Search

Idelalisib is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that has shown substantial activity in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To evaluate idelalisib as initial therapy, 64 treatment-naive older patients with CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (median age, 71 years; range, 65-90) were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly ×8 and idelalisib 150 mg twice daily continuously for 48 weeks. Patients completing 48 weeks without progression could continue to receive idelalisib on an extension study. The median time on treatment was 22.4 months (range, 0.8-45.8+). The overall response rate (ORR) was 97%, including 19% complete responses. The ORR was 100% in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutations and 97% in those with unmutated IGHV. Progression-free survival was 83% at 36 months. The most frequent (>30%) adverse events (any grade) were diarrhea (including colitis) (64%), rash (58%), pyrexia (42%), nausea (38%), chills (36%), cough (33%), and fatigue (31%). Elevated alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase was seen in 67% of patients (23% grade ≥3). The combination of idelalisib and rituximab was highly active, resulting in durable disease control in treatment-naive older patients with CLL. These results support the further development of idelalisib as initial treatment of CLL. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01203930.

Bone complications of metastatic disease, including skeletal-related events (SREs), impair patients' functioning and quality of life. In a randomized, phase 3 trial of 1,776 patients with metastases from solid tumors (except breast or prostate) or multiple myeloma, denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying or preventing SREs. This ad hoc analysis reports outcomes in the subgroup of 1,597 patients with solid tumors, excluding patients with multiple myeloma. Patients received monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or intravenous ZA 4 mg, adjusted for creatinine clearance, with calcium and vitamin D supplementation recommended. Endpoints included times to first on-study SRE, first-and-subsequent SREs, and pain worsening. Denosumab significantly delayed time to first on-study SRE compared with ZA (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.68–0.96) and time to first-and-subsequent SREs (RR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.72–1.00). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to development of moderate or severe pain (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.66–1.00), pain worsening (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.71–0.97), and worsening pain interference in patients with no/mild baseline pain (HR, 0.77; 95 % CI, 0.61–0.96). Adverse event rates were 96 % in both groups. Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia, mostly without clinical sequelae, was more frequent in denosumab-treated patients (denosumab 4 %, ZA 2 %). Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (denosumab 0.8 %, ZA 1.1 %). Denosumab was more effective in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and also prevented pain progression compared to ZA in this ad hoc analysis.

Purpose Denosumab, an anti–RANK ligand monoclonal antibody, significantly increases bone metastasis–free survival (BMFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .028) and delays time to first bone metastasis in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 8.0 ng/mL and/or PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 10.0 months. To identify men at greatest risk for bone metastasis or death, we evaluated relationships between PSA and PSADT with BMFS in the placebo group and the efficacy and safety of denosumab in men with PSADT ≤ 10, ≤ 6, and ≤ 4 months. Patients and Methods A total of 1,432 men with nonmetastatic CRPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or placebo. Enrollment began February 2006; primary analysis cutoff was July 2010, when approximately 660 men were anticipated to have developed bone metastases or died. Results In the placebo group, shorter BMFS was observed as PSADT decreased below 8 months. In analyses by shorter baseline PSADT, denosumab consistently increased BMFS by a median of 6.0, 7.2, and 7.5 months among men with PSADT ≤ 10 (HR, 0.84; P = .042), ≤ 6 (HR, 0.77; P = .006), and ≤ 4 months (HR, 0.71; P = .004), respectively. Denosumab also consistently increased time to bone metastasis by PSADT subset. No difference in survival was observed between treatment groups for the overall study population or PSADT subsets. Conclusion Patients with shorter PSADT are at greater risk for bone metastasis or death. Denosumab consistently improves BMFS in men with shorter PSADT and seems to have the greatest treatment effects in men at high risk for progression.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand (RANKL), an essential cytokine for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts. The role of excessive RANKL as a contributor to conditions characterized by bone loss or bone destruction has been well studied. With its novel mechanism of action, denosumab offers a significant advance in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis; bone loss associated with hormone ablation therapy in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer; and the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors by offering clinical benefit to these patients in need.

Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand, increased bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced fracture risk vs placebo in a phase 3 trial in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The present analysis of this study evaluated BMD changes after 36 months in responder subgroups and in individual patients for three key skeletal sites (lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH)) and the distal radius. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT were treated with subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg (n=734) or placebo (n=734) every 6 months for up to 36 months in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were instructed to take supplemental calcium and vitamin D. For this BMD responder analysis, the primary outcome measure was the percentage change in BMD from baseline to month 36 at the LS, FN and TH as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD at the distal 1/3 radius at 36 months was measured in a substudy of 309 patients. At 36 months, significantly more patients in the denosumab arm had increases of >3% BMD from baseline at each site studied compared with placebo (LS, 78 vs 17%; FN, 48 vs 13%; TH, 48 vs 6%; distal 1/3 radius, 40 vs 7% (P

Bone is a complex tissue that provides mechanical support for muscles and joints, protection for vital organs, a mineral reservoir that is essential for calcium homeostasis, and the environment and niches required for haematopoiesis. The regulation of bone mass in mammals is governed by a complex interplay between bone-forming cells termed osteoblasts and bone-resorbing cells termed osteoclasts, and is guided physiologically by a diverse set of hormones, cytokines and growth factors. The balance between these processes changes over time, causing an elevated risk of fractures with age. Osteoclasts may also be activated in the cancer setting, leading to bone pain, fracture, spinal cord compression and other significant morbidities. This Review chronicles the events that led to an increased understanding of bone resorption, the elucidation of the signalling pathway mediated by osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) and RANK ligand (RANKL) and its role in osteoclast biology, as well as the evolution of recombinant RANKL antagonists, which culminated in the development of the therapeutic RANKL-targeted antibody denosumab.

