Search

SummaryLow Density Lipoprotein (LDL) is known to sensitize platelets for physiological agonists. To clarify the basis of this sensitization, we investigated the involvement of p38MAP Kinase (p38MAPK). As dual phosphorylation on Thr180 and Tyr182 of p38MAPK is the trigger for activation of the kinase, p38MAPK-activity was measured with an antibody that recognizes the dual-phosphorylated sequence. LDL induced a rapid and dose dependent activation of p38MAPK. The activation was not inhibited by a wide variety of inhibitors of platelet signalling, including TxA2-formation, Phospholipase C-activation, Ca2+-mobilization and ERK 1/2-activation. Only a slight reduction in p38MAPK-activation was observed when protein kinase C was inhibited. Activation of p38MAPK was strongly inhibited by a rise in cAMP. Thus, p38MAPK-activation was upstream of most signalling pathways and close to the LDL-receptor. A number of platelet receptors was screened with the use of antibodies. Integrins αIIbβ3 and α2β1, as well as the FcγRII-receptor, CD36 (platelet glycoprotein IV), CD68 (gp110) and Low Density Lipoprotein-receptor related protein (LRP) were not implicated in LDL-induced p38MAPK-activation. Inhibition of LDL binding by modification of apo B100 lysines reduced p38MAPK-activation by 80 %. Activation of p38MAPK resulted in an increase in release of arachidonic acid, the precursor for thromboxane A2 synthesis. In conclusion, activation of p38MAPK might be the first step in platelet sensitization by LDL, leading to formation of arachidonate metabolites and increased aggregation and secretion responses to physiological agonists.

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) is known to sensitize platelets to agonists via integrin mediated outside-in signaling (Hackeng, C. M., Huigsloot, M., Pladet, M. W., Nieuwenhuis, H. K., Rijn, H. J. M. v., and Akkerman, J. W. N. (1999) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., in press). As outside in signaling is associated with phosphorylation of p125(FAK), the effect of LDL on p125(FAK) phosphorylation in platelets was investigated. LDL induced p125(FAK) phosphorylation in a dose- and time- dependent manner. The phosphorylation was independent of ligand binding to integrin alphaIIbbeta3 and aggregation, such in contrast to alpha-thrombin-induced p125(FAK) phosphorylation, that critically depended on platelet aggregation. Platelets from patients with Glanzmann's thrombastenia showed the same LDL- induced phos- phorylation of p125(FAK) as control platelets, whereas alpha-thrombin completely failed to phosphorylate the kinase in the patients platelets. LDL signaling to p125(FAK) was independent of integrin alpha2 beta1, the FcgammaRII receptor, and the lysophosphatidic acid receptor and not affected by inhibitors of cyclooxygenase, protein kinase C, ERK1/2 or p38(MAPK). Phosphorylation of p125(FAK) by LDL was strongly inhibited by cyclic AMP. These observations indicate that LDL is a unique platelet agonist, as it phosphorylates p125(FAK) in platelet suspensions, under unstirred conditions and independent of integrin alphaIIb beta3.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) binds to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor and induces catabolism of normal human very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) via LRP in vitro. Recent studies showed that the C-terminal domain of LPL can bind LRP in solid phase assays and inhibit cellular catabolism of two LRP ligands, activated alpha 2-macroglobulin and the 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (Williams, S.E., Inoue, I., Tran, H., Fry, G. L., Pladet, M.W., Iverius, P.-H., Lalouel, J.-M., Chappell, D.A., and Strickland, D.K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8653-8658). The current study investigated the potential for this region of LPL to promote cellular catabolism of VLDL via LRP. A fragment comprising the C-terminal domain of LPL (designated LPLC) was expressed in bacteria and found to promote cellular binding, uptake, and degradation of normal human VLDL in a dose-dependent manner. These effects were present whether LPLC was added simultaneously with 125I-VLDL or was prebound to cell surfaces prior to the assay. Mutations involving Lys407, Trp393, Trp394, or deletion of the C-terminal 14 residues reduced the effects of LPLC. Three LRP-binding proteins, the receptor-associated protein, lactoferrin, and a polyclonal antibody against LRP, competed for 125I-VLDL degradation induced by LPLC. Heparin or heparinase treatment of cells prevented LPLC-induced 125I-VLDL catabolism. Thus, cell-surface proteoglycans play an important role in this pathway. Interestingly, either LPLC or LPL when added in excess could block LPL-induced 125I-VLDL degradation presumably by interacting directly with LRP. However, unlabeled VLDL could not prevent catabolism of 125I-labeled LPLC or LPL. These data show that cellular fates for VLDL versus LPLC or LPL are divergent. This is probably due to independent catabolism of the latter via cell-surface proteoglycans. In summary, these in vitro studies indicate that a fragment of LPL corresponding to the C-terminal domain mimics the native enzyme with respect to induction of VLDL catabolism via LRP. Because LPLC lacks the catalytic site of native LPL, these studies establish that lipase activity is not required for LRP-mediated lipoprotein catabolism.

