Search

This article, published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, presents a case report on the rapid clinical improvement of refractory subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) with the use of the oral tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib. The report highlights the challenges in treating severe cases of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and discusses the potential of januskinase inhibition as an alternative therapy. The case study describes a 56-year-old Vietnamese patient with SCLE who showed significant improvement in symptoms after starting deucravacitinib treatment. The authors suggest that further research is needed to explore the safety, effectiveness, and tolerability of deucravacitinib in managing patients with SCLE. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate (EGCG) has been proven effective in treating viral warts. Since anticarcinogenic as well as anti‐inflammatory properties are ascribed to the substance, its use has been evaluated in the context of different dermatoses. The effect of EGCG on interface dermatitis (ID), however, has not yet been explored. Objectives: In this study, we investigated the effect of EGCG on an epidermal human in vitro model of ID. Methods: Via immunohistochemistry, lesional skin of lichen planus patients and healthy skin were analysed concerning the intensity of interferon‐associated mediators, CXCL10 and MxA. Epidermal equivalents were stained analogously upon ID‐like stimulation and EGCG treatment. Monolayer keratinocytes were treated likewise and supernatants were analysed via ELISA while cells were processed for vitality assay or transcriptomic analysis. Results: CXCL10 and MxA are strongly expressed in lichen planus lesions and induced in keratinocytes upon ID‐like stimulation. EGCG reduces CXCL10 and MxA staining intensity in epidermis equivalents and CXCL10 secretion by keratinocytes upon stimulation. It furthermore minimizes the cytotoxic effect of the stimulus and downregulates a magnitude of typical pro‐inflammatory cytokines that are crucial for the perpetuation of ID. Conclusions: We provide evidence concerning anti‐inflammatory effects of EGCG within a human in vitro model of ID. The capacity to suppress mediators that are centrally involved in disease perpetuation suggests EGCG as a potential topical therapeutic in lichen planus and other autoimmune skin diseases associated with ID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subcutaneous interferon-beta injections in patients with multiple sclerosis initiate inflammatory skin reactions by local chemokine induction. The rash was markedly pronounced at injection sites of interferon-beta (IFN- ) administered for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; see Fig. We herein describe the case of a 33-year-old male patient who presented at our emergency department with concomitant flu symptoms and a maculopapular rash. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Sampling refers to the free supply of small product samples. In this process, the packaging can be disproportionate to the contents leading to raw material consumption and, in the case of poor recyclability, environmental pollution., Objective: In this article, calculations regarding the ratio between packaging and product weight for commonly used types of packaging (sachet, tube, jar) of dermatological product samples are presented. The usefulness of sampling is discussed considering environmental and economic criteria., Material and Methods: A total of 43 dermatological product samples from different manufacturers were manually weighed and classified. Packaging was disassembled into its structural components. The proportional weights or the weight of the bottle/tube body were calculated with database values for the respective material in terms of greenhouse gas equivalents (CO2eq) and freshwater consumption. Subsequently, a total sum for the impact of each packaging was formed. Only the material and manufacturing process were considered because there were no valid data available for transport, utilization, and end of life (EoL) impacts., Results: The smallest and lightest product sample (1.24 g) generated ca. 15 g CO2eq and approximately 700 ml of freshwater consumption. The largest and heaviest product sample (37 g) generated 53 g CO2eq and 5.78 l of freshwater consumption. Assuming an annual distribution of 10 million units of the 43 product samples examined here, ca. 8000 t of CO2eq are produced by the packaging alone. Additionally, 880,000,000 l of water are used and approximately 2300 t of packaging waste are generated., Discussion: Sampling shows an unfavorable ratio between CO2eq/water consumption and utility, especially in comparison to larger units of packaging. Millions of product samples are distributed annually in doctor's practices, hospitals and pharmacies, particularly in dermatology. The practice of sampling should be questioned both ecologically and economically., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Climate change because of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions increasingly triggers extreme weather events. Of all the continents, Europe is warming the fastest. Heat and drought, forest fires and floods will worsen in Europe even in optimistic global warming scenarios, affecting living conditions across the continent. Extreme weather events threaten energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and people's healthcare. Many of these risks have already reached critical levels and could take on catastrophic proportions without immediate, decisive action., Objectives: This paper outlines current challenges for medical practices and clinics in the context of climate change and provides examples and guidance for strengthening crisis resilience., Materials and Methods: Selective literature review on the different requirements for crisis resilience in practices and clinics was performed., Results: Medical practices and clinics achieve crisis resilience by high degrees of adaptability and flexibility. They prepare for climate change-related challenges and are, therefore, able to protect themselves and maintain their function in the healthcare system. Recent weather events in Germany revealed insufficient resilience among the healthcare sector; hence, improvements are necessary., Conclusions: Changing environmental conditions urgently require the healthcare sector to adapt and effectively strengthen crisis resilience in order to ensure that critical infrastructure remains functional and the population has access to healthcare., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