Summary Background Bone metastases are a major burden in men with advanced prostate cancer. We compared denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, with zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods In this phase 3 study, men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and no previous exposure to intravenous bisphosphonate were enrolled from 342 centres in 39 countries. An interactive voice response system was used to assign patients (1:1 ratio), according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence, to receive 120 mg subcutaneous denosumab plus intravenous placebo, or 4 mg intravenous zoledronic acid plus subcutaneous placebo, every 4 weeks until the primary analysis cutoff date. Randomisation was stratified by previous skeletal-related event, prostate-specific antigen concentration, and chemotherapy for prostate cancer within 6 weeks before randomisation. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. Patients, study staff, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to first on-study skeletal-related event (pathological fracture, radiation therapy, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression), and was assessed for non-inferiority. The same outcome was further assessed for superiority as a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00321620, and has been completed. Findings 1904 patients were randomised, of whom 950 assigned to denosumab and 951 assigned to receive zoledronic acid were eligible for the efficacy analysis. Median duration on study at primary analysis cutoff date was 12·2 months (IQR 5·9–18·5) for patients on denosumab and 11·2 months (IQR 5·6–17·4) for those on zoledronic acid. Median time to first on-study skeletal-related event was 20·7 months (95% CI 18·8–24·9) with denosumab compared with 17·1 months (15·0–19·4) with zoledronic acid (hazard ratio 0·82, 95% CI 0·71–0·95; p=0·0002 for non-inferiority; p=0·008 for superiority). Adverse events were recorded in 916 patients (97%) on denosumab and 918 patients (97%) on zoledronic acid, and serious adverse events were recorded in 594 patients (63%) on denosumab and 568 patients (60%) on zoledronic acid. More events of hypocalcaemia occurred in the denosumab group (121 [13%]) than in the zoledronic acid group (55 [6%]; p vs 12 [1%]; p=0·09). Interpretation Denosumab was better than zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events, and potentially represents a novel treatment option in men with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Funding Amgen.

Purpose This randomized study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK) ligand, with zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer with bone metastases. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg and intravenous placebo (n = 1,026) or intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg adjusted for creatinine clearance and subcutaneous placebo (n = 1,020) every 4 weeks. All patients were strongly recommended to take daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (defined as pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). Results Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .01 superiority) and time to first and subsequent (multiple) on-study SREs (rate ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.89; P = .001). Reduction in bone turnover markers was greater with denosumab. Overall survival, disease progression, and rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar between groups. An excess of renal AEs and acute-phase reactions occurred with zoledronic acid; hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (2.0%, denosumab; 1.4%, zoledronic acid; P = .39). Conclusion Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone and was generally well tolerated. With the convenience of a subcutaneous injection and no requirement for renal monitoring, denosumab represents a potential treatment option for patients with bone metastases.

Background: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody which inhibits RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast activity. Results from the primary analysis of this pivotal phase 3 trial showed that denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying the time to first on-study skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. We now report results including an additional 4 months of blinded treatment. Methods: Randomized patients received either subcutaneous (SC) denosumab (120 mg) and intravenous (IV) placebo or IV ZA (4 mg, adjusted for renal function) and SC placebo every 4 weeks. No dose adjustments were made for SC denosumab. All patients were advised to take daily calcium (≥500 mg) and vitamin D (≥400 IU) supplements. The primary endpoint was time to first on-study SRE (predefined as pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). Time to first and subsequent SRE (multiple event analysis) and safety endpoints were also evaluated. Analyses for the extended treatment phase are considered exploratory. Results: Overall, 2046 patients enrolled: 1026 were randomized to denosumab and 1020 were randomized to ZA. Denosumab was superior to ZA in delaying the time to first on-study SRE by 18%, and the time to first and subsequent on-study SRE by 22% (Table). The median time to first on-study SRE was 5 months longer for the denosumab group (32.4 months) than the ZA group (27.4 months). Overall survival and disease progression were similar for both treatment groups. Similar percentages of subjects reported adverse events (AEs; 96.2% denosumab, 97.4% ZA) and serious AEs (47.9% denosumab, 50.2% ZA). Positively adjudicated cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported in 2.5% (n=26) of denosumab-treated patients and 1.8% (n=18) of ZA-treated patients (P=0.29). Hypocalcemia was reported by 62 (6.1 %) patients in the denosumab group and 37 (3.7%) patients in the ZA group. Conclusion: Among patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, denosumab was superior to ZA in delaying or preventing SREs, and continued treatment with denosumab resulted in a median time to first SRE that was 5 months longer than treatment with ZA. Denosumab, with its novel mode of action, may represent a potential treatment option for patients with breast cancer and bone metastases without the need for dose adjustment or renal monitoring. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-01.

