Search

Locally advanced esophageal cancer is challenging to treat. This study tested a 3-drug, multimodality approach. Chemotherapy dose reductions, the addition of amifostine, and pharmacogenetics were tested in an effort to mitigate toxicity and predict outcomes.This phase II trial tested chemotherapy (carboplatin area under the curve = 4 [lower dose than that from Meluch et al] on day 1 and 22, 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 per day continuous infusion on days 1 to 42, and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22) with concomitant radiation 4500 cG for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy was scheduled after radiation. Amifostine 500 mg subcutaneously before radiation was given to the first 19 patients.Among 54 eligible patients, the pathologic complete response rate was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-49%). Median survival was 21.2 months (95% CI, 13.6-37.6 months), and median time to cancer recurrence/progression 19 months (95% CI, 11.4-44.6 months). Nearly all patients (94%) suffered at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event, including 3 treatment-related deaths. Amifostine was discontinued because of one of these deaths. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of severe adverse events among patients who received amifostine and those who did not. Genotyping for polymorphisms of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, cytochrome P3A4, and glutathione-S-transferase did not predict tumor response or severe adverse events.This 3-drug, multimodality approach yielded a pathologic complete response rate of 35%, but the severe adverse event rate was high. Utilizing amifostine to reduce toxicity or employing molecular approaches to predict outcomes did not show promise.

To compare the combination of a nicotine inhaler and bupropion to either treatment alone for initiating smoking abstinence and relapse prevention.Smokers were randomized to receive a nicotine inhaler, bupropion, or both for 3 months. At 3 months, smoking-abstinent study participants were randomized to their initial medications or placebo. Participants who were smoking at 3 months were randomized to an alternative treatment regimen or placebo. This study was conducted from July 2001 to January 2003.A total of 1700 smokers were randomized to treatment (phase 1) for 3 months. Among the 941 study participants eligible for randomization to the phase 2 trial, 837 continued in the study. For the phase 2 trial, 405 smoking-abstinent participants were randomized to relapse prevention for 9 additional months, and 432 smokers were randomized to re-treatment for an additional 3 months. At the end of the initial 3 months of treatment (phase 1), 82 (14%) of 566, 145 (26%) of 567, and 194 (34%) of 567 study participants receiving a nicotine inhaler, bupropion, or both, respectively, were abstinent from smoking. Of the 405 smoking-abstinent participants at the end of 3 months, the bupropion group had more smokers than the placebo group (mean No. of smokers, 1.5 vs 1.1; P.001), and the nicotine inhaler group had higher smoking abstinence rates at 12 months than the placebo group. Those receiving combination therapy had reduced rates of relapse to smoking for the first 3 months of relapse prevention, but this difference disappeared after the initial 3 months. Of the 432 study participants who were smoking at the end of 3 months and who received an alternative treatment regimen, the 223 smokers initially assigned to a nicotine inhaler were more likely to stop smoking at 6 months if they were re-treated with bupropion instead of placebo (8 [7%] of 111 vs 0 [0%] of 112; P = .003), and the 209 smokers initially treated with bupropion and re-treated with a nicotine inhaler did not have significantly higher smoking abstinence rates (6 [6%] of 104 vs 3 [3%] of 105; P = -.50).Combined therapy with a nicotine inhaler and bupropion increased smoking abstinence rates. Continuation of the initial combination therapy does not appear to prevent relapse to smoking. Timing of re-treatment and alternative approaches to relapse prevention should be further examined.

Recent research has demonstrated there is a high prevalence of weight concerns in smokers and that smokers with weight concerns may respond poorly to treatment for tobacco dependence. Most studies have focused only on females or have consisted of small samples. In this study of a 12-week randomized trial of nicotine inhaler, bupropion or both for smoking cessation, 50% of the 1012 female smokers and 26% of the 680 male smokers, at study entry, were weight concerned. In examining the impact of weight concerns on the 12-week point-prevalence smoking abstinence, 26% of non-weight-concerned smokers quit smoking compared to 22% of weight-concerned smokers (p=0.06). This study, which includes a large sample of both genders, provides further evidence that approximately half of females who are seeking smoking cessation treatment are weight concerned and that one quarter of male smokers are weight concerned. Additionally, being weight concerned may impact the short-term success rates of stopping smoking using pharmacotherapy.

Purpose: This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation that can be administered with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods and Materials: This trial included 15 patients with unresectable non–small-cell lung cancer. Paclitaxel (50 mg/m 2 ) and carboplatin (area under the curve=2) were given weekly during radiation therapy (RT). The RT included 2 Gy daily to an initial dose of 70 Gy, and the dose was increased in 4 Gy increments until determining the MTD. The MTD was defined as the highest safely tolerated dose where at most 1 patient of 6 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) with the next higher dose having at least 2 of 6 patients experiencing DLT. Three-dimensional treatment planning techniques were used without prophylactic nodal RT. Results: Two patients were not evaluable because they did not receive therapy according to the protocol. No DLTs occurred in the 3 patients who received 70 Gy, 1 DLT occurred in the 6 patients who received 74 Gy, and 2 DLTs occurred in the 4 patients who received 78 Gy. The DLTs included Grade 3 pneumonitis ( n = 2) and Grade 4 pneumonitis ( n = 1). There have been 3 deaths during follow-up ranging from 14 to 38 months (median, 28 months). Conclusions: The MTD of the RT was 74 Gy with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. The Phase II portion of this trial is currently under way. The goal is to improve local control and survival with higher doses of RT delivered with this combined modality approach.

Purpose Gemcitabine remains the standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA), but has limited activity. ISIS-2503 is an antisense compound directed against H-ras with preclinical activity against pancreatic ACA in tumor models. The combination of ISIS-2503 and gemcitabine has been evaluated in a prior phase I study. Methods Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic ACA not amenable to surgery or local radiation received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and ISIS-2503 6 mg/kg/d as a continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days of an every-3-weeks cycle. Responses were monitored by radiologic imaging every 6 weeks. Results Forty-eight eligible patients were enrolled, 43 with metastatic disease. Median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 2.2 to 16.8 months) for living patients. A median of four cycles of treatment was given (range, 1 to 18 cycles). All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The 6-month survival percentage was 57.5% (95% CI, 44.9% to 73.5%) and the median survival was 6.6 months. The response rate was 10.4% (one complete response, four partial responses). Clinically significant toxicity was limited except for one fatal pulmonary embolism. Conclusion This study shows a promising response rate to the combination of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in patients with pancreatic ACA. The observed 6-month survival rate in these patients met our protocol-defined criteria for success. This regimen is tolerable, but is of unclear benefit. Additional studies evaluating the role of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in the treatment of pancreatic ACA should be considered.

