Search

Pain over the lateral aspect of the elbow without nerve injury or elbow instability often is diagnosed as lateral epicondylitis or, colloquially, tennis elbow. It is a common complaint, seen most frequently in women between ages 40 and 60, although it is common in men too. Typical presenting symptoms include pain with prolonged wrist extension activities, pain with resisted wrist or elbow extension, and pain at rest radiating from the elbow along the dorsum of the forearm.

Background and objectivesPercutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an analgesic modality involving the insertion of a lead through an introducing needle followed by the delivery of electric current. This modality has been reported to treat chronic pain as well as postoperative pain following knee and foot surgery. However, it remains unknown if this analgesic technique may be used in ambulatory patients following upper extremity surgery. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate various lead implantation locations and evaluate the feasibility of using percutaneous brachial plexus PNS to treat surgical pain following ambulatory rotator cuff repair in the immediate postoperative period.MethodsPreoperatively, an electrical lead (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) was percutaneously implanted to target the suprascapular nerve or brachial plexus roots or trunks using ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, subjects received 5 min of either stimulation or sham in a randomized, double-masked fashion followed by a 5 min crossover period, and then continuous stimulation until lead removal postoperative days 14–28.ResultsLeads (n=2) implanted at the suprascapular notch did not appear to provide analgesia, and subsequent leads (n=14) were inserted through the middle scalene muscle and placed to target the brachial plexus. Three subjects withdrew prior to data collection. Within the recovery room, stimulation did not decrease pain scores during the first 40 min of the remaining subjects with brachial plexus leads, regardless of which treatment subjects were randomized to initially. Seven of these 11 subjects required a single-injection interscalene nerve block for rescue analgesia prior to discharge. However, subsequent average resting and dynamic pain scores postoperative days 1–14 had a median of 1 or less on the Numeric Rating Scale, and opioid requirements averaged less than 1 tablet daily with active stimulation. Two leads dislodged during use and four fractured on withdrawal, but no infections, nerve injuries, or adverse sequelae were reported.ConclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS of the brachial plexus is feasible for ambulatory shoulder surgery, and although analgesia immediately following surgery does not appear to be as potent as local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks, the study suggests that this modality may provide analgesia and decrease opioid requirements in the days following rotator cuff repair. Therefore, it suggests that a subsequent, large, randomized clinical trial with an adequate control group is warranted to further investigate this therapy in the management of surgical pain in the immediate postoperative period. However, multiple technical issues remain to be resolved, such as the optimal lead location, insertion technique, and stimulating protocol, as well as preventing lead dislodgment and fracture.Trial registration numberNCT02898103.

That the lumbrical muscles are the workhorse of digital extension and that they can relax their own antagonist have been time-honored principles. However, we believe this dogma is incorrect and an oversimplification. We base our assertion on anatomy, innervation, and the notion that muscle architecture is the most important determinant of muscle function. Wang and colleagues proposed the lumbrical to be a sophisticated tension monitoring device. We elaborate on their well-supported thesis, further proposing that the lumbricals also function as a constant tension spring within the closed loop composed of the digital flexors and the extensor mechanism.

We report the occurrence of a short radiolunate ligament rupture in a rock climber. To our knowledge, an isolated traumatic rupture of this ligament has not been described in the literature, and awareness of this entity allows initiation of therapy. The magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound appearances are reviewed and the mechanism of injury is discussed.

Purpose Repair of a lacerated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon underneath or just distal to the A4 pulley can be technically challenging, and success can be confounded by tendon triggering and scarring to the pulley. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of partial and complete A4 pulley release in the context of a lacerated and repaired FDP tendon just distal to the A4 pulley. Methods Tendon biomechanics were tested in 6 cadaveric hands secured to a rigid frame, permitting measurement of tendon excursion, tendon force, and finger range of motion. After control testing, each finger had laceration and repair of the FDP tendon at the distal margin of the A4 pulley using a 6-strand core suture technique and epitendinous repair. Testing was then repeated after the following interventions: (1) intact A4 pulley, (2) release of the distal half of the A4 pulley, (3) complete release of the A4 pulley, and (4) continued proximal release of the sheath to the distal edge of A2 (release of C2, A3, and C1 pulleys). Release of the pulleys was performed by incision; no tissue was removed from the specimens. Results From full extension to full flexion, average FDP tendon excursion for all intact digits was 37.9 ± 1.5 mm, and tendon repair resulted in average tendon shortening of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm. Flexion lag increased from 4 mm with venting of the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release, respectively. Compared to the intact state, repair of the tendon with an intact A4 pulley, release of half the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release resulted in percentage increases in work of flexion of 11.5 ± 3.1%, 0.83 ± 2.8%, 2.6 ± 2.4%, and 3.25 ± 2.2%, respectively. Conclusions After FDP laceration and repair in the region of the A4 pulley, work of flexion did not increase by more than 3% from control conditions after partial or complete A4 pulley release, and work of flexion was significantly less than that achieved by performing a repair and leaving the A4 pulley intact.

Background: Although the efficacy of single-injection supraclavicular nerve blocks is well established, no controlled study of continuous supraclavicular blocks is available, and their relative risks and benefits remain unknown. In contrast, the analgesia provided by continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks has been validated in randomized controlled trials. We therefore compared supraclavicular with infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion following distal upper-extremity surgery. Methods: Preoperatively, subjects were randomly assigned to receive a brachial plexus perineural catheter in either the infraclavicular or supraclavicular location using an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating catheter technique. Postoperatively, subjects were discharged home with a portable pump (400-mL reservoir) infusing 0.2% ropivacaine (basal rate of 8 mL/hr; 4-mL bolus dose; 30-min lockout interval). Subjects were followed up by telephone on an outpatient basis. The primary outcome was the average pain score on the day after surgery. Results: Sixty subjects were enrolled, with 31 and 29 randomized to receive an infraclavicular and supraclavicular catheter, respectively. All perineural catheters were successfully placed per protocol. Because of protocol violations and missing data, an intention-to-treat analysis was not used; rather, only subjects with catheters in situ and whom we were able to contact were included in the analyses. The day after surgery, subjects in the infraclavicular group reported average pain as median of 2.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.5-6.0) compared with 4.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.6-7.7) in the supraclavicular group (P = 0.025). Similarly, least pain scores (numeric rating scale) on postoperative day 1 were lower in the infraclavicular group compared with the supraclavicular group (0.5 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-3.5] vs 2.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-4.7], respectively; P = 0.040). Subjects in the infraclavicular group required less rescue oral analgesic (oxycodone, in milligrams) for breakthrough pain in the 18 to 24 hrs after surgery compared with the supraclavicular group (0.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-5.0] vs 5.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-15.0], respectively; P = 0.048). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions: A local anesthetic infusion via an infraclavicular perineural catheter provides superior analgesia compared with a supraclavicular perineural catheter.

Objective Compared to the well-established stimulating catheter technique, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for interscalene perineural catheter insertion is a recent development and has not yet been examined in a randomized fashion. We hypothesized that an ultrasound-guided technique would require less time and produce equivalent results compared to electrical stimulation (ES) when trainees attempt interscalene perineural catheter placement. Methods Preoperatively, patients receiving an interscalene perineural catheter for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to an insertion protocol using either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the procedural duration (in minutes), starting when the ultrasound probe (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results All ultrasound-guided catheters (n = 20) were placed successfully and resulted in surgical anesthesia versus 85% of ES-guided catheters (n = 20; P = .231). Perineural catheters placed by ultrasound (n = 20) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 8.0 (5.0-15.5) minutes compared to 14.0 (5.0-30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .022). All catheters placed according to the protocol in both treatment groups resulted in a successful nerve block; however, 1 patient in the ES group had local anesthetic spread to the epidural space. There was 1 vascular puncture using ultrasound guidance compared to 5 in the ES-guided catheter group (P = .182). Conclusions Trainees using a new ultrasound-guided technique can place inter-scalene perineural catheters in less time compared to a well-documented technique using ES with a stimulating catheter and can produce equivalent results.

Electrical stimulation (ES)- and ultrasound-guided placement techniques have been described for infraclavicular brachial plexus perineural catheters but to our knowledge have never been previously compared in a randomized fashion, leaving the optimal method undetermined. We tested the hypothesis that infraclavicular catheters placed via ultrasound guidance alone require less time for placement and produce equivalent results compared with catheters placed solely via ES.Preoperatively, patients receiving an infraclavicular perineural catheter for distal upper extremity surgery were randomly assigned to either ES with a stimulating catheter or ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the catheter insertion duration (minutes) starting when the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound group) or catheter placement needle (stimulation group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter placement needle was removed after catheter insertion.Perineural catheters placed with ultrasound guidance took a median (10th-90th percentile) of 9.0 (6.0-13.2) minutes compared with 15.0 (4.9-30.0) minutes for stimulation (P.01). All ultrasound-guided catheters were successfully placed according to the protocol (n = 20) versus 70% in the stimulation group (n = 20; P.01). All ultrasound-guided catheters resulted in a successful surgical block, whereas 2 catheters placed by stimulation failed to result in surgical anesthesia. Six catheters (30%) placed via stimulation resulted in vascular punctures compared with none in the ultrasound group (P.01). Procedure-related pain scores were similar between groups (P = .34).Placement of infraclavicular perineural catheters takes less time, is more often successful, and results in fewer inadvertent vascular punctures when using ultrasound guidance compared with ES.

Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of both plate location (superior versus anterior-inferior) and plate type Small Fragment Contourable Dual Compression Plate (CDCP) versus 3.5 mm Universal Locking System Contourable Dual Compression Plate (Locked CDCP) in a synthetic midshaft transverse clavicle fracture model. Methods: Twenty-four pre-osteomized synthetic clavicles were repaired with either CDCP or locked CDCP technology 3.5 mm plates in either the superior or anterior-inferior position to form 4 groups of 6 clavicles. These were subsequently tested to evaluate torsional and axial construct stiffness, as well as bending load to failure, bending failure stiffness, and method of failure. Results: In axial compression, locked CDCP constructs were significantly more stiff than CDCP constructs (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant effect of plate location was observed. Torsional tests demonstrated a significant 2-way interaction favoring locked CDCP plates in the superior position and standard CDCP plates in the anterior-inferior position (p < 0.001). Bending failure testing revealed that the superior plate location had higher load to failure and bending failure stiffness than the anterior-inferior location (p < 0.0001). In addition, the superior locked CDCP plates demonstrated significantly greater bending failure stiffness than superior CDCP plates (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Biomechanically, repairing a midshaft clavicle fracture with a superior plate was more favorable compared to anterior-inferior plating in terms of both load to failure and bending failure stiffness. Furthermore, superior locked CDCP plates show improved bending failure stiffness over superior CDCP plates.

Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks and the Perioperative Surgical Home Brian M. Ilfeld, M.D., M.S., Matthew J. Meunier, M.D., Alex Macario, M.D., M.B.A. A continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) consists of a percutaneously inserted peri- neural catheter and subsequent local anesthetic administration to provide site-specific analgesia. With a portable infusion pump, a perineural local anesthetic infu- sion may be provided for patients at home. 1 An article published in this issue of A nesthesiology by Eng et al. 2 suggests that, after major elbow surgery, transferring care from the hospital to the periopera- tive surgical home in the presence of an ambulatory CPNB decreases hospitalization costs without com- promising medical outcomes. Initially, ambulatory CPNB was used solely for postoperative outpatients—patients who were never intended to be hospital- ized overnight—to supplement oral analgesics and improve pain control. 3 Publication of studies of uncontrolled series of patients dis- charged the morning after hip and tricompartment knee arthroplasty suggested that ambulatory CPNB might also shorten hospitaliza- tions for procedures in which inpatient stays were related mainly to postoperative pain. Adding to the optimism, previously published evidence had demonstrated that 2 to 3 days of CPNB provided solely within the hospital could shorten long-term rehabilitation stays by improving joint range of motion up to 6 weeks after knee arthroplasty or arthrolysis. 4,5 Subsequent randomized, controlled trials found that ambu- latory CPNB decreases the time to discharge readiness after knee and hip arthroplasty. However, these subjects were not allowed to actually leave the hospital much earlier than the control group, leaving any benefits of earlier discharge as a the- oretical possibility. 3 The one randomized, placebo-controlled “One can imagine a well- functioning acute regional service that delivers state- of-the-art outpatient anal- gesia as a component for the promise of the peri­ operative surgical home to be fully realized.” trial demonstrating hastening of actual discharge using ambula- tory CPNB investigated the effects on range of motion after shoulder arthroplasty only through the day after surgery. 6 Although research over the last two decades has led to speculation that ambulatory CPNB might shorten hospitalization after major orthopedic surgery, actual evidence quantifying the benefits and risks remains elusive and wor- thy of continued investigation. One can imagine a well-functioning acute regional service that delivers state-of-the-art outpatient analgesia as a component for the promise of the perioperative surgical home to be fully realized. 7 New Study Providing such evidence makes an article published in this issue of A nesthesiology by Eng et al. 2 unique and noteworthy. Instead of studying the effects of ambula- tory perineural infusion on vari- ous endpoints—as has been done previously—the authors investi- gated the effects of early discharge by providing all subjects having major elbow surgery with a continuous infraclavicular nerve block for a total of 60 h and randomized them to a control group remaining hospitalized for 3 days, and an experimental group permitted early dis- charge the day after surgery. Subjects discharged home the day after surgery had similar elbow range of motion after 2 weeks and 3 months compared with those hospitalized for at least 3 days. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in pain scores, opi- oid consumption, patient satisfaction, and function-related questionnaires. In addition, the cost of care for those hospi- talized only one night were lower than for patients staying three nights. Although previous research has suggested the Image: Summit Medical, Salt Lake City, Utah. Corresponding article on page XXX. Accepted for publication September 1, 2015. From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California (B.M.I); Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio (B.M.I); Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California (M.J.M); and Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (A.M.). Copyright © 2015, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Anesthesiology 2015; 123:00-00 Anesthesiology, V 123 • No 6 December 2015 Copyright © 2015, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Downloaded From: http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/Journals/JASA/0/ by BRIAN ILFELD on 10/22/2015

Orthopaedic rehabilitation is a unique subspecialty of orthopaedic surgery that incorporates surgeons and allied health professionals from several disciplines and regional subspecialties. The subspecialty deals with problems associated with neuromuscular disorders (stroke, brain injury, cerebral palsy, and ­poliomyelitis), spinal injury and deformity, total joint reconstruction, sports injury, pediatric orthopaedic surgery, hand surgery, and foot and ankle surgery. The diversity of orthopaedic rehabilitation is reflected by the many diverse subspecialists found in the membership of the Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Association (ORA). Because of the diverse nature of this orthopaedic subspecialty, a discussion on advances in orthopaedic ­rehabilitation can be accomplished by coverage or separate discussions of several topics. The following report highlights some of the advancements in orthopaedic rehabilitation within the last year. It reviews several of the topics presented at the most recent Annual Meetings of the ORA as well as topics covered on ORA Specialty Day during the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting. In addition, recent information from published abstracts and manuscripts pertinent to orthopaedic rehabilitation is included. This information covers diverse topics, such as neuromuscular disorders (stroke and brain injury as well as poliomyelitis), spine surgery (vertebroplasty and kypho­plasty), adult reconstruction (total knee arthroplasty and ­associated rehabilitation), and several aspects of hand re­habilitation after surgery. We conclude the discussion with “What’s New in the Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Association,” including a brief background and an update on the society. ### Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Several new operative procedures for the management of patients with acquired spasticity and paralysis have been recently discussed1-3. The shoulder, which has traditionally received r­elatively little attention in patients with stroke or traumatic brain injury, was among the main topics covered at the recent ORA Specialty Day held in San Francisco on March 3, 20011-3. There were discussions on evaluation, management …

The purpose of this study was to evaluate range of motion and patient-reported outcome after complete arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture. Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy and capsular release were reviewed retrospectively at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Pain and range of motion were measured. Patient outcome was assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form. Mean self-reported satisfaction on a visual analog scale was 8.4 out of 10. Only 6 patients continued to have pain, with a mean maximum pain score of 4.6 out of 10. Flexion increased from a mean of 117.5 degrees to 133 degrees, and extension improved from a mean of 35.4 degrees to 9.3 degrees. In those patients with a preoperative arc of motion less than 100 degrees (10 patients), the mean arc of motion improved from 69 degrees to 119 degrees. All patients had improved function after the procedure, with a mean self-reported functional ability score of 28.3 out of 30. There were no neurovascular complications. The improvement in range of motion and functional outcome compares favorably with open-release procedures. Combined with the potential benefits of improved joint visualization and low surgical morbidity, arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture appears to be a reasonable alternative to open techniques.

Case: Electronic cigarettes are an increasingly popular and poorly regulated alternative to traditional cigarettes that deliver nicotine and other aerosolized substances to the user via a battery-powered atomizer. We report a case in which an electronic cigarette explosion resulted in a high-pressure injection injury of the finger. Conclusion: Explosions involving electronic cigarettes and similar handheld products should be treated as high-pressure injection injuries until proven otherwise. Radiographs are indispensable in the workup of these injuries. Because the true content of injected material cannot be determined with certainty, we recommend immediate surgical debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and close follow-up to observe the evolution of the injury.

