Search

PURPOSE: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) health-related quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer (QLQ-ANL27) supplements the EORTC cancer generic measure (QLQ-C30) to measure concerns specific to people with anal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study tested the psychometric properties and acceptability of the QLQ-ANL27.METHODS AND MATERIALS: People with anal cancer were recruited from 15 countries to complete the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-ANL27 and provide feedback on the QLQ-ANL27. Item responses, scale structure (multitrait scaling, factor analysis), reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility) and sensitivity (known group comparisons and responsiveness to change) of the QLQ-ANL27 were evaluated.RESULTS: Data from 382 people were included in the analyses. The EORTC QLQ-ANL27 was acceptable, comprehensive, and easy to complete, taking an average 8 minutes to complete. Psychometric analyses supported the EORTC QLQ-ANL27 items and reliability (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.71-0.93 and test-retest coefficients above 0.7) and validity of the scales (particularly nonstoma bowel symptoms and pain/discomfort). Most scales distinguished people according to treatment phase and performance status. Bowel (nonstoma), pain/discomfort, and vaginal symptoms were sensitive to deteriorations over time. The stoma-related scales remained untested because of low numbers of people with a stoma. Revisions to the scoring and question ordering of the sexual items were proposed.CONCLUSIONS: The QLQ-ANL27 has good psychometric properties and is available in 16 languages for people treated with chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. It is used in clinical trials and has a potential role in clinical practice.

There is no universally accepted instrument to use as a validated surrogate endpoint for overall survival in phase 2 and phase 3 multimodal rectal cancer trials using chemoradiotherapy. Efforts are hampered by the inaccuracy of clinical TNM staging, the variability of indications for neoadjuvant treatment, and diverse definitions of tumour regression grade. Pathological complete response is commonly used, but fails to capture information from the majority of patients. The neoadjuvant rectal score categorises response and downstaging from the entire trial population to identify whether or not a novel treatment group in a chemoradiation trial is superior by predicting overall survival outcomes. Additionally, the neoadjuvant rectal score assesses the difference between initial clinical and pathological T stage and the presence or absence of nodal involvement after treatment. The neoadjuvant rectal score has been conceptually, but incompletely, statistically validated by two independent trial datasets. However, a fundamental weakness of the score is that no preoperative phase 3 trials in locally advanced rectal cancer in the past 20 years have provided a significant benefit in overall survival to statistically validate the neoadjuvant rectal score as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival. We review the robustness, practical value, applicability, generalisability, advantages, and disadvantages of the neoadjuvant rectal score as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival and recommend how this score could be improved and be acceptable as a standard endpoint in studies investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.

There is a large variability regarding the definition and choice of primary endpoints in phase 2 and phase 3 multimodal rectal cancer trials, resulting in inconsistency and difficulty of data interpretation. Also, surrogate properties of early and intermediate endpoints have not been systematically assessed. We provide a comprehensive review of clinical and surrogate endpoints used in trials for non-metastatic rectal cancer. The applicability, advantages, and disadvantages of these endpoints are summarised, with recommendations on clinical endpoints for the different phase trials, including limited surgery or non-operative management for organ preservation. We discuss how early and intermediate endpoints, including patient-reported outcomes and involvement of patients in decision making, can be used to guide trial design and facilitate consistency in reporting trial results in rectal cancer.

Background\ud Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for anal cancer. Following national UK implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), this prospective, national cohort evaluates the one-year oncological outcomes and patient-reported toxicity outcomes (PRO) after treatment.\ud Materials and methods\ud A national cohort of UK cancer centers implementing IMRT was carried out between February to July 2015. Cancer centers provided data on oncological outcomes, including survival, and disease and colostomy status at one-year. EORTC-QLQ core (C30) and colorectal (CR29) questionnaires were completed at baseline and one-year followup. The PRO scores at baseline and one year were compared.\ud Results\ud 40 UK Cancer Centers returned data with a total of 187 patients included in the analysis. 92% received mitomycin with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. One-year overall survival was 94%; 84% were disease-free and 86% colostomy-free at one-year followup. At one year, PRO results found significant improvements in buttock pain, blood and mucus in stools, pain, constipation, appetite loss, and health anxiety compared to baseline. No significant deteriorations were reported in diarrhea, bowel frequency, and flatulence. Urinary symptom scores were low at one year. Moderate impotence symptoms at baseline remained at one year, and a moderate deterioration in dyspareunia reported.\ud Conclusions\ud With national anal cancer IMRT implementation, at this early pre-defined time point, one-year oncological outcomes were reassuring and resulted in good disease-related symptom control. one-year symptomatic complications following CRT for anal cancer using IMRT techniques appear to be relatively mild. These PRO results provide a basis to benchmark future studies.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ypN+ status according to ypT category in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, and to assess the impact of ypN+ on disease recurrence and survival by pooled analysis of individual-patient data.Methods: Individual-patient data from 10 studies of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer were included. Pooled rates of ypN+ disease were calculated with 95 per cent confidence interval for each ypT category. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were undertaken to assess influence of ypN status on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Data on 1898 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 50 (range 0-219)months. The pooled rate of ypN+ disease was 7 per cent for ypT0, 12 per cent for ypT1, 17 per cent for ypT2, 40 per cent for ypT3, and 46 per cent for ypT4 tumours. Patients with ypN+ disease had lower 5-year DFS and OS (46.2 and 63.4 per cent respectively) than patients with ypN0 tumours (74.5 and 83.2 per cent) (P

