Search

Recently, finding solutions to assembly flowshop scheduling problems is a topic of extensive discussion in research communities. While existing research assumes that job processing times are constant numbers, in several practical situations, due to several external factors like machine breakdowns, working environment changes, worker performance instabilities, and tool quality variations and unavailability, job processing times may vary. In this study, therefore, we address a two-stage assembly flowshop scheduling problem with two scenario-dependent jobs processing times to minimise the maximum makepsan among both scenarios (called robust makespan) In view of the NP-hard nature, we first derive a dominance property and a lower bound to propose a branch-and-bound algorithm to find a permutation schedule with minimum makespan. Following that, we use Johnson's rule to propose eight polynomial heuristics for finding near-optimal solutions. Furthermore, we propose four cloud theory-based simulated annealing (CSA) hyper-heuristic algorithms incorporating seven low level heuristics to solve a robust two-stage assembly flowshop problem with scenario-dependent processing times. Finally, we empirically evaluate the effectiveness of all the proposed algorithms in minimising the robust makespan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The multiple job class scheduling problem arises in contexts where a group of jobs belong to multiple classes and in which if all jobs in the same class are operated together, extra setup times would not be needed. On the other hand, the customer order scheduling problem focuses on finishing all jobs from the same order at the same time in order to reduce shipping costs. However, works on customer orders coupled with class setup times do not appear often in the literature. Hence we address here a bicriteria single machine customer order scheduling problem together with multiple job classes. The optimality criterion minimizes a linear combination of the sum of the ranges and sum of tardiness of all customer orders. In light of the high complexity of the concerned problem, we propose a lower bound formula and a property to be used in a branch-and-bound method for optimal solutions. To find approximate solutions, we then propose four heuristics together with a local search method, four cloudy theoretical simulated annealing and a cloudy theoretical simulated annealing hyperheuristic along with five low-level heuristics. The simulation results of the proposed heuristics and algorithms are analyzed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The two-stage assembly scheduling problem has received growing attention in the research community. Furthermore, in many two-stage assembly scheduling problems, the job processing times are commonly assumed as a constant over time. However, it is at odds with real production situations some times. In fact, the dynamic nature of processing time may occur when machines lose their performance during their execution times. In this case, the job that is processed later consumes more time than another one processed earlier. In view of these observations, we address the two-stage assembly linear deterioration scheduling problem in which there are two machines at the first stage and an assembly machine at the second stage. The objective is to complete all jobs as soon as possible (or to minimise the makespan, implies that the system can yield a better and efficient task planning to limited resources). Given the fact that this problem is NP-hard, we then derive some dominance relations and a lower bound used in the branch-and-bound method for finding the optimal solution. We also propose three metaheuristics, including dynamic differential evolution (DDE), simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, and cloud theory-based simulated annealing (CSA) algorithm for find near-optimal solutions. The performances of the proposed algorithms are reported as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The two-stage assembly scheduling problem has attracted increasing research attention. In many such problems, job processing times are commonly assumed to be fixed. However, this assumption does not hold in many real production situations. In fact, processing times usually decrease steadily when the same task is performed repeatedly. Therefore, in this study, we investigated a two-stage assembly position-based learning scheduling problem with two machines in the first stage and an assembly machine in the second stage. The objective was to complete all jobs as soon as possible (or to minimise the makespan, implying that the system can perform better and efficient task planning with limited resources). Because this problem is NP-hard, we derived some dominance relations and a lower bound for the branch-and-bound method for finding the optimal solution. We also propose three heuristics, three versions of the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, and three versions of cloud theory-based simulated annealing algorithm for determining near-optimal solutions. Finally, we report the performance levels of the proposed algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]