Background: Patients with breast cancer and bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, which may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL shown to be superior in delaying/preventing SREs and more effective in delaying moderate or severe pain in patients with advanced breast cancer compared with zoledronic acid (ZA). Previously reported results from this study population showed that both denosumab and ZA patients showed improvement or maintenance in HRQoL relative to baseline (BL), and a greater proportion of denosumab-treated patients had a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL. We now describe the effect of denosumab and ZA treatment on HRQoL among patients with varying degrees of pain at BL. Methods: Enrolled patients received subcutaneous (SC) denosumab 120 mg or intravenous (IV) ZA 4 mg every 4 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion. Pain was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory — Short Form (BPI). Patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on the level of pain reported at BL: no/mild pain or moderate/severe pain. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at BL, day 8, and before each monthly visit to assess overall HRQoL. Higher scores (range 0 to 108) represent better HRQoL. Improvement, maintenance, and worsening of HRQoL were assessed through month 18, when 30% of patients had dropped out due to death, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent. A change of ≥5 points (increase or decrease) in the FACT-G total score was considered a meaningful improvement. Results: Among patients who reported no/mild pain at baseline, more denosumab-treated patients had a ≥5-point increase in their FACT-G score from month 4 onwards. Over the 18 month period, an average of 4.1% more (range: −0.6% to 9.3%) denosumab-treated patients experienced meaningful improvement in HRQoL than ZA-treated patients. There were also fewer denosumab-treated patients experiencing ≥5-point decrease in HRQoL over 18 months (average of 2.4% fewer [range:-4.4% to 6.3% fewer]). Similar patterns were also noted for patients with moderate/severe pain at baseline. An average of 3.0% more (range:-1.7% to 7.9%) denosumab-treated patients had ≥5-point increase in FACT-G scores compared with ZA-treated patients over 18 months. A lower proportion of denosumab-treated patients (3.5% fewer [range: −1.1% to 11.5% fewer]) than ZA-treated patients had a decrease ≥5-points in their FACT-G score over 18 months. Conclusion: In patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, a greater proportion treated with denosumab than ZA had a meaningful improvement in HRQoL regardless of their pain level at BL. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-05.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a disease that is resistant to conventional systemic therapy. Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant has activity in patients with metastatic RCC. This approach has been used in related donor transplantation but there are limited data on outcomes in the setting of unrelated donor (URD) transplantation. This phase II trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and responses in 16 patients, 10 related and 6 URD transplants after a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and stem cell transplant as a treatment for metastatic RCC. Sixteen patients received a conditioning consisting of either fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (n=11) or fludarabine, total body irradiation (n=5) followed by transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor or a unrelated HLA-donor. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were administered as posttransplant immunosuppression. Patients were monitored for engraftment by short tandem repeat for myeloid and lymphoid lineages and clinical response was assessed by serial imaging. All patients achieved donor chimerism, 7 patients developed acute, grades 2 to 3, graft-versus-host disease. Chronic graft-versus-host disease occurred in 6 patients and transplant-related mortality was 12%. Of the 10 related donors, 1 obtained a complete response, 3 had a partial response, and 3 had stable disease. In the 6 patients who underwent URD transplant, 1 obtained a complete response and 1 patient had stable disease. These results suggest that similar outcomes are possible where either related or URD were used as the stem cell source in reduced intensity stem cell transplant for metastatic RCC.

Few attempts have been made to examine the feasibility of safely administering low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs) in the presence of concurrent thrombocytopenia. We retrospectively investigated the safety of low-dose LMWH in BMT patients, a population at risk of bleeding. In total, 26 patients received at least one dose of low-dose enoxaparin (ie1 mg/kg/day) during thrombocytopenia. s.c. enoxaparin 40 mg once daily was given in 85% of the cohort. The mean number of platelet days55 x 10(9) and20 x 10(9)/l were 16.5 days (95% CI=8.04-24.96) and 4.14 days (95% CI=2.35-5.93), respectively. The mean number of low-dose enoxaparin administration days when platelet55 x 10(9) and 20 x 10(9)/l were 9.89 days (95% CI=3.26-16.53) and 2.25 days (95% CI=0.57-3.93), respectively. Minor bleeding occurred in four patients (15%) whereas major episodes developed in two patients (8%). The latter two events occurred during the transition between full therapeutic (ie 1.5-2 mg/kg/day) and low-dose enoxaparin close to the onset of thrombocytopenia. The present case series, along with the discussed literature, descriptively suggests that low-dose enoxaparin may be safely administered at a platelet count in the range of 20 and 55 x 10(9)/l in BMT patients who weigh55 kg.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evidence assessing the use of anti-thrombin III (AT-III) in the management of toxicity associated with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT)—conditioning regimens. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature was accessed through conference proceedings, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, and MEDLINE (1966-December 2003). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Case reports, small case series, case—control and cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials of AT-III in HSCT were evaluated. Publications examining AT-III use in the non-HSCT setting were also explored. Key search terms included AT-III, transplantation, and veno-occlusive disease (VOD). DATA SYNTHESIS: Severe VOD and ensuing multiple organ dysfunction is associated with high mortality in HSCT. A low AT-III level has been shown to correlate with the development of organ dysfunction. Phase II trials, case series, and one small, randomized, placebo-controlled study suggest a benefit when AT-III therapy is instituted early in the course of VOD/multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In all of these reports, AT-III use was devoid of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies are needed to ascertain the optimal target level, method, and duration of administration, AT-III is still a viable alternative for the treatment of severe VOD and ensuing multiple organ dysfunction.

We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled multi-institutional trial to assess the ability of amifostine to protect patients against acute lung injury associated with cyclophosphamide/cisplatin/carmustine (BCNU) (STAMP I), a BCNU-containing high dose chemotherapy regimen used with hematopoietic cell transplantation. Amifostine was administered in a dose of 740 mg/m2 for 2 doses preceding administration of BCNU, the presumed pulmonary-toxic component of the regimen. The trial was stopped after 79 patients were randomized and a planned interim analysis demonstrated that it was unlikely that pulmonary cytoprotection would be detected with further accrual. We conclude that amifostine, used in the dose and schedule we tested, does not reduce the incidence of acute lung injury produced by STAMP I. Further, we suggest that amifostine use with BCNU in other contexts and with clinically achievable doses is unlikely to protect the lung from BCNU-associated acute injury.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem disease of presumed autoimmune pathogenesis for which no proven effective treatment exists. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) has been proposed as an investigational treatment for severe autoimmune diseases. Nineteen patients with poor-prognosis SSc underwent HDIT. The median age was 40 years (range, 23-61 years), the median modified Rodnan skin score (a measure of dermal sclerosis) was 31, and the median DLCO was 57%. Conditioning therapy involved 800 cGy total body irradiation (TBI) (± lung shielding to approximately 200 cGy), 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide, and 90 mg/kg equine antithymocyte globulin. CD34-selected granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor–mobilized autologous blood stem cells provided hematopoietic rescue. With median follow-up at 14.7 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimated 2-year survival rate was 79%. Three patients died of treatment complications and one of disease progression. Two of the first 8 patients had fatal regimen-related pulmonary injury, a complication not found among 11 subsequent patients who received lung shielding for TBI. Overall, internal organ functions were stable to slightly worse after HDIT, and 4 patients had progressive or nonresponsive disease. As measured by modified Rodnan skin scores and modified health assessment questionnaire disability index (mHAQ-DI) scores, significant disease responses occurred in 12 of 12 patients evaluated at 1 year after HDIT. In conclusion, though important treatment-related toxicities occurred after HDIT for SSc, modifications of initial approaches appear to reduce treatment risks. Responses in skin and mHAQ-DI scores exceed those reported with other therapies, suggesting that HDIT is a promising new therapy for SSc that should be evaluated in prospective randomized studies.