Multimodal treatment strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly including the possibility of organ preservation, through nonoperative management or local excision. Organ preservation strategies can enable patients with a complete response or near-complete clinical responses after radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy to safely avoid the morbidities associated with radical surgery, and thus to maintain anorectal function and quality of life. However, standardization of the key outcome measures of organ preservation strategies is currently lacking; this includes a lack of consensus of the optimal definitions and selection of primary end points according to the trial phase and design; the optimal time points for response assessment; response-based decision-making; follow-up schedules; use of specific anorectal function tests; and quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Thus, a consensus statement on outcome measures is necessary to ensure consistency and facilitate more accurate comparisons of data from ongoing and future trials. Here, we have convened an international group of experts with extensive experience in the management of patients with rectal cancer, including organ preservation approaches, and used a Delphi process to establish the first international consensus recommendations for key outcome measures of organ preservation, in an attempt to standardize the reporting of data from both trials and routine practice in this emerging area. Patients with early-stage rectal cancer might potentially benefit from treatment with an organ-sparing approach, which preserves quality of life owing to avoidance of the need for permanent colostomy. Trials conducted to investigate this have so far been hampered by considerable inter-trial heterogeneity in several key features. In this Consensus Statement, the authors provide guidance on the optimal end points, response assessment time points, follow-up procedures and quality of life measures in an attempt to improve the comparability of clinical research in this area. Yorkshire Cancer Research Academic Fellowship fund [L389AA]; Yorkshire Cancer Research; Cancer Research UKCancer Research UK [CRUK/28301]

BACKGROUND: Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) could be an alternative to multimodality staging of colorectal cancer, but its diagnostic accuracy, effect on staging times, number of tests needed, cost, and effect on treatment decisions are unknown. We aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of WB-MRI-based staging pathways with standard pathways in colorectal cancer.METHODS: The Streamline C trial was a prospective, multicentre trial done in 16 hospitals in England. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria were severe systemic disease, pregnancy, contraindications to MRI, or polyp cancer. Patients underwent WB-MRI, the result of which was withheld until standard staging investigations were complete and the first treatment decision made. The multidisciplinary team recorded its treatment decision based on standard investigations, then on the WB-MRI staging pathway (WB-MRI plus additional tests generated), and finally on all tests. The primary outcome was difference in per-patient sensitivity for metastases between standard and WB-MRI staging pathways against a consensus reference standard at 12 months, in the per-protocol population. Secondary outcomes were difference in per-patient specificity for metastatic disease detection between standard and WB-MRI staging pathways, differences in treatment decisions, staging efficiency (time taken, test number, and costs), and per-organ sensitivity and specificity for metastases and per-patient agreement for local T and N stage. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, number ISRCTN43958015, and is complete.FINDINGS: Between March 26, 2013, and Aug 19, 2016, 1020 patients were screened for eligibility. 370 patients were recruited, 299 of whom completed the trial; 68 (23%) had metastasis at baseline. Pathway sensitivity was 67% (95% CI 56 to 78) for WB-MRI and 63% (51 to 74) for standard pathways, a difference in sensitivity of 4% (-5 to 13, p=0·51). No adverse events related to imaging were reported. Specificity did not differ between WB-MRI (95% [95% CI 92-97]) and standard pathways (93% [90-96], p=0·48). Agreement with the multidisciplinary team's final treatment decision was 96% for WB-MRI and 95% for the standard pathway. Time to complete staging was shorter for WB-MRI (median, 8 days [IQR 6-9]) than for the standard pathway (13 days [11-15]); a 5-day (3-7) difference. WB-MRI required fewer tests (median, one [95% CI 1 to 1]) than did standard pathways (two [2 to 2]), a difference of one (1 to 1). Mean per-patient staging costs were £216 (95% CI 211-221) for WB-MRI and £285 (260-310) for standard pathways.INTERPRETATION: WB-MRI staging pathways have similar accuracy to standard pathways and reduce the number of tests needed, staging time, and cost.FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research.

Our aim is to discuss the current established management of care and associated prevention strategies of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA). In general, the development of SCCA is commonly linked to a prior history of HPV. Unfortunately, HPV vaccination continues to be underutilized in the United States versus other countries. Increased acknowledgment of the importance of HPV vaccination as an anticancer vaccine should be encouraged. The present standard of care is primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which results in a high level of disease control for small, early-stage SCCA. More advanced cancers still fare poorly with this treatment, and the disease relapses locoregionally in the majority of cases (30%–50% of patients), resulting in an abdominoperineal resection. Current treatment recommendations are associated with substantial morbidity; alternative radiation doses and/or novel combinations of agents with CRT are needed to improve quality of life and oncologic outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic disease, with a possible new treatment paradigm of carboplatin/weekly paclitaxel. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibition appears to have a promising role in the setting of patients with refractory disease. Several clinical trials with immunotherapeutic and vaccine approaches for locally advanced and metastatic anal cancer are ongoing, as are HPV-agnostic umbrella trials. Whenever possible, clinical trial enrollment is always encouraged for further therapeutic development in the setting of a rare cancer, given the potentially substantial global impact for other HPV-associated malignancies.

Mini: A radiological, anatomic distinction between the rectum and sigmoid colon was agreed by consensus of international experts in rectal cancer using the Delphi Technique. Use of this landmark, “the sigmoid take-off,” may harmonize efforts in research and clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. Background: The wide global variation in the definition of the rectum has led to significant inconsistencies in trial recruitment, clinical management, and outcomes. Surgical technique and use of preoperative treatment for a cancer of the rectum and sigmoid colon are radically different and dependent on the local definitions employed by the clinical team. A consensus definition of the rectum is needed to standardise treatment. Methods: The consensus was conducted using the Delphi technique with multidisciplinary colorectal experts from October, 2017 to April, 2018. Results: Eleven different definitions for the rectum were used by participants in the consensus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the most frequent modality used to define the rectum (67%), and the preferred modality for 72% of participants. The most agreed consensus landmark (56%) was “the sigmoid take-off,” an anatomic, image-based definition of the junction of the mesorectum and mesocolon. In the second round, 81% of participants agreed that the sigmoid take-off as seen on computed tomography or MRI achieved consensus, and that it could be implemented in their institution. Also, 87% were satisfied with the sigmoid take-off as the consensus landmark. Conclusion: An international consensus definition for the rectum is the point of the sigmoid take-off as visualized on imaging. The sigmoid take-off can be identified as the mesocolon elongates as the ventral and horizontal course of the sigmoid on axial and sagittal views respectively on cross-sectional imaging. Routine application of this landmark during multidisciplinary team discussion for all patients will enable greater consistency in tumour localisation.

Chemotherapy dosing is traditionally based on body surface area calculations; however, these calculations ignore separate tissue compartments, such as the lean body mass (LBM), which is considered a big pool of drug distribution. In our era, colorectal cancer patients undergo a plethora of computed tomography scans as part of their diagnosis, staging and monitoring, which could easily be used for body composition analysis and LBM calculation, allowing for personalised chemotherapy dosing. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effect of muscle mass on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), among different chemotherapy regimens used in colorectal cancer patients. This review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1946 to August 2019. The primary search terms were 'sarcopenia', 'myopenia', 'chemotherapy toxicity', 'chemotherapy dosing', 'dose limiting toxicity', 'colorectal cancer', 'primary colorectal cancer' and 'metastatic colorectal cancer'. Outcomes of interest were - DLT and chemotoxicity related to body composition, and chemotherapy dosing on LBM. In total, 363 studies were identified, with 10 studies fulfilling the selection criteria. Seven studies were retrospective and three were prospective. Most studies used the same body composition analysis software but the chemotherapy regimens used varied. Due to marked study heterogeneity, quantitative data synthesis was not possible. Two studies described a toxicity cut-off value for 5-fluorouracil and one for oxaliplatin based on LBM. The rest of the studies showed an association between different body composition metrics and DLTs. Prospective studies are required with a larger colorectal cancer cohort, longitudinal monitoring of body composition changes during treatment, similar body composition analysis techniques, agreed cut-off values and standardised chemotherapy regimens. Incorporation of body composition analysis in the clinical setting will allow early identification of sarcopenic patients, personalised dosing based on their LBM and early optimisation of these patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Background\ud Concurrent chemoradiation is standard-of-care for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Poor compliance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy treatment interruptions and unplanned breaks may impact adversely on long-term outcomes.\ud Methods\ud The ACT II trial recruited 940 patients with localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, and assigned patients to mitomycin (week 1) or cisplatin (weeks 1 and 5), with fluorouracil (weeks 1 and 5) and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 38 days). This post hoc analysis examined the association between baseline factors (age, gender, site, T stage and N stage), and compliance to treatment (radiotherapy and chemotherapy), and their effects on locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Compliance was categorised into groups. Radiotherapy: six groups according to total dose and overall treatment time (OTT). Chemotherapy: three groups (A = per-protocol; B = dose reduction or delay; C = omitted).\ud Results\ud A total of 931/940 patients were assessable for radiotherapy and 936 for chemotherapy compliance. Baseline glomerular filtration rate 42 days is associated with worse PFS and OS [HR: 1.72 (95% CI: 1.17–2.54), P =0.006].\ud Conclusion\ud Poor compliance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with worse locoregional failure-free survival, PFS and OS. Treatment interruptions should be minimised, and OTT and total dose maintained.

