Search

Background: The prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) is poor and differs considerably among patients. Therefore, it is clinically relevant to identify patients with APC who are more likely to benefit from palliative chemotherapy with reduced risk of toxicity. To date, there is no prognostic score universally recommended to help clinicians in planning the therapeutic management. Methods: Using individual patient data from 319 cases of APC treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and enrolled in the SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001 randomized trial, several baseline variables, including inflammatory markers, were analysed post hoc as predictors of mortality and/or grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy-related toxicity and separate risk scores were developed. Results: Median survival of the study patients was 7.9 months (interquartile range 3.7–13.3 months). Independent predictors of mortality included increased Aspartate transaminase (ASAT), low performance status, increased derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, increased Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), low haemoglobin, presence of pain, presence of metastasis and increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP). During the study, 117 patients experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Independent predictors of toxicity included white blood cells, ALP, renal function and bilirubin levels at baseline. Both models displayed moderate levels of discrimination (C-statistic 0.68 and 0.64 for mortality and toxicity, respectively) and adequate calibration. Conclusions: We developed simple-to-use prognostic scores for mortality and severe toxicity for patients with APC. These scores can be useful in daily practice to identify patients with increased risk of death or toxicity and to plan the most appropriate therapeutic strategy to improve survival and quality of life. Further prospective studies to validate such scores are needed.

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is still a challenge for gynecological oncologists because the treatment of the advanced disease remains an unmet need for patients. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) recently provided a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of EC, offering a new classification of the disease, based on genetic features, which defines four subgroups of cancer rather than the two traditionally recognized. In the molecular classification two types of EC, the polymerase epsilon (POLE)-ultramutated and the microsatellite instability (MSI)-hypermutated, seem to present an enhanced immune microenvironment and a high mutation burden. The blockade of the immune checkpoints is an innovative approach that has largely demonstrated to be effective in solid malignancies, such as lung, renal and melanoma; it acts by reducing the cancer-induced immune-suppression through inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed Death and PD-Ligand) axis. All available evidence supporting an over-expression of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in EC has been reviewed. In particular in the POLE and MSI ECs an up-regulation of this pathway was found, aiming to suggest a rationale for testing the PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in these cancer subgroups.

Background Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer has been reported to be effective by several meta-analyses. Perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (RGC) has been reported improving survival by two large randomized trials and recent meta-analyses but the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal regimen remains to be determined. We compared a neoadjuvant with adjuvant docetaxel-based regimen in a prospective randomized phase III trial, of which we present the 10-year follow-up data. Patients and methods Patients with cT3–4 anyN M0 or anyT cN1–3 M0 gastric carcinoma, staged with endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, bone scan, and laparoscopy, were assigned to receive four 21-day/cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, and fluorouracil 300 mg/m2/day over days 1–14, either before (arm A) or after (arm B) gastrectomy. Event-free survival was the primary end point, whereas secondary end points included overall survival, toxicity, down-staging, pathological response, quality of life, and feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results This trial was activated in November 1999 and closed in November 2005 due to insufficient accrual. Of the 70 enrolled patients, 69 were randomized, 34 to arm A and 35 to arm B. No difference in EFS (2.5 years in both arms) or OS (4.3 versus 3.7 years, in arms A and B, respectively) was found. A higher dose intensity of chemotherapy was observed in arm A and more frequent chemotherapy-related serious adverse events occurred in arm B. Surgery was safe after preoperative chemotherapy. A 12% pathological complete response was observed in arm A. Conclusion Docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil chemotherapy is promising in preoperative setting of locally advanced RGC. The early stopping could mask the real effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment. However, the complete pathological tumour responses, feasibility, and safe surgery warrant further investigation of a taxane-based regimen in the preoperative setting.

Background: CR1447 (4-OH-testosterone, 4-OHT), a steroidal small molecule, strongly binds to the androgen receptor (AR) and has aromatase inhibiting activity. Pre-clinical studies show that CR1447 given as an ointment is efficiently absorbed and has antiproliferative activity in both ER-positive and ER-negative/AR-positive breast cancer cells. Methods: CR1447 was administered topically on a daily basis to patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative or ER-negative/PR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer pretreated with several lines of therapy. One cycle was defined as 21 days of treatment. Disease evaluation was performed at 3 and 6 months in order to determine tumor response (i.e. complete/partial remission and stable disease) in 3 cohorts of 3 evaluable patients each plus 3 confirmatory patients (dose escalation 100, 200, 400 mg). Results: 14 patients have been treated for a total of 38 cycles. Two patients are still on treatment at the time of analysis. Two patients, one in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2, showed early tumor progression and were replaced. Related adverse events were all ≤ grade 2 and included fatigue, bone and joint pain, stiffness, dry skin and mouth, nausea, sweating, urinary tract infection, rash, headache and distress. No drug-related dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were seen. Two patients (17%) achieved stable disease at 3 months. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed dose-dependent transdermal uptake of CR1447, resulting in sufficient plasma concentrations of 4-OHT. 4-OH-androstenedione, a key metabolite of 4-OHT, was undetectable in most of the plasma samples. Conclusions: CR1447 administered transdermally as an ointment is well tolerated and appears to have single-agent activity in heavily pretreated ER-positive/HER2-negative and ER-negative/PR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients. The recommended phase II dose is 400 mg/day. Citation Format: Schoenfeld W, Zweifel M, Thuerlimann B, Riniker S, Weder P, von Moos R, Pagani O, Bigler M, Rothgiesser KM, Pilop C, Brauchli P, Tapia C, Sessa C. Phase 1 evaluation of the androgen receptor modulator CR1447 in patients with advanced breast cancer (SAKK 21/12). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-05.