BACKGROUND Gemcitabine has broad activity in a variety of solid tumors including biliary tract carcinomas. The authors evaluated 6-month survival, response, and toxicity associated with a combination of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract or gallbladder adenocarcinoma (ACA). METHODS A 4-week course included 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, 25 mg/m2 LV by intravenous push, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU by intravenous push after LV. RESULTS Forty-two patients were enrolled in 6 months, 35 of whom had metastatic disease. Patients with biliary tract ACA included 24 with hepatic disease (19 patients had intrahepatic disease and 5 patients had extrahepatic disease) and 4 with disease in the ampulla of Vater. All patients were evaluable and received a median of 4 courses of treatment (range, 1–21 courses). Commonly occurring severe toxicity (NCI CTC Grade 3 or worse) included: dyspnea (four patients), nausea (four patients), fatigue (seven patients), thrombocytopenia (six patients), emesis (four patients), and diarrhea (four patients). Five partial responses (9.5%) occurred, 3 of which were sustained for ≥ 8 weeks. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Thirty-two patients had disease progression and 38 died after a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 1.4–24 months). The median time to disease progression was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.4–6.6%). The median survival period was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7–12%). CONCLUSIONS This combination regimen was manageable in patients with advanced biliary tract and gallbladder ACA. Of 42 patients, 24 (57%) survived ≥ 6 months, satisfying the primary end point of the trial. The length of survival suggested that gemcitabine, 5-FU, and LV had benefit equivalent to gemcitabine alone. Cancer 2005. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

Edatrexate is an antifolate agent with improved in vitro antineoplastic activity as compared with methotrexate. A Mayo phase I trial of edatrexate (E), vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (GCSF), (EVAC-GCSF) showed promising antineoplastic activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Colon-Otero G, et al. Cancer J Sci Am 1997;3:297-302) leading to a phase II trial of this regimen, the results of which are reported here. A total of 34 patients with stage IIIB or IV measurable or evaluable NSCLC were entered in this North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 100 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 and cisplatin 30 mg/m 2 /d on day I and day 2 followed by vinblastine 3 mg/m 2 intravenously and doxorubicin 30 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 2. Filgrastim was given at 300 μg subcutaneously daily from day 4 to day 18 or until an absolute neutrophil count of 2,000/mm 3 or more was obtained. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until either progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Sixteen of 34 evaluable patients responded to therapy, for a response rate of 47.1% with a 95% CI of 30.3% to 63.8%. Median time to disease progression was 132 days, median survival time was 219 days, and the estimated 1-year survival was 41.2% (95% CI of 27.6-61.5%). The EVAC/G-CSF regimen has significant antineoplastic activity as seen by the response rates for patients with NSCLC. However, this study had significant myelosup-pressive toxicity; 56% patients had grade III or higher leukopenia with three treatment-related deaths observed. In addition, Quality of Life assessments indicate that patients experienced an overall decline in quality of life during the course of treatment. These mitigating factors need to be considered regarding further evaluation of this regimen in this patient population.

PURPOSE: This article summarizes the third step of a research program to identify variables that supplement the predictive power of the the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) for survival. The objective was to produce a simple, practical, stratification factor for phase III oncology clinical trials involving patients with advanced malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 729 patients with metastatic colorectal or lung cancers. Patients provided a Karnofsky index and appetite rating while physicians provided a survival estimate and the ECOG-PS. Scores for each item were categorized as having a positive, neutral, or negative indication for survival. A patient was classified as having a relatively good prognosis if three or more of the four items showed a positive indication, a bad prognosis if three or more items were negative, and an uncertain prognosis otherwise (Good/Bad/Uncertain [GBU] index). RESULTS: The GBU index improved on the prognostic power of a Cox model quartile index and PS alone and increased the accuracy of survival classification estimates by 5% to 10% more than ECOG-PS alone. For patients with PS of 0 or 1, significant survival patterns exist between GBU groups (P= .002 and .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GBU index may be recommended as a supplementary stratification factor for certain future phase III trials in metastatic lung or colorectal cancer where patient heterogeneity is a particular concern. The GBU represents a relatively modest increase to the cost and patient burden of a clinical trial given the additional control that is achieved over the potentially confounding concomitant to the treatment variable.

This paper presents a randomized clinical trial of standard local ablative treatment with and without systemic interferon-alpha for cervical dysplasia. To determine the extent of the lesion study participants underwent colposcopic examination and local therapy was delivered to sites of colposcopically determined abnormal cervical epithelium and the transformation zone. A dose of 1 million units/sq. m of interferon-alpha was administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 10 weeks. The findings showed that there was no difference between treatment groups in terms of recurrence-free survival. 71% in the interferon group reported at least one toxicity most commonly headache lethargy myalgias chills and fever; while 16% reported at least one toxicity as severe most commonly headache and lethargy. In the control group flu-like symptoms were uncommon and none were severe. Hence the results indicated that interferon-alpha had modest impact on the risk for recurrent dysplasia.

BACKGROUND The biologic behavior of anaplastic (World Health Organization Grade III) astrocytomas and oligoastrocytomas is highly variable, ranging from rapid progression to prolonged survival. It is difficult to predict the outcome of an individual patient based on morphology alone. METHODS To determine the prognostic value of commonly used clinicopathologic markers, we reviewed our experience with 85 similarly treated patients enrolled in 3 North Central Cancer Treatment Group high grade glioma protocols. The pathology was comprised exclusively of primary anaplastic astrocytic tumors (66 astrocytomas and 19 oligoastrocytomas). Variables examined included patient age, morphologic type, preoperative performance score, extent of surgery, solitary versus multiple mitoses, DNA flow cytometric and image morphometric parameters, and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, MIB-1, and p53 expression. RESULTS The study was comprised of 48 men and 37 women ranging in age from 14–79 years (median age, 47 years). Overall survival ranged from 12 years (median, 21.6 months). Statistical analyses revealed that age accounted for the majority of this extensive variability in survival. The median survival times were 65.5 months, 22.1 months, and 4.4 months, respectively, for the groups

Randomized trials of colony-stimulating factors in febrile patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy have not consistently shown clinical benefit. Nevertheless, the use of colony-stimulating factors to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is widespread.We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in afebrile outpatients with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We measured the number of days of neutropenia, rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, number of days the patient received parenteral antibiotics, and number of culture-positive infections.We randomly assigned 138 patients to receive G-CSF (n=71) or placebo (n=67). The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per cubic millimeter was significantly shorter for patients who received G-CSF (two days, vs. four days for the patients given placebo). However, there was no effect on the rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, duration of treatment with parenteral antibiotics, or number of culture-positive infections.Routine therapeutic application of G-CSF in afebrile patients with severe neutropenia can reduce the duration of neutropenia, but this does not appear to provide practical clinical benefit.

