Search

BACKGROUND: Missing more than one tablet of contemporary antiretroviral therapy (ART) per month increases the risk of virological failure. Recent studies evaluating a comprehensive range of potential risk factors for suboptimal adherence are not available for high-income settings.METHODS: Adults on ART with undetectable viral load (UDVL) were recruited into a national, multi-centre cohort, completing a comprehensive survey assessing demographics, socio-economic indicators, physical health, well-being, life stressors, social supports, HIV disclosure, HIV-related stigma and discrimination, healthcare access, ART regimen, adherence, side effects, costs and treatment beliefs. Baseline data were assessed, and suboptimal adherence was defined as self-reported missing ≥1 ART dose/month over the previous 3-months; associated factors were identified using bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression.RESULTS: We assessed 522 participants (494 [94.5%] men, mean age = 50.8 years, median duration UDVL = 3.3 years [IQR = 1.2-6.8]) at 17 sexual health, hospital, and general practice clinics across Australia. Seventy-eight participants (14.9%) reported missing ≥1 dose/month over the previous three months, which was independently associated with: being Australian-born (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 2.4 [95%CI = 1.2-4.9], p = 0.014), not being in a relationship (AOR = 3.3 [95%CI = 1.5-7.3], p = 0.004), reaching the "Medicare safety net" (capping annual medical/pharmaceutical costs) (AOR = 2.2 [95%CI = 1.1-4.5], p = 0.024), living in subsidised housing (AOR = 2.5 [95%CI = 1.0-6.2], p = 0.045), receiving home-care services (AOR = 4.4 [95%CI = 1.0-18.8], p = 0.046), HIV community/outreach services linkage (AOR = 2.4 [95%CI = 1.1-5.4], p = 0.033), and starting ART following self-request (AOR = 3.0 [95%CI = 1.3-7.0], p = 0.012).CONCLUSIONS: In this population, 15% reported recent suboptimal ART adherence at levels associated in prospective studies with subse

The Book of Job displays well the reality of the human predicament. However, does the Book of Job provide an answer to the problem it so vividly displays: the existence of God and the reality of suffering? This paper is a quest for an answer, which, if correct, is no. The purpose of the book has less to do with an answer for why good people suffer and more to do with exactly what God has done, and continues to do, to rectify suffering, culminating in the Christ event. Stated simply, the Book of Job exists as a harbinger, to all those with eyes to see and ears to hear, to the life and ministry of Jesus Christ: explaining what to expect and how to respond to a suffering messiah. What follows should not be mistaken as an argument for the interpretation of the Book of Job but rather one suggesting a potential interpretation as an alternative to theodicy.