IF 13.926 (2017); International audience; BackgroundThis open-label, phase III trial compared chemoradiation followed by surgery with or without neoadjuvant and adjuvant cetuximab in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma.Patients and methodsPatients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to two cycles of chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy, docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2, weekly for 5 weeks) and surgery, with or without neoadjuvant cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly and adjuvant cetuximab 500 mg/m2 fortnightly for 3 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 300 patients (median age, 61 years; 88% male; 63% adenocarcinoma; 85% cT3/4a, 90% cN+) were assigned to cetuximab (n = 149) or control (n = 151). The R0-resection rate was 95% for cetuximab versus 97% for control. Postoperative treatment-related mortality was 6% in both arms. Median PFS was 2.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0 to not reached] with cetuximab and 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.5–2.8) with control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58–1.07; P = 0.13]. Median overall survival (OS) time was 5.1 years (95% CI, 3.7 to not reached) versus 3.0 years (95% CI, 2.2–4.2) for cetuximab and control, respectively (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52–1.01; P = 0.055). Time to loco-regional failure after R0-resection was significantly longer for cetuximab (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31–0.90; P = 0.017); time to distant failure did not differ between arms (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64–1.59, P = 0.97). Cetuximab did not increase adverse events in neoadjuvant or postoperative settings.ConclusionAdding cetuximab to multimodal therapy significantly improved loco-regional control, and led to clinically relevant, but not-significant improvements in PFS and OS in resectable esophageal carcinoma.Clinical trial informationNCT01107639

In advanced HER2+ breast cancer the impact of combining Trastuzumab (T) and chemotherapy (chemo) versus T alone followed by the addition of chemo at disease progression has not been properly studied. Study design The trial compared efficacy, toxicity and quality of life of sequential administration of T followed, at progression, by combination with chemo (T>TChemo) versus the upfront combination of T and chemo (TChemo) in patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer. Materials and methods Eligibility: measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease; ≤2 previous chemo; ECOG performance status The estimated median TTP-TChemo in the control arm (TChemo) was 5-6 months. A 3 months’ increase in the experimental T>TChemo arm was considered meaningful. The chemo backbone was at investigator’s choice (taxanes, vinorelbine, cisplatin) and could be stopped after 6 cycles in responding patients. T was continued until progression. Treatment after progression under TChemo was by investigators’ decision. Patients’ characteristics From Sept 1999–Jan 2013, 175 patients were enrolled. The trial was stopped prematurely due to insufficient accrual. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms: median age 55 years (32–79), ER and/or progesterone receptor positive 63%, ≥2 disease sites 91%, dominant bone 36% or dominant visceral disease 66%, 1stline therapy 72%. Results At the cutoff date (May 2014) 173 patients were evaluable: median follow up 77.7 months, 29 patients (17%) censored when receiving, at chemo stop, off-protocol treatment before progression (maintenance metronomic chemotherapy or endocrine therapy), 11 patients (6%) had no event at the end of follow-up. TTP-TChemo was longer than expected in both arms (12.7 months T>TChemo, 10.3 months TChemo) and not significantly different (HR=0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–1.0; p=0.08). In the T>TChemo arm, median TTP before introduction of chemo was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3–5.1). Overall survival was not significantly different, 35.6 months versus 36.3 months (HR=0.9; 95% CI, 0.6–1.3; p=0.50). Toxicity was mainly chemo related, consistent with the chosen regimen. Cardiac toxicity was mild (no grade 4, 1 cardiac failure NYHA III in the T>TChemo arm). No treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions The sequential administration of T and chemo showed a non-significant trend to longer TTP-TChemo compared to upfront combination therapy: it allows to delay chemo use and its toxicity and seems a reasonable approach. TTP-TChemo was better than projected in both arms. The sequential strategy with double anti-HER2 targeting (T/Pertuzumab) is now under evaluation in 1st-line patients in the SAKK 22/10 trial. Citation Format: Olivia Pagani, Dirk Klingbiel, Thomas Ruhstaller, Franco Nolè, Serenella Eppenberger, Christian Oehlschlegel, Jürg Bernhard, Peter Brauchli, Dagmar Hess, Christoph Mamot, Elisabetta Munzone, Bernhard Pestalozzi, Manuela Rabaglio, Karin Ribi, Christoph Rochlitz, Karin Rothgiesser, Beat Thürlimann, Roger von Moos, Khalil Zaman, Aron Goldhirsch. Advanced HER2 positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab: Is combination with chemotherapy always needed? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-11.

BACKGROUND The risk of osteoporosis and fracture influences the selection of adjuvant endocrine therapy. We analyzed bone mineral density (BMD) in Swiss patients of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial [treatment arms: A, tamoxifen (T) for 5 years; B, letrozole (L) for 5 years; C, 2 years of T followed by 3 years of L; D, 2 years of L followed by 3 years of T]. PATIENTS AND METHODS Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results were retrospectively collected. Patients without DXA served as control group. Repeated measures models using covariance structures allowing for different times between DXA were used to estimate changes in BMD. Prospectively defined covariates were considered as fixed effects in the multivariable models. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-one of 546 patients had one or more DXA with 577 lumbar and 550 hip measurements. Weight, height, prior hormone replacement therapy, and hysterectomy were positively correlated with BMD; the correlation was negative for letrozole arms (B/C/D versus A), known osteoporosis, time on trial, age, chemotherapy, and smoking. Treatment did not influence the occurrence of osteoporosis (T score < -2.5 standard deviation). CONCLUSIONS All aromatase inhibitor regimens reduced BMD. The sequential schedules were as detrimental for bone density as L monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE The long-term follow up data of 2 prospective phase II trials is reported (NCT00072033, NCT00445861), which investigated neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications as well as prognostic factors and patterns of relapse during long-term observation are shown. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Long-term follow-up is often missing in the complex setting of multimodal treatments of esophageal carcinoma; this leads to rather undifferentiated follow-up guidelines for this tumor entity. METHODS In the first trial, patients received induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery. In the second trial, cetuximab was added to the same neoadjuvant treatment concomitant with induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation. RESULTS Eighty-two patients underwent surgery; the median follow-up time was 6.8 and 6.4 years, respectively. Fifty-five percent were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 80% clinically node-positive, 68% received transthoracic esophagectomy, and 32% transhiatal or transmediastinal resection. Five patients died postoperatively in-hospital due to complications (6%). The median overall survival was 4.3 years, and the median event-free survival was 2.7 years. Patients with adenocarcinoma rarely relapsed after a 3-year event-free survival. Whereas patients with residual tumor cells after neoadjuvant therapy primarily experienced relapse within the first 2 postoperative years, this in contrast to several patients with complete remission who also experienced late relapses 4 years after surgery. CONCLUSION After curative surgery in a multimodal setting, the histological type and the response to neoadjuvant therapy predicted the time frame of relapse; this knowledge may influence further follow-up guidelines for esophageal carcinoma.

