Search

Zusammenfassung. Im Projekt QueB 1 – Qualität entwickeln mit und durch Bewegung in Kitas – wurde untersucht, inwieweit Kitas unterstützt werden können, ihre Organisation so zu entwickeln, dass sowohl die Kinder als auch die pädagogischen Fachkräfte ihre Handlungsmöglichkeiten für einen aktiven Lebensstil nachhaltig erweitern. Die Kitas folgten einem 10-Schritte-Programm, das sich am Public Health Action Circle orientierte und von Coaches begleitet wurde. Verschiedene Methoden wie eine Kita-Check-App, eine Bewegungstagebuch-App und Schrittzähler wurden eingesetzt. Getestet wurde das Vorgehen in einer einjährigen Studie in zwei Regionen in Bayern mit Wartegruppe, prä-post-Design und mixed-methods Ansatz. Die Ergebnisse zeigen u.a. positive Veränderungen in den Bewegungsaktivitäten. Kinder machten rund 10% mehr Schritte und reduzierten ihre Sitzzeiten. Pädagogische Fachkräfte steigerten ihre Aktivität sogar um fast 15%. In der Kita wurden nicht nur die vorhandenen Möglichkeiten sich zu bewegen mehr genutzt, es wurden auch neue Bewegungsgelegenheiten geschaffen. Analysen der Ziele, die die Kitas individuell formulierten, zeigten vielfältiges Potential für die Kita-Entwicklung.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) together with HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) are utilized to classify invasive breast cancer (IBC) into predictive molecular subtypes. As IHC evaluation may be hampered by analytical errors, gene expression assays could offer a reliable alternative. In this first Europe-wide external quality assessment (EQA) study, we investigated performance of mRNA-based Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 (CE-IVD) in five European laboratories. The cohort comprised ten pre-therapy IBC core biopsies diagnosed in the coordinating center (CC). STRAT4 binary (positive or negative) mRNA results of each marker (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2,&nbsp, MKI67) were compared with the gold standard IHC/ISH performed by the CC. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA were 100% for all samples. In contrast, PGR expression was falsely negative for one case by two sites and MKI67 falsely negative for two cases (respectively by four and one sites). These cases had STRAT4 expression values close to assay cut-offs and immunohistochemically presented heterogeneous low positive PgR and heterogeneous Ki-67. Our EQA shows that STRAT4 mRNA assay may be a reproducible method to evaluate ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. However, cases with expression values close to assay cut-offs should be carefully reviewed.

Simple Summary Four biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, and HER2], are used to stratify breast cancer (BC) into subtypes predictive of therapy response. In a Europe-wide external quality assessment, we compared performance of an mRNA-based method [Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 (CE-IVD)] for determining ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 expression against the gold standard [immunohistochemistry (IHC)/HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH)]. The coordinating center (CC) and five European laboratories tested ten breast cancer samples. STRAT4 binary (positive or negative) results of each marker were compared with the gold standard. ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA results were concordant with IHC/ISH in all single analyses. In contrast, PGR and MKI67 results were discordant in a few cases, which had STRAT4 expression values close to assay cut-offs and immunohistochemically presented heterogeneous low positive PgR and heterogeneous Ki-67. STRAT4 assay may be a reproducible method. However, cases with expression values close to cut-offs should be carefully reviewed. Abstract Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) together with HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) are utilized to classify invasive breast cancer (IBC) into predictive molecular subtypes. As IHC evaluation may be hampered by analytical errors, gene expression assays could offer a reliable alternative. In this first Europe-wide external quality assessment (EQA) study, we investigated performance of mRNA-based Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 (CE-IVD) in five European laboratories. The cohort comprised ten pre-therapy IBC core biopsies diagnosed in the coordinating center (CC). STRAT4 binary (positive or negative) mRNA results of each marker (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67) were compared with the gold standard IHC/ISH performed by the CC. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA were 100% for all samples. In contrast, PGR expression was falsely negative for one case by two sites and MKI67 falsely negative for two cases (respectively by four and one sites). These cases had STRAT4 expression values close to assay cut-offs and immunohistochemically presented heterogeneous low positive PgR and heterogeneous Ki-67. Our EQA shows that STRAT4 mRNA assay may be a reproducible method to evaluate ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. However, cases with expression values close to assay cut-offs should be carefully reviewed.

Cannabinoids elicit hypotension mainly via activated CB(1) receptors and show complex cardiovascular actions. Effects on human heart muscle have not been studied yet. Isolated human atrial heart muscle preparations were stimulated by electrical field with 1 Hz to contract isometrically at optimal length and were challenged with the endogenous cannabinoid arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide), the metabolically stable analogue R-methanandamide, and the potent synthetic CB(1) receptor agonist HU-210. Anandamide dose-dependently decreased systolic force (82.2 +/- 4.8% and 60.8 +/- 6.8% of maximal systolic force for 0.1 and 1 microM, respectively, P < 0.05). The selective CB(1) receptor antagonist AM-251 (1 microM, P < 0.05), but not the CB(2) receptor antagonist, AM-630 (1 microM), the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) (500 microM), or the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (100 microM), prevented the effect. Contrary to indomethacin, l-NAME alone showed negative inotropic effects (72.1 +/- 3.54%, P < 0.001). The R-methanandamide (1 microM: 50.4 +/- 3.5%, P < 0.001) and HU-210 (1 microM: 60.1 +/- 3.8%, P < 0.001) had similar negative inotropic effects. The existence of CB(1) receptors on heart muscle was verified using Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining. The conclusion is that anandamide, R-methanandamide, and HU-210 decrease contractile performance in human atrial muscle via CB(1) receptors.