Whilst anal cancer accounts for less than 1% of all new cancer cases, incidence rates have increased by up to 70% in the last 30 years with the majority of cases driven by human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Standard treatment for localised anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Localised progression is the predominant pattern of relapse but well under 50% of cases are salvaged by surgery, predominantly because confirming recurrence within post-radiation change is very challenging. Identifying cancer-associated circulating cells (CCs) in peripheral blood could offer a corroborative method of monitoring treatment efficacy and identifying relapse early. To study this, nucleated cells were isolated from the blood of patients with anal cancer prior to, during, and after CRT and processed through the Amnis&reg, ImageStream&reg, X Mk II Imaging Flow Cytometer, without prior enrichment, using Pan-cytokeratin (PCK), CD45 antibodies and making use of the DNA dye DRAQ5. Analysis was undertaken using IDEAS software to identify those cells that were PCK-positive and DRAQ5-positive as well as CD45-negative, these were designated as CCs. CCs were identified in 7 of 8 patients, range 60&ndash, 876 cells per mL of blood. This first report of the successful identification of CCs in anal cancer patients raises the possibility that liquid biopsies will find a future role as a prognostic/diagnostic tool in this patient group.

In colon cancer, primary surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care. In rectal cancer, the standard of care is preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiation, which significantly reduces local recurrence but has no impact on subsequent metastatic disease or overall survival. The administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery can increase the chance of a curative resection and improves long-term outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Hence, NACT is being explored in both primary rectal and colon cancers as an alternative strategy to shrink the tumor, facilitate a curative resection, and simultaneously counter the risk of metastases. Yet, this lack of clarity regarding the precise aims of NACT (downstaging, maximizing response, or improving survival) is hindering progress. The appropriate cytotoxic agents, the optimal regimen, the number of cycles, or duration of NACT prior to surgery or in the postoperative setting remains undefined. Several potential strategies for integrating NACT are discussed with their advantages and disadvantages.

ispartof: RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY vol:148 pages:213-215 ispartof: location:Ireland status: published

Bevacizumab; Teràpia intensiva; Càncer colorectal metastàtic Bevacizumab; Terapia intensiva; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico Bevacizumab; Intensive therapy; Metastatic colorectal cancer Background We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT–B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C–B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies. Patients and methods From 29 April 2016 to 29 March 2017, 153 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either TT–B (N = 77) or C–B (N = 76). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The primary PFS analysis was performed after 100 events (radiological progression or death) were observed. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL; QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires), and safety. Results Median (range) duration of treatment was 7.8 (6.0–9.7) months and 6.2 (4.1–9.1) months in the TT–B and C–B groups, respectively. Median (range) PFS was 9.2 (7.6–11.6) and 7.8 (5.5–10.1) months, respectively. Median (range) OS was 18 (15.2 to NA) and 16.2 (12.5 to NA) months, respectively. QoL questionnaires showed no relevant changes over time for either treatment. Therapies were well tolerated. Patients receiving TT–B had more grade ≥3 neutropenia (47% versus 5% with C–B). Patients receiving C–B had more grade ≥3 hand–foot syndrome (12% versus 0% with TT–B) and grade ≥3 diarrhea (8% versus 1% with TT–B), consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. Conclusion TT–B treatment showed promising clinical activity in untreated patients with unresectable mCRC ineligible for intensive therapy, with an acceptable safety profile and no clinically relevant changes in QoL. This study was funded by Servier and Taiho.

The aim was to examine the current trend in rectal cancer, which is to extend ’watch-and-wait’ to earlier-stage tumors, not normally treated with chemoradiotherapy, to define the up-side and down-side regarding quality of life (QOL) and anorectal/sexual/urinary function from this approach. We reviewed the literature regarding a ‘watch-and-wait’ strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was complete clinical response. Secondary measures included colostomy rate, functional outcomes and QOL. There is a trend to use chemoradiotherapy in earlier tumors using dose-escalation of radiation and/or additional chemotherapy, resulting in high rates of complete clinical response, which may impact adversely on QOL if radical surgery is subsequently required. Focusing on organ-preservation as the primary goal of treatment rather than overall functional outcomes and QOL for the whole population, may not provide patients with sufficient information for optimal decision-making.

Purpose: To retrospectively review our experience on 84 patients with squamous cell anal canal cancer (SCAC) within 12 months after combined treatment with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), in terms of acute and early-late toxicity, overall treatment time and interruptions, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and tumor response. Methods: Acute gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and cutaneous (CU) toxicities were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Early-late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late radiation morbidity scoring system. Tumor response was evaluated with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Results: Acute toxicity for 84 subjects (100%): severe (≥ G3) GI and skin toxicity was observed in 4 (5%) and 19 patients (23%), respectively. Early-late toxicity for 73 subjects (87%): severe (≥ G3) GI and vulvo-vaginal toxicity was observed in 2 (3%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. No acute or early-late severe GU toxicity was reported. A treatment interruption occurred in 65 patients (77%). CFS was 96% (95% CI 89–99) at 6 months and 92% (95% CI 83–96) at 12 months. At 6 months complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) was observed in 70 (83%), 3 (4%), and 7 patients (8%), respectively. At 12 months, CR was observed in 60 patients (81%); eleven patients (15%) experienced PD. Conclusion: Our study showed an excellent clinical result and very low acute toxicity rates, confirming the IMRT as standard of care for curative treatment of anal cancer patients. The current trial was registered with the number IEO N87/11

