Search

Rationale: Research suggests that respiratory and cardiovascular drugs can ameliorate the rate of lung function decline. Objectives: To investigate the impact of respiratory and cardiovascular pharmacotherapy on lung function trajectories in the general population. Methods: Repeated spirometry was performed in the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort of adults aged ≥45 years. Exposure to long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), cardioselective beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor blockers, and statins was quantified from pharmacy records to account for therapy adherence. Propensity-score matching and multinomial logistic regression were performed to model medication effects on lung function trajectories, which were previously identified based on FEV 1 and FVC patterns. Models were additionally stratified by genetic variation in each drug target. Measurement and Main Results: Among 3,783 individuals, 2,974 (78.6%) were classified as normal lung function decliners, 432 (11.4%) as rapid decliners, and 377 (10.0%) as improvers. Exposure to LABA (odds ratio (OR) =1.09 [95%-CI: 1.03-1.16] per 10% increase in exposure), ICS (OR=1.08 [95%-CI: 1.02-1.14]), and statins (OR=1.04 [95%-CI: 1.02-1.06]) significantly increased the odds of being an improver compared to a normal decliner. Beta 1 -blocker use was associated with higher odds of being a rapid decliner (OR=1.04 [95%-CI: 1.00-1.09]), which was driven by incident users. Pharmacogenetic analysis suggests that the effects of LABA, ICS, and beta 1 -blockers are dependent on genetic variation in their drug targets. Conclusions: Our study suggests that LABA, ICS, and statins may favorably modulate lung function trajectories in adults, while initiation of beta 1 -blockers was associated with rapid lung function decline.

Background: Assessing medication adherence is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management to prevent exacerbations. However, it is unclear whether this association between adherence and exacerbations is influenced by the adherence assessment methods or thresholds used. Electronic healthcare databases are valuable to study exacerbations and adherence in real life. We aimed to systematically review the literature to identify adherence assessment methods and thresholds used in healthcare databases when investigating the association between medication adherence and COPD exacerbations and to meta-analyse the associated effect sizes., Method: MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed articles, written in English, published up to 10 October 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022363449). Two reviewers independently conducted screening for inclusion and performed data extraction. A qualitative approach described the adherence assessment methods and thresholds used. A quantitative approach (meta-analysis using random effects model) estimated the association between adherence and the risk of COPD exacerbations., Results: Eight studies were included in the systematic review of which five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The medication possession ratio (MPR) and the proportion of days covered (PDC) were the adherence assessment methods used and 0.80 was always used as threshold to differentiate good from poor adherence. Adherence and exacerbations were mostly measured over the same time period. Poor adherence (MPR or PDC<0.80) was significantly associated with a higher COPD exacerbation risk (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.62, I 2 =85%), regardless of the adherence assessment method used. Results were consistent when stratified by exacerbation severity. Poor adherence was also associated with a time-dependent risk of COPD exacerbations (incidence rate ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.46)., Conclusion: Our systematic review with meta-analysis demonstrated a 40% increased risk of COPD exacerbations in case of poor adherence to inhaler medication., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022363449., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Outside this manuscript, LL received a consulting fee paid to her institution from AstraZeneca, GSK and Sanofi and has given a lecture sponsored by Chiesi. Outside this manuscript, LL and MG have given lectures sponsored by IPSA vzw, a non-profit organisation facilitating lifelong learning for healthcare providers. Neither author has received any fees personally. LL is an unpaid member of European Respiratory Society and Belgian Respiratory Society, member of Faculty Board of Ghent University–Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and faculty committees., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Medication errors (MEs) are a major public health concern which can cause harm and financial burden within the healthcare system. Characterizing MEs is crucial to develop strategies to mitigate MEs in the future., Objectives: To characterize ME-associated reports, and investigate signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) on MEs in the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Methods: FAERS data from 2004 to 2020 was used. ME reports were identified with the narrow Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities® (MedDRA®) Query (SMQ) for MEs. Drug names were converted to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. SDRs were investigated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR)., Results: In total 488 470 ME reports were identified, mostly (59%) submitted by consumers and mainly (55%) associated with females. Median age at time of ME was 57 years (interquartile range: 37-70 years). Approximately 1 out of 3 reports stated a serious health outcome. The most prevalent reported drug class was "antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents" (25%). The most common ME type was "incorrect dose administered" (9%). Of the 1659 SDRs obtained, adalimumab was the most common drug associated with MEs, noting a ROR of 1.22 (95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.24)., Conclusion: This study offers a first of its kind characterization of MEs as reported to FAERS. Reported MEs are frequent and may be associated with serious health outcomes. This FAERS data provides insights on ME prevention and offers possibilities for additional in-depth analyses., (© 2023 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Skin cancer is a leading form of cancer in Belgium. Prevention of skin cancer by community pharmacists can play a role in increasing