(1) Background: Rare skin cancers include epithelial, neuroendocrine, and hematopoietic neoplasias as well as cutaneous sarcomas. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and sunburns are important drivers for the incidence of certain cutaneous sarcomas; however, the pathogenetic role of UV light is less clear in rare skin cancers compared to keratinocyte cancer and melanoma. In this study, we compared the degree of actinic elastosis (AE) as a surrogate for lifetime UV exposure among selected rare skin cancers (atypical fibroxanthoma [AFX], pleomorphic dermal sarcoma [PDS], dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans [DFSP], Kaposi sarcoma [KS], Merkel cell carcinoma [MCC], and leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) while taking into account relevant clinical variables (age, sex, and body site). (2) Methods: We newly established a semi-quantitative score for the degree of AE ranging from 0 = none to 3 = total loss of elastic fibers (basophilic degeneration) and multiplied it by the perilesional vertical extent (depth), measured histometrically (tumor-associated elastosis grade (TEG)). We matched the TEG of n = 210 rare skin cancers from 210 patients with their clinical variables. (3) Results: TEG values were correlated with age and whether tumors arose on UV-exposed body sites. TEG values were significantly higher in AFX and PDS cases compared to all other analyzed rare skin cancer types. As expected, TEG values were low in DFSP and KS, while MCC cases exhibited intermediate TEG values. (4) Conclusions: High cumulative UV exposure is more strongly associated with AFX/PDS and MCC than with other rare skin cancers. These important results expand the available data associated with rare skin cancers while also offering insight into the value of differentiating among these tumor types based on their relationship with sun exposure, potentially informing preventative, diagnostic and/or therapeutic approaches.

(1) Background: Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and sunburns are associated with an increased incidence of acquired nevi and melanomas. However, the data are controversial as to whether chronic UV exposure or high intermittent UV exposure is the major carcinogenic factor in melanocytic tumors. In this study, we compared the degree of actinic elastosis (AE) as a surrogate for lifetime UV exposure in nevi and different clinical melanoma subtypes (i.e., superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), nodular malignant melanoma (NMM), acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM)) with respect to clinical variables (age, sex, and body site). (2) Methods: We defined a semi-quantitative score for the degree of AE ranging from 0 = none to 3 = total loss of elastic fibers (basophilic degeneration) and multiplied it by the perilesional vertical extent (depth), measured histometrically (tumor-associated elastosis grade (TEG)). We matched the TEG of n = 595 melanocytic lesions from 559 patients with their clinical variables. (3) Results: The TEG was correlated with age and UV-exposed body sites. Furthermore, the TEG was significantly higher in LMM than in all other types of melanomas and the TEG in NMM was higher than in SSM, irrespective of patient age and tumor site. (4) Conclusions: High cumulative UV exposure is more strongly associated with LMM and NMM than with other melanoma subtypes.

A 16-year-old female patient with previously diagnosed acne vulgaris was transferred to our clinic in reduced general condition with rapidly progressive and extremely painful ulcerations. In the laboratory exam, inflammatory parameters were highly elevated, but she was normothermic. Based on the findings, we diagnosed multilocular pyoderma gangrenosum. Further investigations established the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis as the underlying condition. Treatment with systemic corticosteroids was initiated and we started therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. This led to improvement within a few days. PAPA-syndrome (pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum and acne vulgaris) could be ruled out by genetic analysis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Lupus erythematosus comprises a spectrum of autoimmune diseases that may affect various organs (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) or the skin only (cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]). Typical combinations of clinical, histological and serological findings define clinical subtypes of CLE, yet there is high interindividual variation. Skin lesions arise in the course of triggers such as ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, smoking or drugs; keratinocytes, cytotoxic T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) establish a self-perpetuating interplay between the innate and adaptive immune system that is pivotal for the pathogenesis of CLE. Therefore, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers and UV protection, topical therapies (glucocorticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) and rather unspecific immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs. Yet, the advent of licensed targeted therapies for SLE might also open new perspectives in the management of CLE. The heterogeneity of CLE might be attributable to individual variables and we speculate that the prevailing inflammatory signature defined by either T cells, B cells, pDCs, a strong lesional type I interferon (IFN) response, or combinations of the above might be suitable to predict therapeutic response to targeted treatment. Therefore, pretherapeutic histological assessment of the inflammatory infiltrate could stratify patients with refractory CLE for T-cell-directed therapies (e.g. dapirolizumab pegol), B-cell-directed therapies (e.g. belimumab), pDC-directed therapies (e.g. litifilimab) or IFN-directed therapies (e.g. anifrolumab). Moreover, Janus kinase (JAK) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitors might broaden the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future. A close interdisciplinary exchange with rheumatologists and nephrologists is mandatory for optimal treatment of lupus patients to define the best therapeutic strategy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

(1) Background: Keratinocyte cancer (KC) is associated with exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. However, data are controversial as to whether chronic UV exposure or high intermittent UV exposure are key drivers of carcinogenesis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Prolonged sun exposure of the skin causes photo-aging, which is associated with actinic elastosis, a condition characterized by the degeneration of elastin in the upper dermis, which is assessable via conventional histology. In this study, we aimed to compare the degree of actinic elastosis in different types of KC with regard to various patient characteristics. (2) Methods: We defined a semiquantitative score for the degree of actinic elastosis ranging from 0 = none to 3 = total loss of elastic fibers (basophilic degeneration). The extent was measured histometrically by two independent dermatohistopathologists in the immediate vicinity of 353 KC. The scores were merged and matched with tumor types (cSCC and BCC with subtypes), and clinical variables such as body site, sex and age. (3) Results: As expected, the degree of actinic elastosis correlated with age. However, it was significantly higher in cSCC compared to BCC irrespective of age, sex, body site and tumor subtypes. (4): Conclusions: Lifetime sun exposure may be estimated via routine histology using this scoring technique for actinic elastosis as a surrogate marker. cSCCs are more strongly associated with chronic UV exposure than BCCs, even in sun-exposed localizations such as the face.

Ongoing high consumption of resources results in exceeding the planetary boundaries. Modern healthcare systems contribute to this problem. To address this issue, this article provides an overview of various aspects of sustainable actions in medical offices and clinics that can also be applied to dermatology. Specific fields of action include energy consumption, structural measures, traffic and mobility, organization including digitalization as well as personnel and evaluation. Moreover, we discuss specific topics such as hygiene and cleansing, dermatosurgery and prescription practices. External treatments and cosmetics are discussed separately as dermatological peculiarities. Finally, we provide information on established initiatives for more sustainable health care in Germany. We aim to encourage critical reappraisal of currently established practices and to stimulate the implementation of sustainable measures., (© 2023 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG).)