Purpose: We performed a randomized trial to comparesurvival distributions and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT)and DBD with RT and BCNU in patientswith high-grade astrocytoma. Methods: A total of 238patients with supratentorial grade 3 and grade 4astrocytoma were studied. Patients were stratified by age,extent of surgery, tumor grade, and performance scoreand randomly assigned to receive RT 55-60 Gyand either DBD, 200 mg/m2 orally on Days1–10 every five weeks or BCNU, 200 mg/m2intravenously every seven weeks. Median age was 60years; 62% were 55 years or older. Eighty-threepercent had subtotal resection, 58% had grade 4tumors, and 83% had performance scores of 0–2.Results: Survival distributions for all patients in thetwo arms were similar, with median survival of41 weeks in each arm. Time to progressiondistributions were virtually identical, with medians of 22weeks. BCNU produced significantly greater hematologic toxicity; medianleukocyte and platelet nadirs on the first cyclewere 3.6 vs. 4.7 (P=0.0001) and117 vs. 162 (P < 0.0001), and overallplatelet nadirs were 80.5 vs. 114 (P =0.0019). Non-hematologic toxicities were also significantly greater withBCNU, including nausea (57% vs. 31%; P

PURPOSE Megestrol acetate has been reported to improve appetite and quality of life and to decrease nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was formulated to evaluate the impact of megestrol acetate on quality of life, toxicity, response, and survival in individuals with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer who received concomitant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive megestrol acetate 800 mg/d orally or placebo. In addition, all patients were scheduled to receive a maximum of four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Quality of life was self-assessed at entry onto study, with every cycle of chemotherapy, and 4 months thereafter with a linear visual analog scale. Toxicity was evaluated by patient questionnaire and investigator reports. RESULTS A total of 243 eligible patients were randomized. Those who received megestrol acetate had increased nonfluid weight gain (P = .004) and significantly less nausea (P = .0002) and vomiting (P = .02). Significant thromboembolic phenomena occurred more often in patients who received megestrol acetate versus placebo (9% v 2%, P = .01). Patients who received megestrol acetate had more edema (30% v 20%, P = .002), an inferior response rate to chemotherapy (68% v 80%, P = .03), and a trend for inferior survival duration (median, 8.2 v 10.0 months, P = .49). These findings may have been influenced by a poorer quality of life of the megestrol acetate group at study initiation. There were no significant changes in quality of life scores over time between either of the study arms. CONCLUSION Megestrol acetate cannot be routinely recommended for all patients with small-cell lung cancer at the time of chemotherapy initiation. Rather, its therapeutic ratio may be more favorable for patients with problematic cancer anorexia/cachexia.

This study was developed to test whether prospective dietician counseling could abrogate the unwanted weight gain seen among women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for resected breast cancer. It was also designed to examine predictive factors for weight gain in an exploratory manner. Premenopausal women starting adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer were recruited for this trial. After appropriate stratification, they were randomized to a group which received monthly dietician counseling primarily aimed at weight maintenance versus a control group (whose attending physicians and nurses told them about possible weight gain but provided no formalized dietician counseling). One hundred and seven evaluable women were equally divided between the two protocol arms. The median weight changes 6 months after start of chemotherapy were gains of 2.0 kg in the dietician counseling group versus 3.5 kg in the control group. The median changes in average calorie consumption were reductions of 120 versus 46 cal/day on weekdays and 196 versus 20 cal/day on weekends for the counseling and control groups, respectively. Study data suggest that more weight was gained by patients with higher Quetelet's indices (p = 0.01) and patients who had been on a diet in the preceding 6 months (p = 0.02). Routine prospective dietician counseling aimed at weight maintenance appeared to produce small but statistically insignificant reductions in both calorie consumption and weight gain in this group of patients.

A phase II combination chemotherapy protocol combining methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was designed to evaluate tumor response and survival in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Thirty patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate 30 mg/m 2 iv Days 1, 15, and 22; vinblastine 3 mg/m 2 iv Days 2, 15, and 22; doxorubicin 30 mg/m 2 iv Day 2; and cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 iv Day 2. After a median of four cycles (maximum number two cycles beyond complete regression: minimum six cycles for stable partial regression), we observed objective regressions in 20 patients (67%) (95% CI, 50, 84) with complete regression in 8 patients (27%) and partial regression in 12 patients (40%). Median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-34.2), and median survival of responders was 11.0 months (range, 2.6-34.2) from initial date of response. Toxicity was substantial with two treatment-related deaths and consisted predominantly of neutropenia (grade 3 or greater in 93% of the patients), alopecia, nausea, emesis, stomatitis, and azotemia. In conclusion, MVAC is a highly active outpatient chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma, achieving a high complete and partial response rate. Toxicity is substantial in this elderly patient population.

✓ The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) plus recombinant interferon-alpha (IFN-a) in patients with recurrent glioma. As single agents, both BCNU and IFN-α can cause tumor regression in patients with recurrent glioma. In vitro studies suggest synergy between the two agents. Thirty-five patients in whom computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) evidence was obtained of progressive astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma received recombinant IFN-α2a (12 × 106 U/m2 intramuscularly) on Days 1 through 3 and BCNU (150 mg/m2 intravenously) on Day 3 of each 6-week cycle. All patients had tumor progression despite radiation therapy and had received no prior chemotherapy. Response was assessed by CT or MR evidence and by neurological examination while the patients were on a regimen of stable or decreasing doses of corticosteroids. All patients could be evaluated for response and toxicity. Twenty-nine percent of the patients demonstrated objective tumor regression; 37% remained stable for more than 6 months and 25% were stable for less than 6 months. The median duration of response to IFN-α and BCNU was 9.9 months and the median survival for all patients was 13.3 months. Toxicity consisted primarily of moderate myelosuppression, venous irritation, vomiting, flulike symptoms, and transient reversible exacerbation of underlying neurological symptoms. The use of BCNU plus IFN-α is a safe, active regimen in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioma who have failed to respond to prior radiation therapy. The contribution of IFN to the antitumor activity observed in this study compared with that previously described with BCNU alone cannot be assessed from this trial.

