1. Differences in 24-h blood pressure profile of Japanese hypertensive patients under ARB treatment
- Author
-
Noboru Tamaki, Naoto Yokota, Takuma Etoh, Yusuke Ohya, Toru Shimokubo, Seigo Nakada, Toshihiro Kita, Atsushi Sakima, Kazuo Kitamura, and Shuichi Takishita
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ambulatory blood pressure ,Physiology ,Tetrazoles ,Blood Pressure ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ,Japan ,Internal medicine ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,business.industry ,Biphenyl Compounds ,Imidazoles ,General Medicine ,Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ,Middle Aged ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,Pulse pressure ,Candesartan ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Blood pressure ,Therapeutic Equivalency ,Anesthesia ,Hypertension ,Cardiology ,Benzimidazoles ,Female ,Telmisartan ,Olmesartan ,business ,hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) control throughout the entire day is recommended for cardiovascular protection. Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in hypertensive patients because of beneficial class effects. It is uncertain, however, whether are there any differences in 24-h BP profiles among ARBs. We examined ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among 211 Japanese hypertensive patients (age, 69.4 ± 9.6 years; female, 59.2%) under treatment with five different ARBs. Patients were divided into five groups according to ARBs prescribed. Patient backgrounds were almost identical in all the groups and there were no differences in office, 24-h and daytime BP; however, nighttime BP with olmesartan was significantly lower than with other ARBs. Office BPs with candesartan and telmisartan, but not other ARBs, correlated well with 24-h BP (p 0.01). Also, there were higher correlations between daytime and nighttime BP with candesartan and telmisartan. In all patients, pulse pressure with office BP was significantly correlated with ambulatory arterial stiffness index (p = 0.001) and fluctuation of systolic BP on ABPM (p = 0.002). In conclusion, different ARB treatments produced meaningful differences in 24-h profiles.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF