Search

Your search keyword '"Musodza, Y"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Musodza, Y" Publication Year Range Last 50 years
3 results on '"Musodza, Y"'

1. The cost‐effectiveness of prophylaxis strategies for individuals with advanced HIV starting treatment in Africa

Author

Walker, Simon M., Cox, Edward, Revill, Paul, Musiime, Victor, Bwakura?Dangarembizi, Mutsa, Mallewa, Jane, Cheruiyot, Priscilla, Maitland, Kathryn, Ford, Nathan, Gibb, Diana M., Walker, A Sarah, Soares, Marta, Mugyenyi, P, Kityo, C, Musiime, V, Wavamunno, P, Nambi, E, Ocitti, P, Ndigendawani, M, Kabahenda, S, Kemigisa, M, Acen, J, Olebo, D, Mpamize, G, Amone, A, Okweny, D, Mbonye, A, Nambaziira, F, Rweyora, A, Kangah, M, Kabaswahili, V, Abach, J, Abongomera, G, Omongin, J, Aciro, I, Philliam, A, Arach, B, Ocung, E, Amone, G, Miles, P, Adong, C, Tumsuiime, C, Kidega, P, Otto, B, Apio, F, Baleeta, K, Mukuye, A, Abwola, M, Ssennono, F, Baliruno, D, Tuhirwe, S, Namisi, R, Kigongo, F, Kikyonkyo, D, Mushahara, F, Tusiime, J, Musiime, A, Nankya, A, Atwongyeire, D, Sirikye, S, Mula, S, Noowe, N, Lugemwa, A, Kasozi, M, Mwebe, S, Atwine, L, Senkindu, T, Natuhurira, T, Katemba, C, Ninsiima, E, Acaku, M, Kyomuhangi, J, Ankunda, R, Tukwasibwe, D, Ayesiga, L, Hakim, J, Nathoo, K, Bwakura?Dangarembizi, M, Reid, A, Chidziva, E, Mhute, T, Tinago, Gc, Bhiri, J, Mudzingwa, S, Phiri, M, Steamer, J, Nhema, R, Warambwa, C, Musoro, G, Mutsai, S, Nemasango, B, Moyo, C, Chitongo, S, Rashirai, K, Vhembo, S, Mlambo, B, Nkomani, S, Ndemera, B, Willard, M, Berejena, C, Musodza, Y, Matiza, P, Mudenge, B, Guti, V, Etyang, A, Agutu, C, Berkley, J, Maitland, K, Njuguna, P, Mwaringa, S, Etyang, T, Awuondo, K, Wale, S, Shangala, J, Kithunga, J, Mwarumba, S, Maitha, S Said, Mutai, R, Lewa, M Lozi, Mwambingu, G, Mwanzu, A, Kalama, C, Latham, H, Shikuku, J, Fondo, A, Njogu, A, Khadenge, C, Mwakisha, B, Siika, A, Wools?Kaloustian, K, Nyandiko, W, Cheruiyot, P, Sudoi, A, Wachira, S, Meli, B, Karoney, M, Nzioka, A, Tanui, M, Mokaya, M, Ekiru, W, Mboya, C, Mwimali, D, Mengich, C, Choge, J, Injera, W, Njenga, K, Cherutich, S, Orido, M Anyango, Lwande, G Omondi, Rutto, P, Mudogo, A, Kutto, I, Shali, A, Jaika, L, Jerotich, H, Pierre, M, Mallewa, J, Kaunda, S, Van Oosterhout, J, O'Hare, B, Heydermann, R, Gonzalez, C, Dzabala, N, Kelly, C, Denis, B, Selemani, G, Mipando, L Nyondo, Chirwa, E, Banda, P, Mvula, L, Msuku, H, Ziwoya, M, Manda, Y, Nicholas, S, Masesa, C, Mwalukomo, T, Makhaza, L, Sheha, I, Bwanali, J, Limbuni, M, Gibb, D, Thomason, M, Walker, As, Pett, S, Szubert, A, Griffiths, A, Wilkes, H, Rajapakse, C, Spyer, M, Prendergast, A, Klein, N, Rauchenberger, M, Van Looy, N, Little, E, Fairbrother, K, Cowan, F, Seeley, J, Bernays, S, Kawuma, R, Mupambireyi, Z, Kyomuhendo, F, Nakalanzi, S, Peshu, J, Ndaa, S, Chabuka, J, Mkandawire, N, Matandika, L, Kapuya, C, Weller, I, Malianga, E, Mwansambo, C, Miiro, F, Elyanu, P, Bukusi, E, Katabira, E, Mugurungi, O, Peto, T, Musoke, P, Matenga, J, Phiri, S, Lyall, H, Johnston, V, Fitzgerald, F, Post, F, Ssali, F, Arenas?Pinto, A, Turkova, A, and Bamford, A