Randomized trials have shown an increase in survival with perioperative chemotherapy as well as with postoperative chemoradiation. It was hypothesized that combining induction chemotherapy with postoperative chemoradiation would be well tolerated and improve pathologic complete response.Patients with resectable cancers of the stomach/gastroesophageal junction were eligible. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3 cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin. Adjuvant therapy consisted of 1 cycle of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy with concurrent 5-FU/LV). Chemoradiation was followed by 2 additional cycles of 5-FU/LV. Response to neoadjuvant therapy was based on pathology.From 1999 to 2002, 38 eligible patients were enrolled; 35 completed induction chemotherapy, and 29 went on to surgery. Sixteen patients did not develop metastatic progression, 10 developed metastatic disease, and 12 were unevaluable. There were no pathologic complete responses after induction therapy. Twenty-five of 38 patients suffered grade 3-4 toxicities during induction paclitaxel/cisplatin. Six of the 7 patients who received postoperative therapy suffered grade 3-4 toxicities. Only 3 of 38 (7.9%) eligible patients completed all assigned treatment. The median overall survival was 1.6 years, and the 2-year survival was 40%.This regimen of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/cisplatin followed by postoperative 5-FU/LV-based chemoradiation did not have a high enough response rate and proved to be too toxic for further development.

Several randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that megestrol acetate therapy can result in appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was designed to compare megestrol acetate doses ranging from 160 to 1,280 mg/day. day. This trial randomly assigned 342 evaluable patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia to receive oral megestrol acetate at doses of 160, 480, 800 and 1,280 mg/day. Patients were evaluated monthly by history, examination and patient-completed questionnaires, as well as by serum albumin levels. The data demonstrate a positive dose-response effect for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation (p = 0.02). there was a trend for more nonfluid weight gain with higher drug doses. Megestrol acetate was well tolerated in this group of patients with advanced malignant disease. The positive dose-response effect observed for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation supports both the prestudy hypothesis and findings in the literature. The optimal dose in this study seemed to be 800 mg/day; no further benefit was derived from using the higher dose. Nonetheless, it may be reasonable to start with lower initial doses in routine clinical practice, taking into account dosage form, availability and cost of therapy.

PURPOSE We performed a randomized trial to compare survival distributions and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) and PCNU with those of RT and carmustine (BCNU) in patients with malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 346 patients with histologically verified supratentorial grade 3 and grade 4 astrocytoma were studied. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions and either PCNU 100 mg/m2 or BCNU 200 mg/m2 every 7 weeks for 1 year and every 10 weeks for the second year. RT and chemotherapy were started within 72 hours of randomization and usually on the same day. Of 334 assessable patients, 72% had partial or radical resection and 71% had grade 4 tumors. Median age was 59 years, and 85% had performance scores of 0 to 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]). The follow-up duration of 51 living patients ranged from 10.3 to 63.2 months, with a median of 36.2 months. RESULTS The median survival duration in each group was 47 weeks, and median time to progression was 28 weeks. PCNU produced significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas BCNU produced significantly more nausea, vomiting, and irritation. CONCLUSION PCNU has no therapeutic advantage at this dose and schedule and does not warrant further study as a single agent for patients with high-grade glioma.

BACKGROUND Modest activity for doxorubicin has been detected repeatedly for the therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Variable activity in this disease also has been documented for alpha-interferon. Preclinical data indicated the possibility that alpha-interferon could enhance or add to the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin. METHODS The authors evaluated the use of alpha-interferon at a dose of 12 x 10(6) units/m2/day for 5 days given by intramuscular injection plus doxorubicin 25-40 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 3 (both repeated every 4 weeks) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS Among 31 eligible patients treated, there was only one instance of objective tumor regression. The median survival for all patients was 10 months. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were significant but tolerable to the patients. CONCLUSIONS The 3% response rate indicated that, by the method used, the addition of alpha-interferon to doxorubicin does not improve the clinical effectiveness. This combination cannot be recommended for further study.

A randomized trial was performed to determine if therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) plus fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 (42%) TAM patients and 64 of 119 (54%) TAM plus FLU patients (two-sided P = 0.07). Time to disease progression was better for TAM plus FLU (medians: 11.6 versus 6.5 months; Cox model, P = 0.03). Duration of response and survival were similar in the two treatment arms. Among 97 patients with estrogen receptor (ER) of 10 or greater and 65 years of age or older, there were highly significant advantages for treatment with TAM plus FLU in both response rate and time to progression. Of particular note is that in this patient group TAM plus FLU showed a survival advantage (Cox model, P = 0.05). Although these data require confirmation in a prospective randomized trial, they suggest that there is a substantive therapeutic advantage for TAM plus FLU over TAM alone in elderly women with ER of 10 fmol or greater.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are effective cancer therapies, but they are reported to cause a rash in50% of patients. In the current study, the authors examined the use of tetracycline for rash prevention.This placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial enrolled patients who were starting cancer treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. Patients could not have had a rash at the time of enrollment. All patients were randomly assigned to receive either tetracycline at a dose of 500 mg orally twice a day for 28 days versus a placebo. Patients were monitored for rash (through monthly physician assessment and weekly patient-reported questionnaires), quality of life (using the SKINDEX-16, a skin-specific quality of life index), and adverse events. Monitoring occurred during the 4-week intervention and then for an additional 4 weeks. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the incidence of rash between the study arms, and the enrollment of 30 patients per arm provided a 90% probability of detecting a 40% difference in incidence with a P value of .05 (2-sided).A total of 61 evaluable patients were enrolled. The 2 treatment arms were well balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, dropout rates, and rates of discontinuation of the EGFR inhibitor. The incidence of rash was found to be comparable across treatment arms. Physicians reported that 16 patients treated with tetracycline (70%) and 22 patients treated with placebo (76%) developed a rash (P = .61). Tetracycline appears to have lessened the rash severity, although the high dropout rates invite caution when interpreting these findings. By Week 4, physician-reported grade 2 rash (using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) occurred in 17% of tetracycline-treated patients (n = 4 patients) and in 55% of placebo-exposed patients (n = 16 patients) (P = .04). Patients treated with tetracycline reported better scores, as per the SKINDEX-16, on certain quality-of-life parameters such as skin burning or stinging, skin irritation, and being bothered by the persistence/recurrence of a skin condition. Adverse events were found to be comparable across treatment arms.In the current study, tetracycline was not found to prevent EGFR inhibitor-induced rashes and therefore cannot be clinically recommended for this purpose. However, preliminary observations of diminished rash severity and improved quality of life suggest this antibiotic merits further study.

In an effort to test clinically the hypothesis that the duration of cellular exposure to etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin (CDDP) is an important determinant of cytotoxicity, we performed a phase III randomized trial comparing an outpatient bolus regimen of combined VP-16 and CDDP with a sequential infusion over 72 hours of these same two drugs. All patients had stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, and survival was the primary end point. Of 113 patients randomly allocated to the study, 108 were assessable for response, survival, and toxicity. A major response was observed in 20 (37%) of 54 patients on the bolus regimen and in 16 (30%) of 54 patients receiving infusion therapy. The median time to progression was 61 and 88 days for bolus and infusion therapy, respectively. The median survival time was 148 and 157 days, respectively (P = .71). Study results were not consistent with the possibility that infusion therapy could be associated with a 50% improvement in median survival, i.e. from 5 months to 7 1/2 months. Toxicity was primarily myelosuppression and was significantly greater with the infusion regimen. We conclude that infusion therapy as tested in this protocol with VP-16 and CDDP does not offer any advantage in response rate, time to disease progression, or survival as compared with bolus therapy. In addition, infusion therapy is associated with a greater degree of neutropenia and more treatment-related deaths.

One hundred eighty-seven patients with histologically proven advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone, to the Mallinson regimen (combined and sequential 5-FU, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, vincristine, and mitomycin C), or to combined 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (FAP). Patients with both measurable and nonmeasurable disease were included and the primary study end point was survival. Among 41 patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were 7% for 5-FU alone, 21% for the Mallinson regimen, and 15% for FAP. The median interval to progression for each of the three regimens was 2.5 months. Survival curves intertwined with the median survival times for 5-FU alone and the Mallinson regimen at 4.5 months and for FAP at 3.5 months. Compared with 5-FU alone, both the Mallinson regimen and FAP produced significantly more toxicity. Neither the Mallinson regimen nor FAP can be recommended as therapy for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Any chemotherapy for this disease should remain an experimental endeavor.

Forty-eight patients with advanced gastric cancer and measurable areas of malignant disease were treated with etoposide (130 mg/mz/day X 3 days) plus cisplatin (45 mg/mzday on days 2 and 3). Both drugs were given by constant intravenous infusion and repeated every 4 weeks. Common toxic reactions included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Most patients experienced severe but reversible toxic reactions. In 46 evaluable patients an overall objective regression rate of 28% was obtained with a median duration of regression of 4 months. Regression rates were only modestly reduced among patients with prior chemotherapy exposure (21%). Whereas this combination of etoposide and cisplatin does not appear to offer any major advantage over other single and combination regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, it shows definite activity and its lack of cross-resistance with other commonly used agents for this disease could indicate a possible role in new combination or sequential chemotherapy approaches. As an interesting sidelight, we found that 21% of our patients had elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels, and among this group regression rates were higher than in HCG-negative patients. It would be of interest to extend these observations in other gastric carcinoma studies involving cisplatin regimens. Cancer 65:1491-1494,1990. LTHOUGH carcinoma of the stomach has shown a A steady decline in incidence in this country over the last half century,' it still remains one of the major causes of cancer death. Worldwide it may very well be the most common lethal cancer. Although this disease may occasionally be cured surgically, it is discouraging that over 80% of patients who develop gastric cancer will die of gastric cancer. The great majority of these patients, therefore, become candidates for systemic therapy of advanced

Interleukin-4 (IL-4), a pleiotropic cytokine, has in vitro activity against non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This phase II study was conducted to learn the efficacy and toxicity of IL-4 in patients with NHL. Patients with relapsed or refractory indolent or aggressive NHL were eligible to receive 2.5 or 5.0 mcg/kg of subcutaneous IL-4 for 28 days of a 42-day cycle. Patients with response and acceptable toxicity after two cycles were eligible to continue treatment for six cycles. The target overall response rate (ORR) was 20%. Forty-one patients were enrolled and assessable for toxicity; two were ineligible after histology review. The ORR was 13% (5/39) with one complete and four partial responses. All responders were treated with 5.0 mcg/kg; the median time to progression was 84 days, the median duration of response for responders was 8.3 months. The most common toxicities of any grade in all patients were edema (66%), malaise (56%), and elevated liver function tests (56%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common at 5.0 mcg/kg, leading to a reduction in the starting dose. Although the study observed anti-tumor activity with IL-4, the ORR goal of the study was not achieved. Agents that target the IL-4 receptor can potentially benefit patients with NHL; however, alternative schedules using IL-4 in shorter duration and in combination with other agents would be required to overcome toxicities observed in this study.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) beta is a putative mediator of the cancer anorexia/weight loss syndrome, and certain polymorphisms of its gene are thought to be associated with a greater risk of gastric cancer. Do these IL-1 beta genetic polymorphisms predispose patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer to the anorexia/weight loss syndrome? This study focused on 44 patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal cancer. All underwent genotyping, completed serial quality-of-life questionnaires germane to appetite, and underwent meticulous serial follow-up. Patients with the IL-1 beta-31 C/T and T/T genotypes were more likely to describe a worse appetite at baseline than were those with the C/C genotype. In addition, patients with the IL-1 beta+3954 C/T and T/T genotypes showed greater improvements in their weight (P = 0.02) and in survival (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = 0.04) over time than did patients with the C/C genotype. These associations occurred independently of tumor response. These preliminary data suggest that certain interleukin-1 beta genetic polymorphisms may modulate the cancer anorexia/weight loss syndrome in patients with metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer. Confirmatory studies are warranted.