Background: Synthetic polymers (plastics) from fossil resources are produced in large quantities and reach the environment as microplastics due to improper disposal and via various entry routes. This may lead to implications on flora, fauna, and humans., Objectives: This article aims to provide a concise overview for dermatologists about this complex topic and how it relates to daily medical practice., Materials and Methods: We performed a selective literature review regarding microplastics and sustainability in dermatology in liaison with the collaborative research center on microplastics at the University of Bayreuth., Results: Primary and secondary microplastics are released into the environment on a large scale and accumulate in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This may lead to their disruption and bears potential to create ecological niches for human pathogenic species. Humans and animals inhale and ingest microplastics, and the health consequences have not been sufficiently investigated. This is mainly because microplastics are not a homogenous group of substances, and potential effects depend on various properties (e.g., type of polymer, size, shape, additivation, surface charge). Dermatological care is resource intensive and contributes in various ways to this matter., Conclusion: Plastics are currently indispensable in many fields. Nevertheless, physicians have the responsibility to prevent negative consequences for the health of society (precautionary principle). Extensive efforts are thus necessary for better sustainability; this includes medical care., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Climate change as a consequence of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (CO 2 e) favors weather extremes. This challenges the healthcare system to cope with negative consequences and to remain functional at the same time. Despite rising costs and shortage of staff, sick people in an aging society must be increasingly cared for in a resource-efficient and climate-neutral manner without compromising the quality of care., Aim: This article summarizes current challenges for practices and outpatient clinics due to climate change and societal transformation. In addition, steps to implement transformative interventions are discussed., Materials and Methods: Selective literature review in PubMed database was conducted on the impact of climate change on the healthcare system, crisis resilience, climate management, overprescription, and co-benefits., Results: Crisis-resilient practices are attuned to challenges resulting from climate change. Communicating co-benefits in the physician-patient conversation can accelerate the transformation to a sustainable society., Conclusion: Rapidly changing environmental conditions require adaptation on the part of the healthcare system. Education and prevention are key to meet this challenge. Transformation to sustainable practices is an ongoing process and it represents a holistic concept that encompasses social, environmental, and economic aspects, which are interdependent and cannot be considered separately., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Topical compounds are an important treatment option in dermatology. Many ingredients and packaging do not yet sufficiently fulfill sustainable criteria., Objectives: This article aims to provide a compact overview of sustainability criteria of topical compounds and packaging., Materials and Methods: Based on a selective literature search and personal experience, common ingredients and packaging of topical preparations are summarized., Results: Topical preparations often contain mineral oils, acrylates, silicones and polyethylene glycols (PEG), which show poor biodegradability and may accumulate in the environment. As an alternative to these non-renewable substances, plant-based fats, oils, and waxes can be used. Biopolymers such as plant-based gum, agar-agar, pectin, and biologically produced hyaluronic acid are an alternative to plastic polymers. The environmental footprint of glass as packaging material is overestimated. Currently, plastics and aluminum may be preferable when recycled correctly., Conclusion: The production of topical formulations without using mineral oils, silicones, acrylates, and PEGs is technically challenging. A sustainable packaging material that fulfills all relevant functionalities is not yet available. Packaging should meet high requirements regarding ecological, economic, and social factors. Better performance with respect to new opportunities in recycling and waste management should be incorporated. Overall, the legislative authorities should provide relevant incentives for more sustainable topical compounds and packaging., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Cutaneous lesions in lupus erythematosus (LE) subtypes are heterogenous. In line with the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation, the underlying lesional inflammation in LE skin samples is defined by different immune cell infiltrates. Pathophysiologically, lesional inflammation is driven by autoreactive cytotoxic T cells, targeting keratinocytes; plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), producing large amounts of interferon (IFN); and B cells, whose function in cutaneous LE is still unclear. This study aims to (a) classify inflammatory patterns with regard to the dominating cell type or cytokine expression and (b) investigating the specific role of B cells in LE skin lesions. Therefore, the immunohistological expression of inflammatory surrogates (CD20, CD123, MXA) in skin samples of n = 119 LE (subtypes: subacute cutaneous LE, chronic discoid LE, chilblain LE, LE tumidus, other LE) and n = 17 patients with inflammatory skin diseases (atopic dermatitis, psoriasis) were assessed. Samples were classified with regard to inflammatory groups. In addition multiplex-immunohistochemical analyses of n = 17 LE skin samples focusing on lesional B cells were conducted. In this study, we show that cutaneous lesions present with eight different inflammatory groups dominated by B cells, pDCs, a strong IFN expression, or overlapping patterns. Altogether, LE subtypes show heterogenous infiltration regardless of LE subtype, certain subtypes display a preference for infiltration groups. Furthermore, lesional B cells either form diffuse infiltrates or pseudofollicular structures, wherein they show antigen-presenting and T cell-activating properties. Altogether, in the light of emerging targeted therapeutic options, we suggest histological assessment in regard to B-cell or pDC preponderance to allow tailored treatment decisions., Competing Interests: JW received fees for consultation/funding from different companies developing drugs for LE including AstraZeneca, EMD Sereno, Jansen, Bayer, BMS, GSK and Incyte. DN had received financial support (speaker’s honoraria, advisory boards or travel expense reimbursements) from: Abbvie, Almirall, BMS, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, L’Oreal, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 de Vos, Guel, Niebel, Bald, ter Steege, Bieber and Wenzel.)