The infraclavicular brachial plexus block is a routinely used anesthesia technique for orthopedic hand, wrist, and arm surgeries. Although the pulmonary anatomy surrounding the brachial plexus would suggest a theoretical potential for pneumothorax development during infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade, this complication is rarely reported in the literature. We report two occurrences of pneumothorax development following routine infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade performed by physicians at an academic training institution with technical experience. Both patients were healthy adult males with a normal body habitus undergoing elective upper extremity surgical intervention. They presented to the emergency department on postoperative days 1 and 2 with shortness of breath and chest pain. Despite different clinical management strategies for each patient, including conservative physical activity with inspirational spirometry compared to thoracic decompression, both patients' pneumothoraces resolved with no apparent sequelae. This article describes the clinical benefits of infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade versus general anesthesia during elective outpatient surgeries. The development of symptomatic pneumothoraces in 2 healthy adult patients stresses the importance of careful patient assessment pre- and postoperatively. Possible preventative strategies to avoid pneumothorax complications during infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade are discussed. This case report indicates there is a risk of iatrogenic injury during infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. This information could be valuable in determining anesthesia modalities used for orthopedic upper extremity surgeries in patient populations with problematic follow-up or limited access to health care.

Purpose Metacarpal fractures are common in hand surgery. Metacarpal shortening ranging from 2 mm to as much as 10 mm has been deemed acceptable in the literature. We examined the effect of metacarpal shortening on interosseous muscle architecture and predicted force production capacity based on the standard muscle length-tension curve (commonly known as the Blix curve ). Methods The dorsal interosseous muscles between the middle and ring finger metacarpals from 9 adult human cadaver hands were exposed and studied. The ring finger metacarpal was translated proximally in 2-mm increments in relation to a stationary middle finger metacarpal. Digital images were obtained and analyzed to define the length and orientation of individual muscle fibers with each incremental change in position. Results Interosseous muscle fiber length increased and pennation angle decreased uniformly with increasing proximal translation of the ring finger metacarpal. At 10 mm of shortening the fiber length had increased to 20.8 ± 1.8 mm, or to approximately 125% of optimum fiber length, and the pennation angle had decreased to 6.7° ± 2.2° or by approximately 50%. Conclusions The interosseous muscles have been shown to have a high fiber-to-muscle length ratio. This ratio indicates that these muscles function optimally over a short range of lengths, leaving them vulnerable to derangement in function owing to alteration in the surrounding bony architecture. Based on the standard muscle length—-tension relationship we had predicted a steady linear decrease in interosseous power with proximal translation of the metacarpal. The results indicate an initial linear progression with a plateau at approximately 8 mm of shortening. At 2 mm of shortening there is an approximately 8% loss of power generation, at 10 mm of metacarpal shortening we predict the interosseous muscle to be capable of only approximately 55% of its optimum power compared with the resting position.

Clinicians have long noted substantial variation in the cross-sectional size of flexor tendons in the hand; however, data indicating that surgical repair techniques of lacerated flexor tendons should be altered according to size are unavailable. Our objectives were to evaluate the cross-sectional size differences among tendons within the same hand and to correlate tendon size with tensile mechanical properties after suture repair. Fifty human cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons were measured with digital calipers to determine radioulnar and volardorsal diameters. Twenty tendons were used to measure resistance to suture pull-through; tendons were transected at the A2 pulley, and a transverse double-stranded 4-0 Supramid suture (S. Jackson, Inc, Alexandria, VA) was passed through the radioulnar plane of the tendon 1 cm from the transection site. The remaining tendons were transected and repaired by using a modified Kessler repair with double-stranded 4-0 Supramid suture. Both tendon repairs and tendon-suture pull-through specimens were tested to failure in tension by using a material testing machine. Dorsovolar tendon height and tendon cross-sectional area varied significantly between digits, with an average difference of approximately 40% between the values of the smallest (fifth) and largest (third) fingers. Yield and ultimate force determined by pull-through tests of the simple transverse suture correlated positively with tendon radioulnar width. Tensile properties of tendons repaired with a double-stranded modified Kessler repair, however, did not depend significantly on tendon size. These results indicate that the strength of the commonly used Kessler suture technique is not dependent on tendon cross-sectional size within the clinically relevant range of tendons evaluated.