Adoptive immunotherapy (AI) with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells is an antineoplastic modality in which immune-activated cells are administered to a host having cancer in an attempt to mediate tumor regression. Levamisole (LEV), an immune stimulant, has been suggested as having therapeutic effectiveness in a variety of cancers. After a phase I trial of recombinant IL-2 plus LEV, a phase II trial of this combination was conducted in patients who had advanced renal cell carcinoma. The regimen was IL-2 at 3 X 10 6 U/m 2 daily X 5 plus LEV at 50 mg/m 2 perorally three times a day X 5. Only one of the 22 eligible patients had a regression. It was a partial regression, 85 days in duration. The median time to treatment failure (refusal, progression, or off study because of toxicity) was 36 days. The only grade 4 toxicity reported was lethargy. This regimen is not recommended for further testing in patients who have advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Purpose Despite the utility of newer antidepressants for alleviating hot flashes, antidepressants do not work adequately enough in many patients. Gabapentin is a nonhormonal agent that also can reduce hot flashes. No data have been available to address whether the combination of both agents would more effectively alleviate hot flashes, compared with gabapentin alone, in patients with inadequate hot flash control with an antidepressant alone. Patients and Methods This was a randomized trial in which 118 patients with inadequate hot flash control on an antidepressant were randomly assigned to receive both an antidepressant and gabapentin versus being weaned off the antidepressant and receiving gabapentin alone. Patients were observed for 5 weeks (including a baseline week in which patients continued on their current antidepressant without gabapentin) during which time they completed validated daily hot flash diaries. Results Ninety-one patients provided complete data at the 5-week assessment. Regardless of whether or not the antidepressant was continued when gabapentin was started, there was an approximately 50% median reduction in hot flash frequencies (54%; 95% CI, 34% to 70% for combined treatment v 49%; 95% CI, 26% to 58% for gabapentin alone) and scores (56%; 95% CI, 26% to 71% for combined treatment v 60%; 95% CI, 33% to 73% for gabapentin alone). Conclusion Gabapentin seems to decrease hot flashes by approximately 50% in women with inadequate hot flash control who were using an antidepressant. This study saw no significant additional hot flash reduction from continuation of the antidepressant.

Purpose To compare maintenance epoetin alfa administered once every 3 weeks with continued weekly epoetin alfa for patients with cancer-associated anemia. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly assigned at enrollment to receive three weekly doses of epoetin alfa 40,000 U subcutaneously (SC), followed by either standard weekly epoetin alfa (40K arm) or 120,000 U of epoetin alfa (120K arm) SC every 3 weeks for 18 additional weeks. Results Three hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled. One hundred eighty-three patients were assigned to the 40K arm, and 182 were assigned to the 120K arm. There was no difference in the proportion of patients requiring transfusions during the study (23% in 40K arm and 18% in 120K arm, P = .22) or specifically during the maintenance phase (13% in 40K arm v 15% in 120K arm, P = .58). Patients randomly assigned to the 40K arm were more likely to have a ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) increment, were more likely to have a drug dose held because of high Hb, and had higher mean end-of-study Hb levels. Toxicities, including thromboembolism, and overall survival were similar. Patients in the 40K arm had a higher global quality of life (QOL) at baseline for unclear reasons, whereas patients in the 120K arm had a greater global QOL improvement during the study, so end-of-study QOL was equivalent. Conclusion After three weekly doses of epoetin alfa 40,000 U, a dose of 120,000 U can be administered safely once every 3 weeks without increasing transfusion needs or sacrificing QOL. The Hb increment is somewhat greater with continued weekly epoetin alfa. Lack of blinding as a result of different treatment schedules may have confounded results.

Background: Previous studies suggest that the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine are worthy of further testing in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. We therefore undertook this phase II study to test this combination in a multi-institutional, first-line clinical trial. Patients and methods: Forty-four eligible patients with histologic or cytologic confirmation of the above malignancy were recruited. The cohort had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 0, 1 and 2 in 59%, 39% and 2% of patients, respectively. Median age was 57 years (range 32–77 years). Adequate organ function was a requirement for study entry. All patients were prescribed docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 orally twice a day on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. Results: The tumor response rate was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23% to 55%]. There were two complete responses and the rest were partial. Median survival was 9.4 months (95% CI 6.3–10.7 months) and median time-to-tumor progression was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.6–5.6 months). There was one treatment-related death from a myocardial infarction and dysrhythmia. Commonly occurring grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (11 patients), infection (five patients), constipation (three patients), thrombosis (three patients), dyspnea (three patients) and hand–foot syndrome (three patients). In addition, 24/45 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: The regimen docetaxel and capecitabine shows activity in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. This regimen merits further study.

At present there remains a need for more effective systemic therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Some studies have suggested that infusional chemotherapy schedules and biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve the therapeutic outcome in advanced colon cancer. One such regimen that uses continuous infusion 5-FU, weekly leucovorin, daily dipyridamole, and intermittent mitomycin-C has activity in both colon and unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The intent of this trial was to test the effectiveness of this four-drug regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received 5-FU 200 mg/m2 daily by continuous infusion, leucovorin 30 mg/m2 IV weekly, mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 day 1, and dipyridamole 75 mg orally four times daily for 5 weeks. After a 1-week break, treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. Eligibility included biopsy-proven advanced measurable pancreatic cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 and 2, and no prior systemic chemotherapy. Of 46 evaluable patients, 9 partial responses and 1 complete tumor response were seen, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval 11-36%). The median survival in the group of 50 patients registered to this trial was 4.6 months, with a range of 0.33 to 40.2 months. Toxicity was manageable, with the most common toxicities (or =grade III National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) being anorexia (13%), stomatitis (17%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). Of note, little severe hematologic toxicity and no significant headaches were reported. Although some patients did respond, the therapeutic results are not encouraging enough to take this regimen to phase III testing.

Current systemic treatment options for patients with relapsed gliomas are limited. The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has demonstrated broad antitumor activity in both preclinical studies as well as a number of phase I and II trials in humans. Studies in primates have shown good cerebrospinal fluid levels of topotecan following systemic administration. We therefore performed this phase II trial in patients who developed evidence of progressive glioma after definitive radiation therapy. Patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days repeated every three weeks. For patients who had received prior nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy, the starting dose was 1.25 mg/m2. Thirty-three patients were entered on this study. All patients were eligible and evaluable for both response and toxicity. Seven patients experienced grade 4 leukopenia with 2 of these patients dying of infection-related complications. Six of these seven patients were not taking anticonvulsants during treatment. Nine patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, seven of whom were not taking anticonvulsants. Nonhematologic side effects were infrequent and manageable. One patient experienced a partial response to this treatment for an overall response rate of 3% (95% binomial confidence interval 0.3%-20.4%). The median time to progression was 14.9 weeks and median survival 19.9 weeks. Topotecan at this dose and schedule showed no substantial activity in relapsed gliomas.