Background HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is standard treatment in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab alone followed by addition of chemotherapy at disease progression versus upfront combination therapy has not been elucidated. Patients and methods One-hundred seventy-five patients with measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease without previous HER2-directed therapy were randomized to trastuzumab alone followed, at disease progression, by the combination with chemotherapy (Arm A) or upfront trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Arm B). Chemotherapy could be stopped after ≥6 cycles in responding patients, trastuzumab was continued until progression. The primary endpoint of this superiority trial was time to progression (TTP) on combined trastuzumab-chemotherapy (Combination-TTP) in both arms. Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. Results Combination-TTP was longer than expected in both arms, 12.2 months in Arm A and 10.3 months in Arm B and not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1; P =0.1). Overall survival was also not significantly different (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6-1.5; P = 0.55). In Arm A, the median TTP before introduction of chemotherapy was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.4), yet at 2 years 6% of patients were still on trastuzumab alone. Patients without visceral disease had a Combination-TTP of 21.8 months in arm A, compared with 10.1 months in arm B (unplanned analysis HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2, P = 0.03). Patients with visceral disease showed no difference. Toxicity was chemotherapy-related. Conclusion The outcome of patients receiving sequential trastuzumab-chemotherapy or upfront combination was similar. We failed to demonstrate superiority of the sequential approach. These results nevertheless suggest chemotherapy and its toxicity can be deferred, especially in patients with indolent, non-visceral disease. Despite a larger non-inferiority confirmatory study would be needed, these findings represent an additional proof of concept that de-escalation strategies can be discussed in individual patients.

Objectives Molecular subclassification of non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential to improve clinical outcome. This study assessed the prognostic and predictive value of circulating micro-RNA (miRNA) in patients with non-squamous NSCLC enrolled in the phase II SAKK (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research) trial 19/05, receiving uniform treatment with first-line bevacizumab and erlotinib followed by platinum-based chemotherapy at progression. Materials and methods Fifty patients with baseline and 24h blood samples were included from SAKK 19/05. The primary study endpoint was to identify prognostic (overall survival, OS) miRNA's. Patient samples were analyzed with Agilent human miRNA 8x60K microarrays, each glass slide formatted with eight high-definition 60K arrays. Each array contained 40 probes targeting each of the 1347 miRNA. Data preprocessing included quantile normalization using robust multi-array average (RMA) algorithm. Prognostic and predictive miRNA expression profiles were identified by Spearman's rank correlation test (percentage tumor shrinkage) or log-rank testing (for time-to-event endpoints). Results Data preprocessing kept 49 patients and 424 miRNA for further analysis. Ten miRNA's were significantly associated with OS, with hsa-miR-29a being the strongest prognostic marker (HR=6.44, 95%-CI 2.39–17.33). Patients with high has-miR-29a expression had a significantly lower survival at 10 months compared to patients with a low expression (54% versus 83%). Six out of the 10 miRNA's (hsa-miRN-29a, hsa-miR-542-5p, hsa-miR-502-3p, hsa-miR-376a, hsa-miR-500a, hsa-miR-424) were insensitive to perturbations according to jackknife cross-validation on their HR for OS. The respective principal component analysis (PCA) defined a meta-miRNA signature including the same 6 miRNA's, resulting in a HR of 0.66 (95%-CI 0.53–0.82). Conclusion Cell-free circulating miRNA-profiling successfully identified a highly prognostic 6-gene signature in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Circulating miRNA profiling should further be validated in external cohorts for the selection and monitoring of systemic treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Purpose This phase II trial aimed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a first-line combination of targeted therapies for advanced non-squamous NSCLC: bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E), followed by platinum-based CT at disease progression (PD). Methods 103 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC were treated with B (15 mg/kg day 1 of each 21-day cycle) and E (150 mg daily) until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Upon PD patients received 6 cycles of CT (cisplatin/carboplatin and gemcitabine). The primary endpoint was disease stabilization rate (DSR) after 12 weeks of BE treatment. Results 101 patients were evaluable. Under BE, DSR at week 12 was 54.5%. 73 patients had at least stable disease (SD), including 1 complete remission and 17 partial responses (PR). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Median time to progression (TTP) under BE was 4.1 months. 62 patients started CT; 35 received at least 4 cycles (6 PR, 32 SD). At a median follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months. Conclusions First-line BE treatment followed by a fixed CT regimen at PD is feasible with acceptable toxicity and activity. In a non-squamous NSCLC population unselected for EGFR status, we found OS rates similar to standard CT.