Background: TIGIT is an immune checkpoint under investigation as therapeutic target. Understanding the regulation of TIGIT on an epigenetic level might support the development of companion biomarkers., Methods: We correlated TIGIT DNA methylation of single CpG sites with gene expression, signatures of immune infiltrates and interferon-γ, and survival in melanoma. We further analyzed methylation levels in immune cell subsets, melanocyte and melanoma cell lines. TIGIT expression patterns within components of the melanoma microenvironment were analyzed by single cell sequencing. We used quantitative methylation-specific PCR, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry for correlations between expression and methylation and to assess the effect of pharmacological demethylation of melanoma cells treated with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (decitabine). Finally, we investigated the association of patients' survival with TIGIT mRNA and methylation., Results: Depending on the sequence context of the analyzed CpG site, we found a cell type-specific TIGIT gene locus methylation pattern and significant correlations of TIGIT methylation with mRNA expression, an interferon γ signature, and distinct immune cell infiltrates, including TIGIT + lymphocytes. We detected a melanoma cell-intrinsic TIGIT protein expression. Pharmacological demethylation of the A375 melanoma cell line led to a constitutive TIGIT expression. Low promoter flank methylation and high mRNA expression was associated with patients' prognosis and predicted progression-free survival in patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. A high TIGIT + lymphocyte score was associated with better progression-free survival under anti-PD-1 immunotherapy., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate an epigenetic regulation of TIGIT expression via DNA methylation within the melanoma microenvironment. TIGIT DNA methylation and expression may serve as predictive biomarkers in the context of immunotherapies in melanoma., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The most common autoimmune blistering disease, bullous pemphigoid (BP), shows an increased prevalence in psoriatic patients and oncologic patients undergoing immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). Even though the same autoantigens (BP180/BP230) are detectable, it remains obscure whether clinical or histopathological differences exist between these different groups of BP patients. In this study, we strived to analyze this matter based on own data and previously published reports., Methods: We performed an institutional chart review from 2010-2020 to identify BP patients with psoriasis ( n = 6) or underlying ICB ( n = 4) and matched them with idiopathic cases of BP ( n = 33). We compared clinical characteristics, subtypes, and dermatopathological determinants (e.g., tissue eosinophilia/neutrophilia, papillary edema, lymphocytic infiltration) among the groups., Results: ICB-associated BP affects men more often and might show mucosal involvement more frequently. We found no statistically significant dermatopathological differences among the groups., Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of an increased risk of BP in patients with psoriasis and oncologic patients receiving ICB; atypical pruritic skin lesions should prompt a workup including a skin biopsy for histopathology and direct immunofluorescence in these patients. Larger studies might be necessary to detect slight dermatopathological variation.

Unlike the established anti-inflammatory drugs with a broad range, new-targeted therapeutic approaches have emerged in the management of autoimmune skin diseases to increase efficacy and decrease adverse reactions on the basis of an improved molecular understanding of pathogenesis. Most inflammatory dermatoses are driven by misled immune responses physiologically directed at exogenous pathogens, that is, type 1 immunity against viral pathogens, type 2 immunity against parasites, and type 3 immunity against fungi and bacteria. Pathogenic hallmarks of these major immune reaction patterns are characterized within this article, and a comprehensive overview of current clinical trials evaluating targeted therapeutics for respective dermatoses is outlined., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Effective vaccines for prevention of severe course and lethal outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 have been developed and approved in regulatory rolling and fast-track procedures; they are now widely distributed worldwide. Data about cutaneous side-effects of the new mRNA-type vaccines is scant, however. We herein report two similar cases of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADR) mimicking Rowell's syndrome that occurred after the first dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively. Both patients achieved prompt clinical improvement with a short pulse of oral prednisolone and non-steroidal inflammatory drugs. We suspect this phenomenon to occur in a timeframe of 7-14 days after vaccination due to an interferon-γ-driven shift towards type I immunity in susceptible individuals. As rheumatic patients were excluded from phase III clinical trials and as most countries prioritized the elderly population to receive the vaccinations first, cutaneous ADR might become more frequent once the younger part of the population is vaccinated over the course of 2021. Atypical cutaneous ADR might be misinterpreted or overlooked by non-dermatologists. Further studies are required to determine the best suitable vaccine types for individual groups of patients., (© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

