Search

Objective: A major limitation of current suicide research is the lack of power to identify robust correlates of suicidal thoughts or behavior. Variation in suicide risk assessment instruments used across cohorts may represent a limitation to pooling data in international consortia. Method: Here, we examine this issue through two approaches: (a) an extensive literature search on the reliability and concurrent validity of the most commonly used instruments and (b) by pooling data (N ∼ 6,000 participants) from cohorts from the Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics Through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Major Depressive Disorder and ENIGMA–Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviour working groups, to assess the concurrent validity of instruments currently used for assessing suicidal thoughts or behavior. Results: We observed moderate-to-high correlations between measures, consistent with the wide range (κ range: 0.15–0.97; r range: 0.21–0.94) reported in the literature. Two common multi-item instruments, the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale and the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.83). Sensitivity analyses identified sources of heterogeneity such as the time frame of the instrument and whether it relies on self-report or a clinical interview. Finally, construct-specific analyses suggest that suicide ideation items from common psychiatric questionnaires are most concordant with the suicide ideation construct of multi-item instruments. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that multi-item instruments provide valuable information on different aspects of suicidal thoughts or behavior but share a modest core factor with single suicidal ideation items. Retrospective, multisite collaborations including distinct instruments should be feasible provided they harmonize across instruments or focus on specific constructs of suicidality.

[Background]: Morphology of the human cerebral cortex differs across psychiatric disorders, with neurobiology and developmental origins mostly undetermined. Deviations in the tangential growth of the cerebral cortex during pre/perinatal periods may be reflected in individual variations in cortical surface area later in life., [Methods]: Interregional profiles of group differences in surface area between cases and controls were generated using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging from 27,359 individuals including those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and high general psychopathology (through the Child Behavior Checklist). Similarity of interregional profiles of group differences in surface area and prenatal cell-specific gene expression was assessed., [Results]: Across the 11 cortical regions, group differences in cortical area for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and Child Behavior Checklist were dominant in multimodal association cortices. The same interregional profiles were also associated with interregional profiles of (prenatal) gene expression specific to proliferative cells, namely radial glia and intermediate progenitor cells (greater expression, larger difference), as well as differentiated cells, namely excitatory neurons and endothelial and mural cells (greater expression, smaller difference). Finally, these cell types were implicated in known pre/perinatal risk factors for psychosis. Genes coexpressed with radial glia were enriched with genes implicated in congenital abnormalities, birth weight, hypoxia, and starvation. Genes coexpressed with endothelial and mural genes were enriched with genes associated with maternal hypertension and preterm birth., [Conclusions]: Our findings support a neurodevelopmental model of vulnerability to mental illness whereby prenatal risk factors acting through cell-specific processes lead to deviations from typical brain development during pregnancy., This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG Grant Nos. HA7070/2-2, HA7070/3, HA7070/4 [to TH]) and IZKF of the medical faculty of Münster (Grants No. Dan3/012/17 [to UD] and MzH 3/020/20 [to TH]), and NHMRC projects (Grant No. 1064643 [to BJH] and 1024570 [to CGD]). The CIAM study was supported by the University of Cape Town Research Committee, South African National Research Foundation, and the South African Medical Research Council (principal investigator [PI], Fleur M. Howells) and Grant No. R01MH117601 (to NJ). This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (Grant Nos. FOR2107 JA 1890/7-1 and FOR2107 JA 1890/7-2 [to AJ]) and Swinburne University scholarship/Australian Postgraduate Award (to JK). Collection of the COGSBD cohort was funded by the Jack Brockhoff Foundation, University of Melbourne, Barbara Dicker Brain Sciences Foundation, Rebecca L Cooper Foundation, and the Society of Mental Health Research (to JK). This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (Grant Nos. FOR2107 KI588/14-1 and FOR2107 KI588/14-2 [to TK]). The St. Göran study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (Grant No. 2018-02653 [to ML]), the Swedish foundation for Strategic Research (Grant No. KF10-0039 [to ML]), the Swedish Brain foundation (Grant No. FO2020-0261 [to ML]), and the Swedish Government under the LUA/ALF agreement (Grant Nos. ALF 20170019 and ALFGBG-716801 [to ML]). This work was supported by RFBR (Grant No. 20-013-00748 [to IL, AST]) and funded by the Health Research Board (Grant No. HRA_POR/2011/100 [to CM]). The Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB) was supported by the NHMRC (Enabling Grant No. 386500), the Pratt Foundation, Ramsay Health Care, the Viertel Charitable Foundation, and the Schizophrenia Research Institute. Chief investigators for ASRB were VC, US, RSc, AJ, BM, PTM, SVC, FH, and CPa. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant Nos. DFG NE 2254/2-1, NE 2254/3-1, NE2254/4-1 [to IN]), the University Research Priority Program “Integrative Human Physiology” at the University of Zurich (to ROT), an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (Grant No. 1105825 [to CPa]), an NHMRC L3 Investigator Grant (Grant No. 1196508 [to CPa]), and NHMRC Program Grant (Grant No. 1150083 [to CPa]). ASRB was supported by the NHMRC (Enabling Grant No. 386500), the Pratt Foundation, Ramsay Health Care, the Viertel Charitable Foundation and the Schizophrenia Research Institute. Chief investigators for ASRB were VC, US, RSc, AJ, BM, PTM, SVC, FH, and CPa. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant (Agreement No. 798181 [to GP]). ASRB was supported by the NHMRC (Enabling Grant, ID 386500), the Pratt Foundation, Ramsay Health Care, the Viertel Charitable Foundation and the Schizophrenia Research Institute. Chief investigators for ASRB were VC, US, RSc, AJ, BM, PTM, SVC, FH, and CPa. The Imaging Genetics in Psychosis study was funded by Project Grants from the NHMRC (Grant Nos. APP630471 and APP1081603 [to YQ]) and the Macquarie University’s Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (Grant No. CE110001021 [to YQ]). This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities/Economy and Competitiveness/Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Grant Nos. PI11/01766 and CPII19/00009 [to JR]), co-financed by European Regional Development Fund funds from the European Commission (“A Way of Making Europe”). ASRB was supported by the NHMRC (Enabling Grant No. 386500), the Pratt Foundation, Ramsay Health Care, the Viertel Charitable Foundation, and the Schizophrenia Research Institute. Chief investigators for ASRB were VC, US, RSc, AJ, BM, PTM, SVC, FH, and CPa. SR was supported by an NHMRC Senior Fellowship (Grant No. GNT1154651). Collection of the COGSBD cohort was funded by the Jack Brockhoff Foundation, University of Melbourne, Barbara Dicker Brain Sciences Foundation, Rebecca L Cooper Foundation, and the Society of Mental Health Research (to SR). This work was supported by NIHR; MRC (to KR), NIH (Grant Nos. MH-094268, MH-105660, and MH-107730 [to ASS]). The Neuroimaging of the Children's Attention Project cohort was funded by NHMRC, Australia (Grant No. 1065895). Earlier funding for the cohort as also provided by NHMRC (Grant No. 1008522) and a grant from the Collier Foundation. The ACPU cohort was funded by NHMRC, Australia (Project Grant Nos. 384419 and 569533 [to TS]). This work was supported by research grants from the National Healthcare Group, Singapore (Grant Nos. SIG/05004, SIG/05028, and SIG /1103), and the Singapore Bioimaging Consortium (RP C009/2006 [to KS]), and the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization (“Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, IN 00023001” [to ASk]). This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant No. RC/17-18-19-20-21/A [to GS]) and Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (Grant No. NU20-04-00393 [to FS]). The Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS) cohort is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No. OPP 1017641) and the South African Medical Research Council. This DCHS contribution was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the author (DJS). STRADL study was supported and funded by the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award “Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally” (Grant No. 104036/Z/14/Z), and the Medical Research Council Mental Health Pathfinder Award “Leveraging routinely collected and linked research data to study the causes and consequences of common mental disorders” (MRC, Grant No. MC_PC_17209). Scottish Bipolar Family Study (SBFS) was supported by National Health Service Research Scotland, through the Scottish Mental Health Research Network (www.smhrn.org.uk), who provided assistance with subject recruitment and assessments. SBFS was conducted at the Brain Research Imaging Centre (http://www.bric.ed.ac.uk), which is supported by SINAPSE (Scottish Imaging Network, a Platform for Scientific Excellence, http://www.sinapse.ac.uk). Processing of the datasets used the resources provided by the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/) (ASt). TVR was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (Grant No. GNT1088785). Collection of the COGSBD cohort was funded by the Jack Brockhoff Foundation, University of Melbourne, Barbara Dicker Brain Sciences Foundation, Rebecca L Cooper Foundation, and the Society of Mental Health Research (to TVR). EV was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PI18/00805) integrated into the Plan Nacional de I+D+I and co-financed by the ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and the FEDER; the Instituto de Salud Carlos III; the CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental); by the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya and the Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia I Coneixement (Grant No. 2017SGR1355). This study was also supported by the Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya, Pla