This study aimed to investigate in a multicenter cohort study the radicality of colorectal cancer resections, to assess the oncosurgical quality of colorectal specimens, and to compare the performance between centers. One German and nine Swiss hospitals agreed to prospectively register all patients with primary colorectal cancer resected between September 2001 and June 2005. The median number of eligible patients with one primary tumor included per center was 95 (range 12–204). The following variations of median values or percentages between centers were found: length of bowel specimen 20–39 cm (25.8 cm), maximum height of mesocolon 6.5–12.5 cm (9.0 cm), number of examined lymph nodes 9–24 (16), distance to nearer bowel resection margin in colon cancer 4.8–12 cm (7 cm), and in rectal cancer 2–3 cm (2.5 cm), central ligation of major artery 40–97 % (71 %), blood loss 200–500 ml (300 ml), need for perioperative blood transfusion 5–40 % (19 %), tumor opened during mobilization 0–11 % (5 %), T4-tumors not en-bloc resected 0–33 % (4 %), inadvertent perforation of mesocolon/mesorectum 0–8 % (4 %), no-touch isolation technique 36–86 % (67 %), abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer 0–30 % (17 %), rectal cancer specimen with circumferential margin ≤1 mm 0–19 % (10 %), in-hospital mortality 0–6 % (2 %), anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess 0–17 % (7 %), re-operation 0–17 % (8 %). In colorectal cancer, surgery considerable variations between different centers were found with regard to radicality and oncosurgical quality, suggesting a potential for targeted improvement of surgical technique.

In der akademischen klinischen Krebsforschung sind kooperative Gruppen die Organisationen, die therapeutische Fortschritte herbeifuhren. Die Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur klinische Krebsforschung (SAKK) bildet in der Schweiz ein flachendeckendes Netzwerk.

We developed a novel diagram to depict patient flow and outcomes in clinical trials. In contrast to flow diagrams such as the CONSORT chart, our diagram enables individual patient histories to be traced and depicts important patterns of treatment administration and outcomes, such as response and adverse events. Also, it is particularly useful for multimodal treatments or a sequence of different therapies where the CONSORT flow chart is less informative and can be confusing.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced, incurable cancer receiving anticancer treatment often experience multidimensional symptoms. We hypothesize that real-time monitoring of both symptoms and clinical syndromes will improve symptom management by oncologists and patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cluster-randomized phase-III trial, patients with incurable, symptomatic, solid tumors, who received new outpatient chemotherapy with palliative intention, were eligible. Immediately before the weekly oncologists' visit, patients completed the palm-based E-MOSAIC assessment (Edmonton-Symptom-Assessment-Scale, ≤3 additional symptoms, estimated nutritional intake, body weight change, Karnofsky Performance Status, medications for pain, fatigue, nutrition). A cumulative, longitudinal monitoring sheet (LoMoS) was printed immediately. Eligible experienced oncologists were defined as one cluster each and randomized to receive the immediate print-out LoMoS (intervention) or not (control). Primary analysis limited to patients having uninterrupted (>4/6 visits with same oncologist) patient-oncologist sequences was a mixed model for the difference in patients global quality of life (G-QoL; items 29/30 of EORTC-QlQ-c30) between baseline (BL) and week 6. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all eligible patients. RESULTS: In 8 centers, 82 oncologists treated 264 patients (median 66 years; overall survival intervention 6.3, control 5.4 months) with various tumors. The between-arm difference in G-QoL of 102 uninterrupted patients (intervention: 55; control: 47) was 6.8 (P = 0.11) in favor of the intervention; in a sensitivity analysis (oncologists treating ≥2 patients; 50, 39), it was 9.0 (P = 0.07). ITT analysis revealed improvement in symptoms (difference last study visit-BL: intervention -5.4 versus control 2.1, P = 0.003) and favored the intervention for communication and coping. More patients with high symptom load received immediate symptom management (chart review, nurse-patient interview) by oncologists getting the LoMoS. CONCLUSION: Monitoring of patient symptoms, clinical syndromes and their management clearly reduced patients' symptoms, but not QoL. Our results encourage the implementation of real-time monitoring in the routine workflow of oncologist with a computer solution.

In this trial, stopping bevacizumab after completion of induction chemotherapy was associated with a shorter time to progression, but no statistically significant difference in overall survival compared with the bevacizumab continuation strategy. Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. Treatment costs are substantially higher for continuous bevacizumab treatment. Background Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after completing first-line chemotherapy. Patients and methods In an open-label, phase III multicentre trial, patients with mCRC without disease progression after 4–6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned to continuing bevacizumab at a standard dose or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significance level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%. Results The intention-to-treat population comprised 262 patients: median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median TTP was 4.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1–5.4] months for bevacizumab continuation versus 2.9 (95% CI 2.8–3.8) months for no continuation; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.96). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The median overall survival was 25.4 months for bevacizumab continuation versus 23.8 months (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63–1.1;P = 0.2) for no continuation. Severe adverse events were uncommon in the bevacizumab continuation arm. Costs for bevacizumab continuation were estimated to be ∼30 000 USD per patient. Conclusions Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for treatment holidays versus continuing bevacizumab monotheray, after 4–6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Based on no impact on overall survival and increased treatment costs, bevacizumab as a single agent is of no meaningful therapeutic value. More efficient treatment approaches are needed to maintain control of stabilized disease following induction therapy. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00544700.

Objective: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of combined weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer, of whom 15 were evaluable for toxicity and response, were enrolled in 7 Swiss centers. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 was given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Capecitabine was administered orally on days 1 through 14 using five different dose levels. Both drugs were given in a 21-day schedule. Results: Capecitabine could be administered at doses commonly used for the drug as a single agent, i.e. 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily in combination with weekly paclitaxel. Hematological and other toxicities did not appear to be dose-limiting; however, significant skin and nail toxicities were observed. A response or stable disease was observed in 87% of patients [13/15; exact 95% confidence interval (CI) 60–98%], with 2 complete responses, 4 partial responses (overall response rate 40%, exact 95% CI 16–68%) and 7 patients with stable disease for at least 9 weeks. Conclusion: The phase I evaluation of capecitabine in combination with fixed-dose weekly paclitaxel did not allow the definition of an MTD of capecitabine based on the predefined criteria. Instead, the dose for the phase II evaluation was determined based on the occurrence of toxicity in later courses and on experience with other regimens containing capecitabine. Capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1–14, every 3 weeks) with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 weekly) is a promising combination for advanced breast cancer now being investigated in a phase II trial.

4019 Background: We compared chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant cetuximab (cetux) in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Methods: Pts with resectable esophageal cancer (T2N1-3;T3-4aNx) received two cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75mg/m2, cisplatin 75mg/m2) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy, docetaxel 20mg/m2 and cisplatin 25mg/m2 weekly) and surgery or the same treatment with addition of neoadjuvant cetux 250mg/m2 weekly and adjuvant cetux 500mg/m2 bi-weekly for three months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). After a median follow-up of 4y 166 of the planned 180 events occurred (plateau reached). Results: 300 pts were treated between 2010-13: 88% male, median age 61y, 63% adenocarcinoma, 85% cT3/4a, 90% cN+. 84% completed neoadjuvant therapy, 87% were operated (cetux: 89%, control: 86%), 67% started and 50% completed adjuvant cetux-therapy. The R0 resection rate was 95% in the cetux-arm and 97% in the control-arm, there were 10 and 14 treatment-related deaths and 9 and 4 postoperative in-hospital deaths, respectively. Major differences in adverse events (grade >2) with addition of cetux were higher rate of allergic reactions and hypomagnesemia, but lower rate of dysphagia (-15%) and esophagitis (-4%) during chemoradiation. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to a multimodal therapy showed a statistically significant reduction of loco-regional recurrences which led to a statistically non-significant, but clinically relevant improvement of PFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01107639. [Table: see text]

1 Amadori D, Aglietta M, Alessi B, et al. Effi cacy and safety of 12-weekly versus 4-weekly zoledronic acid for prolonged treatment of patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (ZOOM): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 663–70. 2 Martin M, Lopez-Tarruella S. Zooming in on the schedule of bone-modifying drugs. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 575–76. 3 Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, et al. Long-term effi cacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 98: 1735–44. of the 12-weekly group would not be proven in this case. Furthermore, the skeletal morbidity rate is questionable as the primary endpoint, since the use of the skeletal morbidity rate is based on the assumption that all skeletalrelated events are independent of one another. This assumption is probably unrealistic because bone metastases often seem to be temporally clustered. In a previous study by Rosen and colleagues, which was the basis of the sample size calculation for this study, skeletal-related events occurring within a 21-day window were counted as one event. However, in Amadori and colleagues’ study, the authors do not mention that the same procedure was applied to avoid multiple counting of linked events. This fact weakens the comparability of the two studies and casts doubt upon the reliability of the design parameters. Moreover, the standard deviation in Rosen and colleagues’ study was very high—2·04 for a mean skeletal morbidity rate of 0·98. Thus, it would have been advisable to plan an interim analysis to adjust for these crucial design parameters. Another important point is that effi cacy analyses were only done in the intention-to-treat population, although it is well known and captured in regulatory guidelines that the primary analysis set in a noninferiority trial should be the perprotocol set. The intention-to-treat population should be used only for supportive analysis since the noncompliers will generally reduce the observed diff erence between the treatment groups and will therefore lead to bias towards non-inferiority. Finally, the original choice of a wide non-inferiority margin leads to a small sample size and wide confi dence intervals. Thus, the results of this study, which indeed look promising, are compatible with a wide range of scenarios. For instance, the skeletal mortality rate ratio of 0·97 is close to one. But with a 95% CI of 0·60–1·57, 7 Hutton B, Addison C, Mazzarello S, et al. De-escalated administration of bone-targeted agents in patients with breast and prostate cancer— a survey of Canadian oncologists. J Bone Oncol 2013; 2: 77–83. 8 Hutton B, Morretto P, Emmenegger U, et al. Bone-targeted agent use for bone metastases from breast cancer and prostate cancer: a patient survey. J Bone Oncol 2013; published online June 21. DOI:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jbo.2013.05.002. 9 Coleman R, Wright J, Houston S, et al. Randomized trial of marker-directed versus standard schedule zoledronic acid for bone metastases from breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (suppl): 511 (abstr).

The professional activity of air traffic controllers (ATC) is often considered to be rather stressful. Certain characteristics of this job are likely to produce stress; for example an ATC can not predict when a situation becomes critical and he is not able to regulate the workload. In order to assess psychophysiological stress reactions in this working situation, saliva samples were taken from 158 male air traffic controllers before and after each of two working sessions. In contrast to the expected immunosuppressive effects, the working sessions caused a marked increase in the concentration and secretion rate of salivary immunoglobulin A (sIgA), as well as in the concentration of salivary cortisol. The increase in sIgA, however, was not correlated with the salivary cortisol response or with the amount of actual or perceived workload, whereas the cortisol response was correlated with both workload measures. It is suggested that positive emotional engagement is responsible for the observed sIgA increase and that measuring this physiological response may be a valuable tool for differentiating between positive and negative stress effects or between successful and unsuccessful adaptation or coping with situational demands.

567Background: Endocrine treatment remains the optimal systemic treatment for metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Recent advances in overcoming acquired or intrinsic endocrine resistance by combination treatments targeting the ER pathway have shown significant improvements in progression-free survival. In first line the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozol significantly increases progression-free survival. The aim of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of this regimen for the Swiss healthcare system. Methods: A Markov cohort simulation based on the PALOMA-2 trial (Finn et al. The Lancet 2015) was used for the clinical course of patients. Input parameters were based on the clinical summary data presented in the trial, while direct costs were assessed for the Swiss healthcare system. Results: Adding palbociblib to letrozol (PALLET) compared to letrozol mono-therapy (LET) was estimated to cost additional CHF342’440 with a gain of 1.14 quality adjusted life ye...

