Search

A new scheme for the application of the intermediate- term medium-range earthquake prediction algorithm M8 is proposed. The scheme accounts for the natural distribution of seismic activity, eliminates the subjectivity in the positioning of the areas of investiga- tion and provides additional stability of the predictions with respect to the original variant. According to the retroactive testing in Italy and adjacent regions, this improvement is achieved without any significant change of the alarm volume in comparison with the results published so far.

In this paper, we discuss a possible combination of Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) and Neo-deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (NDSHA), and propose a new warning model, EEW2.0. The aim is to provide a differentiated warning alert to various end-users based on the results of seismic hazard assessment evaluation. The implementation of such a system contains three basic steps: (a) classification of “potential to cause hazard” in terms of magnitude, (b) determination of the source areas and building a hazard database in terms of Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) maps, considering all possible earthquake scenarios in the source area, for the whole protected area, (3) equipping unique decision framework for specific end-users. When a damaging earthquake (M ≥ 5.0) is detected, EEW2.0 quickly matches the prepared MMI map by estimated magnitude and epicenter, then directly extracts the MMI value and issues an early warning to the public. With the great attention and resources put into the reduction in seismic and its secondary risk in the 21st century, the proposed EEW2.0 will likely play an active role in protecting lives and reducing economic losses.

Rigorous and objective testing of seismic hazard assessments against real seismic activity are a necessary precondition for any responsible seismic risk assessment. The reference hazard maps for the Italian seismic code, obtained with the classical probabilistic approach (PSHA) and the alternative ground shaking maps based on the neo­deterministic approach (NDSHA) are cross-­ compared and tested against the real seismicity for the territory of Italy. NDSHA is a methodology that allows for the sound definition of credible scenario events, based on the realistic physical modelling of ground motion from a wide set of possible earthquakes. The flexibility of NDSHA permits to account for earthquake recurrence and allows for the generation of ground motion maps at specified return periods that permits a straightforward comparison between the NDSHA and the PSHA maps.

The operational and decision-making problems related to earthquake forecast/prediction and seismic hazard assessment are nowadays a matter of significant debate, particularly on account of the very unsatisfactory global performance of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment at the occurence of most of the recent destructive earthquakes. While it is recognized that opera- tional tools must demonstrate their capability in anticipating large earthquakes and the related ground shaking by rigor- ous verification and validation process, only few methods proved effective so far. In view of the inherent uncertainties in predicting predictable, the usefulness of any forecast/ prediction method can then be judged taking into account the wide range of possible mitigation actions of different levels (from increased preparedness to evacuation). This paper aims to open a debate and complement the Summary and Recommendations by the International Commission on Earthquake Forecasting, established after the earthquake in L’Aquila (M = 6.3, 6 April 2009). The issues related with the definition, validation, and possible use of forecasting/ prediction methodologies, are addressed with special emphasis on existing operational practice in Italy.