(1) Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently employed on a population-wide scale in most countries worldwide. Data about unusual cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADR) are scant, though. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed moderate to severe vaccine-related ADR in the Department of Dermatology and Allergy of the University Hospital Bonn between May to June 2021 and analyzed related skin biopsies. (3) Results: As a specialized dermatological academic center, we encountered a total of n = 19 clinically and pathologically heterogeneous cutaneous ADR with a female predominance. Delayed cutaneous ADR occurred as late as 30 days after vaccination. The majority of ADR were mild, though a few patients required systemic treatment (antihistamines, glucocorticosteroids). (4) Conclusions: The clinico-pathological spectrum of cutaneous side effects with COVID-19 vaccines is wide; however, the benefits outweigh the risks by far. More dermatopathological studies on cutaneous ADR not limited to COVID-19 vaccines are desirable to enable a better understanding of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

(1) Background: Numerous vaccines are under preclinical and clinical development for prevention of severe course and lethal outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In light of high efficacy rates and satisfactory safety profiles, some agents have already reached approval and are now distributed worldwide, with varying availability. Real-world data on cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain limited. (2) Methods: We performed a literature research concerning cutaneous ADRs to different COVID-19 vaccines, and incorporated our own experiences. (3) Results: Injection site reactions are the most frequent side effects arising from all vaccine types. Moreover, delayed cutaneous ADRs may occur after several days, either as a primary manifestation or as a flare of a pre-existing inflammatory dermatosis. Cutaneous ADRs may be divided according to their cytokine profile, based on the preponderance of specific T-cell subsets (i.e., Th1, Th2, Th17/22, Tregs). Specific cutaneous ADRs mimic immunogenic reactions to the natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, which is associated with an abundance of type I interferons. (4) Conclusions: Further studies are required in order to determine the best suitable vaccine type for individual groups of patients, including patients suffering from chronic inflammatory dermatoses.

Anti-CTLA-4-antibodies can induce long-lasting tumor remissions. However, only a few patients respond, necessitating the development of predictive companion biomarkers. Increasing evidence suggests a major role of epigenetics, including DNA methylation, in immunology and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we tested CTLA4 promoter methylation and CTLA-4 protein expression as predictive biomarkers for response to anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. We identified retrospectively N = 30 stage IV melanoma patients treated with single-agent anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy (ipilimumab). We used quantitative methylation-specific PCR and immunohistochemistry to quantify CTLA4 methylation and protein expression in pre-treatment samples. CTLA4 methylation was significantly higher in progressive as compared to responding tumors and significantly associated with progression-free survival. A subset of infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor cells highly expressed CTLA-4. However, CTLA-4 protein expression did not predict response to treatment. We conclude that CTLA4 methylation is a predictive biomarker for response to anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy.