Estratègic de Recerca i Innovació en Salut (PERIS) 2016-2020 (Grant No. SLT006/17/00345) and the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (EU.3.1.1. Understanding health, wellbeing and disease: Grant Nos. 754907 and EU.3.1.3 [to EB]; Treating and managing disease: Grant No. 945151 [to EV]). This study was supported by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Grant Nos. R21AT009173 and R61AT009864 [to TTY]); by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (CTSI), National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI (Grant No. UL1TR001872 [to TTY]); by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (Grant No. SRG-1-141-18 [to TTY]); by UCSF Research Evaluation and Allocation Committee (REAC) and J. Jacobson Fund (to TTY); by the NIMH (Grant No. R01MH085734 [to TTY]); and by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (formerly NARSAD) (to TTY). This work was supported by a personal Veni grant to MH from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Grant No. 91619115 [to MH]) and European Community’s Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020/2014 – 2020) (Grant Agreements Nos. 667302 [CoCA], 728018 [Eat2beNICE], and 847879 [PRIME] [to BF]). JBu has been supported by the EU-AIMS (European Autism Interventions) and AIMS-2-TRIALS programmes, which receive support from Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking Grant Nos. 115300 and 777394, the resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union’s FP7 and Horizon 2020 Programmes, and from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations companies’ in-kind contributions, and AUTISM SPEAKS, Autistica and SFARI; and by the Horizon 2020–supported programme CANDY (Grant No. 847818 [to JBu]). This work is supported by Grant No. NIA T32AG058507 and NIH Grant No. U54EB020403 from the Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) Program (to CRKC). ENIGMA MDD work is supported by NIH (Grant Nos. U54 EB020403 [to PT], R01 MH116147 [to PT], and R01 MH117601 [to NJ and LS]). LS was supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (Grant No. 1140764). This work was supported by the National Center for Research Resources at the NIH (Grant Nos. NIH 1 U24 RR021992 [Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network], NIH 1 U24 RR025736-01 [Biomedical Informatics Research Network Coordinating Center; http://www.birncommunity.org]). TGMvE is supported by ENIGMA’s NIH BD2K initiative (Grant No. U54 EB020403), ENIGMA Sex Differences (Grant No. R01MH116147), and ENIGMA-COINSTAC: Advanced Worldwide Transdiagnostic Analysis of Valence System Brain Circuits (Grant No. R01MH121246). This work was supported by the NIH (Grant No. R01MH121246 [to JT, Calhoun, and TGMvE]). This work was supported in part by NIH (Grant No. U54 EB020403 [to PT]).

ObjectiveA major limitation of current suicide research is the lack of power to identify robust correlates of suicidal thoughts or behaviour. Variation in suicide risk assessment instruments used across cohorts may represent a limitation to pooling data in international consortia.MethodHere, we examine this issue through two approaches: (i) an extensive literature search on the reliability and concurrent validity of the most commonly used instruments; and (ii) by pooling data (N∼6,000 participants) from cohorts from the ENIGMA-Major Depressive Disorder (ENIGMA-MDD) and ENIGMA-Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviour (ENIGMA-STB) working groups, to assess the concurrent validity of instruments currently used for assessing suicidal thoughts or behaviour.ResultsOur results suggested a pattern of moderate-to-high correlations between instruments, consistent with the wide range of correlations, r=0.22-0.97, reported in the literature. Two common complex instruments, the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI), were highly correlated with each other (r=0.83), as were suicidal ideation items from common depression severity questionnaires.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that multi-item instruments provide valuable information on different aspects of suicidal thoughts or behaviour, but share a core factor with single suicidal ideation items found in depression severity questionnaires. Multi-site collaborations including cohorts that used distinct instruments for suicide risk assessment should be feasible provided that they harmonise across instruments or focus on specific constructs of suicidal thoughts or behaviours.Key pointsQuestion: To inform future suicide research in multi-site international consortia, it is important to examine how different suicide measures relate to each other and whether they can be used interchangeably.Findings: Findings suggest detailed instruments (such as the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale and Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation) provide valuable information on suicidal thoughts and behaviour, and share a core factor with items on suicidal ideation from depression severity rating scale (such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or the Beck Depression Inventory).Importance: Results from international collaborations can mitigate biases by harmonising distinct suicide risk assessment instruments.Next steps: Pooling data within international suicide research consortia may reveal novel clinical, biological and cognitive correlates of suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour.