Purpose: The EGF receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in the majority of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) and might represent a valid therapeutic target. The combination of docetaxel and cetuximab, the monoclonal antibody against EGFR, has not been tested in patients with prostate cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with mCRPC progressing during or within 90 days after at least 12 weeks of docetaxel were included in this phase II trial. Treatment consisted of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) in combination with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on day 1 and then 250 mg/m2 weekly). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks defined as the absence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), radiographic, or clinical progression. Evaluation of known biomarkers of response and resistance to cetuximab (EGFR, PTEN, amphiregulin, epiregulin) was conducted. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled at 15 Swiss centers. Median age was 68 years and median PSA was 212 ng/mL. PFS at 12 weeks was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19%–52%], PFS at 24 weeks was 20%, and median overall survival (OS) was 13.3 months (95% CI, 7.3–15.4). Seven patients (20%) had a confirmed ≥50% and 11 patients (31%) a confirmed ≥30% PSA decline. About 47% of enrolled patients experienced grade 3 and 8% grade 4 toxicities. A significantly improved PFS was found in patients with overexpression of EGFR and persistent activity of PTEN. Conclusions: EGFR inhibition with cetuximab might improve the outcome of patients with mCRPC. A potential correlation between EGFR overexpression, persistent expression of PTEN, and EGFR inhibition should be investigated further. Clin Cancer Res; 18(21); 6049–57. ©2012 AACR.

Background Mantle cell lymphoma accounts for 6% of all B-cell lymphomas and is generally incurable. It is characterized by the translocation t(11;14) leading to cyclin D1 over-expression. Cyclin D1 is downstream of the mammalian target of rapamycin threonine kinase and can be effectively blocked by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. We set out to examine the single agent activity of the orally available mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in a prospective, multicenter trial in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma ([NCT00516412][1]). Design and Methods Eligible patients who had received a maximum of three prior lines of chemotherapy were given everolimus 10 mg for 28 days (one cycle) for a total of six cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the best objective response. Adverse reactions, progression-free survival and molecular response were secondary endpoints. Results Thirty-six patients (35 evaluable) were enrolled and treatment was generally well tolerated with Common Terminology Criteria grade ≥3 adverse events (>5%) including anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (8%). The overall response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8–37%) with two complete remissions and five partial responses; 49% of the patients had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 6 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.8–8.2) overall and 17.0 (6.4–23.3) months for 18 patients who received six or more cycles of treatment. Three patients achieved a lasting complete molecular response, as assessed by polymerase chain reaction analysis of peripheral blood. Conclusions Everolimus as a single agent is well tolerated and has anti-lymphoma activity in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Further studies of everolimus in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent for maintenance treatment are warranted. ([Clinicaltrials.gov][2] identifier: [NCT00516412][1]) [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00516412&atom=%2Fhaematol%2F97%2F7%2F1085.atom [2]: http://Clinicaltrials.gov

This phase II trial investigated rituximab and cladribine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Four induction cycles, comprising cladribine (0.1 mg/kg/day days 1-5, cycles 1-4) and rituximab (375 mg/m(2) day 1, cycles 2-4), were given every 28 days. Stem cell mobilization (rituximab 375 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) day 2; and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 10 microg/kg/day, from day 4) was performed in responders. Of 42 patients, nine achieved complete remission (CR), 15 very good partial remission, and two nodular partial remission (overall response rate 62%). Stem cell mobilization and harvesting (> or = 2 x 10(6) stem cells/kg body weight) were successful in 12 of 20 patients. Rituximab infusion-related adverse events were moderate. The main grade 3/4 adverse events during induction were neutropenia and lymphocytopenia. Rituximab plus cladribine was effective; however, the CR rate was modest and stem cell harvest was impaired in a large number of responding patients.

Background EUS response assessment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is limited by disintegration of the involved anatomic structures. Objective Predictive and prognostic values of a prospectively defined maximum tumor thickness (MTT). Design Prospective open-label phase ll study (SAKK 75/02). Setting Multicenter, nationwide. Patients Of 66 patients with primary CRT, 56 underwent en bloc esophagectomy. Interventions EUS-measured MTT before and 2-5 weeks after CRT (yMTT). Main Outcome Measurements Cutoffs: (1) absolute thickness (yMTT) after CRT ≤6 mm; (2) relative reduction compared with baseline (ratio yMTT/MTT) ≤50%. Correlation between EUS measurements and histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and overall survival (OS). Results Sixteen of 56 patients were not included for EUS evaluation (10 severe stenosis, 5 MTT not measured, 1 intolerance to second EUS). Characteristics (n = 40) were as follow: median age, 60 years; squamous cell carcinoma, 42%; and adenocarcinoma (AC), 58%. Initial stage was: 10 T2N1, 3 T3N0, 26 T3N1, 1 T3Nx; 14 of 23 AC Siewert type 1. Wilcoxon rank sum test showed significant correlation of TRG1 with yMTT ≤6 mm ( P = .008) and yMTT/MTT ≤50% ( P = .003). The effect of yMTT on TRG1 was significant ( P = .0193; odds ratio, 0.687 [95% CI, 0.502-0.941]). The predefined cutoff of ≤6 mm for yMTT was predictive for TRG1 ( P = .0037; Fisher exact test). After a median follow-up of 28.6 months, there was a clear trend for benefit in OS with yMTT ≤6 mm and yMTT/MTT ≤50%. Limitations Small sample size. Conclusion In a multicenter setting, MTT measured by EUS after CRT was highly predictive for response and showed a clear trend for predicting survival. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00072033.)