Background: Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a known predictive and prognostic factor for a poor outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma. It is unclear whether first-line targeted therapy (TT) or immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is more beneficial in melanoma patients with elevated LDH because prospective studies in this area are lacking., Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 25 melanoma centres worldwide to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among melanoma patients with elevated LDH. The role of confounders was addressed by using inverse probability of treatment weighting., Results: Among 173 BRAFV600-mutant patients, PFS at 12 months in the TT group was 22% compared with 52% in the combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 group (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0, p = 0.07) and 18% in the anti-PD-1 monotherapy group (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8, p = 0.003). Twelve months' OS was 48% in the TT group compared with 83% in the combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 group (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0, p = 0.03) and 50% in the anti-PD-1 monotherapy group (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-2.0, p = 0.37). The ORR in the TT group was 63%, compared with 55% and 20% in the combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monotherapy group, respectively. Among 314 patients receiving ICI first-line, PFS at 12 months was 33% in the anti-PD-1 group versus 38% in the combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 group (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-1.0; p = 0.07). OS at 12 months was 54% in the anti-PD-1 group versus 66% in the combined ICI group (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0; p = 0.03). The ORR was 30% in the anti-PD-1 monotherapy group and 43% in the combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 group. Results from multivariate analysis confirmed the absence of qualitative confounding., Conclusions: Among BRAF-mutant patients with elevated LDH, combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 blockade seems to be associated with prolonged OS compared with first-line TT. Among patients receiving ICI as a first-line treatment, OS appears to be longer for the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 than for anti-PD-1 alone., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sarah Knispel: Travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amgen. Maximilian Gassenmaier: Consultant or Advisory Role: Novartis; Research funding: Novartis. Carmen Loquai: Advisory role/Speakers fee/Travel support: BMS, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma, Sanofi, Roche, Almirall Hermal, Biontech, Kyowa Kirin. Cindy Franklin: Advisory board or received honoraria of BMS and Novartis and received travel grants from BMS, Novartis and Pierre Fabre. Ralf Gutzmer: Personal Honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Almirall Hermal, SUN, Sanofi, Pierre-Fabre. Consultant or advisory role: BMS, Roche, Novartis, Almirall Hermal, MSD, Amgen, SUN, Sanofi, Pierre-Fabre, MerckSerono, Bayer, Pfizer. Research funding: Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Merck-Serono, SUN Pharma, Sanofi, all paid to the institution. Travel, accommodations, expenses: Roche, BMS, SUN, Merck-Serono, Pierre-Fabre. Bastian Schilling: Personal honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe and Dome, Novartis, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Pierre Fabre and Roche; has an advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe and Dome, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche; and has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe and Dome, and Pierre Fabre, all paid to the institute. Andreas Stang: Speaker honoraria from Merck Serono. Selma Ugurel: Research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Serono; speakers and advisory board honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Roche, and Travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Lisa Zimmer: Honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Consultant or advisory role: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma, Sanofi, MSD; Research funding to institution: Novartis; Travel support: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, Sunpharma. Carina N Owen: Travel support from Merck Sharp Dohme. Jessica C Hassel: Honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Consultant or advisory role: MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma; Research funding: BMS; Travel support: Pierre Fabre. Friedegund Meier has received travel support or/and speaker's fees or/and advisor's honoraria by Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD and Pierre Fabre and research funding from Novartis and Roche. Carola Berking: Honoraria from BMS, Immunocore, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis for consultancy and/or presentations on scientific symposia. Douglas B Johnson: Advisory boards for Array Biopharma, BMS, Iovance, Jansen, Merck and Novartis and research funding from BMS and Incyte. Elisabeth Livingstone: Intermittent advisory board relationships with Roche, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi and Actelion and has received travel grants and honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, SunPharma, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, medac. Alexander M Menzies: Advisory boards for BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre-Fabre, QBiotics. Simone M Goldinger: past advisory boards for BMS, MSD, Roche and Novartis. Kai-Martin Thoms: Honoraria from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO, Candela; Consultant or advisory role: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, LEO; Travel support: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, LEO. Dirk Schadendorf: Has/had a consultant/advisory role in the last 2 years for Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Array, Immunocore, InFlaRX, Nektar, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Philogen, Regeneron, SunPharma, Sandoz, Sanofi, Ultimovacs and 4SC. He also received research funds from Bristol-MyersSquibb, Roche, Amgen and Novartis. Travel support: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Nektar, Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono and Sunpharma. Dennis Niebel: Has received speakers’ honoraria or travel expense reimbursements from BMS, Novartis, GSK, Celgene and MSD. Judith Sirokay: Honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Consultant or advisory role: Novartis, MSD; Travel support: BMS, Pierre Fabre. Peter Mohr: Has/had a consultant/advisory role in the last 2 years for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Philogen, Sanofi. He also received research funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) and Novartis. Travel support: Amgen, BMS, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche and Sunpharma. Laura Susok: Collaboration with BMS, Novartis, Sunpharma, MSD, Roche, Pierre Fabre. Paolo Ascierto: Has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Array, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Incyte, Medimmune, AstraZeneca, Syndax, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Ultimovacs, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Alkermes, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo. He also received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Array and travel support from MSD. Claudia Pföhler: Consultancy, speaker fees, travel grants: BMS, MSD, Merck Serono, Roche, Amgen, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Pierre Fabre, LEO, UCB, Sunpharma. Clinical studies: Novartis, BMS. Lucie Heinzerling: Consultant or advisory role: Amgen, BMS, Curevac, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, MSD; research funding (to institution): Novartis. Patrick Schummer: honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); institutional research grant: Novartis; Travel support: Novartis, Lilly and BMS. Thomas Eigentler: Has/had a consultant/advisory role in the last 2 years for Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Sanofi. He also received research funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) and Novartis. Katharina C. Kähler: Serves as consultant to Roche, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre and received travel grants and speaker fees from Roche, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Pierre Fabre and Philogen. Julia Tietze: Honoraria from Roche, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Sanofi, Travel support: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, BMS. Georgina V. Long: Is consultant advisor for Aduro Biotech Inc, Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis Pharma AG, QBiotics Group Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, SkylineDX B.V. All other authors (Felix Kiecker, Raphael Reinhard, Konstantin Drexler, Christopher Cann, Lydia Reinhardt, Carsten Weishaupt, Maria I Fleischer, Leonie Bluhm) declared to have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Development of singular keratoacanthoma (KA) is generally considered a benign condition as it has a tendency to regress spontaneously in spite of histological similarity to squamous cell carcinoma. Most KAs undergo excision to rule out differential diagnoses. Several alternative treatment modalities (keratinolytic, ablative, immunomodulating, antiproliferative, or targeted therapy) have been described in the past with varying success, underlining the therapeutic challenges associated with large or multiple lesions. Isomorphic response (Koebner phenomenon) may limit the efficacy of ablative options, and comorbidity may limit the use of systemic treatments. Less aggressive topical immunomodulatory treatment options represent an alternative with varying therapeutic success., Case Report: Here, we describe the clinical course of a 51-year-old male patient with terminal kidney disease who suffered from the rare benign pruritic condition of Grzybowski's generalized eruptive keratoacanthomas (GEKA) and experienced a significant reduction of lesions and symptoms upon topical therapy with imiquimod 5% cream and lapacho tea dressings alike., Conclusions: Very little is known about the potential antiinflammatory or antiproliferative effects on the epidermis of the popular phytotherapeutic agent lapacho tea. More studies are warranted considering both the etiology and treatment of GEKA and topical use of phytotherapeutics in dermatology in general. Management of large or multiple KAs remains challenging.

