Search

Physical inactivity (PIA) is a pressing public health issue globally, contributing significantly to the rise of non-communicable diseases (NCD), such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. The World Health Organization emphasises the importance of regular physical activity (PA) for preventing and managing NCDs. Initiatives to promote active living have gained momentum, ranging from community programs to workplace wellness campaigns, all focused on reducing sedentary lifestyles in modern society. Structured Physical Activity-Dance, Exercise, and Sports (SPADES) has emerged as an innovative approach to addressing PIA and promoting holistic health. After thoroughly reviewing existing literature from PubMed and Google Scholar databases, a panel of experts developed consensus statements through in-depth discussions, and the strength of concurrence on these statements was voted on using a Likert scale. The panel reached a consensus on the best strategies for PA, dance, exercise, sports, and key factors to consider during PA. This consensus targets individuals with metabolic diseases, particularly in regions like South Asia, East Africa, the Gulf, and Latin America, where these conditions are highly prevalent. The SPADES guidelines emphasise overcoming the barriers people with metabolic disorders face in achieving adequate PA, providing tailored recommendations to improve health outcomes for this population., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Sanjay Kalra is an Editorial Board member of Advances in Therapy. Sanjay Kalra was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Sarita Bajaj, Madhur Verma, Hanjabam Barun Sharma, Kaushik, Ramaiya, and Silver Bahendeka have nothing to disclose. Ethics Statement: The consensus statement was based on reviewing the existing literature, so ethical approval was not deemed necessary. The expert participants involved in developing the consensus statement were aware of the study’s objectives, and their responses would be recorded anonymously, after which the compiled report would be published, for which they gave verbal informed consent. None of the participants declared any conflict of interest., (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Long-acting insulin analogues are the standard of care for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in high-income countries but remain largely inaccessible and understudied in low-resource settings. In settings where glycaemic control is typically poor and food insecurity is common, long-acting insulin analogues may offer tangible clinical benefits for people with T1D. To determine whether insulin glargine, a long-acting insulin analogue, reduces the risk of serious hypoglycaemia and/or improves glycaemic time-in-range (TIR) versus human insulin regimens in this population, we are conducting the Human vs Analogue Insulin for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes in Low-Resource Settings randomised controlled trial., Methods and Analysis: This is a 1:1 randomised, parallel-group clinical trial comparing biosimilar insulin glargine with human insulin (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) or premixed 70/30 insulin) in 400 youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) recruiting in Dhaka, Bangladesh (n=250) and Mwanza, Tanzania (n=150). Blinded continuous glucose monitors will be used to assess glycaemic control in both study arms over 14-day periods at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. The co-primary outcomes are the per cent time in serious hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) and TIR (70-180 mg/dL) at 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include TIR at 12 months and time-in-hypoglycaemia, time-above-range, nocturnal hypoglycaemic events and glycaemic control (ie, haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c)) at 6- and 12-months of follow-up. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life are assessed at baseline, 6- and 12 month follow-up. Additionally, the study is conducting qualitative interviews, quantitative assessments of treatment satisfaction and quality of life, as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of analogue insulin use in low-resource settings., Ethics and Dissemination: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY21110122), the National Health Research Ethics Committee at the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/4265) and the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS-ERC/EC/22/405). Research findings will be shared by the local partner organisations and institutions with relevant stakeholders including youth living with diabetes, policy makers, healthcare workers and the general public. Findings will also be shared at local, regional and international scientific meetings., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05614089., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JL receives research funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Donaghue Foundation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Helmsley Charitable Trust, all to his academic institution. He has consulted for IADA, CARES, Alosa Health and all 501c3 not-for-profit organisations. KR has leadership roles in the World Diabetes Foundation, Africa NCD Alliance and East African NCD Alliance. EA has received salary funding via research grants from Novo Nordisk A/S paid to her academic institution. She has received consulting fees for the WHO Geneva NCD Department and WHO EMRO NCD Department. MLP has received funding in the last 36 months through her organisation from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office (FCDO, government of UK), BreakthroughT1D (formerly Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation), Surgo Health, Children’s Investment Fund, Susan T. Buffet Foundation, Swedish International Development Agency (government of Sweden), Global AMR Innovation Fund (GAMRIF). She has received support from WomenLift Health to attend meetings and events. GDO receives salary funding from The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust. Eli Lilly provided the insulin for the study and also provided unrestricted funding to the Life for a Child Program (not including salaries). All other authors have no competing interest to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: The number of people living with multiple chronic conditions in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing, but health facilities are unable to meet demand. To improve health system capacity and access to care, community models of HIV care have been trialled in countries such as Tanzania and Uganda. However, no evidence exists to inform policymakers on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of integrated community-based models of care for HIV and chronic non-communicable conditions. This protocol outlines a within-trial economic evaluation to address this gap., Methods & Analysis: We will estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of integrated community-based care for HIV, hypertension and diabetes compared with facility-based care within the INTE-COMM pragmatic cluster-randomised trial in Tanzania and Uganda. Analyses will adopt a 52-week time horizon, the duration of trial follow-up. The full enrolled trial sample will be analysed from a societal perspective, comprising provider and patient perspectives. Economic costs will be estimated, which includes valuing inputs such as donated goods or time foregone by participants because of receiving care. For provider costs, participant case report forms will inform resource use along with data from facilities and community sites. Resources will be valued using project accounts, facility spending, and locally available cost data. Patient costs will be estimated based on a care-seeking and cost questionnaire administered to participants. Estimated costs will be analysed with co-primary trial outcomes on plasma viral load suppression, glycaemia and blood pressure control to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). We will also calculate ICERs for secondary trial outcomes related to health-related quality of life and wellbeing. Cost drivers and outcomes will be varied within confidence bounds in a two-way sensitivity analysis. We will investigate equity impact by estimating the mean difference in outcomes between integrated community-based and facility-based care across household socio-economic quintiles and by measuring whether participants incurred catastrophic health expenditures., Trial Registration Number: The ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN15319595. Registered on 07 June 2022: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15319595., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2025 Abou Jaoude GJ et al.)