Contains fulltext : 229807pub.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: The improved overall survival (OS) after short course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy reported in the early rectal cancer trials could not be replicated in subsequent phase III trials. This original survival advantage is attributed to poor quality of surgery and the large differential in local recurrence rates, with and without SCPRT. Immuno-modulation during and after SCPRT and its clinical implications have been poorly investigated. We propose an alternative explanation for this survival benefit in terms of immunological mechanisms induced by SCPRT and the timing of surgery, which may validate the concept of consolidation chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies of SCPRT from 1985 to 2019. We aimed to examine the precise timing of surgery in days following SCPRT and identify evidence for immune modulation, neo-antigens and memory cell induction by radiation. RESULTS: Considerable variability is reported in randomised trials for median overall treatment time (OTT) from start of SCPRT to surgery (8-14 days). Only three early trials showed a benefit in terms of OS from SCPRT, although the level of benefit in preventing local recurrence was consistent across all trials. Different patterns of immune effects are observed within days after SCPRT depending on the OTT, but human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-1 expression was not upregulated. CONCLUSIONS: SCPRT has a substantial immune-stimulatory potential. The importance of the timing of surgery after SCPRT may have been underestimated. An optimal interval for surgery after 5 × 5 Gy may lead to better outcomes, which is possibly exploited in total neoadjuvant therapy schedules using consolidation chemotherapy. Individual patient meta-analyses from appropriate SCPRT trials examining outcomes for each day and prospective trials are needed to clarify the validity of this hypothesis. The interaction of SCPRT with tumour adaptive immunology, in particular the kinetics and timing, should be examined further.

Contains fulltext : 219852pub.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Various methods categorize tumour response after neoadjuvant therapy, including down-staging and tumour regression grading. Response categories allow comparison of different treatments within clinical trials and predict outcome. A reproducible response categorization could identify subgroups with high or low risk for the most appropriate subsequent treatments, like watch and wait. Lack of standardization and interpretation difficulties currently limit the usability of these approaches. In this review we describe these difficulties for the evaluation of chemoradiation in rectal cancer. An alternative approach of tumour response is based on patterns of residual disease, including fragmentation. We summarise the evidence behind this alternative method of response categorisation, which explains a number of very relevant clinical discrepancies. These issues include differences between downstaging and tumour regression, high local regrowth in advanced tumours during watchful waiting procedures, the importance of resection margins, the limited value of post-treatment biopsies and the relatively poor outcome of patients with a near complete pathological response. Recognition of these patterns of response can allow meaningful development of novel biomarkers in the future.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To describe current practice in the management of rectal cancer, to identify uncertainties that usually arise in the multidisciplinary team (MDT)'s discussions ('grey zones') and propose next generation studies which may provide answers to them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire on the areas of controversy in managing T2, T3 and T4 rectal cancer was drawn up and distributed to the Rectal-Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) Expert European Board. Less than 70% agreement on a treatment option was indicated as uncertainty and selected as a 'grey zone'. Topics with large disagreement were selected by the task force group for discussion at the Rectal-ATTM. RESULTS: The controversial clinical issues that had been identified within cT2-cT3-cT4 needed further investigation. The discussions focused on the role of (1) neoadjuvant therapy and organ preservation on cT2-3a low-middle rectal cancer; (2) neoadjuvant therapy in cT3 low rectal cancer without high risk features; (3) total neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy boost and the best chemo-radiotherapy schedule in T4 tumors. A description of each area of investigation and trial proposals are reported. CONCLUSION: The meeting successfully identified 'grey zones' and, in the light of new evidence, proposed clinical trials for treatment of early, intermediate and advanced stage rectal cancer. ispartof: RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY vol:142 pages:6-16 ispartof: location:ITALY, Assisi status: published

Background SBRT is a novel modality in treatment for oligometastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review of results of SBRT in maintaining LC (local control) for CRC liver and lung oligometastases. Materials and methods The review was performed according to PRISMA and PICO guidelines. Database search using keywords: stereotactic, colon, colorectal, cancer, sbrt, sabr returned 457 results. 15 were included in the study. Only cohorts with CRC histology and reported LC were included. Results For liver LC rates ranged from 50% to 100% after 1 year and 32% to 91% after 2 years. BED range 40.5–262.5 Gy (Gray). For lung LC rates ranged from 62% to 92% after 1 one year and from 53% to 92% after 2 years. BED range 51.3–262.5 Gy. Conclusions SBRT of oligometastatic CRC offers high LC with low morbidity and toxicity. It requires more observational studies and randomized trials but available data on clinical efficacy is promising, however not yet matured.

