contribute to diagnostic instability., Design: Diagnoses of participants of the late-onset frontal lobe (LOF) study were collected from the baseline visit (T0) and the 2-year follow-up visit (T2). Clinical outcomes were retrieved 5-8 years after baseline visit (T
final ). Endpoint diagnoses were categorized into bvFTD, PPD and other neurological disorders (OND). We calculated the total amount of participants that switched diagnosis between T0-T2 and T2-Tfinal . Clinical records of participants that switched diagnosis were assessed., Results: Of the 137 patients that were included in the study, the final diagnoses at Tfinal were bvFTD 24.1% (n = 33), PPD 39.4% (n = 54), OND 33.6% (n = 46) and unknown 2.9% (n = 4). Between T0 and T2, a total of 29 (21.2%) patients switched diagnosis. Between T2 and Tfinal , 8 (5.8%) patients switched diagnosis. Prolonged follow-up identified few cases with diagnostic instability. Major contributors to diagnostic instability where a nonconverting diagnosis of possible bvFTD and a probable bvFTD diagnosis based on informant-based history and an abnormal FDG-PET scan whilst having a normal MRI., Conclusion: Considering these lessons, a FTD diagnosis remains stable enough to conclude that 2 years is sufficient to say if a patient with late-life behavioral disorder has FTD., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Biomarker A+T-: is this Alzheimer's disease or not? A combined CSF and pathology study.
- Author
-
Vromen EM, de Boer SCM, Teunissen CE, Rozemuller A, Sieben A, Bjerke M, Visser PJ, Bouwman FH, Engelborghs S, and Tijms BM
- Subjects
- Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Biomarkers, Sensitivity and Specificity, Peptide Fragments, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
The biological definition of Alzheimer's disease using CSF biomarkers requires abnormal levels of both amyloid (A) and tau (T). However, biomarkers and corresponding cutoffs may not always reflect the presence or absence of pathology. Previous studies suggest that up to 32% of individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease show normal CSF p-tau levels in vivo, but these studies are sparse and had small sample sizes. Therefore, in three independent autopsy cohorts, we studied whether or not CSF A+T- excluded Alzheimer's disease based on autopsy. We included 215 individuals, for whom ante-mortem CSF collection and autopsy had been performed, from three cohorts: (i) the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC) [n = 80, 37 (46%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time between CSF collection and death 4.5 ± 2.9 years]; (ii) the Antwerp Dementia Cohort (DEM) [n = 92, 84 (91%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 1.7 ± 2.3 years]; and (iii) the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) [n = 43, 31 (72%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 5.1 ± 2.5 years]. Biomarker profiles were based on dichotomized CSF Aβ1-42 and p-tau levels. The accuracy of CSF AT profiles to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease was assessed. Lastly, we investigated whether the concordance of AT profiles with autopsy diagnosis improved when CSF was collected closer to death in 9 (10%) DEM and 30 (70%) ADNI individuals with repeated CSF measurements available. In total, 50-73% of A+T- individuals and 100% of A+T+ individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. Amyloid status showed the highest accuracy to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in the ADC: 88%, 92% and 84%; in the DEM: 87%, 94% and 12%; and in the ADNI cohort: 86%, 90% and 75%, respectively). The addition of CSF p-tau did not further improve these estimates. We observed no differences in demographics or degree of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology between A+T- and A+T+ individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease. All individuals with repeated CSF measurements remained stable in Aβ1-42 status during follow-up. None of the Alzheimer's disease individuals with a normal p-tau status changed to abnormal; however, four (44%) DEM individuals and two (7%) ADNI individuals changed from abnormal to normal p-tau status over time, and all had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. In summary, we found that up to 73% of A+T- individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. This should be taken into account in both research and clinical settings., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. A caregiver's perspective on clinically relevant symptoms in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia: tools for disease management and trial design.
- Author
-
Fieldhouse JLP, van Dijk G, Gillissen F, van Engelen ME, de Boer SCM, Dols A, van der Waal HJ, Regeer BJ, Vijverberg EGB, and Pijnenburg YAL
- Subjects
- Humans, Disease Management, Clinical Trials as Topic, Research Design, Caregivers psychology, Frontotemporal Dementia psychology, Frontotemporal Dementia therapy
- Abstract
Background: Adequate detection of symptoms and disease progression in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is complex. Dementia cohorts usually utilize cognitive and functional measures, which fail to detect dominant behavioural and social cognitive deficits in bvFTD. Moreover, since patients typically have a loss of insight, caregivers are important informants. This is the first qualitative study to investigate caregiver relevant symptoms during the disease course of bvFTD, aiming to improve tools for diagnosis, progression, and future clinical trials., Methods: Informal caregivers of patients in different disease stages of bvFTD (N = 20) were recruited from the neurology outpatient clinic of the Amsterdam UMC and a patient organization for peer support in the Netherlands. Their perspectives on clinical relevance were thoroughly explored during individual semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis with open coding was performed by two researchers independently to establish overarching themes and patterns., Results: Caregivers reported a variety of symptoms, in which (i) loss of emotional connection, (ii) preoccupation and restlessness, and (iii) apathy and dependency compose major themes of relevance for diagnosis and treatment. Within heterogeneous disease trajectories, symptom presence differed between stages and among individuals, which is relevant in the context of progression and outcome measures. Significant socio-emotional changes dominated in early stages, while severe cognitive, behavioural, and physical deterioration shifted focus from predominant personality change to quality of life in later stages., Conclusions: Caregiver perspectives on target symptoms in bvFTD differ according to clinical stage and patient-caregiver characteristics, with significant socio-emotional changes characterizing early stages. These findings call for more appropriate tools and symptomatic treatments, as well as a personalized approach in treatment of bvFTD and a focus on early stage interventions in clinical trial design., (© 2022 The Authors. Psychogeriatrics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Psychogeriatric Society.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Clinical Phenotypes of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia by Age at Onset.