Lymphedema of the arms can be a serious consequence of local and regional therapy in women with breast cancer. Coumarin has been reported to be effective for the treatment of women with lymphedema; we undertook a study in which we attempted to replicate those findings.We studied 140 women with chronic lymphedema of the ipsilateral arm after treatment for breast cancer. The women received 200 mg of oral coumarin or placebo twice daily for six months and then the other treatment for the following six months. The end points of the study consisted of the volume of the arm (calculated from measurements of hand and arm circumference) and the answers on a questionnaire completed by the patient about symptoms potentially related to lymphedema.The volumes of the arms at 6 and 12 months, were virtually identical, regardless of whether coumarin or placebo was given first. After six months, the average volume of the affected arm increased by 21 ml during placebo treatment and 58 ml during coumarin treatment (P=0.80). In addition, answers to patient-completed questionnaires were similar in the two treatment groups. After six months only 15 percent of the women in the coumarin group and 10 percent of those in the placebo group reported that the study medication had helped a moderate or large amount (P=0.19). Coumarin was well tolerated, except that it resulted in serologic evidence of liver toxicity in 6 percent of the women.Coumarin is not effective therapy for women who have lymphedema of the arm after treatment for breast cancer.

Based on evidence that suggested that systemically administered local anesthetics might be useful in chronic pain, we initiated a pilot study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of mexiletene and flecainide in the treatment of cancer pain. Twenty-one courses of either mexiletine or flecainide were administered to patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of three or better, who were suffering from cancer pain inadequately controlled with opioid analgesics. Pain control was assessed by patient questionnaires to monitor benefit and toxicity. In 17 cases, there was no suggestion of benefit. Two cases had relatively clear-cut analgesic benefit, and two others had some suggestion of mild-to-moderate analgesic relief. Flecainide was relatively well tolerated, but mexiletine appeared to cause nausea and/or vomiting in five of eight patients. This pilot trial suggests that systemically administered local anesthetics can relieve pain in a minority of patients with cancer pain.

A phase II combination chemotherapy protocol combining methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was designed to evaluate tumor response and survival in patients with advanced/recurrent cervix and vaginal cancer. Twenty-nine patients with advanced/recurrent cervix cancer and three patients with advanced vaginal cancer who had not previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate 30 mg/m 2 iv, Day 1, vinblastine 3 mg/m 2 iv, Days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m 2 iv, Day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 iv, Day 2. After a median of 4 cycles (maximum number 2 cycles beyond complete regression; 6 cycles with stable regression); we observed objective regressions in all 3 patients with vaginal cancer and 19 patients (66%, 95% CI=46,82) with cervix cancer including complete regression in 6 patients (21%, 95% CI=8,40) and partial regression in 13 patients (45%, 95% CI=26,64). Median overall survival was 11.5 months (range 1.1-54+). Median survival of responders was 12.8 months (range 3.6-54+). Toxicity included neutropenia, alopecia, nausea, emesis, and stomatitis. Although grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in over half of the patients, there were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, MVAC is a highly active outpatient chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced/recurrent cervix cancer, achieving a high complete and partial response rate with moderate hematologic toxicity. These results need to be confirmed by phase III trial in advanced disease patients and MVAC may be a suitable regimen for investigation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials in poor prognosis, previously untreated patients.

PURPOSE We evaluated the effect of recombinant interferon gamma (rIFN-gamma) on survival and toxicity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred patients in CR following treatment with six cycles of combination chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were studied. All patients had been enrolled onto a cooperative group trial (North Central Cancer Treatment Group [NCCTG] 86-20-51). Patients received observation only or rIFN-gamma at a dose of 4 x 10(6) U subcutaneously per day for 6 months. RESULTS Six patients (12%) did not comply with rIFN-gamma treatment. Substantial nonhematologic toxicities consisting of chills, myalgia, lethargy, and alteration of mood-personality were observed. No patient experienced life-threatening or fatal toxicity. The median times to progression for rIFN-gamma treatment or observation were 6.9 and 8.1 months (P = .54). The median survival times were 13.3 and 18.8 months, respectively (P = .43). Approximately 70% of all patients relapsed within 2 years. CONCLUSION Time to progression and survival were inferior in patients treated with rIFN-gamma compared with randomized control subjects, although this difference was not statistically significant. These data indicate that rIFN-gamma treatment is not associated with a 33% improvement in survival (P = .04). Because of the high rate of relapse, SCLC patients in CR are an ideal group in which to evaluate novel and minimally toxic agents.

To determine the efficacy of transdermal clonidine for alleviating post-orchiectomy hot flashes, a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial was designed including 70 men with a history of prostate cancer who had undergone a medical or surgical orchiectomy and were suffering from hot flashes. The results of this study demonstrated that clonidine did not significantly decrease hot flash frequency or severity. Future research is necessary to find effective means of alleviating hot flashes in post-orchiectomy patients.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and methyl lomustine (CCNU) (FAMe), 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (FAP), and FAMe alternating with triazinate (TZT) when compared with a standard therapy of 5-FU alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred fifty-two eligible patients selected for study had proven locally unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. The majority had nonmeasureable disease. They were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drug combination regimens or to 5-FU alone administered by rapid injection in 5-day course. Survival was the primary study end point. RESULTS None of the three drug combinations showed a significant advantage over 5-FU alone in improved performance score, weight gain, or patient survival. Each of the three combinations was more toxic than 5-FU alone. CONCLUSION FAMe, FAP, or FAMe alternating with TZT cannot be recommended for the therapy of advanced gastric carcinoma. Therapy of this disease should remain an experimental endeavor. It would seem reasonable to prove the value of any new treatment approach by a randomized comparison to simple therapy with 5-FU alone.

From March 1981 to November 1987, 87 patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma, unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region, were randomized to two treatments. The standard treatment was 40-50 Gy external-beam radiation therapy (RT) to gross tumor plus potential microscopic tumor with a 5 Gy boost to gross tumor plus a 1.5-2.0 cm margin, using multiple fields and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2/d intravenously by rapid infusion. The 5-FU was given each of the initial 3 days of each of three 20 Gy radiation courses. The experimental treatment used identical radiation fields, but the two Gy daily radiation fractions were administered in a continuous course to a total dose of 50 Gy. Hycanthone was administered 60 mg/m2 intravenously within 2 to 4 hr during each day of the 5-day course of infusions during the first and fifth weeks of radiation therapy. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment arms in survival (p = 0.82) or disease-free survival (p = 0.27). Seven percent of hycanthone-treated patients demonstrated hepatic toxicity which was usually mild in nature. There was, however, one death due to hepatic toxicity.