Background: Tanzania, like most low- and middle-income countries, is facing an increasing prevalence of obesity in the general population, including among women of reproductive age. Excess weight pre-pregnancy is a risk factor for the onset of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which is associated with several poor pregnancy outcomes. Screening for GDM, as a primary preventive measure, is not systematically done in Tanzania. This study aims to explore current practices of screening for GDM during routine antenatal care (ANC), estimate the prevalence of GDM among ANC users and compare the performance of two commonly used GDM screening algorithms. We will then explore the best ways for implementing a functional screening practice for GDM at primary level hospitals using perspectives of health care workers, health managers, and pregnant women., Methods: This will be an observational cross-sectional study design with sequential mixed-methods approach conducted in ANC clinics of two primary level hospitals: Kisarawe District Hospital in Coast region and Mbagala Rangi Tatu Hospital in Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. Quantitative data will be collected to determine the current structural capacity and screening practices for GDM, the prevalence of GDM among ANC users, and the sensitivity and specificity of the two recommended screening algorithms. Qualitative data will be collected through key informant interviews with health managers and pregnant women and focus group discussions with healthcare workers to understand the rationale, challenges, possible solutions and benefits of the used screening algorithm. We will also explore the meaning of screening/diagnosis to pregnant women, and propose a functional GDM screening algorithm informed by users (i.e. pregnant women, health managers and care workers)., Discussion: ANC is an entry point for pregnant women to access preventive services including screening for GDM. When done appropriately, GDM screening would reduce undesired outcomes attributed to GDM also beyond the pregnancy period. Through this study we will understand the bottlenecks and propose evidence to inform feasible ways to overcome them and establish a functional and standardized GDM screening service., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study has received ethical approval from the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp—Institutional Review Board (Reference number 1687/23), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences ethics review committee—Tanzania (Senate Research and Publication Committee—Reference number DA 282/298/01.C/1834) and the Tanzanian National Institute of Medical Research ethics review sub-committee (Reference number NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/4457). A written informed consent will be sought from all study participants in all the four sub-studies. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Diabetes care remains unavailable and unaffordable for many people. Adapting models of care to low-income and middle-income country contexts is a priority. Digital technology offers substantial potential yet must surmount health system, technological and acceptability issues. This formative research aimed to identify the potential for a digital technology solution (Diabetes Compass) to address diabetes care gaps in primary healthcare., Design: Qualitative research was conducted in selected districts of Sri Lanka and Tanzania with practitioners, patients and family members. In-depth interviews assessed how digital solutions may improve diabetes care, acceptability and usability; contextual and clinical observations identified practitioner clinical competencies, strengths and weaknesses, and the influence of the care environment on service delivery; and workshop discussions explored strategies to encourage digital solution uptake and sustain use., Setting: The research was undertaken in 2022 at nine health facilities in Sri Lanka's Southern Province (Galle), and 16 health facilities in Tanzania's Lindi and Pwani Regions., Participants: Participants included primary and secondary care practitioners, facility managers, patients and family members., Results: There was striking concordance in the diabetes care gaps and potential for digital solutions in the two countries, and between practitioners, patients and family members. Five main gaps were practitioner training; health information systems and data; service delivery; infrastructure, equipment and medication; and community awareness and knowledge. Practitioners, patients and family members saw strong potential for digital solutions to improve early detection, diagnosis, secondary prevention of complications and improve patients' and families' experience of living with diabetes. They identified specific design and implementation considerations to enable the Diabetes Compass to realistically meet these needs and overcome challenges., Conclusion: There was a strong appetite among practitioners, patients and family members for a digital solution to strengthen diabetes care. Their experience of challenges and practical recommendations informed the Diabetes Compass design., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Over the past two decades, Tanzania's burden of non-communicable diseases has grown disproportionately, but limited resources are still prioritized. A trained human resource for health is urgently needed to combat these diseases. However, continuous medical education for NCDs is scarce. This paper reports on the mid-level healthcare workers knowledge on NCDs. We assessed the knowledge to measure the effectiveness of the training conducted during the initiation of a Package for Essential Management of Severe NCDs (PEN Plus) in rural district hospitals in Tanzania., Methods: The training was given to 48 healthcare employees from Dodoma Region's Kondoa Town Council District Hospital. For a total of five (5) days, a fundamental course on NCDs featured in-depth interactive lectures and practical workshops. Physicians from Tanzania's higher education institutions, tertiary university hospitals, research institutes, and medical organizations served as trainers. Before and after the