Objectives: To compare maximum tumour diameter (MTD) and gross tumour volume (GTV) measurements between T2-weighted (T2-w) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) and assess sequence impact on tumour (T) staging. Second, to evaluate interobserver agreement and reader delineation confidence. Methods: The staging MRI scans of 45 SCCA patients (25 females) were assessed retrospectively by two independent radiologists (0 and 5 years’ experience of anal cancer MRI). MTD and GTV were delineated on both T2-w and high-b-value DWI images and compared between sequences; T staging was derived from MTD. Interobserver agreement was assessed and delineation confidence scored (1 to 5) by each observer. Results: GTV and MTD were significantly and systematically lower on DWI versus T2-w sequences by 14.80%/9.98% (MTD) and 29.70%/12.25% (GTV) for each reader, respectively, causing T staging discordances in approximately a quarter of cases. Bland-Altman limits of agreement were narrower and intraclass correlation coefficients higher for DWI. Delineation confidence was greater on DWI: 40/42 cases were scored confidently (4 or 5) by each reader, respectively, versus 31/36 cases based on T2-w images. Conclusions: Sequence selection affects SCCA measurements and T stage. DWI yields higher interobserver agreement and greater tumour delineation confidence. Key Points: • MTD and GTV measurements are significantly lower on DWI than on T2-w MRI. • Such differences cause T staging discordances in up to a quarter of cases. • DWI results in higher agreement between inexperienced and experienced observers. • DWI offers greater tumour delineation confidence to inexperienced readers.

We thank Jones et al. 1 for their comments on our article in a recent issue of the Annals of Oncology highlighting the adverse effects of poor compliance to chemotherapy and chemoradiation in the ACT II trial. 2 The authors advocate both testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and using capecitabine as an alternative to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on the grounds that twice-daily oral administration allows early reduction or discontinuation of the drug if toxicity is observed. They suggest initial dose reductions may not be required. This highlights the dilemma between prioritising safety issues or effectiveness for DPD variants.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is widely applied in oncology for disease staging, assessment of therapy response, relapse diagnosis, follow-up and target volume delineation. In particular, it can detect early response during chemoradiotherapy (interim) because functional modifications usually precede morphological ones. This ability is crucial to the radiation oncologist for the management of patients, to avoid persisting with ineffective therapy - often leading toxicity - and to shift to potentially more effective alternatives. Interim 18F FDG-PET imaging in rectal and cervical cancer, the main malignancies of the pelvic district, has been applied and a broad literature is available, although some results are discordant. This systematic review summarizes the application of 18F FDG-PET/CT during the chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced pelvic malignancies in order to clarify its capability to predict response and prognosis and its potential role to tailor therapy, which seems to be validated in rectal cancer, whilst less conclusive in cervical cancer.

This Review examines the reporting of endpoints in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of radical chemoradiation for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. The types, frequency, and definitions of clinical primary and secondary endpoints, and patient-reported outcome measures, reported in the methods and results sections of papers (and protocols, if available) were examined. Only six published RCTs comprising 2877 patients were identified. Primary outcome measures varied across the trials analysed: two used disease-free survival, one used progression-free survival, two used local failure, and one used colostomy-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, complete clinical response, quality of life, toxicity, and compliance. The definitions for primary and secondary endpoints were not consistent across trials, particularly for treatment failure (local, regional, and distant). We conclude that the quality of outcome reporting in RCTs of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is inconsistent. A core set of outcomes, including clinical and patient-reported outcome measures with standardised definitions, is needed to improve the reporting of RCTs examining chemoradiation for treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

New strategies for the treatment of cancer in the rectum should be directed towards the improvement of micrometastatic disease and the reduction of long-term sequelae, without prejudice to good local control. To achieve this, in the last decade, new strategies have been postulated. Treatment with preoperative chemotherapy (CT) alone or induction CT followed by chemoradiation CRT/short course radiation (CRT/SCPRT) or CRT/SCPRT and consolidative CT is being planned. We currently have data from phase II studies with results of stimulating efficacy and/or compliance. New single-arm and randomized trial is underway and will allow us to know the impact on survival outcomes and long-term sequelae of these strategies.

Preoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Chemoradiation can achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) in 10–20% of patients when surgery is performed at 4–12 weeks following completion, and a clinical complete response (cCR) in 15–30% if surgery is withheld. The probability of pCR and cCR is partly dependent on initial clinical T- and N-stage. Observational/retrospective studies suggest a selective watch-and-wait policy with rigorous surveillance, avoiding radical surgery, is a safe option to offer patients who achieve a cCR or near cCR. With a watch-and-wait approach, approximately one third will relapse within 12 months, but regrowth is almost invariably endoluminal, and can often be salvaged without compromising overall survival. The aim of this overview is to examine the current status of the watch-and-wait policy for patients with cCR following chemoradiation in rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Concomitant external-beam radiochemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C) has become the standard of care in anal cancer since the '90s. A pooled analysis of individual patient data from 7 major trials was performed quantifying the effect of radiation therapy (RT)-related parameters on the outcome of patients with anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooling databases from combined modality trials, the impact of RT parameters (total dose, gap duration, OTT: overall treatment time) on outcome including locoregional failure (LRF), 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and toxicities were investigated. Individual patient data were received for 10/13 identified published studies conducted from 1987 to 2008 (n = 3031). A Cox regression model was used (landmark = 3 months after RT for first follow-up). RESULTS: After data inspection indicating severe heterogeneity between trials, only 1343 patients from 7/10 studies received were analysed (the most recent ones, since 1994; median follow-up = 4.1 years). A higher overall 5-year LRF rate [22.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.3-27.3%)] significantly correlated with longer OTT (p = 0.03), larger tumour size (p

Chapter 9 discusses squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and includes discussion on specific Phase III trials that establish chemoradiotherapy as the treatment of choice, radiotherapy dose, brachytherapy, radical primary treatment, postoperative adjuvant treatment, supportive care during radiotherapy, palliative treatment, therapeutic assessment and follow-up, and current and future research.