PURPOSE Several placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that megestrol acetate can result in appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was designed to compare megestrol acetate doses ranging from 160 to 1,280 mg/d. METHODS This trial randomized 342 assessable patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia to receive oral megestrol acetate at doses of 160, 480, 800, or 1,280 mg/d. Patients were evaluated monthly by history, examination, patient-completed questionnaires, and serum albumin levels. RESULTS The data demonstrate that there is a positive dose-response effect for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation (P < or = .02). In concert, there was a trend for more nonfluid weight gain with higher drug doses. Megestrol acetate was well tolerated in this group of patients with advanced malignant disease. CONCLUSION The positive dose-response effect that we observed for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation supports both our prestudy hypothesis and other available literature. Nonetheless, based primarily on the cost and inconvenience associated with the use of higher doses of this drug, it is reasonable to use 160 mg/d for the initial treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia in routine clinical practice.

In a previous study (J Clin Oncol 7:1407-1417, 1989), we identified two dosage administration schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) combined with leucovorin that were superior to single-agent 5FU for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In this same study, a regimen of 5FU plus high-dose methotrexate (MTX) demonstrated a suggestive advantage over 5FU alone. To permit a more definitive comparison, we have extended our evaluation of these three regimens to involve an additional 259 patients. In all, 457 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following regimens: 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin, 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin, or 5FU plus high-dose MTX with leucovorin rescue. We have found that each of the 5FU/leucovorin regimens demonstrates a significant (P less than or equal to .01) advantage over 5FU plus high-dose MTX for objective tumor response and interval to tumor progression. Moreover, 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin confers a significant survival benefit (P less than or equal to .01) compared with 5FU plus high-dose MTX. The 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin regimen shows a survival benefit only in unadjusted analyses (P = .04), but this difference is not significant when adjusted for imbalances in prognostic variables (P = .44). Evaluation of the two 5FU/leucovorin regimens rules out a 10% decrease in death rate for the high-dose leucovorin regimen compared with the low-dose leucovorin regimen (P less than .05). The regimen of 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin has now been shown to offer a statistically significant survival advantage versus 5FU alone and versus 5FU plus high-dose MTX, a regimen that had shown promise in earlier trials. These data confirm the efficacy of leucovorin combined with 5FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and establish that it is not necessary to use high doses of leucovorin to achieve these results.

• Seventy-four patients with liver metastasis from proved colorectal primary adenocarcinoma were entered into a prospective, randomized clinical trial to evaluate treatment with intra-arterial floxuridine compared with standard outpatient therapy with fluorouracil delivered by intravenous bolus injection. Eligible patients were randomized to hepatic arterial chemotherapy with an implanted infusion pump or systemic chemotherapy. No crossover between treatment arms was permitted, and patients were followed up to progression and death. Objective tumor response was observed in 48% of patients receiving intra-arterial floxuridine and in 21% of patients receiving intravenous fluorouracil. Time to hepatic progression was significantly longer in the group given intra-arterial therapy: 15.7 vs 6.0 months. However, time to overall progression (6.0 vs 5.0 months) and survival (12.6 vs 10.5 months) were not statistically different. Based on these data, we cannot recommend treatment with intra-arterial floxuridine as given in this study for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. ( Arch Surg . 1990;125:1022-1027)

8031 Background: Weekly EPO therapy is beneficial for anemic cancer patients (pts), but it would be more convenient for pts if EPO could be administered less frequently. Methods: 365 pts with cance...

8014 Background: Hot flashes are a prominent symptom in breast cancer survivors. Available data demonstrate that both venlafaxine and progestational agents substantially decrease hot flashes. This trial was developed to compare these two agents. Methods: 227 women, reporting at least 14 hot flashes/wk were randomized to venlafaxine (37.5 mg/day for a wk, then 75 mg/d, 109 pts) versus MPA (400 mg IM, 109 pts) versus MPA (500 mg IM q 2 w for 3 doses, 9 pts, arm closed early due to slow initial study accrual), after being stratified for age, tamoxifen use, raloxifene use, and the duration and frequency of hot flash symptoms. Assuming 109 pts per each of the 2 main study arms, this study had 90% power to detect a difference between the two treatments of 1 hot flash per day, or a drop of 16% from baseline, with a 5% Type I error. Results: At this time, data are reported for 185 evaluable pts (81%). All examined pretreatment factors were equally balanced between the two major treatment groups. 90% of participan...

4270 Background: Few effective options are available for the treatment of unresectable HCC. Chemotherapy, in particular, has been of limited benefit. Several phase I trials suggest promising activi...

An aggressive trimodality approach from the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network [carboplatin AUC = 6, days 1 and 22; 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 continuous infusion, days 1–42, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, days 1 and 22; 45 Gy] has resulted in remarkable pathologic response rates but notable toxicity. This trial was designed to mitigate this toxicity by starting with a lower carboplatin dose, AUC = 4, and by adding subcutaneous amifostine. This phase II trial included patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable esophageal cancer. All were to receive the above regimen with modifications of carboplatin AUC = 4 and amifostine 500 mg subcutaneously before radiation. All were then to undergo an esophagectomy. A planned interim toxicity analysis after the first 10 patients was to determine whether the carboplatin dose should escalate to AUC = 6. Ten patients were enrolled, and all required dose reductions/omissions during neoadjuvant therapy. One patient died from paclitaxel anaphylaxis. Six patients manifested a complete pathologic response. With this regimen, carboplatin AUC = 4 for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer is appropriate.

The objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of adding a maximally tolerated dose of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) to standard chlorambucil (CLB) therapy in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Thirty patients with CLL (median age, 64 years) received two courses of 2-CdA given intravenously (2 mg/m2 daily for 7 days) added to biweekly administration of CLB at 30 mg/m2 given orally. The diagnosis of CLL, treatment indications, and response criteria were according to the National Cancer Institute established guidelines. Sixteen patients (53%) had advanced-stage disease, and four (13%) had trisomy 12 abnormality. The overall remission rate was 80%, including 20% complete remission (CR), 30% nodular partial remission (nPR), and 30% partial remission (PR). Minimal residual disease was detected phenotypically in two of five patients with CR and in eight of nine with nPR. Overall, CR, nPR, and PR rates were not influenced significantly by the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities or advanced clinical stage. With a median follow-up of 33 months, 58% of patients who had a response had relapse. Median time to progression in all 30 patients was 30 months, and time to progression and progression-free survival were not significantly different for the different response groups, clinical stages, or cytogenetic groups. Severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 33% and 7% of patients, respectively. Only two patients had documented bacterial infections, and four had herpetic infections. Concurrent combination chemotherapy with abbreviated doses of 2-CdA and standard-dose CLB is feasible and safe in previously untreated CLL. Antitumor activity may be superior to that of CLB alone given in conventional doses. Whether a different schedule of combining these two agents would result in improved outcome is being investigated.