Search

Objectives: The English version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life Questionnaire (SLEQOL) is a validated disease-specific quality of life instrument. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the SLEQOL (SLEQOL-TH). Methods: Two independent translators translated the SLEQOL into Thai. The back translation of this version was performed by two other independent translators. The final version, SLEQOL-TH, was completed after resolving the discrepancies revealed by the back translation. One hundred and nine patients with SLE were enrolled to test the reliability, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, and sensitivity to the changes of the SLEQOL-TH at six months. The differential item functioning (DIF) between the Thai and English versions was analyzed using the partial gamma. Results: The internal consistency of the SLEQOL-TH was satisfactory with the overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.86. The test-retest reliability of the SLEQOL-TH was acceptable with the intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.86. Low correlations between the SLEQOL-TH and SLEDAI were observed. The total score of the SLEQOLTH was moderately responsive to changes in quality of life, with a standardized response mean of 0.50. When comparing the SLEQOL-TH from Thai SLE patients with the original SLEQOL version obtained from Singapore SLE patients, 11 out of 40 items showed a moderate to large DIF. Conclusions: The SLEQOL-TH has acceptable psychometric properties and shows construct validity. In comparison with the English version of SLEQOL, there are some items that showed DIF. The applicability of the SLEQOL-TH in real-life clinical practice and clinical trials needs to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. METHODS: Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. RESULTS: The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5-1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1-3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count >10/high-power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high-power field (1 point). The chance-adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.79). CONCLUSION: Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data-driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree to which physicians agree with each other and with ratings obtained with 3 existing responder indices, in rating the response to treatment of lupus nephritis. METHODS: Lupus nephritis patient medical records from 125 pairs of visits (6 months apart) were used to create renal response scenarios. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists rated each scenario as demonstrating complete response, partial response, same, or worsening. The plurality (most frequent) rating of renal response by the physicians was compared with the calculated score from the renal component of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (original and updated [2004] version) and of the Responder Index for Lupus Erythematosus (RIFLE). The degree of agreement among the physicians was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The degree of agreement between the plurality physician rating and ratings obtained with the established response indices was assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The ICC among all physicians was 0.64 (0.62 for nephrologists and 0.67 for rheumatologists). The chance-adjusted measure of agreement (kappa coefficient) between the plurality physician rating and the calculated score obtained using established indexes was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.38-0.61) for the RIFLE, 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.25) for the original BILAG, and 0.23 (95% CI 0.21-0.44) for the BILAG 2004. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that rheumatologists as a group and nephrologists as a group have equal agreement in their rating of renal response. There was moderate agreement between plurality physician ratings and ratings obtained using the renal component of the RIFLE. Ratings of response using an index based on the original BILAG did not have good agreement with the plurality physician rating. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare adverse events and flares among different doses and types of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: All consecutive SLE patients in a lupus cohort, seen between March and October 2022, were invited to join this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥ 20 years and had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Data regarding adverse events after vaccination, clinical disease activity and flares within 30 days postvaccination were reviewed., Results: A total of 201 SLE patients received 524 vaccine doses, with 201, 199, and 124 patients received 1, 2, and 3 doses, respectively. The vaccines included inactivated virus vaccine, adenovirus-vectored vaccine, and mRNA vaccines in 183 (35%), 128 (24%), and 213 (41%) doses, respectively. Regardless of the dose and type of vaccine, adverse events occurred in 50%-70% of patients. Pain and swelling at the injection site were common local symptoms, whereas constitutional, neurological, musculoskeletal, and mucocutaneous symptoms were among systemic ones. The majority of these symptoms were mild to moderate. Patients reported they had disease flares after vaccination in 5%-6%, while actual flares determined by physicians occurred in 8%-13% of them, giving fair to moderate rating agreement between patients and physicians (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.44). There was no significant difference in mean mSLEDAI-2K between pre- and 30 days postvaccination., Conclusions: Adverse events after vaccination were common, regardless of the dose or type of COVID-19 vaccines, but only a small proportion of patients had severe symptoms. Flares were uncommon. The rating agreement of flares between patients and physicians as fair to moderate., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: To determine the spectrum, clinical features and outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP)., Method: Medical records of SLE patients in a lupus cohort from January 1987 to June 2023 were reviewed. Patients with AAP requiring hospitalization were identified and categorized into 3 groups: lupus mesenteric vasculitis (LMV), non-LMV, and surgical AAP. Each AAP episode represented one patient., Results: Of 1,538 patients in the cohort, 62 (4.03%) had 93 episodes of AAP. After exclusion, 31 patients had 39 LMV episodes, and 30 had 40 non-LMV episodes (19 due to surgical AAP). Seventy-six of the 79 AAP episodes (96.20%) were in females, with a mean ± SD age and median (IQR) disease duration of 36.76 ± 13.60 years and 6 (2, 9) years, respectively. Patients in the LMV group had more fever, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea than those in the non-LMV group. They also had more small bowel involvement, bowel wall thickening, target water enhancement signs, mesenteric vessels engorgement and mesenteric fat cloudiness, and higher SLE disease activity. These differences were more pronounced when compared to the surgical AAP group. Treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs gave favorable outcomes in the LMV group. Two of 40 (5.00%) non-LMV AAP patients died, of which 1 (5.26%) was in the surgical AAP group., Conclusion: LMV was common among SLE patients admitted for AAP. LMV usually presented with fever, gastrointestinal dysmotility symptoms, diffused abdominal pain, together with evidence of active disease. Localized abdominal pain with peritoneal signs favored surgical AAP. Key Points • Lupus mesenteric vasculitis is common among SLE patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. Its presence often associates with gastrointestinal symptoms together with other clinical manifestations of SLE • The signs in abdominal computed tomography findings are not specific and could be observed in other causes of abdominal pain in SLE. Interpretation of these signs should be cautionary and accompanied by history taking and physical abdominal findings • Treatment of lupus mesenteric vasculitis with corticosteroids alone, or in combination with immunosuppressive drugs, usually results in good outcomes., Competing Interests: Declarations. Disclosures: None., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

This study aimed to clarify the association of HLA Class I and II with dcSSc and lcSSc in Thais. HLA typing for 11 gene loci (Class I: HLA-A, B and C, and Class II [HLA-DR, DP and DQ]) was carried out using the Next Generation DNA Sequencing method (three fields) in 92 Thai patients with systemic sclerosis (55 dcSSc, 37 lcSSc) and 135 healthy controls (HCs). The distribution of HLA alleles in patients with dcSSc and lcSSc was compared. When compared with HCs, the AF of A*24:02:01 , A*24:07:01 , B*27:04:01 and B*27:06 showed an increasing trend in lcSSc patients without statistical significance. DRB1*15:02:01 , DRB5*01:02:01 , DQA1*01:01:01 , DQB1*05:01:24 , DPA1*02:01:01 and DPB1*13:01:01 increased significantly in dcSSc patients. DQB1*05:01:24 and DPB1*13:01:01 also increased significantly in lcSSc patients, but less significantly than in dcSSc patients. The association of DPB1*05:01:01 with lcSSc was significantly protective. HLA-A*24:02:01 , B*27:06 and C*03:04:01 formed a three-locus haplotype that also constituted an eight-locus haplotype with DRB1*15:02:01 , DQA1*01:01:01 , DQB1*05:01:24 , DPA1*02:01:01 and DPB1*13:01:01 . There was a possibility that HLA Class I would play a role in the pathogenesis of lcSSc, while Class II played more of a role in the dcSSc in Thai patients.

