Search

MRI utilization in the United States is relatively higher than in other parts of the world and inpatient MRI utilization is particularly difficult to manage given the lack of direct reimbursement. Body MRI studies present an opportunity to reduce inpatient MRI utilization since they are generally the least emergent. Our objective was to use a targeted questionnaire to probe the necessity of inpatient body MRI orders and present an opportunity to either cancel them or transition them to the outpatient realm A 9-item questionnaire was devised asking questions about the urgency of the inpatient MRI order including the urgent management question, an inpatient procedure or whether it was recommended by a consultant. Peer-to-peer discussion walking through each of the questions was conducted by radiology housestaff with the ordering clinicians and responses recorded. 845 recorded responses reported a lack of specific clinical question in 23.9% of orders, 68.9% were recommended by a non-radiology consulting service and 16.1% were recommended by radiology studies. 17.0% orders were felt to be outpatient appropriate and 23.3% were considered possibly appropriate for the outpatient setting. 3.9% were canceled and 4.9% were transitioned to outpatient orders. Engaging in a focused discussion about the urgency and appropriateness of an inpatient MRI body order following a list of scripted questions has the potential to reduce utilization. This approach also highlights the relatively high rate of indication uncertainty among ordering clinicians and the central role of consultants in prompting orders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review different etiologies for lower extremity pain encountered on lower extremity venous sonography including acute deep venous thrombosis, chronic postthrombotic change, central venous disease, common arterial pathologies, and nonvascular abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Use a tailored version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool to evaluate risk of bias and applicability across LIRADS related publications. Method: A tailored QUADAS-2 tool was created through consensus approach to assess risk of bias and applicability across 37 LI-RADS related publications. Studies were selected from 2017 to 2022 using the assistance of experienced hospital librarians to search for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced ultrasound for HCC using LI-RADS through multiple different databases. QUADAS-2 assessments were performed in duplicate and independently by 2 authors with experience using the QUADAS-2 tool. Disagreements were resolved with a third expert reviewer. Consensus QUADAS-2 assessments were tabulated for each domain. Results: Using the tailored QUADAS-2 tool, 31 of the 37 included LI-RADS studies were assessed as high risk of bias, and 9 out of 37 studies demonstrated concerns for applicability. Patient selection (21 out of 37 studies) and flow/timing (24 out of 37 studies) domains demonstrated the highest risk of bias. 6 out of 37 studies in the index domain demonstrated high risk of bias. 2 out of 37 studies showed high risk of bias in the reference standard domain. Conclusion: A significant proportion of LI-RADS research is at risk of bias with concerns for applicability. Identifying risk of bias in such research is essential to recognize limitations of a study that may affect the validity of the results. Areas for improvement in LI-RADS research include reducing selection bias, avoiding inappropriate exclusions, and decreasing verification bias., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We report a rare case of diffuse replacement of the pancreas with neuroendocrine tumour mimicking chronic pancreatitis. A 55-year-old female with no significant past medical history initially presented with abdominal pain in 2006. A CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed, revealing diffuse pancreatic parenchymal calcifications with mild pancreatic ductal dilatation and no discrete mass. She was diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis and followed clinically until 2015, where she presented with recurrent abdominal pain. A repeat CT and MRI of the abdomen were performed which revealed new hypoenhancing masses within the pancreas, particularly in the pancreatic tail. There was a persistent background of pancreatic parenchymal calcifications. The possibility of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour was raised, and an indium-111 Octreotide scan was recommended. Diffuse intense uptake was identified throughout the pancreas on the indium-111 imaging. Given the concern for neuroendocrine tumour, a total pancreatectomy was performed, with histopathology revealing replacement of the pancreas with coalescing well-circumscribed nodules. Many of the nodules had numerous calcifications and localized amyloid deposition. Immunohistochemical stains of the neoplastic cells were strong for neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Overall the findings were consistent with numerous neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas, Grade II, as per the 2010 WHO criteria for neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas are lesions that arise from the islet cells, with an approximate incidence of five cases per million people per year. Only one other case report has been documented in the literature by Singh et al demonstrating diffuse pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour replacing the entire pancreas. As diffuse pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour can look similar on imaging to chronic pancreatitis or other infiltrative processes, we wanted to present this case and some of the more specific imaging findings in distinguishing these entities.