Chapter 8 assesses the role of radiation therapy in rectal cancer, with emphasis on preoperative imaging, patient selection for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and short-course preoperative radiotherapy, and postoperative chemoradiation. The various available planning techniques are described. More conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volume-modulated arc therapy, and brachytherapy are also covered. In addition, the chapter reviews chemoradiation and radiotherapy as an adjunct to local excision and endoluminal irradiation.

676 Background: TASCO1 is a phase II study which evaluated the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine + bevacizumab (C-B) in first-line unresectable mCRC patients non-eligible for intensive therapy. Promising activity was shown on progression-free survival with TT-B (9.2 months) and C-B (7.8 months). Here we present the Quality of Life (QoL) analysis of the two treatment arms. Methods: In TASCO1, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive TT-B (n = 76) on a four-week cycle or C-B (n = 77) on a three-week cycle. QoL was assessed in TASCO1 at baseline and at each 12 weeks thereafter, until discontinuation of study treatment, using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Responses were described separately in each arm using descriptive statistics. Results: For QLQ-C30, 121 patients completed baseline questionnaire. No clinically relevant difference was observed on treatment in mean change of score from baseline for the global health status, functioning scales, and for most of the symptom scales, except for nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea (worsening in the TT-B group and stable in the C-B group for both symptoms), fatigue (stable in the TT-B group and worsening in the C-B), loss appetite (worsening in the two groups) and insomnia (improvement in the two groups). For QLQ-CR29, 117 patients completed baseline questionnaire. No clinically relevant difference on treatment was observed in mean change of score from baseline for most of items except for the following: hair loss, trouble with taste (worsening for both symptoms in the TT-B group while stable for hair loss and improvement for trouble with taste in the C-B group), sore skin, dry mouth (stable in the TT-B group and worsening in the C-B group for both symptoms), and anxiety (stable in the TT-B group and improvement in the C-B group). Conclusions: The Global Health Scale was maintained in Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab arm as well as in the capecitabine+bevacizumab arm. No clinically relevant difference from baseline was observed over time in both groups except for few sub-scales. Clinical trial information: NCT02743221.

Summary Background Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) could be an alternative to multi-modality staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its diagnostic accuracy, effect on staging times, number of tests needed, cost, and effect on treatment decisions are unknown. We aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of WB-MRI-based staging pathways with standard pathways in NSCLC. Methods The Streamline L trial was a prospective, multicentre trial done in 16 hospitals in England. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, with newly diagnosed NSCLC that was potentially radically treatable on diagnostic chest CT (defined as stage IIIb or less). Exclusion criteria were severe systemic disease, pregnancy, contraindications to MRI, or histologies other than NSCLC. Patients underwent WB-MRI, the result of which was withheld until standard staging investigations were complete and the first treatment decision made. The multidisciplinary team recorded its treatment decision based on standard investigations, then on the WB-MRI staging pathway (WB-MRI plus additional tests generated), and finally on all tests. The primary outcome was difference in per-patient sensitivity for metastases between standard and WB-MRI staging pathways against a consensus reference standard at 12 months, in the per-protocol population. Secondary outcomes were difference in per-patient specificity for metastatic disease detection between standard and WB-MRI staging pathways, differences in treatment decisions, staging efficiency (time taken, test number, and costs) and per-organ sensitivity and specificity for metastases and per-patient agreement for local T and N stage. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, number ISRCTN50436483, and is complete. Findings Between Feb 26, 2013, and Sept 5, 2016, 976 patients were screened for eligibility. 353 patients were recruited, 187 of whom completed the trial; 52 (28%) had metastasis at baseline. Pathway sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 37–63) for WB-MRI and 54% (41–67) for standard pathways, a difference of 4% (−7 to 15, p=0·73). No adverse events related to imaging were reported. Specificity did not differ between WB-MRI (93% [88–96]) and standard pathways (95% [91–98], p=0·45). Agreement with the multidisciplinary team's final treatment decision was 98% for WB-MRI and 99% for the standard pathway. Time to complete staging was shorter for WB-MRI (13 days [12–14]) than for the standard pathway (19 days [17–21]); a 6-day (4–8) difference. The number of tests required was similar WB-MRI (one [1–1]) and standard pathways (one [1–2]). Mean per-patient costs were £317 (273–361) for WBI-MRI and £620 (574–666) for standard pathways. Interpretation WB-MRI staging pathways have similar accuracy to standard pathways, and reduce the staging time and costs. Funding UK National Institute for Health Research.