- Author
-
Fieldhouse JLP, Gossink FT, Feenstra TC, de Boer SCM, Lemstra AW, Prins ND, Bouwman F, Koene T, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Gillissen F, Teunissen CE, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Dols A, Vijverberg EGB, and Pijnenburg YAL
- Subjects
- Adult, Age of Onset, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety physiopathology, Anxiety psychology, Apathy physiology, Delusions physiopathology, Delusions psychology, Female, Frontotemporal Dementia psychology, Hallucinations physiopathology, Hallucinations psychology, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Irritable Mood physiology, Male, Memory Disorders physiopathology, Memory Disorders psychology, Middle Aged, Mood Disorders physiopathology, Mood Disorders psychology, Phenotype, Severity of Illness Index, Frontotemporal Dementia physiopathology, Mortality, Neuropsychological Tests
- Abstract
Background: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is generally considered a young-onset dementia, although age at onset is highly variable. While several studies indicate clinical differences regarding age at onset, no biomarker validated cohort studies with updated clinical criteria have been performed., Objective: We aimed to examine behavior, cognition, and mortality over the full age spectrum in a cohort of bvFTD patients with neuroimaging, genetic, or histopathological confirmation and exclusion of positive Alzheimer's disease biomarkers or severe cerebrovascular damage., Methods: In total, 315 patients with a clinical diagnosis of probable or definite bvFTD were included from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort and grouped into quartiles by age-at-diagnosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive functioning were assessed with the neuropsychiatric inventory, the geriatric depression scale and a neuropsychological test battery. Data on mortality was obtained from the Dutch municipal register. Associations between age-at-diagnosis and clinical features and mortality risk were examined., Results: Age-at-diagnosis ranged from 26 to 85 years and established quartiles with mean ages of 52±6, 61±2, 66±2, and 74±3 years. In the total sample, 44.4%exceeded an age of 65 years at time of diagnosis. Earlier age-at-diagnosis was associated with more severe behavioral symptoms, while later age-at-diagnosis was associated with more severe memory impairment. Unexpectedly, mortality risk was not associated with age-at-diagnosis., Conclusion: In bvFTD, symptom profile is associated with age-at-diagnosis. This should be taken into account with regard to diagnostics, patient management, and trial design. Additionally, based on our sample, the prevalence of late-onset bvFTD is higher than generally thought.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Differences in Sex Distribution Between Genetic and Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia.
- Author
-
de Boer SCM, Riedl L, van der Lee SJ, Otto M, Anderl-Straub S, Landin-Romero R, Sorrentino F, Fieldhouse JLP, Reus LM, Vacaflor B, Halliday G, Galimberti D, Diehl-Schmid J, Ducharme S, Piguet O, and Pijnenburg YAL
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Internationality, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Semantics, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Frontotemporal Dementia classification, Frontotemporal Dementia genetics, Sex Distribution
- Abstract
Background: Reported sex distributions differ between frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts. Possible explanations are the evolving clinical criteria of FTD and its subtypes and the discovery of FTD causal genetic mutations that has resulted in varying demographics., Objective: Our aim was to determine the sex distribution of sporadic and genetic FTD cases and its subtypes in an international cohort., Methods: We included 910 patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 654), non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA; n = 99), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; n = 117), and right temporal variant frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD; n = 40). We compared sex distribution between genetic and sporadic FTD using χ2-tests., Results: The genetic FTD group consisted of 51.2% males, which did not differ from sporadic FTD (57.8% male, p = 0.08). In the sporadic bvFTD subgroup, males were predominant in contrast to genetic bvFTD (61.6% versus 52.9% males, p = 0.04). In the other clinical FTD subgroups, genetic cases were underrepresented and within the sporadic cases the sex distribution was somewhat equal., Conclusion: The higher male prevalence in sporadic bvFTD may provide important clues for its differential pathogenesis and warrants further research.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.