training, a knowledge assessment comprising 28 questions was administered. Descriptive data analysis to describe the characteristics of the specific knowledge on physiology, diagnosis and therapy of diabetes mellitus, rheumatic fever, heart disease, and sickle cell disease was done using Stata version 17 (STATA Corp Inc., TX, USA)., Results: Complete assessment data for 42 out of the 48 participants was available. Six participants did not complete the training and the assessment. The mean age of participants was 36.9 years, and slightly above half (52%) were above 35 years. Two-thirds (61.9%) were female, and about half (45%) were nurses. The majority had the experience of working for more than 5 years, and the average was 9.4 years (+/- 8.4 years). Overall, the trainees' average scores improved after the training (12.79 vs. 16.05, p < 0.0001) out of 28 possible scores. Specifically, trainees' average scores were better in treatment than in diagnosis, except for sickle cell disease (1.26 vs. 1.83). Most were not able to diagnose rheumatic heart disease (47.6% able) compared to diabetes mellitus (54.8% able) or sickle cell disease (64.3% able) at baseline. The proportion of trainees with adequate knowledge of the treatment of sickle cell disease and diabetes mellitus was 35% and 38.1%, respectively, and there was a non-statistical difference after training. Those working for less than 5 years had a higher proportion of adequate knowledge (30.8%) compared to their more experienced colleagues (6.9%). After the training, participants' knowledge of NCDs increased by three times (i.e., aPR 3, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.5, and 6.0)., Conclusion and Recommendations: PEN Plus training improved the knowledge of healthcare workers at Kondoa Town Council District Hospital. Training is especially needed among nurses and those with a longer duration of work. Continuing education for human resources for health on the management of NCDs is highly recommended in this setting., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) arise from diverse risk factors with differences in the contexts and variabilities in regions and countries. Addressing such a complex challenge requires local evidence. Tanzania has been convening stakeholders every year to disseminate and discuss scientific evidence, policies, and implementation gaps, to inform policy makers in NCDs responses. This paper documents these dissemination efforts and how they have influenced NCDs response and landscape in Tanzania and the region ., Methods: Desk review was conducted through available MOH and conference organizers' documents. It had both quantitative and qualitative data. The review included reports of the four NCDs conferences, conference organization, and conduct processes. In addition, themes of the conferences, submitted abstracts, and presentations were reviewed. Narrative synthesis was conducted to address the objectives. Recommendations emanated from the conference and policy uptake were reviewed and discussed to determine the impact of the dissemination., Findings: Since 2019, four theme-specific conferences were organized. This report includes evidence from four conferences. The conferences convened researchers and scientists from research and training institutions, implementers, government agencies, and legislators in Tanzania and other countries within and outside Africa. Four hundred and thirty-five abstracts were presented covering 14 sub-themes on health system improvements, financing, governance, prevention intervention, and the role of innovation and technology. The conferences have had a positive effect on governments' response to NCDs, including health care financing, NCDs research agenda, and universal health coverage., Conclusion: The National NCDs conferences have provided suitable platforms where stakeholders can share, discuss, and recommend vital strategies for addressing the burden of NCDs through informing policies and practices. Ensuring the engagement of the right stakeholders, as well as the uptake and utilization of the recommendations from these platforms, remains crucial for addressing the observed epidemiological transition in Tanzania and other countries with similar contexts., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).)

Aims: Development of non-invasive and minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices (NI-MI-GMDs) generally takes place in high-income countries (HICs), with HIC's attributes guiding product characteristics. However, people living with diabetes (PLWD) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) encounter different challenges to those in HICs. This study aimed to define requirements for NI-MI-GMDs in LMICs to inform a target product profile to guide development and selection of suitable devices., Methods: This was a multiple-methods, exploratory, qualitative study conducted in Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Peru and Tanzania. Interviews and group discussions/activities were conducted with healthcare workers (HCWs), adults living with type 1 (PLWD1) or type 2 diabetes (PLWD2), adolescents living with diabetes and caregivers., Results: Among 383 informants (90 HCW, 100 PLWD1, 92 PLWD2, 24 adolescents, 77 caregivers), a range of differing user requirements were reported, including preferences for area of glucose measurement, device attachment, data display, alert type and temperature sensitivity. Willingness to pay varied across countries; common requirements included ease of use, a range of guiding functions, the possibility to attach to a body part of choice and a cost lower than or equal to current glucose self-monitoring., Conclusions: Ease-of-use and affordability were consistently prioritised, with broad functionality required for alarms, measurements and attachment possibilities. Perspectives of PLWD are crucial in developing a target product profile to inform characteristics of NI-MI-GMDs in LMICs. Stakeholders must consider these requirements to guide development and selection of NI-MI-GMDs at country level, so that devices are fit for purpose and encourage frequent glucose monitoring among PLWD in these settings., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.