Bovine milk lipoprotein lipase (LPL) induced binding, uptake, and degradation of 125I-labeled normal human triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by cultured mutant fibroblasts lacking LDL receptors. The induction was dose-dependent and occurred whether LPL and 125I-lipoproteins were added to incubation media simultaneously or LPL was allowed to bind to cell surfaces, and unbound LPL was removed by washing prior to the assay. Lipolytic modification of lipoproteins did not appear to be necessary for increased catabolism because the effect of LPL was not prevented by inhibitors of LPL's enzymatic activity, p-nitrophenyl N-dodecylcarbamate or phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. However, the effect was abolished by boiling LPL prior to the assay suggesting that major structural features of LPL were required. Also, LPL-induced binding to cells was blocked by an anti-LPL monoclonal antibody but not by antibodies that are known to block apolipoprotein E- or B-100-mediated binding to low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors. This indicates that LPL itself mediated 125I-lipoprotein binding to cells. Cellular degradation of 125I-lipoproteins was partially or completely blocked by two previously described ligands for the LDL receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor (LRP): activated alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2M*), and the 39-kDa receptor-associated protein. These data implicated LRP as mediating LPL-induced lipoprotein degradation and were confirmed by showing that LPL's effects were prevented by an immunoaffinity-isolated polyclonal antibody against LRP. Furthermore, LPL promoted binding of 125I-lipoproteins to highly purified LRP in a solid-phase assay. Heparin or heparinase treatment of cells markedly decreased LPL-induced binding, uptake, and degradation of lipoproteins, but had no effect on catabolism of alpha 2M*. Thus, cell-surface proteoglycans were obligatory participants in the effects of LPL but were not required for LRP-mediated catabolism of alpha 2M*. Taken together, these in vitro findings establish that through interaction with cell-surface proteoglycans, LPL induces catabolism of normal human triglyceride-rich lipoproteins via LRP.

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) is cosynthesized and co-purifies with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor and is thought to modulate ligand binding to LRP. In addition to binding LRP, RAP binds two other members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, gp330 and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors. Here, we show that RAP binds to LDL receptors as well. In normal human foreskin fibroblasts, RAP inhibited LDL receptor-mediated binding and catabolism of LDL and VLDL with Sf 20-60 or 100-400. RAP inhibited 125I-labeled LDL and Sf 100-400 lipoprotein binding at 4 degrees C with KI values of 60 and 45 nM, respectively. The effective concentrations for 50% inhibition (EC50) of cellular degradation of 2.0 nM 125I-labeled LDL, 4.7 nM 125I-labeled Sf 20-60, and 3.6 nM 125I-labeled Sf 100-400 particles were 40, 70, and 51 nM, respectively. Treatment of cells with lovastatin to induce LDL receptors increased cellular binding, internalization, and degradation of RAP by 2.3-, 1.7-, and 2.6-fold, respectively. In solid-phase assays, RAP bound to partially purified LDL receptors in a dose-dependent manner. The dissociation constant (KD) of RAP binding to LDL receptors in the solid-phase assay was 250 nM, which is higher than that for LRP, gp330, or VLDL receptors in similar assays by a factor of 14 to 350. Also, RAP inhibited 125I-labeled LDL and Sf 100-400 VLDL binding to LDL receptors in solid-phase assays with KI values of 140 and 130 nM, respectively. Because LDL bind via apolipoprotein (apo) B100 whereas VLDL bind via apoE, our results show that RAP inhibits LDL receptor interactions with both apoB100 and apoE. These studies establish that RAP is capable of binding to LDL receptors and modulating cellular catabolism of LDL and VLDL by this pathway.