BackgroundPatients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have clinically significant coexisting medical conditions are less able to undergo standard chemotherapy. Effective therapies with acceptable side-effect profiles are needed for this patient population. MethodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of idelalisib, an oral inhibitor of the delta isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, in combination with rituximab versus rituximab plus placebo. We randomly assigned 220 patients with decreased renal function, previous therapy-induced myelosuppression, or major coexisting illnesses to receive rituximab and either idelalisib (at a dose of 150 mg) or placebo twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped early on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board owing to overwhelming efficacy. ResultsThe median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the placebo group and was not reached in the idelalisib group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the idelalisib group, 0.15; P

Background Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) mediates B-cell receptor signaling and microenvironmental support signals that promote the growth and survival of malignant B lymphocytes. In a phase 1 study, idelalisib, an orally active selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, showed antitumor activity in patients with previously treated indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Methods In this single-group, open-label, phase 2 study, 125 patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas who had not had a response to rituximab and an alkylating agent or had had a relapse within 6 months after receipt of those therapies were administered idelalisib, 150 mg twice daily, until the disease progressed or the patient withdrew from the study. The primary end point was the overall rate of response; secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety. Results The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 33 to 87); patients had received a median of four prior therapies (range, 2 to 12). Subtypes of indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma included follicular lymphoma (72 patients), small lymphocytic lymphoma (28), marginal-zone lymphoma (15), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with or without Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (10). The response rate was 57% (71 of 125 patients), with 6% meeting the criteria for a complete response. The median time to a response was 1.9 months, the median duration of response was 12.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 11 months. Similar response rates were observed across all subtypes of indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, though the numbers were small for some categories. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (in 27% of the patients), elevations in aminotransferase levels (in 13%), diarrhea (in 13%), and pneumonia (in 7%). Conclusions In this single-group study, idelalisib showed antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who had received extensive prior treatment. (Funded by Gilead Sciences and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01282424.)

Fifty women with breast cancer metastatic to bone or bone marrow involvement on light microscopy at the time of initial evaluation were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation with CD34(+) cell selection using the Isolex 300i system. All patients received induction chemotherapy. PBPC were mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The median CD34(+) progenitor purity was 94.7% (range 72-98.7%) and recovery 38.4% (range 21-60%). Forty-eight hours after HDC with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and carmustine, PBPC were reinfused. Median time to neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 9 (range 9-12) days and to platelet transfusion independence 11 (4-30) days. These data demonstrate that selected CD34(+) PBPCs allow rapid hematologic reconstitution after HDC. During follow-up, 23% of patients developed herpes zoster. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus infections. Three patients developed fungal infections. The development of these infections was not associated with steroid use but appeared more frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus. Seventy-four per cent of patients received steroids for pulmonary toxicity. Treatment-related mortality was 4%. Progression-free survival and overall survival at 35 months was 22.4% and 40.5%, with a median of 11.4 months and 15.4 months, respectively.

Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation is increasingly employed in the outpatient setting, yet data on early complications following PBPC transplantation are scant. We evaluated 105 women with high-risk primary or metastatic breast cancer who were treated at a single institution during 1996-1997. The mean duration of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count

ObjectThis trial was designed to determine the ability of autologous whole–tumor cell vaccines to induce cell-mediated immune responses in patients with recurrent malignant glioma, as well as to determine whether combining such vaccination with adoptive transfer of in vitro activated T lymphocytes prolongs patient survival.MethodsNineteen patients with recurrent malignant glioma, in whom previous external beam radiotherapy and at least one course of chemotherapy had failed were vaccinated twice with irradiated autologous whole tumor cells by using granulocyte-marcrophage colony–stimulating factor as an adjuvant. Patients then underwent leukapheresis followed by adoptive transfer of peripheral blood lymphocytes activated in vitro with anti-CD3 and interleukin-2. In vivo immune response, radiological response, clinical outcome, and survival were monitored.Seventeen patients developed a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to vaccination that appeared to be directed against the autologous tumor. In eight patients there was radiological evidence of a response and in five there was evidence of clinical improvement. Median survival was 12 months (range 6–28 months), and both the presence of a DTH response and the radiological response correlated with survival (p < 0.02 and p < 0.04, respectively).ConclusionsThese preliminary results suggest that autologous whole–tumor cell vaccines induce a cell-mediated immune response, which appears to be tumor specific in most patients. Furthermore, vaccination combined with adoptive immunotherapy with in vitro activated cells may induce a radiologically demonstrated tumor response and improved survival despite a condition of advanced disease and immunosuppression resulting from previous treatment or tumor burden. Further studies of immunotherapy are warranted.

This review focuses on certain of the principles involved in high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy along with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of certain malignancies. In addition, the evidence, wherever possible based on randomized data, for the application of this approach in certain malignancies is reviewed. The malignancies highlighted include acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease, and breast cancer.

