Search

Background: Primaquine (PQ) has activity against mature P. falciparum gametocytes and proven transmission blocking efficacy (TBE) between humans and mosquitoes. WHO formerly recommended a single transmission blocking dose of 0.75 mg/kg but this was little used. Then in 2012, faced with the emergence of artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum (ARPf) in SE Asia, the WHO recommended a lower dose of 0.25 mg/kg to be added to artemisinin-based combination therapy in falciparum-infected patients in low transmission areas. This dose was considered safe in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) and not requiring G6PD testing. Subsequent single low-dose primaquine (SLDPQ) studies have demonstrated safety in different G6PD variants. Dosing remains challenging in children under the age of 5 because of the paucity of PQ pharmacokinetic (PK) data. We plan to assess the anti-infectivity efficacy of SLDPQ using an allometrically scaled, weight-based regimen, with a target dose of 0.25 mg/kg, in children with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Methods: This study is an open label, randomised 1:1, phase IIb study to assess TBE, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and acceptability of artesunate pyronaridine (ASPYR) administered alone or combined with SLDPQ in 56 Burkinabe children aged ≥ 6 months– < 5 years, with uncomplicated P. falciparum and a haemoglobin (Hb) concentration of ≥ 5 g/dL. We will assess TBE, using direct membrane feeding assays (DMFA), and further investigate PQ pharmacokinetics, adverse events, Hb dynamics, G6PD, sickle cells, thalassaemia and cytochrome 2D6 (CYP2D6) status, acceptability of flavoured PQ [CAST—ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test®], and the population's knowledge, attitude and practices on malaria. Expected results and discussion: We expect children to accept tablets, confirm the TBE and gametocytocidal effects of SLDPQ and then construct a PK infectivity model (including age, sex, baseline Hb, G6PD and CYP2D6 status) to define the dose response TBE relationship that may lead to fine tuning our SLDPQ regimen. Our study will complement others that have examined factors associated with Hb dynamics and PQ PK. It will provide much needed, high-quality evidence of SLDPQ in sick African children and provide reassurance that SLDPQ should be used as a strategy against emerging ARPf in Africa. Trial registration: ISRCTN16297951. Registered on September 26, 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study describes the conditions of use of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and associated outcomes in French hospital settings. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, French observational study. Patients who received at least 1 dose of C/T were included and followed up as per routine clinical practice, until stop of C/T. Results A total of 260 patients were enrolled between October 2018 and December 2019 in 30 centers across France. Of these, 177 (68.0%) received C/T as per indication of usage following the results of the antibiogram (documented cases). Among documented patients, the mean age was 61.8 years, 73.4% were males, and 93.8% presented with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria at inclusion. C/T was most frequently prescribed for pneumonia (48.6%), bacteremia (14.7%), complicated intra-abdominal infections (13.0%), or complicated urinary tract infections (9.6%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the species most frequently isolated with 212 strains from 155 patients, and 96.2% of these strains were susceptible to C/T. The median duration of C/T treatment was 16.1 days (1–115, n = 176). Complete or partial cure was achieved in 71.7% of patients, C/T was discontinued upon adaptation to microbiology results in 11.3% of patients for the following reasons: treatment failure in 2.8%, death in 4.0%, adverse events in 1.7%, and other in 8.5%. Conclusions This is the first prospective observational study of C/T utilization in a health care setting enrolling many patients in France. C/T demonstrated a high rate of clinical effectiveness in MDR infections, confirming it as an effective treatment option for complicated infections in a high-risk population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The medicine development process is complex and requires time and effort to ensure safety, efficacy and quality. In paediatrics, this process is even more challenging, as it involves a subgroup of the population that already faces a considerable gap in the clinical evaluation of medicines and devices compared to the adult population. Moreover, access to therapies is heavily influenced by national health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations, which often form the basis for pricing and reimbursement decisions that affect the availability of effective treatments within the national health systems. Yet performing an HTA to assess the relative effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of a new children's treatment has several non‐trivial implications, creating a critical issue for the paediatric population. In addition, the advent of innovative health technologies for children emphasises the need to empower the role of HTAs in paediatrics. This article aims at describing the most relevant elements of the drug development process in the paediatric field by focusing on the HTA. Particular attention will be paid to the factors that influence market access for new paediatric medicines and patients' access to treatment. The article will also highlight some central methodological challenges in conducting HTA in the paediatric field. Finally, the article will provide insight into how initiatives, such as conect4children, may subsequently reinforce HTA awareness in the paediatric community and strengthen collaborations through network mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The understanding of acceptability of existing dosage forms is limited in most of the world and hinders the development of acceptable, age-appropriate medicines. The attributes of paediatric medicine acceptability may differ from country to country based on culture, healthcare infrastructure and health policies. This study was designed to map the acceptability of oral medicines in paediatric patients treated in hospital in India.Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged below 18 years and taking any form of oral medication. Acceptability scores were obtained using CAST-ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test tool.Findings: 490 patients were recruited and 193 evaluations of different pharmaceutical products available in 20 dosage forms and 7 routes of administration were studied. Oral liquids (50%) and tablets (35%) were the most commonly prescribed and administered forms. Regardless of the therapeutic class and age, the oral liquids were 'positively accepted' in infants and toddlers. Acceptability of tablets improved with age and appeared to be generally good from the age of 6.Conclusion: This study indicates the limited progress towards adoption of age-appropriate dosage forms in India and thus impact on the acceptability of existing oral dosage forms. The key challenges posed by the adoption of age-appropriate formulations in India are (1) awareness of importance of appropriate administration and acceptability of medicines to children in India, (2) availability of age-appropriate dosage forms and (3) lack of child-appropriate medicine policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Medicines acceptability is likely to have a significant impact on older people's adherence and, consequently, treatment effectiveness. The objective was to explore the influence of setting on medicines acceptability in older people. Methods A multi-centre, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in one care home and one elderly care hospital ward in London, UK, involving individuals on ≥1 medicine(s) and aged ≥65 years. Data-driven approach was applied using multiple observer-reported outcomes analysis tool to distinguish between positively and negatively accepted medicines. Key findings 263 observer reports from the care home (n = 97) and hospital ward (n = 166) involving 155 distinct medicinal products were assessed. Collectively, medicines appeared better accepted by patients at the hospital. Differences appeared to be driven by variations in solid oral dosage form (SODF) acceptability. Patients with dysphagia poorly accepted medicines in both settings, as expected. SODFs were unexpectedly better accepted in the hospital than in the care home in patients without dysphagia. Conclusions Medicines acceptability was affected by patient's characteristics, dosage form type and setting. Changes in care practices between care home and hospital may affect medicine administration and lead to variations in the ability and willingness of patients and carers to use the product as intended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]