Search

Background Aortic wall shear stress (WSS) is a known predictor of ascending aortic growth in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). The aim of this study was to study regional WSS and changes over time in BAV patients. Methods BAV patients and age-matched healthy controls underwent 4D flow CMR. Regional, peak systolic ascending aortic WSS, aortic valve function, aortic stiffness measures and aortic dimensions were assessed. In BAV patients, 4D flow CMR was repeated after three years follow-up and both at baseline and follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) was acquired. Aortic growth (volume increase of ≥5%) was measured on CTA. Regional WSS differences within patients’ aorta and WSS changes over time were analysed using linear mixed-effect models and were associated with clinical parameters. Results Thirty BAV patients (aged 34 years [IQR 25-41]) were included in the follow-up analysis. Additionally, another 16 BAV patients and 32 healthy controls (aged 33 years [IQR 28-48]) were included for other regional analyses. Magnitude, axial, and circumferential WSS increased over time (all p<0.001) irrespective of aortic growth. The percentage of regions exposed to a magnitude WSS >95th percentile of healthy controls increased from 21% (baseline 506/2400 regions) to 31% (follow-up 734/2400 regions) (p<0.001). WSS angle, a measure of helicity near the aortic wall, decreased during follow-up. Magnitude WSS changes over time were associated with systolic blood pressure, peak aortic valve velocity, aortic valve regurgitation fraction, aortic stiffness indexes, and normalized flow displacement (all p<0.05). Conclusions An increase of regional WSS over time was observed in BAV patients, irrespective of aortic growth. The increasing WSSs comprising a larger area of the aorta warrants further research to investigate the possible predictive value for aortic dissection.

Aims Aortic wall shear stress (WSS) distributions in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients have been associated with aortic dilatation, but prospective, longitudinal data are missing. This study assessed differences in aortic WSS distributions between BAV patients and healthy controls and determined the association of WSS with aortic growth in patients. Methods and results Sixty subjects underwent four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the thoracic aorta (32 BAV patients and 28 healthy controls). Peak velocity, pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, peak systolic WSS (magnitude, axial, and circumferential), and WSS angle were assessed. WSS angle is defined as the angle between the WSSmagnitude and WSSaxial component. In BAV patients, three-year computed tomography angiography-based aortic volumetric growth was determined in the proximal and entire ascending aorta. WSSaxial was significantly lower in BAV patients compared with controls (0.93 vs. 0.72 Pa, P = 0.047) and WSScircumferential and WSS angle were significantly higher (0.29 vs. 0.64 Pa and 18 degrees vs. 40 degrees, both P < 0.001). Significant volumetric growth of the proximal ascending aorta occurred in BAV patients (from 49.1 to 52.5 cm(3), P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis corrected for baseline aortic volume and diastolic blood pressure, WSS angle was the only parameter independently associated with proximal aortic growth (P = 0.031). In the entire ascending aorta, besides the WSS angle, the WSSmagnitude was also independently associated with growth. Conclusion Increased WSScircumferential and especially WSS angle are typical in BAV patients. WSS angle was found to predict aortic growth. These findings highlight the potential role of WSS measurements in BAV patients to stratify patients at risk for aortic dilation.

AIMS: The influence haemodynamics have on vessel wall pathobiology in aortic disease is incomplete. This aim of this study was to develop a repeatable method for assessing the relationship between aortic wall shear stress (WSS) and disease activity by fusing 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with hybrid positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of an ongoing clinical trial, patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) were prospectively imaged with both 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET, a marker of calcification activity, and 4D flow CMR. We developed novel software allowing accurate 3D co-registration and high-resolution comparison of aortic peak systolic WSS and 18F-NaF PET uptake (maximum tissue-to-background ratio). Intra-observer repeatability of both measurements was determined using Bland-Altman plots and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). The relationship between localized WSS and 18F-NaF uptake was analysed using linear mixed-effect models. Twenty-three patients with BAV (median age 50 [44-55] years, 22% female) were included. Intra-observer repeatability for WSS (ICC = 0.92) and 18F-NaF (ICC = 0.91) measurements obtained within 1.4 ± 0.6 cm2 regions of interest was excellent. On multivariable analysis, 18F-NaF PET uptake was independently and negatively associated with WSS as well as diastolic blood pressure (both P < 0.05), adjusted for age. CONCLUSION: Fused assessment of WSS and 18F-NaF PET uptake is feasible and repeatable, demonstrating a clear association between these two factors. This high spatial resolution approach has major potential to advance our understanding of the relationship between vascular haemodynamics and disease activity.