Each year in the USA, 180,000 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed and about 44,000 women die of the disease. Current primary treatment consists of adjuvant chemotherapy and hormone therapy, and statistics show that combination chemotherapy favorably influences the outcomes in both node-negative and node-positive primary disease. However, a significant number of breast cancer patients succumb to the disease, and nearly every patient diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer will be dead within five years. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) are based upon laboratory and clinical observations of the ability to modify growth properties of quiescent and replicating cancer cells. A large number of HDC and PBPCT regimens have been evaluated for treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and recent autologous bone marrow transplantation data indicate that three HDC regimens (CPB, CTCb and cytoxan and thiotepa) predominate. Unfortunately, negative media coverage surrounding and subsequent to the presentation of preliminary findings reported at the May 1999 American Society of Clinical Oncologists, that were not allowed adequate follow-up time for full analysis of treatment results, has had a detrimental effect on the ability to conduct trials in this area. Several randomized trials have been conducted in both the metastatic and high risk primary disease settings. Thorough analysis of these studies indicates an evaluable improvement in favor of HDC and PBPCT in three of the four randomized studies performed in metastatic breast cancer and two of the four high risk primary studies. Also, initial evaluations found that quality of life appeared comparable in patients receiving either HDC or not. Each randomized trial studied asks a different question and, depending on the intensity of HDC regimen, the intensity and duration of the standard dose chemotherapy control and the schedule of events in relation to induction chemotherapy, the outcomes may be quite variable. Still, certain general trends are indentifiable. HDC alone will not completely cure breast cancer and should be considered as part of an overall therapeutic plan. In some of these studies, significantly longer follow-up is required before definitive analysis can be completed.

(2000). High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Breast Cancer. Cancer Investigation: Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 440-455.

As allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a procedure with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in older patients, many institutions place a limit of 50 to 55 years for allogeneic BMT. Consequently, older patients may not be offered potentially curative treatment for otherwise poor prognosis diseases such as AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. We compared the outcome of 59 patients aged over 50, 124 aged 40-50, and 253 aged 18-39 years who underwent allogeneic BMT in our institution between August 1987 and April 1996. Our results show little influence of age on outcome when comparing patients over 50 years with patients 40-50 years. Apart from an initial higher transplant mortality rate, overall survival was not significantly different between the three age groups. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 57% and 48%, 57% and 48%, and 62% and 58% for the >50 years, 40-50 years, and

A 2-yr and 9-month-old female patient with neurofibromatosis type-1 presented with hepatomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and croupy cough and diagnosed with xanthogranuloma disseminatum (XD). She failed chemotherapy consisting of steroids, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate. A partial response to HLH-94 therapy that included etoposide and cyclosporine A was initially observed. However, she continued to have significant organ dysfunction without further improvement at 6 months of therapy. She then received matched unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) following carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphelan conditioning with complete resolution of symptoms. BMT is an option in therapy-resistant, life threatening XD cases.

Hormone-ablative therapies for breast cancer can cause marked and rapid reductions in circulating estrogen levels. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is generally more rapid and severe than bone loss associated with menopause in women or aging in women and men. In premenopausal women with breast cancer, CTIBL is mainly caused by chemotherapy with resultant ovarian failure, through the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or by tamoxifen. In postmenopausal women, steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase bone turnover, decrease bone mass, and increase fracture rate. Oral bisphosphonates and intravenous zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss in pre- and postmenopausal women. Subcutaneous denosumab has been shown to increase bone mineral density significantly in postmenopausal women receiving AIs. Finally, there is increasing evidence to support a disease modifying effect of bone-targeted treatment with improvements in disease-free and overall survival in some disease settings.

Purpose: Denosumab was shown to be superior to zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal related events (SRE) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases in a randomized, double-blind phase III study. We evaluated further results from this study related to skeletal complications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Experimental Design: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 1,026) and intravenous placebo, or intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg (n = 1,020) and subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks. Analyses reported here include the proportion of patients with one or multiple on-study SREs, time to first radiation to bone, time to first SRE or hypercalcemia of malignancy, and change in HRQoL (functional assessment of cancer therapy–general). Results: Fewer patients receiving denosumab than zoledronic acid had an on-study SRE (31% vs. 36%, P = 0.006). The incidence of first radiation to bone was 12% (n = 123) with denosumab versus 16% (n = 162) with zoledronic acid. Denosumab prolonged the time to first radiation to bone by 26% versus zoledronic acid (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–0.94, P = 0.012) and prolonged the time to first SRE or hypercalcemia of malignancy by 18% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70–0.95; P = 0.007). Ten percent more patients had a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL with denosumab relative to zoledronic acid, regardless of baseline pain levels. Conclusions: Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in reducing bone-related complications of metastatic breast cancer and maintained HRQoL, providing an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment option for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 18(17); 4841–9. ©2012 AACR.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand (RANKL), an essential cytokine for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts. The role of excessive RANKL as a contributor to conditions characterized by bone loss or bone destruction has been well studied. With its novel mechanism of action, denosumab offers a significant advance in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis; bone loss associated with hormone ablation therapy in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer; and the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors by offering clinical benefit to these patients in need.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of denosumab versus zoledronic acid (ZA) on pain in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases. METHODS: The prevention of pain, reduction in pain interference with daily life activities, and the proportion of patients requiring strong opioid analgesics were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 3 study comparing denosumab with ZA for preventing skeletal-related events in 2046 patients who had breast cancer and bone metastases. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at baseline and monthly thereafter. RESULTS: Fewer patients who received denosumab reported a clinically meaningful worsening of pain severity (≥2-point increase) from baseline compared with patients who received ZA, and a trend was observed toward delayed time to pain worsening with denosumab versus ZA (denosumab, 8.5 months; ZA, 7.4 months; P = .08). In patients who had no/mild pain at baseline, a 4-month delay in progression to moderate/severe pain was observed with denosumab compared with ZA (9.7 months vs 5.8 months; P = .002). Denosumab delayed the time to increased pain interference by approximately 1 month compared with ZA (denosumab, 16.0 months; ZA, 14.9 months; P = .09). The time to pain improvement (P = .72) and the time to decreased pain interference (P = .92) were similar between the groups. Fewer denosumab-treated patients reported increased analgesic use from no/low use at baseline to strong opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab demonstrated improved pain prevention and comparable pain palliation compared with ZA. In addition, fewer denosumab-treated patients shifted to strong opioid analgesic use. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Matthew Smith*, Boston, MA; Fred Saad, Montreal, Canada; Neal Shore, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephane Oudard, Paris, France; Kurt Miller, Berlin, Germany; Bertrand Tombal, Bruxelles, Belgium; Paul Sieber, Lancaster, PA; Karim Fizazi, Villejuif, France; Peter Van Veldhuizen, Kansas City, MO; Ronaldo Damiao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Gavin Marx, Wahroonga, Australia; Juan Morote, Barcelona, Spain; Amy Feng, Roger Dansey, Carsten Goessl, Thousand Oaks, CA