Background/objective: To determine the prevalence of thyroid dysfunctions and thyroid autoantibodies in Thai systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and compare them with age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Associations between thyroid dysfunctions and SLE disease activity, and associated factors for thyroid dysfunctions in SLE also were determined., Method: One hundred SLE patients, without apparent clinical thyroid disease, attended the Rheumatology Clinic between November 2021 and October 2022, were enrolled into this study. HCs were matched to SLE cases by age and sex (ratio of 1:1). Clinical manifestations, SLE disease activity and medication received were collected in all SLE patients. Thyroid function tests and thyroid autoantibodies (anti-thyroglobulin: anti-TG and anti-thyroid peroxidase: anti-TPO) were collected from all participants., Results: When compared with HCs, SLE patients had higher prevalence of thyroid dysfunctions, hypothyroidism and euthyroid sick syndrome (28% vs. 7%, p < .001, and 12% vs. 2%, p = .010, and 6% vs. 0%, p = .013, respectively). Prevalence of isolated hypothyroxinemia was higher numerically in SLE patients (9% vs. 3%, p = .074). Prevalence of anti-TG or anti-TPO was no different between SLE patients and HCs (16% vs. 18%, p = .707). There was no association between SLE disease activity and abnormal thyroid functions or thyroid autoantibodies. Family history of thyroid disease and prednisolone use (>10 mg/day) were associated factors for thyroid abnormalities with adjusted OR (95% CI) of 6.13 (1.58-23.75), p = .009 and 4.00 (1.37-11.70), p = .011, respectively., Conclusion: Thyroid dysfunctions were more prevalent in SLE patients. Family history of thyroid disease and prednisolone use (>10 mg/day) were independent associated factors of thyroid abnormalities., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Studies have found that late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (age at diagnosis ≥ 50 years) had less severe disease and milder clinical course, but with higher organ damage and mortality rate than early-onset ones (age at diagnosis < 50 years). Unfortunately, direct comparison of renal manifestations and treatment outcomes between late- and early-onset SLE patients has been determined rarely. This study aimed to compare lupus nephritis (LN) manifestations, treatment, and outcomes between late- and early-onset in SLE patients., Methods: Medical records of SLE patients in a lupus cohort at a tertiary care university hospital, seen between January 1994 and June 2020, were reviewed. Late- and early-onset patients were matched with year at SLE diagnosis at a ratio of 1:2 (62 and 124 patients, respectively). Those with LN were identified and analyzed., Results: At SLE onset and end of the study, LN was identified in 29 and 33 late-onset patients, respectively, and 58 and 90 early-onset patients, respectively. At the end of the study, there were 39 and 214 LN flares in late- and early-onset patients, respectively: giving an incident rate (IR) (95% confidence interval (CI))/100 person-years of LN and active LN flares of 2.00 (0.75 - 5.33) vs. 6.11 (4.32 - 8.64), P = 0.020, and 5.78 (2.75 - 12.12) vs. 18.28 (13.93 - 24.00), P = 0.001, respectively. Late-onset patients received a higher proportion of moderate- to high-dose corticosteroids, but fewer immunosuppressive drugs. In all LN flares, no difference existed between the two groups in serum creatinine, degree of proteinuria, and proportion of patients with nephrotic range proteinuria or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, and outcomes in terms of complete, partial or no-remission were similar between them. Mortality rate was higher in late-onset patients (27.27% vs. 6.67%, P = 0.004)., Conclusion: This matched controlled study of year at SLE diagnosis showed that late-onset SLE patients had lower prevalence of LN and LN flares. Although they received fewer immunosuppressive drugs, their renal manifestations and treatment outcomes were no different from those in early-onset patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright 2024, Mongkolchaiarunya et al.)

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of non-loading versus loading low-dose colchicine in patients with acute crystal-associated arthritis., Materials and Methods: All in-patients who were admitted to Chiang Mai University Hospital with non-arthritis disease and developed acute crystal-associated arthritis during admission (within 48 h after arthritis onset) were invited to join this study. The patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in Group I (non-loading group) and Group II (loading group) received colchicine at 1.2 and 2.4 mg in the first 24 h, respectively. The primary outcome was the patients' pain response at 24 h after treatment., Results: Of 80 patients, 49 were acute gouty arthritis, and 31 acute calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis. The mean [95% CI] pain score was no different between Groups I and II at the baseline level (6.46[5.72-7.19] vs. 6.654[5.85-7.44], p = .867) and at 24 h (3.13[2.43-3.82] vs. 3.18[2.42-3.93], p = .907). The proportion of patients with ≥50% pain reduction was not different (57.50% vs. 55.00%, p = .822). Sensitivity analysis among patients with a baseline pain score of ≥4 showed the same pattern of response. Mild diarrhea was common and comparable in both groups. Subgroup analysis according to renal function (eGFR < 60 vs. ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) or type of crystals (acute gouty arthritis vs. acute CPP arthritis) also showed the same pattern of response., Conclusion: Non-loading low-dose colchicine was as effective as loading low-dose colchicine in patients with acute crystal-associated arthritis, regardless of renal function or type of crystals., (© 2023 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)