BACKGROUND: Only responding patients benefit from preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. Early detection of non-responders may avoid futile treatment and delayed surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-center phase ll trial, patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were treated with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery. Positron emission tomography with 2[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET) was performed at baseline and after induction chemotherapy. The metabolic response was correlated with tumor regression grade (TRG). A decrease in FDG tumor uptake of less than 40% was prospectively hypothesized as a predictor for histopathological non-response (TRG < 2) after CRT. RESULTS: 45 patients were included. The median decrease in FDG tumor uptake after chemotherapy correlated well with TRG after completion of CRT (p = 0.021). For an individual patient, less than 40% decrease in FDG tumor uptake after induction chemotherapy predicted histopathological non-response after completion of CRT, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 52% (positive predictive value 58%, negative predictive value 63%). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic response correlated with histopathology after preoperative therapy. However, FDG-PET did not predict non-response after induction chemotherapy with sufficient clinical accuracy to justify withdrawal of subsequent CRT and selection of patients to proceed directly to surgery.

The addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel as primary chemotherapy for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) prolongs progression-free survival without a substantial increase of toxicity. A Markov cohort simulation was used to follow the clinical course of typical patients with MBC. Information on response rates and major adverse effects was derived, and transition probabilities were estimated, based on the results of the E2100 clinical trial. Direct costs were assessed from the perspective of the Swiss health system. The addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel is estimated to cost an additional 40,369euro and to yield a gain of 0.22 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 189,427euro/QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the willingness-to-pay threshold of 60,000euro was never reached. The addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel in MBC patients is expensive given the clinical benefit in terms of QALYs gained.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced nonpretreated and pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three nonpretreated patients and 26 patients who had experienced one fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen for advanced colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with good performance status (World Health Organization grade 0 to 1) were accrued onto two nonrandomized parallel arms of a phase II study. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 65%) for nonpretreated and 15% (95% CI, 4% to 35%) for pretreated patients. The main toxicity of this combination was diarrhea, which occurred at grade 3 or 4 in 35% of the nonpretreated and 50% of the pretreated patients. Grade 3 or 4 sensory neuropathy, including laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia, occurred in 16% of patients on both cohorts. Capecitabine dose reductions were necessary in 26% of the nonpretreated and 45% of the pretreated patients in the second treatment cycle. The median overall survival was 17.1 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. On the basis of our toxicity experience, we recommend use of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 at an initial dose of 1,250 mg/m2 bid in nonpretreated patients and at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 bid in pretreated patients.

Background: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANK-Ligand with a higher activity in preventing skeletal related events (SREs) than zoledronic acid but without impact on disease progression or death. SREs are pathologic bone fractures, surgery or radiation to the bone or spinal cord compression. The relative effects on SREs in patients with bone metastases from castration resistant prostate cancer and breast cancer are similar (hazard ratio 0.82). Denosumab is usually well tolerated but a dose-dependent increase in risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in up to 8% of patients and cases of fatal hypocalcaemia have been observed. The approved dose of denosumab is 120mg sc every 4 weeks (q4w); the basis for this dose and schedule, however, is not quite clear. E.g. in a study of 255 women with bone metastases from breast cancer who were randomized to receive denosumab 30mg q4w, 120 mg q4w, 180 mg q4w, 60mg q12w, 180mg q12w or an iv bisphosphonate, a similar degree of creatinine-corrected urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx/Cr) suppression was observed at weeks 13 and 25 in all cohorts. Given that the optimal dose and schedule of denosumab is unknown and this drug is associated with considerable costs and adds toxicity a study of de-escalation is warranted. Trial design: The aim of this trial is to test the hypothesis that the benefit of denosumab is maintained if administered 120mg q12w as compared to 120mg q4w. The primary endpoint of this randomized phase III non-inferiority trial is time to first on-trial symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) defined as clinically significant pathological fracture, surgery to bone, radiation therapy to bone, or spinal cord compression. With a non-inferiority margin of 1.2 for the hazard ratio, a power 80% and a type I error 5%, the total sample size is 1380. Secondary endpoints include safety, time to first and subsequent on-trial SSE, health economic outcomes, quality of life, and change in bone turnover markers. Patients with adequate organ function and bone metastases from breast cancer of from castration resistant prostate cancer are eligible. This trial is open for international collaboration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02051218. Reused with permission from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Disclosure: S. Gillessen: Advisory board Novartis; B. Thurlimann: Stock owndership Novartis: R. von Moos: Research funding, honoraria, and consultant Amgen. Honoraria and advisory board Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

TPS5095 Background: Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-Ligand has been shown to be superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to a first on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) in patien...

Background: The dual blockade of HER2 signaling with trastuzumab (T) + pertuzumab (P) has been shown to be highly active with low toxicity in patients (pts) with HER2 positive breast cancer both in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting even in the absence of chemotherapy. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate combining the antitumor properties of trastuzumab with the cytotoxic agent DM1 via a stable linker. T-DM1 was more efficacious and less toxic than a combination of docetaxel and T in pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on these data we decided to evaluate a potentially less toxic strategy of T+P without chemotherapy followed by T-DM1 in the context of a randomized phase 2 trial. It would be a major advantage for patients in terms of toxicity if the regimen of T+P followed by T-DM1 was equally effective with regard to overall survival to a strategy using a traditional chemotherapy-based regimen with T+P upfront followed by T-DM1. Trial design: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 trial, pts with HER2 positive disease will be randomized to T + P alone or to T + P combined with chemotherapy (paclitaxel weekly or vinorelbine) for at least 4 months followed by maintenance treatment with T+P until progression. Pts with hormone receptor positive disease will receive endocrine treatment when treated without chemotherapy or after completion of chemotherapy. In case of progression pts of both treatment arms will receive T-DM1 as second line treatment. Eligibility: Eligibility criteria for the first-line part of the trial include a histologically confirmed BC with distant metastases, no prior chemotherapy, no anti-HER2 treatment for MBC. A biopsy from the primary tumor or a metastasis may be used for diagnosis. HER2 positive status must be confirmed by central testing. Prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment with T and/or lapatinib is allowed. Previous treatment with P is not allowed. For second-line treatment pts must have had at least one dose of trial therapy in the first-line phase and proven disease progression on first-line therapy. Objectives: The primary endpoint is to evaluate the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) at 24 months in both treatment arms. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line treatment ignoring first CNS lesion, PFS of second-line treatment and of both treatment lines, OS, adverse events of first- and second -line treatment, quality of life and duration of chemotherapy-free time. Statistical methods: For sample size calculation we estimated a median OS of 32 months corresponding to an expected survival proportion of 59.5% at 24 months under an exponential distribution. The two arms will be analyzed separately. Statistical comparisons by hypothesis tests between treatment arms are not planned. The hazard ratio for OS will be estimated with 95% confidence interval. Time-to-event endpoints are described by Kaplan-Meier plots and medians (with 95% confidence interval). Accrual: Target accrual is 104 pts per arm, first patient was enrolled in May 2013. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT1-1-05.