With increasing healthcare resource constraints, it has become important to understand the incremental cost-effectiveness of new medicines. Subcutaneous denosumab is superior to intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA) for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with advanced solid tumors and bone metastases. This study sought to determine the lifetime cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs ZA in this setting, from a US managed-care perspective.A lifetime Markov model was developed, with relative rate reductions in SREs for denosumab vs ZA derived from three pivotal Phase 3 trials involving patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), breast cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and bone metastases. The real-world SRE rates in ZA-treated patients were derived from a large commercial database. SRE and treatment administration quality-adjusted life year (QALY) decrements were estimated with time-trade-off studies. SRE costs were estimated from a nationally representative commercial claims database. Drug, drug administration, and renal monitoring costs were included. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.Across tumor types, denosumab was associated with a reduced number of SREs, increased QALYs, and increased lifetime total costs vs ZA. The costs per QALY gained for denosumab vs ZA in CRPC, breast cancer, and NSCLC were $49,405, $78,915, and $67,931, respectively, commonly considered good value in the US. Costs per SRE avoided were $8567, $13,557, and $10,513, respectively. Results were sensitive to drug costs and SRE rates.Differences in pain severity and analgesic use favoring denosumab over ZA were not captured. Mortality was extrapolated from fitted generalized gamma function beyond the trial duration.Denosumab is a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of SREs in patients with advanced solid tumors and bone metastases compared to ZA. The overall value of denosumab is based on superior efficacy, favorable safety, and more efficient administration.

Summary Background Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in men with prostate cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that osteoclast inhibition might prevent bone metastases. We assessed denosumab, a fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody, for prevention of bone metastasis or death in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at high risk of bone metastasis (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥8·0 μg/L or PSA doubling time ≤10·0 months, or both) were enrolled at 319 centres from 30 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by PSA eligibility criteria and previous or ongoing chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Patients, investigators, and all people involved in study conduct were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was bone-metastasis-free survival, a composite endpoint determined by time to first occurrence of bone metastasis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) or death from any cause. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. The masked treatment phase of the trial has been completed. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00286091. Findings 1432 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (716 denosumab, 716 placebo). Denosumab significantly increased bone-metastasis-free survival by a median of 4·2 months compared with placebo (median 29·5 [95% CI 25·4–33·3] vs 25·2 [22·2–29·5] months; hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·73–0·98, p=0·028). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to first bone metastasis (33·2 [95% CI 29·5–38·0] vs 29·5 [22·4–33·1] months; HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·71–0·98, p=0·032). Overall survival did not differ between groups (denosumab, 43·9 [95% CI 40·1–not estimable] months vs placebo, 44·8 [40·1–not estimable] months; HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·85–1·20, p=0·91). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups, except for osteonecrosis of the jaw and hypocalcaemia. 33 (5%) patients on denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the jaw versus none on placebo. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 12 (2%) patients on denosumab and two ( Interpretation This large randomised study shows that targeting of the bone microenvironment can delay bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer. Funding Amgen Inc.

Background Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease. ONJ incidence, risk factors, and outcomes were evaluated in a combined analysis of three phase III trials in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies. Patients and methods Patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors or myeloma were randomly assigned to receive either s.c. denosumab (120 mg) or i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks. On-study oral examinations were conducted by investigators at baseline and every 6 months. Oral adverse events were adjudicated by an independent blinded committee of dental experts. Results Of 5723 patients enrolled, 89 (1.6%) patients were determined to have ONJ: 37 (1.3%) received zoledronic acid and 52 (1.8%) received denosumab (P = 0.13). Tooth extraction was reported for 61.8% of patients with ONJ. ONJ treatment was conservative in >95% of patients. As of October 2010, ONJ resolved in 36.0% of patients (29.7% for zoledronic acid and 40.4% for denosumab). Conclusions In this combined analysis of three prospective trials, ONJ was infrequent, management was mostly conservative, and healing occurred in over one-third of the patients. Educating physicians about oral health before and during bone-targeted therapy may help reduce ONJ incidence and improve outcomes.

