Search

Introduction: Insufficient introspection as part of the 4I's model of medical professionalism (introspection, integrity, interaction, and involvement) is considered an important impediment in trainees. How insufficient introspection relates to decisions to terminate residency training remains unclear. Insights into this subject provide opportunities to improve the training of medical professionals., Methods: We analysed the Dutch Conciliation Board decisions regarding residents dismissed from training between 2011 and 2020. We selected the decisions on residents deemed 'insufficient' regarding introspection as part of the CanMEDS professional domain and compared their characteristics with the decisions about residents without reported insufficiencies on introspection., Results: Of the 120 decisions, 86 dismissed residents were unable to fulfil the requirements of the CanMEDS professional domain. Insufficient introspection was the most prominent insufficiency (73/86). These 73 decisions described more residents' insufficiencies in CanMEDS competency domains compared to the rest of the decisions (3.8 vs. 2.7 p  < 0.001), without significant differences regarding gender or years of training., Conclusions: Insufficient introspection in residents correlates with competency shortcomings programme directors reported in dismissal disputes. The 4I's model facilitates recognition and description of unprofessional behaviours, opening avenues for assessing and developing residents' introspection, but further research is needed for effective implementation in medical education.

Objective To explore how the disciplinary board allocates responsibility between the resident in training and the supervisor. Design Case law analysis. Method All published disciplinary judgments containing the term 'resident in training' from January 1, 2010, to April 1, 2020 on www.tuchtrecht.overheid.nl were analyzed. Results 116 law cases involving 128 complaints were examined. The disciplinary boards' considerations could be distinguished into four groups: situational characteristics, the resident's competence, the extent and quality of supervision, and information provision. Conclusion The disciplinary boards allocates responsibility between the resident in training and the supervisor in the context of the specific complaint and situation. It is therefore important that the general rules and regulations regarding supervision of residents are clearly outlined and documented, including their momentary alignment. In addition, the hospital has a general responsibility to inform patients about the implications of training residents while providing healthcare.

Background: Patients use social media on a daily basis, and they can be restricted under the new Dutch Compulsory Mental Healthcare Act., Aim: To describe which social media behaviors of psychiatric patients were rightfully restricted by health care professionals and reveal underlying reasons., Method: We searched for law cases of the courts of first instance and decisions of boards on patients&rsquo; complaints from implementation of the new act (2020-2023) about patients&rsquo; behaviors related to social media in two open source databases., Results: We found 38 cases on patients&rsquo; behaviors related to social media. Most cases included patients with (manic) psychotic episodes. Social media restrictions were applied to prevent or surcease several types of behaviors creating harm for self and others, such as exploitation, social decline, protection of privacy and safety of healthcare personal, or threats towards others. Altered patient&rsquo;s interactions on social media, signal early symptoms related to decompensation., Conclusion: Restrictions on the patient&rsquo;s use of social media are accepted by law in inpatients with manic psychotic episodes and effective in preventing several forms of detriment. Monitoring social media might be relevant for diagnostics or self-signaling. Self-binding statements should consider requirements to restrict social media use in times of decompensation or self-damaging tendencies.

Patients can become victims of sexual harassment by their healthcare provider. Sometimes patients disclose this unpleasant experience to a healthcare provider. In those cases it's important to deal with this adequately. It's also possible that the doctor himself witnesses sexual harassment by a colleague towards a patient. Although the need for speaking up is obvious, the Dutch Code of Conduct for Doctors gives few words to such situations. The noncommittal reaction of the bystander is thus given all the space it needs. In this article, we call on the reader to advocate for awareness, prevention and intervention in their own working environment.

With the free movement of people within the European Union (EU), it occurs that EU citizens need healthcare in and different country, other than their country of origin. Identification of patients is important, and the EU is currently implementing a digital Patient Summary to provide physicians with essential information concerning an European patient. Physicians should be aware that the obligation concerning informed consent carries extra weight for patients with a language barrier. A professional interpreter can facilitate bridging this linguistic barrier. All patients who die within the Netherlands are subject to Dutch legislation on organ donation. The reimbursement of care is regulated within the EU by Regulations (No 883/2004 and No 987/2009) and the Directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare. In principle, unplanned care is always reimbursed, whereas planned clinical care requires permission from the patient's health insurer.

A 23-year-old man who has sex with men with perianal pain and blood loss showed erosive perianal plaques. PCR swab of the plaque was positive for Treponema pallidum and herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2. Patient was diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis with a co-infection of HSV and was successfully treated with benzathine benzylpenicillin.

Introduction: Behaviour is visible in real-life events, but also on social media. While some national medical organizations have published social media guidelines, the number of studies on professional social media use in medical education is limited. This study aims to explore social media use among medical students, residents and medical specialists., Methods: An anonymous, online survey was sent to 3844 medical students at two Dutch medical schools, 828 residents and 426 medical specialists. Quantitative, descriptive data analysis regarding demographic data, yes/no questions and Likert scale questions were performed using SPSS. Qualitative data analysis was performed iteratively, independently by two researchers applying the principles of constant comparison, open and axial coding until consensus was reached., Results: Overall response rate was 24.8%. Facebook was most popular among medical students and residents; LinkedIn was most popular among medical specialists. Personal pictures and/or information about themselves on social media that were perceived as unprofessional were reported by 31.3% of students, 19.7% of residents and 4.1% of medical specialists. Information and pictures related to alcohol abuse, partying, clinical work or of a sexually suggestive character were considered inappropriate. Addressing colleagues about their unprofessional posts was perceived to be mainly dependent on the nature and hierarchy of the interprofessional relation., Discussion: There is a widespread perception that the presence of unprofessional information on social media among the participants and their colleagues is a common occurrence. Medical educators should create awareness of the risks of unprofessional (online) behaviour among healthcare professionals, as well as the necessity and ways of addressing colleagues in case of such lapses., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19., Methods: An extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19., Results: Three hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. "Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families" was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect,  ethical awareness and support. "Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions" and "Self-reflective and empowering leadership" received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p < 0.001) and intensivists (p < 0.05) compared to one year prior., Conclusion: Levels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.