BACKGROUND Recommendations from international task forces on geriatric assessment emphasize the need for research including validation of cancer-specific geriatric assessment (C-SGA) tools in oncological settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the SAKK Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment (C-SGA) in clinical practice. METHODS A cross sectional study of cancer patients >=65 years old (N = 51) with pathologically confirmed cancer presenting for initiation of chemotherapy treatment (07/01/2009-03/31/2011) at two oncology departments in Swiss canton hospitals: Kantonsspital Graubunden (KSGR N = 25), Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG N = 26). Data was collected using three instruments, the SAKK C-SGA plus physician and patient evaluation forms. The SAKK C-SGA includes six measures covering five geriatric assessment domains (comorbidity, function, psychosocial, nutrition, cognition) using a mix of medical record abstraction (MRA) and patient interview. Five individual domains and one overall SAKK C-SGA score were calculated and dichotomized as below/above literature-based cut-offs. The SAKK C-SGA was evaluated by: patient and physician estimated time to complete, ease of completing, and difficult or unanswered questions. RESULTS Time to complete the patient questionnaire was considered acceptable by almost all (>=96%) patients and physicians. Patients reported slightly shorter times to complete the questionnaire than physicians (17.33 +/- 7.34 vs. 20.59 +/- 6.53 minutes, p = 0.02). Both groups rated the patient questionnaire as easy/fairly easy to complete (91% vs. 84% respectively, p = 0.14) with few difficult or unanswered questions. The MRA took on average 8.32 +/- 4.72 minutes to complete. Physicians (100%) considered time to complete MRA acceptable, 96% rated it as easy/fairly easy to complete. Individual study site populations differed on health-related characteristics (excellent/good physician-rated general health KSGR 71% vs. KSSG 32%, p = 0.007). The overall mean C-SGA score was 2.4 +/- 1.12. Patients at KSGR had lower C-SGA scores (2.00 +/- 1.19 vs. 2.81 +/- 0.90, p = 0.009) and a smaller proportion (28% vs.65%, p = 0.008) was above the C-SGA cut-off score compared to KSSG. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest the SAKK C-SGA is a feasible practical tool for use in clinical practice. It demonstrated discriminative ability based on objective geriatric assessment measures, but additional investigations on use for clinical decision-making are warranted. The SAKK C-SGA also provides important usable domain information for intervention to optimize outcomes in older cancer patients.

3503 Background: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after stop of first-line chemotherapy. Methods: In an open-label, phase 3 multicenter study conducted in Switzerland, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer having non-progressive disease after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to continuing bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks between randomization and disease progression. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significant level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%. Results: The per-protocol population comprised 262 patients. Median follow-up is 28.6 months (range, 0.6-54.9 months). Median TTP was 17.9 weeks (95% CI 13.3-23.4) for bevacizumab continuation and 12.6 weeks (95% CI 12.0-16.4) for no continuation; HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.92). Median progression free-survival and overall survival, both measured from start of first-line treatment, was 9.5 months and 24.9 months for bevacizumab continuation and 8.5 months (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.94)) and 22.8 months (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.64 – 1.18)) for no continuation. Median time from randomization to second-line treatment was 5.9 months for bevacizumab and 4.8 for no continuation. Grade 3-4 adverse events in the bevacizumab continuation arm were uncommon. Conclusions: Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The 95% confidence intervals for the TTP HR indicate superiority of bevacizumab continuation after stop of first-line chemotherapy. The median differences in TTP and in time between randomization and start of second-line treatment were of moderate magnitude being less than 6 weeks. The results of an accompanying cost analysis will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00544700.

Chemical Senses, 20 (5), ISSN:0379-864X, ISSN:1464-3553

The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that varying sensory input can affect mood, autonomic arousal, and electrocortical activity. Twenty right-handed males were exposed to three rhythmic audio-visual stimulation programs, with either a high intensity and variety of stimuli (program H), a low stimulation (program L) or with a transient from high to low (program HL). Multichannel EEG, heart rate, and skin conductance were recorded continuously, and after each trial mood was rated on a bipolar adjective list. EEG data were subjected to FFT dipole approximation procedure, and dipole locations and field strength (Global Field Power) were analyzed for the frequency bands theta, alpha, and beta1. Mood ratings clearly differed between programs H and HL, with highest values of arousal after H. Programs L and HL decreased autonomic arousal, whereas H induced deactivating as well as activating effects. Field strength of the alpha band decreased similarly during all programs. Dipole sources were located more to the left in the alpha band and more to the right in the betal band during all programs as compared with baseline. Therefore, programs affected mood and autonomic variables differently, but not electrocortical variables. The higher activation of the right hemisphere during all programs is interpreted as an indication that audio-visual stimulation does induce changes in the brain, such as are commonly found in altered states of consciousness.