The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) is widely used for assessing pain in clinical and research studies. The worst pain rating is often the primary outcome of interest; yet, no published data are available on its minimally important difference (MID). Breast cancer patients with bone metastases enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing denosumab with zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal related events and completed the BPI-SF, FACT-B, and EQ-5 Datbaseline, week 5, and monthly through the end of the study. Anchor-and distribution-based MID estimates were computed. Data from 1,564 patients were available. Spearman correlation coefficients for anchors ranged from 0.33-0.65. Mean change scores for worst pain ratings corresponding to one-category improvement in each anchor were 0.26-1.04 for BPI-SF current pain, -1.40 to -2.42 for EQ-5D Index score, 1.71-1.98 for EQ-5D Pain item, -2.22 to -0.51 for FACT-BTOI, -1.61 to -0.16 for FACT-G Physical, and -1.31 to -0.12 for FACT-G total. Distribution-based results were ISEM = 1.6, 0.5 effect size = 1.4, and Guyatt's statistic = 1.4. Combining anchor-and distribution-based results yielded a two-point MID estimate. An MID estimate of two points is useful for interpreting how much change in worst pain is considered clinically meaningful.

Purpose This study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and prostate) or myeloma. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 886) or intravenous ZA 4 mg (dose adjusted for renal impairment; n = 890). Daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). Results Denosumab was noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P = .0007). Although directionally favorable, denosumab was not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (P = .03 unadjusted; P = .06 adjusted for multiplicity) or time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P = .14). Overall survival and disease progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grading. Conclusion Denosumab was noninferior (trending to superiority) to ZA in preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma. Denosumab represents a potential novel treatment option with the convenience of subcutaneous administration and no requirement for renal monitoring or dose adjustment.

Summary Background Giant-cell tumour (GCT) of bone is a primary osteolytic bone tumour with low metastatic potential and is associated with substantial skeletal morbidity. GCT is rich in osteoclast-like giant cells and contains mononuclear (stromal) cells that express RANK ligand (RANKL), a key mediator of osteoclast activation. We investigated the potential therapeutic effect of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, on tumour-cell survival and growth in patients with GCT. Methods In this open-label, single-group study, 37 patients with recurrent or unresectable GCT were enrolled and received subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg monthly (every 28 days), with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of month 1. The primary endpoint was tumour response, defined as elimination of at least 90% of giant cells or no radiological progression of the target lesion up to week 25. Study recruitment is closed; patient treatment and follow-up are ongoing. The study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00396279. Findings Two patients had insufficient histology or radiology data for efficacy assessment. 30 of 35 (86%; 95% CI 70–95) of evaluable patients had a tumour response: 20 of 20 assessed by histology and 10 of 15 assessed by radiology. Adverse events were reported in 33 of 37 patients; the most common being pain in an extremity (n=7), back pain (n=4), and headache (n=4). Five patients had grade 3–5 adverse events, only one of which (grade 3 increase in human chorionic gonadotropin concentration not related to pregnancy) was deemed to be possibly treatment related. Five serious adverse events were reported although none were deemed treatment related. Interpretation Further investigation of denosumab as a therapy for GCT is warranted. Funding Amgen, Inc.

Four hundred fifteen patients with metastatic breast cancer with known hormone receptor status received primary treatment with tamoxifen. Measured values for the estrogen receptor (ER, i.e., with estrogen binding) followed a continuous distribution (range, 3 to 1000 fmol/mg of protein). These values correlated positively with age. The response to treatment with tamoxifen correlated with the ER level, with response rates of approximately 80% when the ER level was greater than 30.1 fmol/mg of protein. Two hundred eighteen (218 of 415, 52%) patients had progesterone receptor (PR) values greater than 10 fmol/mg. The PR positivity correlated with the ER level. Patients with PR levels greater than 10 fmol/mg of protein (124 of 226, 55%) had a significantly higher response rate than those with values less than 10 fmol/mg of protein (45 of 189, 24%). However, in a multivariate analysis including both receptor levels, age, site, and number of metastases, only the ER level was significant in predicting the response to treatment with tamoxifen. A quantitative estimation of the ER level thus is the best predictor of response to hormonal treatment with tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer.

Pediatric patients with recurrent brain tumors have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. We investigated the use of high-dose chemotherapy with adoptive immunotherapy for recurrent brain tumors. Three pediatric patients with recurrent brain tumors received high-dose chemotherapy. This was followed by adoptive transfer of ex-vivo expanded T-cells. The T-cells were generated from peripheral blood after immunization with autologous cancer cells. The objectives of this study included (1) establishing the safety and feasibility of this potential treatment, (2) measuring changes in immune response after high-dose chemotherapy and adoptive immunotherapy, and (3) determining whether adoptive immunotherapy would be able to translate into a clinical response. Immune function was tested in all patients at the time of enrollment into the study. Humoral responses to recall antigens delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) were intact in all patients. After immunizing patients with autologous cancer cells, peripheral blood lymphocytes were harvested and activated with anti-CD3, expanded in-vitro, and infused post-autologous transplant. Patients received at least three doses of the vaccine, each consisting of an intradermal administration near a draining lymph node at biweekly intervals. Toxicity was limited and well tolerated in all patients. All three patients showed a tumor-specific immune response by serial imaging. Responses were durable at 16, 23, and 48 months, respectively.

Venoocclusive disease (VOD) is the most frequent cause of early nonrelapse mortality among patients receiving high-dose chemoradiotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Endothelial injury of sinusoids and hepatic veins following chemotherapy is considered the initial event in the development of VOD. Activation of the coagulation cascade and inflammatory processes following endothelial injury results in a hypercoagulable state and a localized consumption of the natural anticoagulants, antithrombin III, protein C and protein S. The resultant coagulopathy can lead to multiorgan dysfunction and death. The objective was to retrospectively study the largest series of patients that has received antithrombin III for the treatment of VOD following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 48 patients were diagnosed with VOD post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (median age, 39 years; range, 1-69 years); 38 of the 48 received a nonradiation-based conditioning regimen and 21 of 48 received a transplant from an unrelated donor. Treatment was primarily directed at early intervention rather than prophylactic therapy to correct the antithrombin III deficiency associated with VOD. We attempted to achieve antithrombin III levels greater than 120%. There was no significant treatment-related morbidity. The overall 100-day mortality for the treatment cohort was 17%, with 10% for the mild/moderate group and 39% for the severe group, respectively. In conclusion, the encouraging results of this study suggest that this antithrombin III treatment should be further considered in patients with severe VOD.