Interface dermatitis is a histopathological pattern mirroring a distinct cytotoxic immune response shared by a number of clinically diverse inflammatory skin diseases amongst which lichen planus and cutaneous lupus erythematosus are considered prototypic. Interface dermatitis is characterized by pronounced cytotoxic immune cell infiltration and necroptotic keratinocytes at the dermoepidermal junction. The initial inflammatory reaction is established by cytotoxic immune cells that express CXC chemokine receptor 3 and lesional keratinocytes that produce corresponding ligands, CXC motif ligands 9/10/11, recruiting the effector cells to the site of inflammation. During the resulting anti-epithelial attack, endogenous immune complexes and nucleic acids are released from perishing keratinocytes, which are then perceived by the innate immune system as danger signals. Keratinocytes express a distinct signature of pattern recognition receptors and binding of endogenous nucleic acid motifs to these receptors results in interferon-mediated immune responses and further enhancement of CXC chemokine receptor 3 ligand production. In this perspective article, we will discuss the role of innate nucleic acid sensing as a common mechanism in the perpetuation of clinically heterogeneous diseases featuring interface dermatitis based on own data and a review of the literature. Furthermore, we will introduce a keratinocyte-specific in vitro model of interface dermatitis as follows: Stimulation of human keratinocytes with endogenous nucleic acids alone and in combination with interferon gamma leads to pronounced production of distinct cytokines, which are essential in the pathogenesis of interface dermatitis. This experimental approach bears the capability to investigate potential therapeutics in this group of diseases with unmet medical need., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Braegelmann, Fetter, Niebel, Dietz, Bieber and Wenzel.)

B lymphocytes are crucial mediators of systemic immune responses and are known to be substantial in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases with cutaneous manifestations. Amongst them are lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis and psoriasis, and particularly those driven by autoantibodies such as pemphigus and pemphigoid. However, the concept of autoreactive skin-associated B cells, which may reside in the skin and locally contribute to chronic inflammation, is gradually evolving. These cells are believed to differ from B cells of primary and secondary lymphoid organs and may provide additional features besides autoantibody production, including cytokine expression and crosstalk to autoreactive T cells in an antigen-presenting manner. In chronically inflamed skin, B cells may appear in tertiary lymphoid structures. Those abnormal lymph node-like structures comprise a network of immune and stromal cells possibly enriched by vascular structures and thus constitute an ideal niche for local autoimmune responses. In this review, we describe current considerations of different B cell subsets and their assumed role in skin autoimmunity. Moreover, we discuss traditional and B cell-associated approaches for the treatment of autoimmune skin diseases, including drugs targeting B cells (e.g., CD19- and CD20-antibodies), plasma cells (e.g., proteasome inhibitors, CXCR4 antagonists), activated pathways (such as BTK- and PI3K-inhibitors) and associated activator molecules (BLyS, APRIL).