Subjects
Cost benefit analysis, Practice guidelines (Medicine) -- Evaluation, HIV infection -- Diagnosis -- Care and treatment, Cost benefit analysis, Health
Abstract

: Introduction: Many HIV‐positive individuals in Africa have advanced disease when initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) so have high risks of opportunistic infections and death. The REALITY trial found that an enhanced‐prophylaxis package including fluconazole reduced mortality by 27% in individuals starting ART with CD4 Methods: The REALITY trial enrolled from June 2013 to April 2015. A decision‐analytic model was developed to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of six management strategies in individuals initiating ART in the REALITY trial countries. Strategies included standard‐prophylaxis, enhanced‐prophylaxis, standard‐prophylaxis with fluconazole; and three CrAg testing strategies, the first stratifying individuals to enhanced‐prophylaxis (CrAg‐positive) or standard‐prophylaxis (CrAg‐negative), the second to enhanced‐prophylaxis (CrAg‐positive) or enhanced‐prophylaxis without fluconazole (CrAg‐negative) and the third to standard‐prophylaxis with fluconazole (CrAg‐positive) or without fluconazole (CrAg‐negative). The model estimated costs, life‐years and quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) over 48 weeks using three competing mortality risks: cryptococcal meningitis; tuberculosis, serious bacterial infection or other known cause; and unknown cause. Results: Enhanced‐prophylaxis was cost‐effective at cost‐effectiveness thresholds of US$300 and US$500 per QALY with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$157 per QALY in the CD4 Conclusions: The REALITY enhanced‐prophylaxis package in individuals with advanced HIV starting ART reduces morbidity and mortality, is practical to administer and is cost‐effective. Efforts should continue to ensure that components are accessed at lowest available prices., Introduction In low‐ and middle‐income settings, more than a third of HIV‐positive individuals starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) present with advanced disease (CD4 ≤ 200 cells/mm[sup.3]); over half of these have [...]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Raltegravir-intensified initial antiretroviral therapy in advanced HIV disease in Africa: A randomised controlled trial