awareness and promoting sun protection. However, which persons could be reached by community pharmacists for skin cancer awareness in Belgium and whether this increased awareness is associated with increased sun protection and early detection remains unclear., Methods: Demographics of approached persons in Flemish community pharmacies during the months of May-June 2022 and the content of the skin cancer counseling were retrieved from the pharmacy database. Sunscreen purchases and dermatologist visits were evaluated up to 180 days after the skin cancer counseling., Results: Community pharmacists provided skin cancer counseling to a broad population of visitors (n = 822, 69% females, median age of 59 years Q1-Q3: 44-71 years). During the campaign, 822 visitors received a leaflet with skin cancer prevalence and sunscreen importance. On top of that, 335 visitors (41%) received additional counseling: skin type sensitivity was checked for 198 visitors (24%), typical characteristics of melanoma were discussed with 100 visitors (12%) and 37 visitors (5%) were referred to a physician for further information or concerns regarding a skin spot. Overall, one out of three visitors purchased sunscreen on the day of the counseling (33%, increasing up to 38% after 180 days). Among people under 20 years, this was even higher (51%). Additional counseling increased the likelihood of a dermatologist visit within 180 days (OR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.12-2.88)., Conclusions: By providing skin cancer counseling in Belgian community pharmacies, a broad range of citizens was reached and triggered to purchase sunscreen, often on the same day as the counseling. Notably, young people were likely to purchase sunscreen. Citizens receiving additional counseling were more likely to visit a dermatologist within 180 days., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 report recommends medication adherence assessment in COPD as an action item. Healthcare databases provide opportunities for objective assessments; however, multiple methods exist. We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe existing methods to assess adherence in COPD in healthcare databases and to evaluate the reporting of influencing variables., Method: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase for peer-reviewed articles evaluating adherence to COPD medication in electronic databases, written in English, published up to 11 October 2022 (PROSPERO identifier CRD42022363449). Two reviewers independently conducted screening for inclusion and performed data extraction. Methods to assess initiation (dispensing of medication after prescribing), implementation (extent of use over a specific time period) and/or persistence (time from initiation to discontinuation) were listed descriptively. Each included study was evaluated for reporting variables with an impact on adherence assessment: inpatient stays, drug substitution, dose switching and early refills., Results: 160 studies were included, of which four assessed initiation, 135 implementation and 45 persistence. Overall, one method was used to measure initiation, 43 methods for implementation and seven methods for persistence. Most of the included implementation studies reported medication possession ratio, proportion of days covered and/or an alteration of these methods. Only 11% of the included studies mentioned the potential impact of the evaluated variables., Conclusion: Variations in adherence assessment methods are common. Attention to transparency, reporting of variables with an impact on adherence assessment and rationale for choosing an adherence cut-off or treatment gap is recommended., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Outside this manuscript, J.K. Quint received grants paid to her institution from the Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asthma + Lung UK and AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Evidera, AstraZeneca and Insmed. None of which are related to the content of this work. Outside this manuscript, K. Verhamme received unconditional research grants paid to her institution from Chiesi, Amgen, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). None of which are related to the content of this work. Outside this manuscript, L. Lahousse received a consulting fee paid to her institution from AstraZeneca and honoraria for lectures paid to her institution from Chiesi and IPSA vzw, a non-profit organisation facilitating lifelong learning for healthcare providers. L. Lahousse is an unpaid member of European Respiratory Society and Belgian Respiratory Society, member of Faculty board of Ghent University – Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and faculty committees. None of which are related to the content of this work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Purpose: Poor adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may raise thromboembolic risks in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the minimal adherence to maintain the protective effect of NOACs is currently unknown. Therefore, we investigated thresholds of NOAC adherence in association with thromboembolic and mortality risks., Methods: Patients with AF initiating NOACs between 2013 and 2019 were identified in Belgian nationwide data. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) after one year of treatment. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was used to investigate outcomes., Results: 92,111 persons were included (250,750 person-years). Compared to NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 100%, significantly higher risks of stroke or systemic embolism were observed among NOAC users with PDCs of 85-89% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.19-1.54)), 80-84% (aHR 1.31, 95%CI (1.08-1.58)) and < 80% (aHR 1.64, 95%CI (1.34-2.01)), while no significant differences were observed among NOAC users with one-year PDCs of 95-99% (aHR 1.02, 95%CI (0.94-1.12)) or 90-94% (aHR 1.06, 95%CI (0.95-1.18)). Significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality were observed with decreasing levels of NOAC adherence, which were already higher among NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 90-94% versus 100% (aHR 1.09, 95%CI (1.01-1.17)). Findings were similar with once-daily and twice-daily dosed NOACs., Conclusion: Poor adherence to NOACs is associated with increased risks of thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. The minimal adherence threshold should be ≥ 90%, preferably even ≥ 95%., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)