SUMMARYBackgroundSuicidal behavior is highly heterogeneous and complex. A better understanding of its biological substrates and mechanisms could inform the design of more effective suicide prevention and intervention strategies. Neuroimaging studies of suicidality have so far been conducted in small samples, prone to biases and false-positive associations, yielding inconsistent results. The ENIGMA-MDD working group aims to address the issues of poor replicability and comparability by coordinating harmonized analyses across neuroimaging studies of major depressive disorder and related phenotypes, including suicidal behavior.MethodsHere, we pool data from eighteen international cohorts with neuroimaging and clinical measurements in 18,925 participants (12,477 healthy controls and 6,448 people with depression, of whom 694 had attempted suicide). We compare regional cortical thickness and surface area, and measures of subcortical, lateral ventricular and intracranial volumes between suicide attempters, clinical controls (non-attempters with depression) and healthy controls.FindingsWe identified 25 regions of interest with statistically significant (FDRPost-hoc examinations identified neuroimaging markers associated with suicide attempt over and above the effects of depression, including smaller volumes of the left and right thalamus and the right pallidum, and lower surface area of the left inferior parietal lobe.InterpretationThis study addresses the lack of replicability and consistency in several previously published neuroimaging studies of suicide attempt, and further demonstrates the need for well-powered samples and collaborative efforts to avoid reaching biased or misleading conclusions. Our results highlight the potential involvement of the thalamus, a structure viewed historically as a passive gateway in the brain, and the pallidum, a region linked to reward response and positive affect. Future functional and connectivity studies of suicidality may focus on understanding how these regions relate to the neurobiological mechanisms of suicide attempt risk.

A key objective in the field of translational psychiatry over the past few decades has been to identify the brain correlates of major depressive disorder (MDD). Identifying measurable indicators of brain processes associated with MDD could facilitate the detection of individuals at risk, and the development of novel treatments, the monitoring of treatment effects, and predicting who might benefit most from treatments that target specific brain mechanisms. However, despite intensive neuroimaging research towards this effort, underpowered studies and a lack of reproducible findings have hindered progress. Here, we discuss the work of the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Consortium, which was established to address issues of poor replication, unreliable results, and overestimation of effect sizes in previous studies. The ENIGMA MDD Consortium currently includes data from 45 MDD study cohorts from 14 countries across six continents. The primary aim of ENIGMA MDD is to identify structural and functional brain alterations associated with MDD that can be reliably detected and replicated across cohorts worldwide. A secondary goal is to investigate how demographic, genetic, clinical, psychological, and environmental factors affect these associations. In this review, we summarize findings of the ENIGMA MDD disease working group to date and discuss future directions. We also highlight the challenges and benefits of large-scale data sharing for mental health research. ENIGMA MDD work is supported by NIH grants U54 EB020403 (Thompson), R01 MH116147 (Thompson), and R01 MH117601 (Jahanshad & Schmaal). LS was supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (1140764). AFFDIS cohort: this study was funded by the University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG Startfoerderung) and the research team is supported by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung, BMBF: 01 ZX 1507, “PreNeSt - e:Med”). Barcelona cohort: MJP is funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of the Spanish Government and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III through a ‘Miguel Servet’ research contract (CP16–0020); National Research Plan (Plan Estatal de I + D + I 2016–2019); and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). BRC DeCC cohort: CHYF is supported by NIHR BRC. Calgary cohort: supported by Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Branch Out Neurological Foundation. Cardiff cohort: supported by the Medical Research Council (grant G 1100629) and the National Center for Mental Health (NCMH), funded by Health Research Wales (HS/14/20). CLING cohort: this study was partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via grants to OG (GR1950/5–1 and GR1950/10–1). CODE cohort: Henrik Walter is supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA 1539/4–1). The CODE cohort was collected from studies funded by Lundbeck and the German Research Foundation (WA 1539/4–1, SCHN 1205/3–1, SCHR443/11–1). DIP-Groningen cohort: this study was supported by the Gratama Foundation, the Netherlands (2012/35 to NG). Edinburgh cohort: The research leading to these results was supported by IMAGEMEND, which received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 602450. This paper reflects only the author’s views and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This