Author

Kityo, C, Szubert, AJ, Siika, A, Heyderman, R, Bwakura-Dangarembizi, M, Lugemwa, A, Mwaringa, S, Griffiths, A, Nkanya, I, Kabahenda, S, Wachira, S, Musoro, G, Rajapakse, C, Etyang, T, Abach, J, Spyer, MJ, Wavamunno, P, Nyondo-Mipando, L, Chidziva, E, Nathoo, K, Klein, N, Hakim, J, Gibb, DM, Walker, AS, Pett, SL, Mugyenyi, P, Musiime, V, Nambi, E, Ocitti, P, Ndigendawani, M, Kemigisa, M, Acen, J, Olebo, D, Mpamize, G, Amone, A, Okweny, D, Mbonye, A, Nambaziira, F, Rweyora, A, Kangah, M, Kabaswahili, V, Abongomera, G, Omongin, J, Aciro, I, Philliam, A, Arach, B, Ocung, E, Amone, G, Miles, P, Adong, C, Tumsuiime, C, Kidega, P, Otto, B, Apio, F, Baleeta, K, Mukuye, A, Abwola, M, Ssennono, F, Baliruno, D, Tuhirwe, S, Namisi, R, Kigongo, F, Kikyonkyo, D, Mushahara, F, Tusiime, J, Musiime, A, Nankya, A, Atwongyeire, D, Sirikye, S, Mula, S, Noowe, N, Kasozi, M, Mwebe, S, Atwine, L, Senkindu, T, Natuhurira, T, Katemba, C, Ninsiima, E, Acaku, M, Kyomuhangi, J, Ankunda, R, Tukwasibwe, D, Ayesiga, L, Reid, A, Mhute, T, Tinago, GC, Bhiri, J, Mudzingwa, S, Phiri, M, Steamer, J, Nhema, R, Warambwa, C, Mutsai, S, Nemasango, B, Moyo, C, Chitongo, S, Rashirai, K, Vhembo, S, Mlambo, B, Nkomani, S, Ndemera, B, Willard, M, Berejena, C, Musodza, Y, Matiza, P, Mudenge, B, Guti, V, Etyang, A, Agutu, C, Berkley, J, Maitland, K, Njuguna, P, Awuondo, K, Wale, S, Shangala, J, Kithunga, J, Mwarumba, S, Maitha, SS, Mutai, R, Lewa, ML, Mwambingu, G, Mwanzu, A, Kalama, C, Latham, H, Shikuku, J, Fondo, A, Njogu, A, Khadenge, C, Mwakisha, B, Wools-Kaloustian, K, Nyandiko, W, Cheruiyot, P, Sudoi, A, Meli, B, Karoney, M, Nzioka, A, Tanui, M, Mokaya, M, Ekiru, W, Mboya, C, Mwimali, D, Mengich, C, Choge, J, Injera, W, Njenga, K, Cherutich, S, Orido, MA, Lwande, GO, Rutto, P, Mudogo, A, Kutto, I, Shali, A, Jaika, L, Jerotich, H, Pierre, M, Mallewa, J, Kaunda, S, Van Oosterhout, J, O'Hare, B, Heydermann, R, Gonzalez, C, Dzabala, N, Kelly, C, Denis, B, Selemani, G, Mipando, LN, Chirwa, E, Banda, P, Mvula, L, Msuku, H, Ziwoya, M, Manda, Y, Nicholas, S, Masesa, C, Mwalukomo, T, Makhaza, L, Sheha, I, Bwanali, J, Limbuni, M, and DiFDMRCWellcome Trust

Subjects
Adult, Male, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Adolescent, Anti-HIV Agents, BIOMARKERS, CHILDREN, HIV Infections, Drug Administration Schedule, Health Services Accessibility, IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION, EFAVIRENZ, Young Adult, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, Raltegravir Potassium, INFECTION, Humans, Uganda, Child, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, RESTORATION, IMMUNODEFICIENCY, Science & Technology, MORTALITY, ADULTS, SOUTH-AFRICA, Kenya, Anti-Retroviral Agents, Child, Preschool, Africa, Disease Progression, Female, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, REALITY trial team, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

