1. If I could just stop loving you: anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical breakup
- Author
-
Earp, BD, Wudarczyk, OA, Sandberg, A, and Savulescu, J
- Subjects
Target Article ,Adult ,Male ,Psychotropic Drugs ,neuroenhancement ,Libido ,Sexual Behavior ,domestic abuse ,Homosexuality ,ethics ,Love ,Object Attachment ,anti-love biotechnology ,wellbeing ,Animals ,Humans ,Female ,Interpersonal Relations ,love drugs ,pharmacology ,Child ,Gonadal Steroid Hormones ,Stress, Psychological ,Biotechnology - Abstract
“Love hurts”—as the saying goes—and a certain amount of pain and difficulty in intimate relationships is unavoidable. Sometimes it may even be beneficial, since adversity can lead to personal growth, self-discovery, and a range of other components of a life well-lived. But other times, love can be downright dangerous. It may bind a spouse to her domestic abuser, draw an unscrupulous adult toward sexual involvement with a child, put someone under the insidious spell of a cult leader, and even inspire jealousy-fueled homicide. How might these perilous devotions be diminished? The ancients thought that treatments such as phlebotomy, exercise, or bloodletting could “cure” an individual of love. But modern neuroscience and emerging developments in psychopharmacology open up a range of possible interventions that might actually work. These developments raise profound moral questions about the potential uses—and misuses—of such anti-love biotechnology. In this article, we describe a number of prospective love-diminishing interventions, and offer a preliminary ethical framework for dealing with them responsibly should they arise.
- Published
- 2013