Idelalisib (ZYDELIG®, GS-1101) is a first-in-class, targeted, highly selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that reduces proliferation, enhances apoptosis, and inhibits homing and retention of malignant B cells in lymphoid tissues (Lannutti et al, 2011). We studied idelalisib in 2 registrational trials, one in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and one in refractory, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). In the Phase 3 CLL trial (Furman 2014), patients with relapsed disease and multiple co-morbidities precluding the use of chemotherapy were randomized to receive blinded idelalisib 150 mg BID plus rituximab intravenously (at a dose of 375 mg per square meter, followed by 500 mg per square meter every 2 weeks for 4 doses and then every 4 weeks for 3 doses) for a total of 8 infusions or an oral placebo plus rituximab. A total of 220 patients were randomized, with a median age of 71 yrs (78% ≥65 yrs), median time since diagnosis of 8.5 yrs, and median number of 3 prior therapies (range: 1-12). Of these, 44% of pts had del17p/TP53 mutation. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the placebo group and was not reached in the idelalisib group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the idelalisib group, 0.15; P Citation Format: Roger Dansey. Clinical validation of PI3Kδ as a therapeutic target in B-cell malignancy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Targeting the PI3K-mTOR Network in Cancer; Sep 14-17, 2014; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(7 Suppl):Abstract nr IA18.

High-dose immunosuppressive therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently being evaluated for the control of severe autoimmune diseases. The addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) to high-dose chemoradiotherapy in the high-dose immunosuppressive therapy regimen and CD34 selection of the autologous graft may induce a higher degree of immunosuppression compared with conventional autologous HSCT for malignant diseases. Patients may be at higher risk of transplant-related complications secondary to the immunosuppressed state, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), but this is an unusual complication after autologous HSCT. Fifty-six patients (median age, 42 years; range, 23–61 years) with either multiple sclerosis (n = 26) or systemic sclerosis (n = 30) have been treated. The median follow-up has been 24 months (range, 2–60 months). Two patients (multiple sclerosis, n = 1; systemic sclerosis, n = 1) had significant reactivations of herpesvirus infections early after HSCT and then developed aggressive EBV-PTLD and died on days +53 and +64. Multiorgan clonal B-cell infiltrates that were EBV positive by molecular studies or immunohistology were identified at both autopsies. Both patients had positive screening skin tests for equine ATG (Atgam) and had been converted to rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin) from the first dose. Of the other 54 patients, 2 of whom had partial courses of rabbit ATG because of a reaction to the intravenous infusion of equine ATG, only 1 patient had a significant clinical reactivation of a herpesvirus infection (herpes simplex virus 2) early after HSCT, and none developed EBV-PTLD. The T-cell count in the peripheral blood on day 28 was 0/μL in all 4 patients who received rabbit ATG; this was significantly less than in patients who received equine ATG (median, 174/μL; P = .001; Mann-Whitney ranked sum test). Although the numbers are limited, the time course and similarity of the 2 cases of EBV-PTLD and the effect on day 28 T-cell counts support a relationship between the development of EBV-PTLD and the administration of rabbit ATG. The differences between equine and rabbit ATG are not yet clearly defined, and they should not be considered interchangeable in this regimen without further study.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem disease of presumed autoimmune pathogenesis for which no proven effective treatment exists. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) has been proposed as an investigational treatment for severe autoimmune diseases. Nineteen patients with poor-prognosis SSc underwent HDIT. The median age was 40 years (range, 23-61 years), the median modified Rodnan skin score (a measure of dermal sclerosis) was 31, and the median DLCO was 57%. Conditioning therapy involved 800 cGy total body irradiation (TBI) (+/- lung shielding to approximately 200 cGy), 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide, and 90 mg/kg equine antithymocyte globulin. CD34-selected granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized autologous blood stem cells provided hematopoietic rescue. With median follow-up at 14.7 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimated 2-year survival rate was 79%. Three patients died of treatment complications and one of disease progression. Two of the first 8 patients had fatal regimen-related pulmonary injury, a complication not found among 11 subsequent patients who received lung shielding for TBI. Overall, internal organ functions were stable to slightly worse after HDIT, and 4 patients had progressive or nonresponsive disease. As measured by modified Rodnan skin scores and modified health assessment questionnaire disability index (mHAQ-DI) scores, significant disease responses occurred in 12 of 12 patients evaluated at 1 year after HDIT. In conclusion, though important treatment-related toxicities occurred after HDIT for SSc, modifications of initial approaches appear to reduce treatment risks. Responses in skin and mHAQ-DI scores exceed those reported with other therapies, suggesting that HDIT is a promising new therapy for SSc that should be evaluated in prospective randomized studies.

During the past few years there has been an explosion of knowledge in nonablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This approach to transplantation relies more on the creation of "immunologic space" for engraftment rather than the more traditional approach of creating "physical space" by the application of either intensive radiation or chemical therapy. Nonablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation holds the promise of allowing powerful alloimmune responses to eradicate disease processes while minimizing the initial treatment-related morbidity and mortality, and it appears to be the necessary enabling platform by which to apply allogeneic cellular therapy. Intuitively, this approach should broaden the eligibility for potentially curative allogeneic transplantation in various disease categories, reduce initial hospitalization costs, and at the same time have a positive impact on quality of life. We review the current published data relating to this approach including the underlying principles, the preparative regimen, disease indications, preliminary results in hematologic and solid malignancies, and certain correlative immunologic evaluations.