work was also supported by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 104036/Z/14/Z. FOR2107-Marburg cohort: funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant FOR2107 KR 3822/7–2 to AK; FOR2107 KI 588/14–2 to TK and FOR2107 JA 1890/7–2 to AJ). Houston cohorts: supported in part by NIMH grant R01 085667 and the Dunn Research Foundation. JCS is supported by the Pat Rutherford, Jr. Endowed Chair in Psychiatry. IMH Study cohort: supported by funding from NHG (SIG/15012) and NMRC CISSP (2018). Melbourne cohort: funded by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Project Grants 1064643 (Principal Investigator BJH) and 1024570 (Principal Investigator CGD). Minnesota cohort: the study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH090421; Dr. Cullen) and Biotechnology Research Center (P41 RR008079; Center for Magnetic Resonance Research), the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, the University of Minnesota Graduate School, and the Minnesota Medical Foundation. This work was carried out in part using computing resources at the University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute. Münster cohort: funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant FOR2107 DA1151/5–1 and DA1151/5–2 to UD; SFB-TRR58, Projects C09 and Z02 to UD) and the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) of the medical faculty of Münster (grant Dan3/012/17 to UD). NESDA cohort: The infrastructure for the NESDA study (www.nesda.nl) is funded through the Geestkracht program of the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Zon-Mw, grant number 10–000–1002) and is supported by participating universities (VU University Medical Center, GGZ inGeest, Arkin, Leiden University Medical Center, GGZ Rivierduinen, University Medical Center Groningen) and mental health care organizations, see www.nesda.nl. Pharmo cohort: supported by ERA-NET PRIOMEDCHILD FP 6 (EU) grant 11.32050.26. PSYABM-NORMENT: supported by the Research Council of Norway (project number 229135). The South East Norway Health Authority Research Funding (project number 2015052). The Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway. San Francisco cohort: supported by NIH/NCCIH 1R61AT009864–01A1. NIMH R01MH085734. SHIP and SHIP-trend cohorts: SHIP is part of the Community Medicine Research net of the University of Greifswald, Germany, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grants no. 01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, and 01ZZ0403), the Ministry of Cultural Affairs and the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. MRI scans in SHIP and SHIP-TREND have been supported by a joint grant from Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany and the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. Stanford cohorts: this work was supported by NIH grant R37 MH101495. The BiDirect Study was supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; grants FKZ-01ER0816 and FKZ-01ER1506). MDS is partially supported by an award funded by the Phyllis and Jerome Lyle Rappaport Foundation. TCH is supported by NIMH grant 5K01MH117442. EJWVS, JL, and TFB are supported by European Research Council grant no. ERC-ADG-2014–671084 INSOMNIA. TFB is supported by a VU University Amsterdam University Research Fellowship 2016–2017. JL is supported by a VU University Amsterdam University Research Fellowship 2017–2018.

Objective: Asymmetry is a subtle but pervasive aspect of the human brain, and it may be altered in several psychiatric conditions. MRI studies have shown subtle differences of brain anatomy between people with major depressive disorder and healthy control subjects, but few studies have specifically examined brain anatomical asymmetry in relation to this disorder, and results from those studies have remained inconclusive. At the functional level, some electroencephalography studies have indicated left fronto-cortical hypoactivity and right parietal hypoactivity in depressive disorders, so aspects of lateralized anatomy may also be affected. The authors used pooled individual-level data from data sets collected around the world to investigate differences in laterality in measures of cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volume between individuals with major depression and healthy control subjects.Methods: The authors investigated differences in the laterality of thickness and surface area measures of 34 cerebral cortical regions in 2,256 individuals with major depression and 3,504 control subjects from 31 separate data sets, and they investigated volume asymmetries of eight subcortical structures in 2,540 individuals with major depression and 4,230 control subjects from 32 data sets. T-1-weighted MRI data were processedwith a single protocol using FreeSurfer and the Desikan-Killiany atlas. The large sample size provided 80% power to detect effects of the order of Cohen's d=0.1.Results: The largest effect size (Cohen's d) of major depression diagnosis was 0.085 for the thickness asymmetry of the superior temporal cortex, which was not significant after adjustment for multiple testing. Asymmetry measures were not significantly associated with medication use, acute compared with remitted status, first episode compared with recurrent status, or age at onset.Conclusions: Altered brain macro-anatomical asymmetry may be of little relevance to major depression etiology in most cases.

Understanding the mechanisms by which transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols exert changes in the default mode network (DMN) is paramount to develop therapeutically more effective approaches in the future. A full session (3000 pulses) of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) reduces the functional connectivity (FC) of the DMN and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex but current understanding of the effects of a single session of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on the DMN in healthy subjects is limited. To reduce the effects of inter-individual variability in functional architectures, we used a novel personalized target selection approach based on each subject’s resting state fMRI for an unprecedented investigation into the effects of a single session (1800 pulses) of iTBS over the DMN in healthy controls. 26 healthy subjects participated in a double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled study. After iTBS to the personalized left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) targets, we investigated the time lapse of effects in the DMN and its relationship to the harm avoidance (HA) personality trait measure (Temperament and Character Inventory/TCI). Approx. 25-30 minutes after stimulation, we observed reduced FC between the DMN and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC). About 45 minutes after stimulation the FC of rACC strongly decreased further, as did the FC of right anterior insula (rAI) with the DMN. We also report a positive correlation between the FC decrease in the rACC and the HA domain of TCI. Our results show how iTBS at personalized left-DLPFC targets reduces the FC between DMN and the rACC and rAI, regions typically described as nodes of the salience network. We find that HA scores can potentially predict iTBS response, as has been observed for HF-rTMS.

High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an effective treatment option for treatment resistant depression. However, the underlying mechanisms of a full session of HF-rTMS in healthy volunteers have not yet been described. Here we investigated, with a personalized selection of DLPFC stimulation sites, the effects driven by HF-rTMS in healthy volunteers (n = 23) over the default mode network (DMN) in multiple time windows. After a complete 10 Hz rTMS (3000 pulses) session, we observe a decrease of functional connectivity between the DMN and the subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex (sgACC), as well as the ventral striatum (vStr). A negative correlation between the magnitude of this decrease in the right sgACC and the harm avoidance domain measure from the Temperament and Character Inventory was observed. Moreover, we identify that coupling strength of right vStr with the DMN post-stimulation was proportional to a decrease in self-reports of negative mood from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. This shows HF-rTMS attenuates perception of negative mood in healthy recipients in agreement with the expected effects in patients. Our study, by using a personalized selection of DLPFC stimulation sites, contributes understanding the effects of a full session of rTMS approved for clinical use in depression over related brain regions in healthy volunteers. Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2019 peerReviewed

Noninvasive neuromodulation, including repetitive trans­cranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS), provides researchers and health care professionals with the ability to gain unique insights into brain functions and treat several neurological and psychiatric conditions. Undeniably, the number of published research and clinical papers on this topic is increasing exponentially. In parallel, several methodological and scientific caveats have emerged in the transcranial stimulation field; these include less robust and reliable effects as well as contradictory clinical findings. These inconsistencies are maybe due to the fact that research exploring the relationship between the methodological aspects and clinical efficacy of rTMS and tDCS is far from conclusive. Hence, additional work is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of magnetic stimulation and low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in order to optimize dosing, methodological designs, and safety aspects.

High frequency repetitive TMS (HF-rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an approved option for the treatment of depression, but there is also much variability in the resulting antidepressant response. This variability is believed to arise from various factors, an important one of which being the method by which rTMS is targeted to the optimal stimulation site in the left DLPFC. To more accurately target HF-rTMS at left DLPFC, we present a new method for target selection based on individual RS-fMRI data. We show in 23 healthy subjects that the new proposed method of target selection is reproducible and yields left DLPFC targets whose functional connectivity correlates more negatively with subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) than targets based on standard MNI coordinates. Since previous work has highlighted higher negative connectivity with the sgACC as an important feature of targets for higher antidepressant effect of HF-rTMS, the targets selected by the new method can be expected to lead to a higher therapeutic response. Additionally, the mechanism of action of an entire single session of HF-rTMS (3000 pulses) in healthy subjects has not been reported. We show significant decreases in functional connectivity of the default mode network in sgACC and ventral striatum (vStr) regions, peaking at 27-32 minutes after stimulation. Also, we report a negative correlation between the magnitude of this decrease in the right sgACC and the harm avoidance domain measure from the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). This finding points towards the possibility of using the harm avoidance measure as a predictor of HF-rTMS response. In addition, the decreased functional connectivity of the default mode network in right nucleus accumbens (NAcc) correlates with a short-term decrease in self-rated negative emotions from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) i.e. the lower the functional connectivity of right NAcc with the default mode network, the lower the reported perception of negative mood by the subjects. This suggests a mechanism by which changes induced by rTMS influence the perception of negative mood in recipients.