Background Preoperative Long-course chemoradiation (LCCRT) is the standard-of-care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase I/II trial in two sequential studies aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab administered weekly-prior to, and following LCCRT. Patients and Methods All patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defined cT3/cT4 or node-positive rectal adenocarcinoma and treatment with LCCRT (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid on Monday-Friday for 5 weeks during radiotherapy [45Gy in 25 daily fractions] followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). In Phase I patients received weekly induction cetuximab 400mg/m2 loading, then 250mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks prior to standard LCCRT. In phase II 10 patients were randomised to receive: arm A standard LCCRT alone or arm B (sandwich) LCCRT with additional induction cetuximab 250mg/m2 weekly prior to LCCRT and consolidation for 5 weeks following. Results In Phase I all 12 patients proceeded to surgery with a single pCR (8%) reported. This pCR rate together with acceptable compliance (100%) and toxicity (4 Grade 3 toxicities, 2 skin rash, 1 pain and 1 pulmonary embolus) and the absence of severe surgical complications allowed continuation to phase II. In Phase II, 10 patients were recruited and five patients were randomly assigned to each treatment arm. One additional patient allocated cetuximab/CRT chose to withdraw from the trial and received no treatment. In Arm B 4/5 patients proceeded to surgery with one pCR compared to three of five patients proceeding to surgery with two achieving pCR in Arm A. The Trial closed after studies in metastatic disease reported efficacy depended on selection according to K-RAS/NRAs mutational status. Conclusions: In unselected patients without enrichment according to KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, the addition of induction and consolidation cetuximab to pre-operative LCCRT provided modest efficacy with good compliance and manageable toxicity.

Current treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) represents a challenge for the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard of care. With improvements in surgical technique, local recurrence has become an uncommon event, but up to 40% will still die of metastatic disease and approximately 20–30% have metastases at the time of diagnosis. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following chemoradiation is difficult to deliver in a timely manner and the benefit remains uncertain. Hence the use of neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy to achieve tumour shrinkage and prevent systemic disease is gaining popularity.

In advising the optimal management for older patients, health care professionals try to balance the risks from frailty, vulnerability, and comorbidity against the patient's ultimate prognosis, potential functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL). At the same time it is important to involve the patient and incorporate their preferences. But how can we present and balance the potential downside of radical radiotherapy and risks of unsalvageable recurrence against the potential risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with radical surgery? There are currently no nationally approved and evidence-based guidelines available to ensure consistency in discussions with older adults or frail and vulnerable patients. In this overview we hope to provide an insightful discussion of the relevant issues and options currently available. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

14 Background: Our phase II randomized study was conducted in patients with previously untreated unresectable mCRC not eligible to receive standard oxaliplatin- or irinotecan- based chemotherapy regimens. The results of the primary study analysis were reported earlier and demonstrated a promising efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and an acceptable safety profile for the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (E. Van Cutsem et al. Ann. Oncol. 2020). Here we present the final end-of-study analysis on the overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either trifluridine/tipiracil administered orally at 35 mg/m²/dose bid from days 1-5 and days 8-12, and bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle (TT-B), or capecitabine administered orally at 1250 or 1000 mg/m²/dose bid (according to the patient’s status) from days 1-14 and bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle (C-B). Cycles were repeated until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator’s/patient’s decision. Following the treatment discontinuation, all patients were followed for OS until the end-of-study, which was defined as the date of the withdrawal visit for the last patient. In the absence of death confirmation or for patients alive as of the end-of-study date, survival time was censored at the date of their last study follow-up. For the OS analysis the HR and the corresponding 2-sided 80% and 2-sided 95% CIs for TT-B versus C-B were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for the stratification factors based on IWRS data. OS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and further characterized in terms of the median and survival probabilities at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months along with the corresponding 2-sided 80% and 2-sided 95% CI (Brookmeyer and Crowley CI for median and Kalbfleisch and Prentice CI for survival probabilities). Results: From April 2016 to March 2017, 153 patients were randomized and followed until end-of-study on September 1, 2020. Twenty-one patients, 11 from TT-B and 10 from C-B, were alive and censored for the analysis. Median OS was 22.31 months in TT-B and 17.67 months in C-B with HR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.10). Survival probability at 18 months in TT-B was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.50, 0.72), and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.35, 0.57) in C-B. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated earlier a median PFS of 9.2 months for TT-B and 7.8 months for C-B when administered to patients with previously untreated unresectable mCRC ineligible for standard combination chemotherapy. The final study analysis performed on OS, the main secondary endpoint, provided further evidence for TT-B as a noteworthy valuable regimen in this population settings. Clinical trial information: NCT02743221.

The treatment of patients with colorectal cancer with colorectal liver metastases remains an exciting challenge for the multidisciplinary team. The role and choice of induction chemotherapy, the timing of surgery in resectable disease and the prioritisation of resection of the primary or the metastases are all still controversial. A true multidisciplinary approach and individualisation of treatment strategies are recommended.

A series of clinical trials in the last several decades has resulted in the development of multimodality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer that includes neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision, and postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Owing to this regimen, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer have better survival rates than patients with colon cancer, but at the cost of substantial morbidity and reduced quality of life. The challenge is to identify treatment approaches that maintain or even improve oncologic outcomes while preserving quality of life. We have identified different tumor characteristics that are associated with recurrence and probability of survival for locally advanced rectal cancer. This risk stratification, based on baseline clinical staging and tumor response to chemoradiotherapy, has led us to question whether all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer require every component of the multimodal regimen. In this article, we will review recent evidence that some patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be spared one or more treatment modalities without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes and while preserving quality of life.