Responses of Rocky Mountain National Park elk (Cervus canadensis) to human activities were quantified in autumn 1974 and winter-spring 1975. During autumn, numbers of elk seen, rates of bugling, times of arrival and departure of elk to and from meadows, and harem bulls' activities were analyzed for relationships with traffic volume and tourist activities. Results suggested small effects of traffic volume upon elk, but no trends were statistically significant. People approaching animals off roads usually caused elk to leave open areas. Harassing elk in 2 meadows on alternate weeks during winter and spring did not affect their distribution or observability on winter ranges. Elk made greater use of areas near roads as the winter-spring study progressed, suggesting slight avoidance of roads when forage was more abundant earlier in winter. Wintering elk often used a residential area at night when human encounters were minimal. During winter and spring, elk were approached significantly closer during darkness with artificial lights than during daylight. These elk, which experienced little or no hunting, were very visible and were disturbed little, if any, by normal on-road visitor activities. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 42(1):91-100 Elk are frequently seen during autumn, winter, and spring in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, where visitors make special efforts to observe and photograph them. Effects of this increasing pastime on behavior and ultimately on the physical condition of elk in the Park are unknown. Objectives of this study were to quantify effects of human activity and intentional harassment upon observability, movements, and behavior of Park elk during the rutting period and when elk are concentrated on winter-spring ranges. Elk in Rocky Mountain National Park have increased since 49 were reintroduced in 1913-1914. By 1943, concern for effects on ranges stimulated initiation of direct population control. This program was discontinued in 1945 due to public disfavor (Guse 1966). Controlled hunting by Park staff was resumed in 1949 and continued until 1962 when increasing public disfavor again prompted a halt (Gill 1967). Reduction programs encouraged elk to migrate out of the Park and harassing actions kept the animals scattered, thereby alleviating range damage in concentration areas, at least near roads (Broman 1954). Elk were comparatively difficult to observe during the early and middle 1960's, apparently because they were accustomed to being fired upon within the Park during earlier controlled hunts. Elk on open meadows usually fled into surrounding forest if approached by a vehicle. Elk seemed more observable in 1975, though no data are available for comparison. The 1975 estimate of elk wintering in Rocky Mountain National Park was 600 to 700 animals (David Stevens, Park Biologist, personal communication). Most studies of effects of human disturbance on ungulates have involved hunted populations. Geist (1971) stated that, "Mammals learn to minimize encounters with humans if harassed enough, by reducing activity to areas, habitats and times of day where encounters with humans are minimal." He suggested that harassment led to increased energy expenditures and was most damaging when animals were in poor condition and (Geist 1970) when the disturbance was frequent and unpredictable. Others studying effects of human activity on ungulates have noted effects upon physical condition, disease and reproduction (Zigunov 1961, Bannikov et al. 1961) and upon behavior, distribution and habitat J. Wildl. Manage. 42(1):1978 91 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.148 on Sun, 11 Sep 2016 04:33:54 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 92 ELK RESPONSE TO HUMANS * Schultz and Bailey use (Walther 1969, Dauphine and McClure 1974, Batcheler 1968, Moran 1973, Rost 1975, Ward 1973, Dorrance et al. 1975). This study was financed by the Denver Service Center, National Park Service contract CX2000-5-0012. We gratefully acknowledge the advice, assistance and cooperation of E. Starkey, M. Nyquist, D. Stevens, and others of the National Park Service; of T. Boardman, Statistics Lab, Colorado State University; R. Gard and C. Hibler, also faculty of Colorado State; and of E. Reed and G. Rost, then students at Colorado State University.