Background In sub-Saharan Africa, individuals infected with HIV who are severely immunocompromised have high mortality (about 10%) shortly after starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). This group also has the greatest risk of morbidity and mortality associated with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), a paradoxical response to successful ART. Integrase inhibitors lead to significantly more rapid declines in HIV viral load (VL) than all other ART classes. We hypothesised that intensifying standard triple-drug ART with the integrase inhibitor, raltegravir, would reduce HIV VL faster and hence reduce early mortality, although this strategy could also risk more IRIS events. Methods and findings In a 2×2×2 factorial open-label parallel-group trial, treatment-naive adults, adolescents, and children >5 years old infected with HIV, with cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) 0.7) and despite significantly greater VL suppression with raltegravir-intensified ART at 4 weeks (343/836 [41.0%] versus 113/841 [13.4%] with standard ART, p < 0.001) and 12 weeks (567/789 [71.9%] versus 415/803 [51.7%] with standard ART, p < 0.001). Through 48 weeks, there was no evidence of differences in mortality (aHR = 0.98 [95% CI 0.76–1.28], p = 0.91); in serious (aHR = 0.99 [0.81–1.21], p = 0.88), grade-4 (aHR = 0.88 [0.71–1.09], p = 0.29), or ART-modifying (aHR = 0.90 [0.63–1.27], p = 0.54) adverse events (the latter occurring in 59 [6.5%] participants with raltegravir-intensified ART versus 66 [7.3%] with standard ART); in events judged compatible with IRIS (occurring in 89 [9.9%] participants with raltegravir-intensified ART versus 86 [9.5%] with standard ART, p = 0.79) or in hospitalisations (aHR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.76–1.17], p = 0.59). At 12 weeks, one and two raltegravir-intensified participants had predicted intermediate-level and high-level raltegravir resistance, respectively. At 48 weeks, the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation K219E/Q (p = 0.004) and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations K101E/P (p = 0.03) and P225H (p = 0.007) were less common in virus from participants with raltegravir-intensified ART, with weak evidence of less intermediate- or high-level resistance to tenofovir (p = 0.06), abacavir (p = 0.08), and rilpivirine (p = 0.07). Limitations of the study include limited clinical, radiological, and/or microbiological information for some participants, reflecting available services at the centres, and lack of baseline genotypes. Conclusions Although 12 weeks of raltegravir intensification was well tolerated and reduced HIV viraemia significantly faster than standard triple-drug ART during the time of greatest risk for early death, this strategy did not reduce mortality or clinical events in this group and is not warranted. There was no excess of IRIS-compatible events, suggesting that integrase inhibitors can be used safely as part of standard triple-drug first-line therapy in severely immunocompromised individuals. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01825031.

Published
2018

3. A Standardized Approach for Collection of Objective Data to Support Outcome Determination for Late-Phase Tuberculosis Clinical Trials.

Author

Kurbatova EV, Phillips PPJ, Dorman SE, Sizemore EE, Bryant KE, Purfield AE, Ricaldi J, Brown NE, Johnson JL, Wallis CL, Akol JP, Ocheretina O, Van Hung N, Mayanja-Kizza H, Lourens M, Dawson R, Nhung NV, Pierre S, Musodza Y, Shenje J, Badal-Faesen S, Vilbrun SC, Waja Z, Peddareddy L, Scott NA, Yuan Y, Goldberg SV, Swindells S, Chaisson RE, and Nahid P

Subjects
Humans, Antitubercular Agents therapeutic use, Tuberculosis drug therapy, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary drug therapy, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary microbiology
Abstract

Rationale: We developed a standardized method, possible poor treatment response (PPTR), to help ascertain efficacy endpoints in Study S31/A5349 (NCT02410772), an open-label trial comparing two 4-month rifapentine-based regimens with a standard 6-month regimen for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Objectives: We describe the use of the PPTR process and evaluate whether the goals of minimizing bias in efficacy endpoint assessment and attainment of relevant data to determine outcomes for all participants were achieved. Methods: A PPTR event was defined as the occurrence of one or more prespecified triggers. Each PPTR required initiation of a standardized evaluation process that included obtaining multiple sputum samples for microbiology. Measurements and Main Results: Among 2,343 participants with culture-confirmed drug-susceptible TB, 454 individuals (19.4%) had a total of 534 individual PPTR events, of which 76.6% were microbiological (positive smear or culture at or after 17 wk). At least one PPTR event was experienced by 92.4% (133 of 144) of participants with TB-related unfavorable outcome and between 13.8% and 14.7% of participants with favorable and not-assessable outcomes. A total of 75% of participants with TB-related unfavorable outcomes had microbiological confirmation of failure to achieve a disease-free cure. Conclusions: Standardized methodologies, such as our PPTR approach, could facilitate unbiased efficacy outcome determinations, improve discrimination between outcomes that are related and unrelated to regimen efficacy, and enhance the ability to conduct pooled analyses of contemporary trials.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results