Search

Background and ObjectivesFunctional outcomes after stroke are strongly related to focal injury measures. However, the role of global brain health is less clear. In this study, we examined the impact of brain age, a measure of neurobiological aging derived from whole-brain structural neuroimaging, on poststroke outcomes, with a focus on sensorimotor performance. We hypothesized that more lesion damage would result in older brain age, which would in turn be associated with poorer outcomes. Related, we expected that brain age would mediate the relationship between lesion damage and outcomes. Finally, we hypothesized that structural brain resilience, which we define in the context of stroke as younger brain age given matched lesion damage, would differentiate people with good vs poor outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional observational study using a multisite dataset of 3-dimensional brain structural MRIs and clinical measures from the ENIGMA Stroke Recovery. Brain age was calculated from 77 neuroanatomical features using a ridge regression model trained and validated on 4,314 healthy controls. We performed a 3-step mediation analysis with robust mixed-effects linear regression models to examine relationships between brain age, lesion damage, and stroke outcomes. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression to examine whether brain resilience predicts good vs poor outcomes in patients with matched lesion damage.ResultsWe examined 963 patients across 38 cohorts. Greater lesion damage was associated with older brain age (β = 0.21; 95% CI 0.04–0.38,p= 0.015), which in turn was associated with poorer outcomes, both in the sensorimotor domain (β = −0.28; 95% CI −0.41 to −0.15,p< 0.001) and across multiple domains of function (β = −0.14; 95% CI −0.22 to −0.06,p< 0.001). Brain age mediated 15% of the impact of lesion damage on sensorimotor performance (95% CI 3%–58%,p= 0.01). Greater brain resilience explained why people have better outcomes, given matched lesion damage (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08,p= 0.004).DiscussionWe provide evidence that younger brain age is associated with superior poststroke outcomes and modifies the impact of focal damage. The inclusion of imaging-based assessments of brain age and brain resilience may improve the prediction of poststroke outcomes compared with focal injury measures alone, opening new possibilities for potential therapeutic targets.

Background After stroke, increases in contralesional primary motor cortex (M1CL) activity and excitability have been reported. In pre-clinical studies, M1CL reorganization is related to the extent of ipsilesional M1 (M1IL) injury, but this has yet to be tested clinically. Objectives We tested the hypothesis that the extent of damage to the ipsilesional M1 and/or its corticospinal tract (CST) determines the magnitude of M1CL reorganization and its relationship to affected hand function in humans recovering from stroke. Methods Thirty-five participants with a single subacute ischemic stroke affecting M1 or CST and hand paresis underwent MRI scans of the brain to measure lesion volume and CST lesion load. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1IL was used to determine the presence of an electromyographic response (motor evoked potential (MEP+ and MEP−)). M1CL reorganization was determined by TMS applied to M1CL at increasing intensities. Hand function was quantified with the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test. Results The extent of M1CL reorganization was related to greater lesion volume in the MEP− group, but not in the MEP+ group. Greater M1CL reorganization was associated with more impaired hand function in MEP− but not MEP+ participants. Absence of an MEP (MEP−), larger lesion volumes and higher lesion loads in CST, particularly in CST fibers originating in M1 were associated with greater impairment of hand function. Conclusions In the subacute post-stroke period, stroke volume and M1IL output determine the extent of M1CL reorganization and its relationship to affected hand function, consistent with pre-clinical evidence. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02544503

Sensorimotor performance after stroke is strongly related to focal injury measures such as corticospinal tract lesion load. However, the role of global brain health is less clear. Here, we examined the impact of brain age, a measure of neurobiological aging derived from whole brain structural neuroimaging, on sensorimotor outcomes. We hypothesized that stroke lesion damage would result in older brain age, which would in turn be associated with poorer sensorimotor outcomes. We also expected that brain age would mediate the impact of lesion damage on sensorimotor outcomes and that these relationships would be driven by post-stroke secondary atrophy (e.g., strongest in the ipsilesional hemisphere in chronic stroke). We further hypothesized that structural brain resilience, which we define in the context of stroke as the brain’s ability to maintain its global integrity despite focal lesion damage, would differentiate people with better versus worse outcomes.We analyzed cross-sectional high-resolution brain MRI and outcomes data from 963 people with stroke from 38 cohorts worldwide using robust linear mixed-effects regressions to examine the relationship between sensorimotor behavior, lesion damage, and brain age. We used a mediation analysis to examine whether brain age mediates the impact of lesion damage on stroke outcomes and if associations are driven by ipsilesional measures in chronic (≥180 days) stroke. We assessed the impact of brain resilience on sensorimotor outcome using logistic regression with propensity score matching on lesion damage.Stroke lesion damage was associated with older brain age, which in turn was associated with poorer sensorimotor outcomes. Brain age mediated the impact of corticospinal tract lesion load on sensorimotor outcomes most strongly in the ipsilesional hemisphere in chronic stroke. Greater brain resilience, as indexed by younger brain age, explained why people have better versus worse sensorimotor outcomes when lesion damage was fixed.We present novel evidence that global brain health is associated with superior post-stroke sensorimotor outcomes and modifies the impact of focal damage. This relationship appears to be due to post-stroke secondary degeneration. Brain resilience provides insight into why some people have better outcomes after stroke, despite similar amounts of focal injury. Inclusion of imaging-based assessments of global brain health may improve prediction of post-stroke sensorimotor outcomes compared to focal injury measures alone. This investigation is important because it introduces the potential to apply novel therapeutic interventions to prevent or slow brain aging from other fields (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease) to stroke.

Accurate lesion segmentation is critical in stroke rehabilitation research for the quantification of lesion burden and accurate image processing. Current automated lesion segmentation methods for T1-weighted (T1w) MRIs, commonly used in rehabilitation research, lack accuracy and reliability. Manual segmentation remains the gold standard, but it is time-consuming, subjective, and requires significant neuroanatomical expertise. We previously released a large, open-source dataset of stroke T1w MRIs and manually segmented lesion masks (ATLAS v1.2, N=304) to encourage the development of better algorithms. However, many methods developed with ATLAS v1.2 report low accuracy, are not publicly accessible or are improperly validated, limiting their utility to the field. Here we present ATLAS v2.0 (N=955), a larger dataset of T1w stroke MRIs and manually segmented lesion masks that includes both training (public) and test (hidden) data. Algorithm development using this larger sample should lead to more robust solutions, and the hidden test data allows for unbiased performance evaluation via segmentation challenges. We anticipate that ATLAS v2.0 will lead to improved algorithms, facilitating large-scale stroke rehabilitation research.